The insurrection is not over

'
The filth here and elsewhere that supported this attempted coup against our democracy continues. We must respond to it at every level. These people have committed and are committing treason to our nation.


The right overwhelmingly condemned going into the Capital.


NOPE! If that was the case you would condemn Trump who propagated gross lies that caused this and directed people to go to Capitol.

Only 28% of Republicans put any kind of responsibility on Trump



I didn't say they condemned Trump, moron. Trump had nothing to do with it.

We condemned the people who went into the Capital.


.....so Trump who told his MAGA crowd to march on Capitol to stop the stealing of the election...had nothing to do with people going to the Capitol to stop the certification of the election.

Really dummy? You seriously think anyone buys that horseshit?


Nowhere in that did Trump say anything about violence.

You're such a liar and a hypocrite. You know perfectly well there is no reference to violence in that and you know perfectly well that Democrats say that sort of thing all the time.

Grow up and stop being a dick


Trump made it very clear what he wanted them to do, and they tried to do it.

Your attempts at gaslighting fail!


His words quoted so far imply protests.

Show the words that meant violence, lying fascist dick. You can't, they don't exist.

That while you're fine with the extreme rhetoric from the Dems where you don't take it as violence, even Maxine Whack Job Waters who clearly is referencing violence


Here ya go:

'We will stop the steal'

'We will never give up. We will never concede. It doesn't happen'

'If you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore'

'We are going to the Capitol'


Trump not only incited the crowd that he spoke to, but there was a vanguard already attacking the Capitol before he finished his speech.

The entire event was planned, there was a conspiracy:



None of those refer to violence, and you know that you stupid lying fuck. And when Democrats say far more incendiary things, you purr like a kitten. Democrats just lie, lie, lie and lie, you're fundamentally dishonest people, fascists and racists


'fight like hell' is an explicit call for violence.

'Stop the steal', stated while the electoral college was in session is an explicit call for immediate action.

Please stop playing dumb. We all know what happened on Jan. 6. You will not gaslight us!


No it's not you fucking lying retard. So you SERIOUSLY claim that calls to fight are for you literal and only literal. Fight for it! And you go start punching and shooting people.

No you don't you fucking liar, you'd be in jail now. Your claim you are not a functioning adult is absolutely ridiculous.

But you are saying when Democrats say to fight that is a CALL FOR VIOLENCE and you will condemn them just as strongly as Trump? All I have to do is show you such a quote and you will demand they are impeached? You care claiming that?


From a Hillary Clinton Mailer in 2016:

Are you in? Your donation is about more than money. It’s your way of saying you’re ready to fight like hell to make sure Donald Trump never becomes president (and when you make your first donation today, we’ll send you a free sticker so you can show off your Team Hillary pride).

If it wasn't for false equivalence, you guys wouldn't have anything would you?


if it wasn't for your sides hypocrisy and willful blindness to it you wouldn't have shit.

Oooh, the "I know you are but what am I" strategy. So devious. :lol:


It's all dried up twats like you deserve.

And it isn't a false equivalence, it's showing how your side works. Be literalist morons when needed, ignorant when required.

Uh oh...Marty's getting pissy...breaking out the "twat". :lol:

It absolutely was a false equivalency. Hillary Clinton was not talking in front of an angry crowd she had been fomenting for weeks about a "stolen election" .


Only for you, saggy-tits.

No, she just said Trump can "never become president". and "fight like hell"

Trump told them to be peaceful, he never told them to break the law. Yet you give Hillary a pass for words like that, and bray and bitch about Trump.

It's called being a hack.

Only for me? I get under your skin like no other? Cool!

The people on Hillary's email list didn't storm the capital shouting to "stop the steal" and "kill Mike Pence"...probably because she hadn't been spending weeks cultivating them to do so.

His handlers made sure he said peaceful...once, but when the mob wasn't, he didn't do anything about it for hours...by all reports actually reveling in it. And then, when he did FINALLY say something, he said what? "I love you".


I tailor my responses, you get a different flavor of disdain then say Colefucks, JoeBlow, or Dunna7whatever.

he told them to follow the law.

Gosh, fickle as well as bitter and childish. You're just the whole kooky package!

He threw a rock and tried to hide his hand. MOST people realize it.



Only people with an axe to grind already come to the conclusion you did, how convenient.

Wrong, cultist. It's only the faithful worshippers of the Oompa Loompa Oligarch that don't see it for what it was...a failed insurrection spurred on by Trump.


Nope. Your side is still trying to get as much play out of this as you can, and the longer it goes on the more the story changes, and not in a good way for you. First it was planned, then it wasn't. First the mob killed the officer, then they didn't. Now all those crazy insurrection charges look like they will be brought down to trespass and assaults.

"My side" is trying to determine what happened and where the failures in security were. The fact that it was planned is not in contention. That is fully supported by the weapons and other paraphernalia found on the rioters, the bombs placed the night before and communications between members of certain groups.


The mob did kill an officer. If not for the mob, he would not be dead. The mob sent another into cardiac arrest.

Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?


your side is just trying to extend the Trumpbash and by extension marginalize your political opponents.

It's amazing how once you get a concept you refuse to change it even when shown it was wrong. it's the main failing of the progressive.

Orwell would be proud.

Well, that was a spectacularly bad dodge. Why not answer the question?

Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?


It would never be "bipartisan"

It would be a shitshow TDS circle jerk.

54-35 in favor seems pretty fucking bipartisan in this day and age. Were the dozen or so Benghazi investigations bipartisan?


Were they called bipartisan?


54-35 what? what are you referencing?

Some poll?

Grossly misinformed I see...that would be the Senate vote on the January 6th commission that a majority of Americans want.

Here's the poll supporting that.

 
The American people deserve to have a full & complete understanding of EVERY aspect of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol so they can make informed choices in the 2022 election and beyond.

If that full & complete understanding is to the disadvantage of the Republican Party then TOO FUCKING BAD.

In the future, fascists will think twice before attempting to overthrow Democracy!!!
 
'
The filth here and elsewhere that supported this attempted coup against our democracy continues. We must respond to it at every level. These people have committed and are committing treason to our nation.


The right overwhelmingly condemned going into the Capital.


NOPE! If that was the case you would condemn Trump who propagated gross lies that caused this and directed people to go to Capitol.

Only 28% of Republicans put any kind of responsibility on Trump



I didn't say they condemned Trump, moron. Trump had nothing to do with it.

We condemned the people who went into the Capital.


.....so Trump who told his MAGA crowd to march on Capitol to stop the stealing of the election...had nothing to do with people going to the Capitol to stop the certification of the election.

Really dummy? You seriously think anyone buys that horseshit?


Nowhere in that did Trump say anything about violence.

You're such a liar and a hypocrite. You know perfectly well there is no reference to violence in that and you know perfectly well that Democrats say that sort of thing all the time.

Grow up and stop being a dick


Trump made it very clear what he wanted them to do, and they tried to do it.

Your attempts at gaslighting fail!


His words quoted so far imply protests.

Show the words that meant violence, lying fascist dick. You can't, they don't exist.

That while you're fine with the extreme rhetoric from the Dems where you don't take it as violence, even Maxine Whack Job Waters who clearly is referencing violence


Here ya go:

'We will stop the steal'

'We will never give up. We will never concede. It doesn't happen'

'If you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore'

'We are going to the Capitol'


Trump not only incited the crowd that he spoke to, but there was a vanguard already attacking the Capitol before he finished his speech.

The entire event was planned, there was a conspiracy:



None of those refer to violence, and you know that you stupid lying fuck. And when Democrats say far more incendiary things, you purr like a kitten. Democrats just lie, lie, lie and lie, you're fundamentally dishonest people, fascists and racists


'fight like hell' is an explicit call for violence.

'Stop the steal', stated while the electoral college was in session is an explicit call for immediate action.

Please stop playing dumb. We all know what happened on Jan. 6. You will not gaslight us!


No it's not you fucking lying retard. So you SERIOUSLY claim that calls to fight are for you literal and only literal. Fight for it! And you go start punching and shooting people.

No you don't you fucking liar, you'd be in jail now. Your claim you are not a functioning adult is absolutely ridiculous.

But you are saying when Democrats say to fight that is a CALL FOR VIOLENCE and you will condemn them just as strongly as Trump? All I have to do is show you such a quote and you will demand they are impeached? You care claiming that?


From a Hillary Clinton Mailer in 2016:

Are you in? Your donation is about more than money. It’s your way of saying you’re ready to fight like hell to make sure Donald Trump never becomes president (and when you make your first donation today, we’ll send you a free sticker so you can show off your Team Hillary pride).

If it wasn't for false equivalence, you guys wouldn't have anything would you?


if it wasn't for your sides hypocrisy and willful blindness to it you wouldn't have shit.

Oooh, the "I know you are but what am I" strategy. So devious. :lol:


It's all dried up twats like you deserve.

And it isn't a false equivalence, it's showing how your side works. Be literalist morons when needed, ignorant when required.

Uh oh...Marty's getting pissy...breaking out the "twat". :lol:

It absolutely was a false equivalency. Hillary Clinton was not talking in front of an angry crowd she had been fomenting for weeks about a "stolen election" .


Only for you, saggy-tits.

No, she just said Trump can "never become president". and "fight like hell"

Trump told them to be peaceful, he never told them to break the law. Yet you give Hillary a pass for words like that, and bray and bitch about Trump.

It's called being a hack.

Only for me? I get under your skin like no other? Cool!

The people on Hillary's email list didn't storm the capital shouting to "stop the steal" and "kill Mike Pence"...probably because she hadn't been spending weeks cultivating them to do so.

His handlers made sure he said peaceful...once, but when the mob wasn't, he didn't do anything about it for hours...by all reports actually reveling in it. And then, when he did FINALLY say something, he said what? "I love you".


I tailor my responses, you get a different flavor of disdain then say Colefucks, JoeBlow, or Dunna7whatever.

he told them to follow the law.

Gosh, fickle as well as bitter and childish. You're just the whole kooky package!

He threw a rock and tried to hide his hand. MOST people realize it.



Only people with an axe to grind already come to the conclusion you did, how convenient.

Wrong, cultist. It's only the faithful worshippers of the Oompa Loompa Oligarch that don't see it for what it was...a failed insurrection spurred on by Trump.


Nope. Your side is still trying to get as much play out of this as you can, and the longer it goes on the more the story changes, and not in a good way for you. First it was planned, then it wasn't. First the mob killed the officer, then they didn't. Now all those crazy insurrection charges look like they will be brought down to trespass and assaults.

"My side" is trying to determine what happened and where the failures in security were. The fact that it was planned is not in contention. That is fully supported by the weapons and other paraphernalia found on the rioters, the bombs placed the night before and communications between members of certain groups.


The mob did kill an officer. If not for the mob, he would not be dead. The mob sent another into cardiac arrest.

Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?


your side is just trying to extend the Trumpbash and by extension marginalize your political opponents.

It's amazing how once you get a concept you refuse to change it even when shown it was wrong. it's the main failing of the progressive.

Orwell would be proud.

Well, that was a spectacularly bad dodge. Why not answer the question?

Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?


It would never be "bipartisan"

It would be a shitshow TDS circle jerk.


Wtf are you talking about? The commission would be conducted by even number of Republicans and Democrats. How the hell would it NOT be bi-partisan?


By using "Republicans" that hate Trump's guts.

The rules of the commission would still be set by the Democrats.
 
'
The filth here and elsewhere that supported this attempted coup against our democracy continues. We must respond to it at every level. These people have committed and are committing treason to our nation.


The right overwhelmingly condemned going into the Capital.


NOPE! If that was the case you would condemn Trump who propagated gross lies that caused this and directed people to go to Capitol.

Only 28% of Republicans put any kind of responsibility on Trump



I didn't say they condemned Trump, moron. Trump had nothing to do with it.

We condemned the people who went into the Capital.


.....so Trump who told his MAGA crowd to march on Capitol to stop the stealing of the election...had nothing to do with people going to the Capitol to stop the certification of the election.

Really dummy? You seriously think anyone buys that horseshit?


Nowhere in that did Trump say anything about violence.

You're such a liar and a hypocrite. You know perfectly well there is no reference to violence in that and you know perfectly well that Democrats say that sort of thing all the time.

Grow up and stop being a dick


Trump made it very clear what he wanted them to do, and they tried to do it.

Your attempts at gaslighting fail!


His words quoted so far imply protests.

Show the words that meant violence, lying fascist dick. You can't, they don't exist.

That while you're fine with the extreme rhetoric from the Dems where you don't take it as violence, even Maxine Whack Job Waters who clearly is referencing violence


Here ya go:

'We will stop the steal'

'We will never give up. We will never concede. It doesn't happen'

'If you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore'

'We are going to the Capitol'


Trump not only incited the crowd that he spoke to, but there was a vanguard already attacking the Capitol before he finished his speech.

The entire event was planned, there was a conspiracy:



None of those refer to violence, and you know that you stupid lying fuck. And when Democrats say far more incendiary things, you purr like a kitten. Democrats just lie, lie, lie and lie, you're fundamentally dishonest people, fascists and racists


'fight like hell' is an explicit call for violence.

'Stop the steal', stated while the electoral college was in session is an explicit call for immediate action.

Please stop playing dumb. We all know what happened on Jan. 6. You will not gaslight us!


No it's not you fucking lying retard. So you SERIOUSLY claim that calls to fight are for you literal and only literal. Fight for it! And you go start punching and shooting people.

No you don't you fucking liar, you'd be in jail now. Your claim you are not a functioning adult is absolutely ridiculous.

But you are saying when Democrats say to fight that is a CALL FOR VIOLENCE and you will condemn them just as strongly as Trump? All I have to do is show you such a quote and you will demand they are impeached? You care claiming that?


From a Hillary Clinton Mailer in 2016:

Are you in? Your donation is about more than money. It’s your way of saying you’re ready to fight like hell to make sure Donald Trump never becomes president (and when you make your first donation today, we’ll send you a free sticker so you can show off your Team Hillary pride).

If it wasn't for false equivalence, you guys wouldn't have anything would you?


if it wasn't for your sides hypocrisy and willful blindness to it you wouldn't have shit.

Oooh, the "I know you are but what am I" strategy. So devious. :lol:


It's all dried up twats like you deserve.

And it isn't a false equivalence, it's showing how your side works. Be literalist morons when needed, ignorant when required.

Uh oh...Marty's getting pissy...breaking out the "twat". :lol:

It absolutely was a false equivalency. Hillary Clinton was not talking in front of an angry crowd she had been fomenting for weeks about a "stolen election" .


Only for you, saggy-tits.

No, she just said Trump can "never become president". and "fight like hell"

Trump told them to be peaceful, he never told them to break the law. Yet you give Hillary a pass for words like that, and bray and bitch about Trump.

It's called being a hack.

Only for me? I get under your skin like no other? Cool!

The people on Hillary's email list didn't storm the capital shouting to "stop the steal" and "kill Mike Pence"...probably because she hadn't been spending weeks cultivating them to do so.

His handlers made sure he said peaceful...once, but when the mob wasn't, he didn't do anything about it for hours...by all reports actually reveling in it. And then, when he did FINALLY say something, he said what? "I love you".


I tailor my responses, you get a different flavor of disdain then say Colefucks, JoeBlow, or Dunna7whatever.

he told them to follow the law.

Gosh, fickle as well as bitter and childish. You're just the whole kooky package!

He threw a rock and tried to hide his hand. MOST people realize it.



Only people with an axe to grind already come to the conclusion you did, how convenient.

Wrong, cultist. It's only the faithful worshippers of the Oompa Loompa Oligarch that don't see it for what it was...a failed insurrection spurred on by Trump.


Nope. Your side is still trying to get as much play out of this as you can, and the longer it goes on the more the story changes, and not in a good way for you. First it was planned, then it wasn't. First the mob killed the officer, then they didn't. Now all those crazy insurrection charges look like they will be brought down to trespass and assaults.

"My side" is trying to determine what happened and where the failures in security were. The fact that it was planned is not in contention. That is fully supported by the weapons and other paraphernalia found on the rioters, the bombs placed the night before and communications between members of certain groups.


The mob did kill an officer. If not for the mob, he would not be dead. The mob sent another into cardiac arrest.

Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?


your side is just trying to extend the Trumpbash and by extension marginalize your political opponents.

It's amazing how once you get a concept you refuse to change it even when shown it was wrong. it's the main failing of the progressive.

Orwell would be proud.

Well, that was a spectacularly bad dodge. Why not answer the question?

Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?


It would never be "bipartisan"

It would be a shitshow TDS circle jerk.

54-35 in favor seems pretty fucking bipartisan in this day and age. Were the dozen or so Benghazi investigations bipartisan?


Were they called bipartisan?


54-35 what? what are you referencing?

Some poll?

Grossly misinformed I see...that would be the Senate vote on the January 6th commission that a majority of Americans want.

Here's the poll supporting that.



"Polls"


It's amazing how your side bitches about the Senate being unbalanced when you don't get your way, then run to it when it votes tilt in your favor.

it's called being a hypocrite.
 
The American people deserve to have a full & complete understanding of EVERY aspect of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol so they can make informed choices in the 2022 election and beyond.

If that full & complete understanding is to the disadvantage of the Republican Party then TOO FUCKING BAD.

In the future, fascists will think twice before attempting to overthrow Democracy!!!

Don't you have a screening of Kamala pegging Biden to attend?
 
'
The filth here and elsewhere that supported this attempted coup against our democracy continues. We must respond to it at every level. These people have committed and are committing treason to our nation.


The right overwhelmingly condemned going into the Capital.


NOPE! If that was the case you would condemn Trump who propagated gross lies that caused this and directed people to go to Capitol.

Only 28% of Republicans put any kind of responsibility on Trump



I didn't say they condemned Trump, moron. Trump had nothing to do with it.

We condemned the people who went into the Capital.


.....so Trump who told his MAGA crowd to march on Capitol to stop the stealing of the election...had nothing to do with people going to the Capitol to stop the certification of the election.

Really dummy? You seriously think anyone buys that horseshit?


Nowhere in that did Trump say anything about violence.

You're such a liar and a hypocrite. You know perfectly well there is no reference to violence in that and you know perfectly well that Democrats say that sort of thing all the time.

Grow up and stop being a dick


Trump made it very clear what he wanted them to do, and they tried to do it.

Your attempts at gaslighting fail!


His words quoted so far imply protests.

Show the words that meant violence, lying fascist dick. You can't, they don't exist.

That while you're fine with the extreme rhetoric from the Dems where you don't take it as violence, even Maxine Whack Job Waters who clearly is referencing violence


Here ya go:

'We will stop the steal'

'We will never give up. We will never concede. It doesn't happen'

'If you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore'

'We are going to the Capitol'


Trump not only incited the crowd that he spoke to, but there was a vanguard already attacking the Capitol before he finished his speech.

The entire event was planned, there was a conspiracy:



None of those refer to violence, and you know that you stupid lying fuck. And when Democrats say far more incendiary things, you purr like a kitten. Democrats just lie, lie, lie and lie, you're fundamentally dishonest people, fascists and racists


'fight like hell' is an explicit call for violence.

'Stop the steal', stated while the electoral college was in session is an explicit call for immediate action.

Please stop playing dumb. We all know what happened on Jan. 6. You will not gaslight us!


No it's not you fucking lying retard. So you SERIOUSLY claim that calls to fight are for you literal and only literal. Fight for it! And you go start punching and shooting people.

No you don't you fucking liar, you'd be in jail now. Your claim you are not a functioning adult is absolutely ridiculous.

But you are saying when Democrats say to fight that is a CALL FOR VIOLENCE and you will condemn them just as strongly as Trump? All I have to do is show you such a quote and you will demand they are impeached? You care claiming that?


From a Hillary Clinton Mailer in 2016:

Are you in? Your donation is about more than money. It’s your way of saying you’re ready to fight like hell to make sure Donald Trump never becomes president (and when you make your first donation today, we’ll send you a free sticker so you can show off your Team Hillary pride).

If it wasn't for false equivalence, you guys wouldn't have anything would you?


if it wasn't for your sides hypocrisy and willful blindness to it you wouldn't have shit.

Oooh, the "I know you are but what am I" strategy. So devious. :lol:


It's all dried up twats like you deserve.

And it isn't a false equivalence, it's showing how your side works. Be literalist morons when needed, ignorant when required.

Uh oh...Marty's getting pissy...breaking out the "twat". :lol:

It absolutely was a false equivalency. Hillary Clinton was not talking in front of an angry crowd she had been fomenting for weeks about a "stolen election" .


Only for you, saggy-tits.

No, she just said Trump can "never become president". and "fight like hell"

Trump told them to be peaceful, he never told them to break the law. Yet you give Hillary a pass for words like that, and bray and bitch about Trump.

It's called being a hack.

Only for me? I get under your skin like no other? Cool!

The people on Hillary's email list didn't storm the capital shouting to "stop the steal" and "kill Mike Pence"...probably because she hadn't been spending weeks cultivating them to do so.

His handlers made sure he said peaceful...once, but when the mob wasn't, he didn't do anything about it for hours...by all reports actually reveling in it. And then, when he did FINALLY say something, he said what? "I love you".


I tailor my responses, you get a different flavor of disdain then say Colefucks, JoeBlow, or Dunna7whatever.

he told them to follow the law.

Gosh, fickle as well as bitter and childish. You're just the whole kooky package!

He threw a rock and tried to hide his hand. MOST people realize it.



Only people with an axe to grind already come to the conclusion you did, how convenient.

Wrong, cultist. It's only the faithful worshippers of the Oompa Loompa Oligarch that don't see it for what it was...a failed insurrection spurred on by Trump.


Nope. Your side is still trying to get as much play out of this as you can, and the longer it goes on the more the story changes, and not in a good way for you. First it was planned, then it wasn't. First the mob killed the officer, then they didn't. Now all those crazy insurrection charges look like they will be brought down to trespass and assaults.

"My side" is trying to determine what happened and where the failures in security were. The fact that it was planned is not in contention. That is fully supported by the weapons and other paraphernalia found on the rioters, the bombs placed the night before and communications between members of certain groups.


The mob did kill an officer. If not for the mob, he would not be dead. The mob sent another into cardiac arrest.

Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?


your side is just trying to extend the Trumpbash and by extension marginalize your political opponents.

It's amazing how once you get a concept you refuse to change it even when shown it was wrong. it's the main failing of the progressive.

Orwell would be proud.

Well, that was a spectacularly bad dodge. Why not answer the question?

Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?


It would never be "bipartisan"

It would be a shitshow TDS circle jerk.


Wtf are you talking about? The commission would be conducted by even number of Republicans and Democrats. How the hell would it NOT be bi-partisan?


By using "Republicans" that hate Trump's guts.

The rules of the commission would still be set by the Democrats.


If so many Republicans hate Trump, perhaps it's because he deserves it.

up to their scrutinyThey have not compromised their principals, sorry if Trump can't
The American people deserve to have a full & complete understanding of EVERY aspect of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol so they can make informed choices in the 2022 election and beyond.

If that full & complete understanding is to the disadvantage of the Republican Party then TOO FUCKING BAD.

In the future, fascists will think twice before attempting to overthrow Democracy!!!

Don't you have a screening of Kamala pegging Biden to attend?

If you don't have anything relevant to say, please refrain from posting.

:th_Back_2_Topic_2:
 
If so many Republicans hate Trump, perhaps it's because he deserves it.

They hate Trump because he's not part of the club. Republicans and Democrats put on a good show in Congress, but at the end of the day, they're at the same bar buying each other drinks.

In the establishment on both sides, they believe they are the ones who set the rules. You start out small in a city or state government position. You work your way to Governor, Congress member or Senator. You do favors for them and they do favors for you. Should you decide to run for President, you get their approval first.

Trump never asked if he could join that gang. He busted down the back doors and took the highest seat in the club uninvited. There was a lot of resentment on both sides. HOW DARE HE??? DOESN'T HE KNOW HOW THIS WORKS???

The Republicans who care about the party warmed up to him because Trump led in a conservative way. The Karen's not so much. They still hate him and always will.
 
If so many Republicans hate Trump, perhaps it's because he deserves it.

They hate Trump because he's not part of the club. Republicans and Democrats put on a good show in Congress, but at the end of the day, they're at the same bar buying each other drinks.

In the establishment on both sides, they believe they are the ones who set the rules. You start out small in a city or state government position. You work your way to Governor, Congress member or Senator. You do favors for them and they do favors for you. Should you decide to run for President, you get their approval first.

Trump never asked if he could join that gang. He busted down the back doors and took the highest seat in the club uninvited. There was a lot of resentment on both sides. HOW DARE HE??? DOESN'T HE KNOW HOW THIS WORKS???

The Republicans who care about the party warmed up to him because Trump led in a conservative way. The Karen's not so much. They still hate him and always will.

Trump is and was a buffoon. He had no idea of what the Presidents job is. He was able to get the support of idiots who also don't know what the President's job is.

Sure, he's not in the club of competent political leaders - people who know what they're doing.

Most of his supporters base their 'knowledge' of government on television dramas. They don't have a clue.

How many Trump supporters declare that Washington is corrupt, but have no proof whatsoever? They just magically 'know it'.

Yes, professional people who know how to run government resented this buffoon taking advantage of a legion of idiots to gain the Presidency.
 
'
The filth here and elsewhere that supported this attempted coup against our democracy continues. We must respond to it at every level. These people have committed and are committing treason to our nation.


The right overwhelmingly condemned going into the Capital.


NOPE! If that was the case you would condemn Trump who propagated gross lies that caused this and directed people to go to Capitol.

Only 28% of Republicans put any kind of responsibility on Trump



I didn't say they condemned Trump, moron. Trump had nothing to do with it.

We condemned the people who went into the Capital.


.....so Trump who told his MAGA crowd to march on Capitol to stop the stealing of the election...had nothing to do with people going to the Capitol to stop the certification of the election.

Really dummy? You seriously think anyone buys that horseshit?


Nowhere in that did Trump say anything about violence.

You're such a liar and a hypocrite. You know perfectly well there is no reference to violence in that and you know perfectly well that Democrats say that sort of thing all the time.

Grow up and stop being a dick


Trump made it very clear what he wanted them to do, and they tried to do it.

Your attempts at gaslighting fail!


His words quoted so far imply protests.

Show the words that meant violence, lying fascist dick. You can't, they don't exist.

That while you're fine with the extreme rhetoric from the Dems where you don't take it as violence, even Maxine Whack Job Waters who clearly is referencing violence


Here ya go:

'We will stop the steal'

'We will never give up. We will never concede. It doesn't happen'

'If you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore'

'We are going to the Capitol'


Trump not only incited the crowd that he spoke to, but there was a vanguard already attacking the Capitol before he finished his speech.

The entire event was planned, there was a conspiracy:



None of those refer to violence, and you know that you stupid lying fuck. And when Democrats say far more incendiary things, you purr like a kitten. Democrats just lie, lie, lie and lie, you're fundamentally dishonest people, fascists and racists


'fight like hell' is an explicit call for violence.

'Stop the steal', stated while the electoral college was in session is an explicit call for immediate action.

Please stop playing dumb. We all know what happened on Jan. 6. You will not gaslight us!


No it's not you fucking lying retard. So you SERIOUSLY claim that calls to fight are for you literal and only literal. Fight for it! And you go start punching and shooting people.

No you don't you fucking liar, you'd be in jail now. Your claim you are not a functioning adult is absolutely ridiculous.

But you are saying when Democrats say to fight that is a CALL FOR VIOLENCE and you will condemn them just as strongly as Trump? All I have to do is show you such a quote and you will demand they are impeached? You care claiming that?


From a Hillary Clinton Mailer in 2016:

Are you in? Your donation is about more than money. It’s your way of saying you’re ready to fight like hell to make sure Donald Trump never becomes president (and when you make your first donation today, we’ll send you a free sticker so you can show off your Team Hillary pride).

If it wasn't for false equivalence, you guys wouldn't have anything would you?


if it wasn't for your sides hypocrisy and willful blindness to it you wouldn't have shit.

Oooh, the "I know you are but what am I" strategy. So devious. :lol:


It's all dried up twats like you deserve.

And it isn't a false equivalence, it's showing how your side works. Be literalist morons when needed, ignorant when required.

Uh oh...Marty's getting pissy...breaking out the "twat". :lol:

It absolutely was a false equivalency. Hillary Clinton was not talking in front of an angry crowd she had been fomenting for weeks about a "stolen election" .


Only for you, saggy-tits.

No, she just said Trump can "never become president". and "fight like hell"

Trump told them to be peaceful, he never told them to break the law. Yet you give Hillary a pass for words like that, and bray and bitch about Trump.

It's called being a hack.

Only for me? I get under your skin like no other? Cool!

The people on Hillary's email list didn't storm the capital shouting to "stop the steal" and "kill Mike Pence"...probably because she hadn't been spending weeks cultivating them to do so.

His handlers made sure he said peaceful...once, but when the mob wasn't, he didn't do anything about it for hours...by all reports actually reveling in it. And then, when he did FINALLY say something, he said what? "I love you".


I tailor my responses, you get a different flavor of disdain then say Colefucks, JoeBlow, or Dunna7whatever.

he told them to follow the law.

Gosh, fickle as well as bitter and childish. You're just the whole kooky package!

He threw a rock and tried to hide his hand. MOST people realize it.



Only people with an axe to grind already come to the conclusion you did, how convenient.

Wrong, cultist. It's only the faithful worshippers of the Oompa Loompa Oligarch that don't see it for what it was...a failed insurrection spurred on by Trump.


Nope. Your side is still trying to get as much play out of this as you can, and the longer it goes on the more the story changes, and not in a good way for you. First it was planned, then it wasn't. First the mob killed the officer, then they didn't. Now all those crazy insurrection charges look like they will be brought down to trespass and assaults.

"My side" is trying to determine what happened and where the failures in security were. The fact that it was planned is not in contention. That is fully supported by the weapons and other paraphernalia found on the rioters, the bombs placed the night before and communications between members of certain groups.


The mob did kill an officer. If not for the mob, he would not be dead. The mob sent another into cardiac arrest.

Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?


your side is just trying to extend the Trumpbash and by extension marginalize your political opponents.

It's amazing how once you get a concept you refuse to change it even when shown it was wrong. it's the main failing of the progressive.

Orwell would be proud.

Well, that was a spectacularly bad dodge. Why not answer the question?

Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?


It would never be "bipartisan"

It would be a shitshow TDS circle jerk.


Wtf are you talking about? The commission would be conducted by even number of Republicans and Democrats. How the hell would it NOT be bi-partisan?


By using "Republicans" that hate Trump's guts.

The rules of the commission would still be set by the Democrats.

That’s the way it will be now, because Republicans don’t want to participate.
 
'
The filth here and elsewhere that supported this attempted coup against our democracy continues. We must respond to it at every level. These people have committed and are committing treason to our nation.


The right overwhelmingly condemned going into the Capital.


NOPE! If that was the case you would condemn Trump who propagated gross lies that caused this and directed people to go to Capitol.

Only 28% of Republicans put any kind of responsibility on Trump



I didn't say they condemned Trump, moron. Trump had nothing to do with it.

We condemned the people who went into the Capital.


.....so Trump who told his MAGA crowd to march on Capitol to stop the stealing of the election...had nothing to do with people going to the Capitol to stop the certification of the election.

Really dummy? You seriously think anyone buys that horseshit?


Nowhere in that did Trump say anything about violence.

You're such a liar and a hypocrite. You know perfectly well there is no reference to violence in that and you know perfectly well that Democrats say that sort of thing all the time.

Grow up and stop being a dick


Trump made it very clear what he wanted them to do, and they tried to do it.

Your attempts at gaslighting fail!


His words quoted so far imply protests.

Show the words that meant violence, lying fascist dick. You can't, they don't exist.

That while you're fine with the extreme rhetoric from the Dems where you don't take it as violence, even Maxine Whack Job Waters who clearly is referencing violence


Here ya go:

'We will stop the steal'

'We will never give up. We will never concede. It doesn't happen'

'If you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore'

'We are going to the Capitol'


Trump not only incited the crowd that he spoke to, but there was a vanguard already attacking the Capitol before he finished his speech.

The entire event was planned, there was a conspiracy:



None of those refer to violence, and you know that you stupid lying fuck. And when Democrats say far more incendiary things, you purr like a kitten. Democrats just lie, lie, lie and lie, you're fundamentally dishonest people, fascists and racists


'fight like hell' is an explicit call for violence.

'Stop the steal', stated while the electoral college was in session is an explicit call for immediate action.

Please stop playing dumb. We all know what happened on Jan. 6. You will not gaslight us!


No it's not you fucking lying retard. So you SERIOUSLY claim that calls to fight are for you literal and only literal. Fight for it! And you go start punching and shooting people.

No you don't you fucking liar, you'd be in jail now. Your claim you are not a functioning adult is absolutely ridiculous.

But you are saying when Democrats say to fight that is a CALL FOR VIOLENCE and you will condemn them just as strongly as Trump? All I have to do is show you such a quote and you will demand they are impeached? You care claiming that?


From a Hillary Clinton Mailer in 2016:

Are you in? Your donation is about more than money. It’s your way of saying you’re ready to fight like hell to make sure Donald Trump never becomes president (and when you make your first donation today, we’ll send you a free sticker so you can show off your Team Hillary pride).

If it wasn't for false equivalence, you guys wouldn't have anything would you?


if it wasn't for your sides hypocrisy and willful blindness to it you wouldn't have shit.

Oooh, the "I know you are but what am I" strategy. So devious. :lol:


It's all dried up twats like you deserve.

And it isn't a false equivalence, it's showing how your side works. Be literalist morons when needed, ignorant when required.

Uh oh...Marty's getting pissy...breaking out the "twat". :lol:

It absolutely was a false equivalency. Hillary Clinton was not talking in front of an angry crowd she had been fomenting for weeks about a "stolen election" .


Only for you, saggy-tits.

No, she just said Trump can "never become president". and "fight like hell"

Trump told them to be peaceful, he never told them to break the law. Yet you give Hillary a pass for words like that, and bray and bitch about Trump.

It's called being a hack.

Only for me? I get under your skin like no other? Cool!

The people on Hillary's email list didn't storm the capital shouting to "stop the steal" and "kill Mike Pence"...probably because she hadn't been spending weeks cultivating them to do so.

His handlers made sure he said peaceful...once, but when the mob wasn't, he didn't do anything about it for hours...by all reports actually reveling in it. And then, when he did FINALLY say something, he said what? "I love you".


I tailor my responses, you get a different flavor of disdain then say Colefucks, JoeBlow, or Dunna7whatever.

he told them to follow the law.

Gosh, fickle as well as bitter and childish. You're just the whole kooky package!

He threw a rock and tried to hide his hand. MOST people realize it.



Only people with an axe to grind already come to the conclusion you did, how convenient.

Wrong, cultist. It's only the faithful worshippers of the Oompa Loompa Oligarch that don't see it for what it was...a failed insurrection spurred on by Trump.


Nope. Your side is still trying to get as much play out of this as you can, and the longer it goes on the more the story changes, and not in a good way for you. First it was planned, then it wasn't. First the mob killed the officer, then they didn't. Now all those crazy insurrection charges look like they will be brought down to trespass and assaults.

"My side" is trying to determine what happened and where the failures in security were. The fact that it was planned is not in contention. That is fully supported by the weapons and other paraphernalia found on the rioters, the bombs placed the night before and communications between members of certain groups.


The mob did kill an officer. If not for the mob, he would not be dead. The mob sent another into cardiac arrest.

Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?


your side is just trying to extend the Trumpbash and by extension marginalize your political opponents.

It's amazing how once you get a concept you refuse to change it even when shown it was wrong. it's the main failing of the progressive.

Orwell would be proud.

Well, that was a spectacularly bad dodge. Why not answer the question?

Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?


It would never be "bipartisan"

It would be a shitshow TDS circle jerk.

54-35 in favor seems pretty fucking bipartisan in this day and age. Were the dozen or so Benghazi investigations bipartisan?


Were they called bipartisan?


54-35 what? what are you referencing?

Some poll?

Grossly misinformed I see...that would be the Senate vote on the January 6th commission that a majority of Americans want.

Here's the poll supporting that.



"Polls"


It's amazing how your side bitches about the Senate being unbalanced when you don't get your way, then run to it when it votes tilt in your favor.

it's called being a hypocrite.

What are you even talking about? The vote in favor of having a January 6th commission was as bipartisan as it gets these days and that still isn’t good enough. The filibuster is killing bipartisanship.
 
Trump is and was a buffoon. He had no idea of what the Presidents job is. He was able to get the support of idiots who also don't know what the President's job is.

Sure, he's not in the club of competent political leaders - people who know what they're doing.

Most of his supporters base their 'knowledge' of government on television dramas. They don't have a clue.

How many Trump supporters declare that Washington is corrupt, but have no proof whatsoever? They just magically 'know it'.

Yes, professional people who know how to run government resented this buffoon taking advantage of a legion of idiots to gain the Presidency.

Well that buffoon gave us the best economy in 50 years. That buffoon presided over several stock market highs. That buffoon's policies led us to a record high in median household income, and a new high in black meidan household income. That buffoon gave us the lowest unemployment for women and all minority groups since records were kept. That buffoon supported fuel production where our gasoline never seen $3.00 per gallon during our best economic times, which also made the USA the worlds largest energy exporter. That buffoon reduced our border crossings by over 90% in 2019 after he fought the commies in Congress and their commie judges who were constantly trying to stop him from solving the problem. That buffoon presided when the US had over a million more jobs than Americans who could work them which never happened in my 61 years living on this planet. That buffoon signed contracts with 8 different potential vaccines makers in July of 2020 guaranteeing 100 million doses at US disposal, with a rider of 500 million more doses on demand so Americans came first.

This is what that buffoon did in four years. Name me the last President that did more positive things for this country and our people than he did.
 
D38BE5E1-F458-4497-9C9F-E0B0431DCAE7.jpeg
 
'
The filth here and elsewhere that supported this attempted coup against our democracy continues. We must respond to it at every level. These people have committed and are committing treason to our nation.


The right overwhelmingly condemned going into the Capital.


NOPE! If that was the case you would condemn Trump who propagated gross lies that caused this and directed people to go to Capitol.

Only 28% of Republicans put any kind of responsibility on Trump



I didn't say they condemned Trump, moron. Trump had nothing to do with it.

We condemned the people who went into the Capital.


.....so Trump who told his MAGA crowd to march on Capitol to stop the stealing of the election...had nothing to do with people going to the Capitol to stop the certification of the election.

Really dummy? You seriously think anyone buys that horseshit?


Nowhere in that did Trump say anything about violence.

You're such a liar and a hypocrite. You know perfectly well there is no reference to violence in that and you know perfectly well that Democrats say that sort of thing all the time.

Grow up and stop being a dick


Trump made it very clear what he wanted them to do, and they tried to do it.

Your attempts at gaslighting fail!


His words quoted so far imply protests.

Show the words that meant violence, lying fascist dick. You can't, they don't exist.

That while you're fine with the extreme rhetoric from the Dems where you don't take it as violence, even Maxine Whack Job Waters who clearly is referencing violence


Here ya go:

'We will stop the steal'

'We will never give up. We will never concede. It doesn't happen'

'If you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore'

'We are going to the Capitol'


Trump not only incited the crowd that he spoke to, but there was a vanguard already attacking the Capitol before he finished his speech.

The entire event was planned, there was a conspiracy:



None of those refer to violence, and you know that you stupid lying fuck. And when Democrats say far more incendiary things, you purr like a kitten. Democrats just lie, lie, lie and lie, you're fundamentally dishonest people, fascists and racists


'fight like hell' is an explicit call for violence.

'Stop the steal', stated while the electoral college was in session is an explicit call for immediate action.

Please stop playing dumb. We all know what happened on Jan. 6. You will not gaslight us!


No it's not you fucking lying retard. So you SERIOUSLY claim that calls to fight are for you literal and only literal. Fight for it! And you go start punching and shooting people.

No you don't you fucking liar, you'd be in jail now. Your claim you are not a functioning adult is absolutely ridiculous.

But you are saying when Democrats say to fight that is a CALL FOR VIOLENCE and you will condemn them just as strongly as Trump? All I have to do is show you such a quote and you will demand they are impeached? You care claiming that?


From a Hillary Clinton Mailer in 2016:

Are you in? Your donation is about more than money. It’s your way of saying you’re ready to fight like hell to make sure Donald Trump never becomes president (and when you make your first donation today, we’ll send you a free sticker so you can show off your Team Hillary pride).

If it wasn't for false equivalence, you guys wouldn't have anything would you?


if it wasn't for your sides hypocrisy and willful blindness to it you wouldn't have shit.

Oooh, the "I know you are but what am I" strategy. So devious. :lol:


It's all dried up twats like you deserve.

And it isn't a false equivalence, it's showing how your side works. Be literalist morons when needed, ignorant when required.

Uh oh...Marty's getting pissy...breaking out the "twat". :lol:

It absolutely was a false equivalency. Hillary Clinton was not talking in front of an angry crowd she had been fomenting for weeks about a "stolen election" .


Only for you, saggy-tits.

No, she just said Trump can "never become president". and "fight like hell"

Trump told them to be peaceful, he never told them to break the law. Yet you give Hillary a pass for words like that, and bray and bitch about Trump.

It's called being a hack.

Only for me? I get under your skin like no other? Cool!

The people on Hillary's email list didn't storm the capital shouting to "stop the steal" and "kill Mike Pence"...probably because she hadn't been spending weeks cultivating them to do so.

His handlers made sure he said peaceful...once, but when the mob wasn't, he didn't do anything about it for hours...by all reports actually reveling in it. And then, when he did FINALLY say something, he said what? "I love you".


I tailor my responses, you get a different flavor of disdain then say Colefucks, JoeBlow, or Dunna7whatever.

he told them to follow the law.

Gosh, fickle as well as bitter and childish. You're just the whole kooky package!

He threw a rock and tried to hide his hand. MOST people realize it.



Only people with an axe to grind already come to the conclusion you did, how convenient.

Wrong, cultist. It's only the faithful worshippers of the Oompa Loompa Oligarch that don't see it for what it was...a failed insurrection spurred on by Trump.


Nope. Your side is still trying to get as much play out of this as you can, and the longer it goes on the more the story changes, and not in a good way for you. First it was planned, then it wasn't. First the mob killed the officer, then they didn't. Now all those crazy insurrection charges look like they will be brought down to trespass and assaults.

"My side" is trying to determine what happened and where the failures in security were. The fact that it was planned is not in contention. That is fully supported by the weapons and other paraphernalia found on the rioters, the bombs placed the night before and communications between members of certain groups.


The mob did kill an officer. If not for the mob, he would not be dead. The mob sent another into cardiac arrest.

Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?


your side is just trying to extend the Trumpbash and by extension marginalize your political opponents.

It's amazing how once you get a concept you refuse to change it even when shown it was wrong. it's the main failing of the progressive.

Orwell would be proud.

Well, that was a spectacularly bad dodge. Why not answer the question?

Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?


It would never be "bipartisan"

It would be a shitshow TDS circle jerk.


Wtf are you talking about? The commission would be conducted by even number of Republicans and Democrats. How the hell would it NOT be bi-partisan?


By using "Republicans" that hate Trump's guts.

The rules of the commission would still be set by the Democrats.

That’s the way it will be now, because Republicans don’t want to participate.


It's the way it was always going to be.

Dog and Pony show, nothing but.
 
'
The filth here and elsewhere that supported this attempted coup against our democracy continues. We must respond to it at every level. These people have committed and are committing treason to our nation.


The right overwhelmingly condemned going into the Capital.


NOPE! If that was the case you would condemn Trump who propagated gross lies that caused this and directed people to go to Capitol.

Only 28% of Republicans put any kind of responsibility on Trump



I didn't say they condemned Trump, moron. Trump had nothing to do with it.

We condemned the people who went into the Capital.


.....so Trump who told his MAGA crowd to march on Capitol to stop the stealing of the election...had nothing to do with people going to the Capitol to stop the certification of the election.

Really dummy? You seriously think anyone buys that horseshit?


Nowhere in that did Trump say anything about violence.

You're such a liar and a hypocrite. You know perfectly well there is no reference to violence in that and you know perfectly well that Democrats say that sort of thing all the time.

Grow up and stop being a dick


Trump made it very clear what he wanted them to do, and they tried to do it.

Your attempts at gaslighting fail!


His words quoted so far imply protests.

Show the words that meant violence, lying fascist dick. You can't, they don't exist.

That while you're fine with the extreme rhetoric from the Dems where you don't take it as violence, even Maxine Whack Job Waters who clearly is referencing violence


Here ya go:

'We will stop the steal'

'We will never give up. We will never concede. It doesn't happen'

'If you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore'

'We are going to the Capitol'


Trump not only incited the crowd that he spoke to, but there was a vanguard already attacking the Capitol before he finished his speech.

The entire event was planned, there was a conspiracy:



None of those refer to violence, and you know that you stupid lying fuck. And when Democrats say far more incendiary things, you purr like a kitten. Democrats just lie, lie, lie and lie, you're fundamentally dishonest people, fascists and racists


'fight like hell' is an explicit call for violence.

'Stop the steal', stated while the electoral college was in session is an explicit call for immediate action.

Please stop playing dumb. We all know what happened on Jan. 6. You will not gaslight us!


No it's not you fucking lying retard. So you SERIOUSLY claim that calls to fight are for you literal and only literal. Fight for it! And you go start punching and shooting people.

No you don't you fucking liar, you'd be in jail now. Your claim you are not a functioning adult is absolutely ridiculous.

But you are saying when Democrats say to fight that is a CALL FOR VIOLENCE and you will condemn them just as strongly as Trump? All I have to do is show you such a quote and you will demand they are impeached? You care claiming that?


From a Hillary Clinton Mailer in 2016:

Are you in? Your donation is about more than money. It’s your way of saying you’re ready to fight like hell to make sure Donald Trump never becomes president (and when you make your first donation today, we’ll send you a free sticker so you can show off your Team Hillary pride).

If it wasn't for false equivalence, you guys wouldn't have anything would you?


if it wasn't for your sides hypocrisy and willful blindness to it you wouldn't have shit.

Oooh, the "I know you are but what am I" strategy. So devious. :lol:


It's all dried up twats like you deserve.

And it isn't a false equivalence, it's showing how your side works. Be literalist morons when needed, ignorant when required.

Uh oh...Marty's getting pissy...breaking out the "twat". :lol:

It absolutely was a false equivalency. Hillary Clinton was not talking in front of an angry crowd she had been fomenting for weeks about a "stolen election" .


Only for you, saggy-tits.

No, she just said Trump can "never become president". and "fight like hell"

Trump told them to be peaceful, he never told them to break the law. Yet you give Hillary a pass for words like that, and bray and bitch about Trump.

It's called being a hack.

Only for me? I get under your skin like no other? Cool!

The people on Hillary's email list didn't storm the capital shouting to "stop the steal" and "kill Mike Pence"...probably because she hadn't been spending weeks cultivating them to do so.

His handlers made sure he said peaceful...once, but when the mob wasn't, he didn't do anything about it for hours...by all reports actually reveling in it. And then, when he did FINALLY say something, he said what? "I love you".


I tailor my responses, you get a different flavor of disdain then say Colefucks, JoeBlow, or Dunna7whatever.

he told them to follow the law.

Gosh, fickle as well as bitter and childish. You're just the whole kooky package!

He threw a rock and tried to hide his hand. MOST people realize it.



Only people with an axe to grind already come to the conclusion you did, how convenient.

Wrong, cultist. It's only the faithful worshippers of the Oompa Loompa Oligarch that don't see it for what it was...a failed insurrection spurred on by Trump.


Nope. Your side is still trying to get as much play out of this as you can, and the longer it goes on the more the story changes, and not in a good way for you. First it was planned, then it wasn't. First the mob killed the officer, then they didn't. Now all those crazy insurrection charges look like they will be brought down to trespass and assaults.

"My side" is trying to determine what happened and where the failures in security were. The fact that it was planned is not in contention. That is fully supported by the weapons and other paraphernalia found on the rioters, the bombs placed the night before and communications between members of certain groups.


The mob did kill an officer. If not for the mob, he would not be dead. The mob sent another into cardiac arrest.

Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?


your side is just trying to extend the Trumpbash and by extension marginalize your political opponents.

It's amazing how once you get a concept you refuse to change it even when shown it was wrong. it's the main failing of the progressive.

Orwell would be proud.

Well, that was a spectacularly bad dodge. Why not answer the question?

Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?


It would never be "bipartisan"

It would be a shitshow TDS circle jerk.

54-35 in favor seems pretty fucking bipartisan in this day and age. Were the dozen or so Benghazi investigations bipartisan?


Were they called bipartisan?


54-35 what? what are you referencing?

Some poll?

Grossly misinformed I see...that would be the Senate vote on the January 6th commission that a majority of Americans want.

Here's the poll supporting that.



"Polls"


It's amazing how your side bitches about the Senate being unbalanced when you don't get your way, then run to it when it votes tilt in your favor.

it's called being a hypocrite.

What are you even talking about? The vote in favor of having a January 6th commission was as bipartisan as it gets these days and that still isn’t good enough. The filibuster is killing bipartisanship.


Not even close. A few RINOs isn't bipartisan.
 
Trump is and was a buffoon. He had no idea of what the Presidents job is. He was able to get the support of idiots who also don't know what the President's job is.

Sure, he's not in the club of competent political leaders - people who know what they're doing.

Most of his supporters base their 'knowledge' of government on television dramas. They don't have a clue.

How many Trump supporters declare that Washington is corrupt, but have no proof whatsoever? They just magically 'know it'.

Yes, professional people who know how to run government resented this buffoon taking advantage of a legion of idiots to gain the Presidency.

Well that buffoon gave us the best economy in 50 years. That buffoon presided over several stock market highs. That buffoon's policies led us to a record high in median household income, and a new high in black meidan household income.

'
The filth here and elsewhere that supported this attempted coup against our democracy continues. We must respond to it at every level. These people have committed and are committing treason to our nation.


The right overwhelmingly condemned going into the Capital.


NOPE! If that was the case you would condemn Trump who propagated gross lies that caused this and directed people to go to Capitol.

Only 28% of Republicans put any kind of responsibility on Trump



I didn't say they condemned Trump, moron. Trump had nothing to do with it.

We condemned the people who went into the Capital.


.....so Trump who told his MAGA crowd to march on Capitol to stop the stealing of the election...had nothing to do with people going to the Capitol to stop the certification of the election.

Really dummy? You seriously think anyone buys that horseshit?


Nowhere in that did Trump say anything about violence.

You're such a liar and a hypocrite. You know perfectly well there is no reference to violence in that and you know perfectly well that Democrats say that sort of thing all the time.

Grow up and stop being a dick


Trump made it very clear what he wanted them to do, and they tried to do it.

Your attempts at gaslighting fail!


His words quoted so far imply protests.

Show the words that meant violence, lying fascist dick. You can't, they don't exist.

That while you're fine with the extreme rhetoric from the Dems where you don't take it as violence, even Maxine Whack Job Waters who clearly is referencing violence


Here ya go:

'We will stop the steal'

'We will never give up. We will never concede. It doesn't happen'

'If you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore'

'We are going to the Capitol'


Trump not only incited the crowd that he spoke to, but there was a vanguard already attacking the Capitol before he finished his speech.

The entire event was planned, there was a conspiracy:



None of those refer to violence, and you know that you stupid lying fuck. And when Democrats say far more incendiary things, you purr like a kitten. Democrats just lie, lie, lie and lie, you're fundamentally dishonest people, fascists and racists


'fight like hell' is an explicit call for violence.

'Stop the steal', stated while the electoral college was in session is an explicit call for immediate action.

Please stop playing dumb. We all know what happened on Jan. 6. You will not gaslight us!


No it's not you fucking lying retard. So you SERIOUSLY claim that calls to fight are for you literal and only literal. Fight for it! And you go start punching and shooting people.

No you don't you fucking liar, you'd be in jail now. Your claim you are not a functioning adult is absolutely ridiculous.

But you are saying when Democrats say to fight that is a CALL FOR VIOLENCE and you will condemn them just as strongly as Trump? All I have to do is show you such a quote and you will demand they are impeached? You care claiming that?


From a Hillary Clinton Mailer in 2016:

Are you in? Your donation is about more than money. It’s your way of saying you’re ready to fight like hell to make sure Donald Trump never becomes president (and when you make your first donation today, we’ll send you a free sticker so you can show off your Team Hillary pride).

If it wasn't for false equivalence, you guys wouldn't have anything would you?


if it wasn't for your sides hypocrisy and willful blindness to it you wouldn't have shit.

Oooh, the "I know you are but what am I" strategy. So devious. :lol:


It's all dried up twats like you deserve.

And it isn't a false equivalence, it's showing how your side works. Be literalist morons when needed, ignorant when required.

Uh oh...Marty's getting pissy...breaking out the "twat". :lol:

It absolutely was a false equivalency. Hillary Clinton was not talking in front of an angry crowd she had been fomenting for weeks about a "stolen election" .


Only for you, saggy-tits.

No, she just said Trump can "never become president". and "fight like hell"

Trump told them to be peaceful, he never told them to break the law. Yet you give Hillary a pass for words like that, and bray and bitch about Trump.

It's called being a hack.

Only for me? I get under your skin like no other? Cool!

The people on Hillary's email list didn't storm the capital shouting to "stop the steal" and "kill Mike Pence"...probably because she hadn't been spending weeks cultivating them to do so.

His handlers made sure he said peaceful...once, but when the mob wasn't, he didn't do anything about it for hours...by all reports actually reveling in it. And then, when he did FINALLY say something, he said what? "I love you".


I tailor my responses, you get a different flavor of disdain then say Colefucks, JoeBlow, or Dunna7whatever.

he told them to follow the law.

Gosh, fickle as well as bitter and childish. You're just the whole kooky package!

He threw a rock and tried to hide his hand. MOST people realize it.



Only people with an axe to grind already come to the conclusion you did, how convenient.

Wrong, cultist. It's only the faithful worshippers of the Oompa Loompa Oligarch that don't see it for what it was...a failed insurrection spurred on by Trump.


Nope. Your side is still trying to get as much play out of this as you can, and the longer it goes on the more the story changes, and not in a good way for you. First it was planned, then it wasn't. First the mob killed the officer, then they didn't. Now all those crazy insurrection charges look like they will be brought down to trespass and assaults.

"My side" is trying to determine what happened and where the failures in security were. The fact that it was planned is not in contention. That is fully supported by the weapons and other paraphernalia found on the rioters, the bombs placed the night before and communications between members of certain groups.


The mob did kill an officer. If not for the mob, he would not be dead. The mob sent another into cardiac arrest.

Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?


your side is just trying to extend the Trumpbash and by extension marginalize your political opponents.

It's amazing how once you get a concept you refuse to change it even when shown it was wrong. it's the main failing of the progressive.

Orwell would be proud.

Well, that was a spectacularly bad dodge. Why not answer the question?

Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?


It would never be "bipartisan"

It would be a shitshow TDS circle jerk.

54-35 in favor seems pretty fucking bipartisan in this day and age. Were the dozen or so Benghazi investigations bipartisan?


Were they called bipartisan?


54-35 what? what are you referencing?

Some poll?

Grossly misinformed I see...that would be the Senate vote on the January 6th commission that a majority of Americans want.

Here's the poll supporting that.



"Polls"


It's amazing how your side bitches about the Senate being unbalanced when you don't get your way, then run to it when it votes tilt in your favor.

it's called being a hypocrite.

What are you even talking about? The vote in favor of having a January 6th commission was as bipartisan as it gets these days and that still isn’t good enough. The filibuster is killing bipartisanship.


Not even close. A few RINOs isn't bipartisan.


Yep, in the age of Trumpism a committee made up of equal number of Democrats and Republican is not bipartisan. :rolleyes:
 
'
The filth here and elsewhere that supported this attempted coup against our democracy continues. We must respond to it at every level. These people have committed and are committing treason to our nation.


The right overwhelmingly condemned going into the Capital.


NOPE! If that was the case you would condemn Trump who propagated gross lies that caused this and directed people to go to Capitol.

Only 28% of Republicans put any kind of responsibility on Trump



I didn't say they condemned Trump, moron. Trump had nothing to do with it.

We condemned the people who went into the Capital.


.....so Trump who told his MAGA crowd to march on Capitol to stop the stealing of the election...had nothing to do with people going to the Capitol to stop the certification of the election.

Really dummy? You seriously think anyone buys that horseshit?


Nowhere in that did Trump say anything about violence.

You're such a liar and a hypocrite. You know perfectly well there is no reference to violence in that and you know perfectly well that Democrats say that sort of thing all the time.

Grow up and stop being a dick


Trump made it very clear what he wanted them to do, and they tried to do it.

Your attempts at gaslighting fail!


His words quoted so far imply protests.

Show the words that meant violence, lying fascist dick. You can't, they don't exist.

That while you're fine with the extreme rhetoric from the Dems where you don't take it as violence, even Maxine Whack Job Waters who clearly is referencing violence


Here ya go:

'We will stop the steal'

'We will never give up. We will never concede. It doesn't happen'

'If you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore'

'We are going to the Capitol'


Trump not only incited the crowd that he spoke to, but there was a vanguard already attacking the Capitol before he finished his speech.

The entire event was planned, there was a conspiracy:



None of those refer to violence, and you know that you stupid lying fuck. And when Democrats say far more incendiary things, you purr like a kitten. Democrats just lie, lie, lie and lie, you're fundamentally dishonest people, fascists and racists


'fight like hell' is an explicit call for violence.

'Stop the steal', stated while the electoral college was in session is an explicit call for immediate action.

Please stop playing dumb. We all know what happened on Jan. 6. You will not gaslight us!


No it's not you fucking lying retard. So you SERIOUSLY claim that calls to fight are for you literal and only literal. Fight for it! And you go start punching and shooting people.

No you don't you fucking liar, you'd be in jail now. Your claim you are not a functioning adult is absolutely ridiculous.

But you are saying when Democrats say to fight that is a CALL FOR VIOLENCE and you will condemn them just as strongly as Trump? All I have to do is show you such a quote and you will demand they are impeached? You care claiming that?


From a Hillary Clinton Mailer in 2016:

Are you in? Your donation is about more than money. It’s your way of saying you’re ready to fight like hell to make sure Donald Trump never becomes president (and when you make your first donation today, we’ll send you a free sticker so you can show off your Team Hillary pride).

If it wasn't for false equivalence, you guys wouldn't have anything would you?


if it wasn't for your sides hypocrisy and willful blindness to it you wouldn't have shit.

Oooh, the "I know you are but what am I" strategy. So devious. :lol:


It's all dried up twats like you deserve.

And it isn't a false equivalence, it's showing how your side works. Be literalist morons when needed, ignorant when required.

Uh oh...Marty's getting pissy...breaking out the "twat". :lol:

It absolutely was a false equivalency. Hillary Clinton was not talking in front of an angry crowd she had been fomenting for weeks about a "stolen election" .


Only for you, saggy-tits.

No, she just said Trump can "never become president". and "fight like hell"

Trump told them to be peaceful, he never told them to break the law. Yet you give Hillary a pass for words like that, and bray and bitch about Trump.

It's called being a hack.

Only for me? I get under your skin like no other? Cool!

The people on Hillary's email list didn't storm the capital shouting to "stop the steal" and "kill Mike Pence"...probably because she hadn't been spending weeks cultivating them to do so.

His handlers made sure he said peaceful...once, but when the mob wasn't, he didn't do anything about it for hours...by all reports actually reveling in it. And then, when he did FINALLY say something, he said what? "I love you".


I tailor my responses, you get a different flavor of disdain then say Colefucks, JoeBlow, or Dunna7whatever.

he told them to follow the law.

Gosh, fickle as well as bitter and childish. You're just the whole kooky package!

He threw a rock and tried to hide his hand. MOST people realize it.



Only people with an axe to grind already come to the conclusion you did, how convenient.

Wrong, cultist. It's only the faithful worshippers of the Oompa Loompa Oligarch that don't see it for what it was...a failed insurrection spurred on by Trump.


Nope. Your side is still trying to get as much play out of this as you can, and the longer it goes on the more the story changes, and not in a good way for you. First it was planned, then it wasn't. First the mob killed the officer, then they didn't. Now all those crazy insurrection charges look like they will be brought down to trespass and assaults.

"My side" is trying to determine what happened and where the failures in security were. The fact that it was planned is not in contention. That is fully supported by the weapons and other paraphernalia found on the rioters, the bombs placed the night before and communications between members of certain groups.


The mob did kill an officer. If not for the mob, he would not be dead. The mob sent another into cardiac arrest.

Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?


your side is just trying to extend the Trumpbash and by extension marginalize your political opponents.

It's amazing how once you get a concept you refuse to change it even when shown it was wrong. it's the main failing of the progressive.

Orwell would be proud.


...you think Orwell wrote about....marginalization?

Here is a tissue poor mr.marginalized


No Orwell wrote about doublethink, which is what progs like you do to keep debunked items "real" in your dime store minds.


I think we should have TRIPPLE think. Where you, and I, and other guy , all agree that when US Congress gets attacked, we ought to have the congress do an investigation of the root causes so it does not EVER happen again.

But nope! According to you crazy fucking rightwingers US Capitol getting attacked isn't something worth examining, because it happened to be MAGAs that were doing the attack and it doesn't make your lord Trump and his "Stolen!" bullshit look too good.


Any actual crimes are being investigated and prosecuted if warranted.

What you want is a dog and pony show that you can jerk off to while you blather on about ORANGE MAN BAD.


That's a cool story bro...except there is actual reality of all the other Congressional investigations that ever took place.

We can have 8 various Congressional investigations of Benghazi, but supposedly this one, where Congress was attacked is a bridge too far? That's just nuts.
 
That's a cool story bro...except there is actual reality of all the other Congressional investigations that ever took place.

We can have 8 various Congressional investigations of Benghazi, but supposedly this one, where Congress was attacked is a bridge too far? That's just nuts.

The Senate already had one. There is no reason for another. The Nazis want it to stretch it out to the 2022 election where they will likely be in big trouble.

Benghazi is a foreign land far away where a lot of questions needed to be answered because we weren't there. A lot of questions like why no military response? Why didn't anybody try to help these people? What happened to the Ambassadors requests for more security? Did this really start over some amateur YouTube video that most nobody seen like Hillary and Rice said? Why did one solder point a laser pen at a target if a bomber was not in the air? What made him think there was one? What happened to all the money the Republican Congress allocated to increased security at that embassy?

There are no questions about the Capital. A bunch of yahoos broke into the place and one sat at Piglosi's desk. We know everything we need to know about these people. What we really need to know the Nazis won't answer, like was Piglosi advised by the Capital police chief of the FBI's information something like the could likely happen? Why didn't she do anything about it? Why are there hundreds of hours of videos they won't release to the public? What was the name of the black officer that killed the unarmed white female vet and what were his reasons?

The Nazis would be in charge of the commission regardless how bipartisan it is. They won't answer the questions we really need to know about because it would point the finger of fault at them.
 
The filth here and elsewhere that supported this attempted coup against our democracy continues. We must respond to it at every level. These people have committed and are committing treason to our nation.


You don't even know what treason is asshole. Beyond that you're projecting.
 
Trump is and was a buffoon. He had no idea of what the Presidents job is. He was able to get the support of idiots who also don't know what the President's job is.

Sure, he's not in the club of competent political leaders - people who know what they're doing.

Most of his supporters base their 'knowledge' of government on television dramas. They don't have a clue.

How many Trump supporters declare that Washington is corrupt, but have no proof whatsoever? They just magically 'know it'.

Yes, professional people who know how to run government resented this buffoon taking advantage of a legion of idiots to gain the Presidency.

Well that buffoon gave us the best economy in 50 years. That buffoon presided over several stock market highs. That buffoon's policies led us to a record high in median household income, and a new high in black meidan household income.

'
The filth here and elsewhere that supported this attempted coup against our democracy continues. We must respond to it at every level. These people have committed and are committing treason to our nation.


The right overwhelmingly condemned going into the Capital.


NOPE! If that was the case you would condemn Trump who propagated gross lies that caused this and directed people to go to Capitol.

Only 28% of Republicans put any kind of responsibility on Trump



I didn't say they condemned Trump, moron. Trump had nothing to do with it.

We condemned the people who went into the Capital.


.....so Trump who told his MAGA crowd to march on Capitol to stop the stealing of the election...had nothing to do with people going to the Capitol to stop the certification of the election.

Really dummy? You seriously think anyone buys that horseshit?


Nowhere in that did Trump say anything about violence.

You're such a liar and a hypocrite. You know perfectly well there is no reference to violence in that and you know perfectly well that Democrats say that sort of thing all the time.

Grow up and stop being a dick


Trump made it very clear what he wanted them to do, and they tried to do it.

Your attempts at gaslighting fail!


His words quoted so far imply protests.

Show the words that meant violence, lying fascist dick. You can't, they don't exist.

That while you're fine with the extreme rhetoric from the Dems where you don't take it as violence, even Maxine Whack Job Waters who clearly is referencing violence


Here ya go:

'We will stop the steal'

'We will never give up. We will never concede. It doesn't happen'

'If you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore'

'We are going to the Capitol'


Trump not only incited the crowd that he spoke to, but there was a vanguard already attacking the Capitol before he finished his speech.

The entire event was planned, there was a conspiracy:



None of those refer to violence, and you know that you stupid lying fuck. And when Democrats say far more incendiary things, you purr like a kitten. Democrats just lie, lie, lie and lie, you're fundamentally dishonest people, fascists and racists


'fight like hell' is an explicit call for violence.

'Stop the steal', stated while the electoral college was in session is an explicit call for immediate action.

Please stop playing dumb. We all know what happened on Jan. 6. You will not gaslight us!


No it's not you fucking lying retard. So you SERIOUSLY claim that calls to fight are for you literal and only literal. Fight for it! And you go start punching and shooting people.

No you don't you fucking liar, you'd be in jail now. Your claim you are not a functioning adult is absolutely ridiculous.

But you are saying when Democrats say to fight that is a CALL FOR VIOLENCE and you will condemn them just as strongly as Trump? All I have to do is show you such a quote and you will demand they are impeached? You care claiming that?


From a Hillary Clinton Mailer in 2016:

Are you in? Your donation is about more than money. It’s your way of saying you’re ready to fight like hell to make sure Donald Trump never becomes president (and when you make your first donation today, we’ll send you a free sticker so you can show off your Team Hillary pride).

If it wasn't for false equivalence, you guys wouldn't have anything would you?


if it wasn't for your sides hypocrisy and willful blindness to it you wouldn't have shit.

Oooh, the "I know you are but what am I" strategy. So devious. :lol:


It's all dried up twats like you deserve.

And it isn't a false equivalence, it's showing how your side works. Be literalist morons when needed, ignorant when required.

Uh oh...Marty's getting pissy...breaking out the "twat". :lol:

It absolutely was a false equivalency. Hillary Clinton was not talking in front of an angry crowd she had been fomenting for weeks about a "stolen election" .


Only for you, saggy-tits.

No, she just said Trump can "never become president". and "fight like hell"

Trump told them to be peaceful, he never told them to break the law. Yet you give Hillary a pass for words like that, and bray and bitch about Trump.

It's called being a hack.

Only for me? I get under your skin like no other? Cool!

The people on Hillary's email list didn't storm the capital shouting to "stop the steal" and "kill Mike Pence"...probably because she hadn't been spending weeks cultivating them to do so.

His handlers made sure he said peaceful...once, but when the mob wasn't, he didn't do anything about it for hours...by all reports actually reveling in it. And then, when he did FINALLY say something, he said what? "I love you".


I tailor my responses, you get a different flavor of disdain then say Colefucks, JoeBlow, or Dunna7whatever.

he told them to follow the law.

Gosh, fickle as well as bitter and childish. You're just the whole kooky package!

He threw a rock and tried to hide his hand. MOST people realize it.



Only people with an axe to grind already come to the conclusion you did, how convenient.

Wrong, cultist. It's only the faithful worshippers of the Oompa Loompa Oligarch that don't see it for what it was...a failed insurrection spurred on by Trump.


Nope. Your side is still trying to get as much play out of this as you can, and the longer it goes on the more the story changes, and not in a good way for you. First it was planned, then it wasn't. First the mob killed the officer, then they didn't. Now all those crazy insurrection charges look like they will be brought down to trespass and assaults.

"My side" is trying to determine what happened and where the failures in security were. The fact that it was planned is not in contention. That is fully supported by the weapons and other paraphernalia found on the rioters, the bombs placed the night before and communications between members of certain groups.


The mob did kill an officer. If not for the mob, he would not be dead. The mob sent another into cardiac arrest.

Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?


your side is just trying to extend the Trumpbash and by extension marginalize your political opponents.

It's amazing how once you get a concept you refuse to change it even when shown it was wrong. it's the main failing of the progressive.

Orwell would be proud.

Well, that was a spectacularly bad dodge. Why not answer the question?

Since you seem to think there are so many unanswered questions, are you in favor of a bipartisan commission to investigate?


It would never be "bipartisan"

It would be a shitshow TDS circle jerk.

54-35 in favor seems pretty fucking bipartisan in this day and age. Were the dozen or so Benghazi investigations bipartisan?


Were they called bipartisan?


54-35 what? what are you referencing?

Some poll?

Grossly misinformed I see...that would be the Senate vote on the January 6th commission that a majority of Americans want.

Here's the poll supporting that.



"Polls"


It's amazing how your side bitches about the Senate being unbalanced when you don't get your way, then run to it when it votes tilt in your favor.

it's called being a hypocrite.

What are you even talking about? The vote in favor of having a January 6th commission was as bipartisan as it gets these days and that still isn’t good enough. The filibuster is killing bipartisanship.


Not even close. A few RINOs isn't bipartisan.


Yep, in the age of Trumpism a committee made up of equal number of Democrats and Republican is not bipartisan. :rolleyes:


Again, some Republicans are nothing more than Democrats.
 
That's a cool story bro...except there is actual reality of all the other Congressional investigations that ever took place.

We can have 8 various Congressional investigations of Benghazi, but supposedly this one, where Congress was attacked is a bridge too far? That's just nuts.

The Senate already had one. There is no reason for another. The Nazis want it to stretch it out to the 2022 election where they will likely be in big trouble.

Benghazi is a foreign land far away where a lot of questions needed to be answered because we weren't there. A lot of questions like why no military response? Why didn't anybody try to help these people? What happened to the Ambassadors requests for more security? Did this really start over some amateur YouTube video that most nobody seen like Hillary and Rice said? Why did one solder point a laser pen at a target if a bomber was not in the air? What made him think there was one? What happened to all the money the Republican Congress allocated to increased security at that embassy?

There are no questions about the Capital. A bunch of yahoos broke into the place and one sat at Piglosi's desk. We know everything we need to know about these people. What we really need to know the Nazis won't answer, like was Piglosi advised by the Capital police chief of the FBI's information something like the could likely happen? Why didn't she do anything about it? Why are there hundreds of hours of videos they won't release to the public? What was the name of the black officer that killed the unarmed white female vet and what were his reasons?

The Nazis would be in charge of the commission regardless how bipartisan it is. They won't answer the questions we really need to know about because it would point the finger of fault at them.
No “the senate” didn’t already have one. The homeland security committee had one but it was very narrowly focused.

Show me a post where you or any one of your Trumplican pals complained about one of the 12+ Benghazi committees.
 

Forum List

Back
Top