PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
....to the Democrat Party.
1.Let’s face it….without the very successful fulfillment of its mission by government schooling, there’d be no DemocratSocialist Party.
I’m making an assumption here, but there is the possibility that huge numbers of the currently indoctrinated would have actually read books, studied history, and learned how correct Santayana was: “'Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it. '”
The point being that the current iteration of the Democrat Party stands for the very same aims and doctrines that the Communist Party USA did. They’re certainly no longer an American Party, and government schooling manages to keep that from its captive audience.
2. In the memoir “Wild Swans,” Jung Chang walks us through the turbulent Cultural Revolution of Mao, and what is striking is how similar the methods and motives are to those of our current Democrats/Liberals/Progressives.
While earlier Democrats put Americans in concentration camps, currently, this is how far they can go today: “…smearing opponents is not only a left-wing value; it is the left’s modus operandi. And the reason for that is: The left does not win through argument. It wins through smear. If you differ with the left, you are, by definition, sexist, racist, bigoted, intolerant, homophobic, Islamophobic, xenophobic, fascist, and/or a hater. The proof? You cannot name a single opponent of the left who has not been so labeled.” Why the Left Calls Good People Racist | RealClearPolitics
3. Here’s a beginning you may recognize: “…during the course of 1964, the emphasis began to shift … to the cult of Mao. … “boundless love and devotion to Chairman Mao.”… a pledge like: “I must study Chairman Mao’s works, heed Chairman Mao’s words, follow Chairman Mao’s instructions, and be a good soldier of Chairman Mao’s.”… to “submit ourselves unquestioningly to the control of the Great Leader”—Mao.” Chang, “Wild Swans”
Hollywood celebs actually made the same sort of pledges to Obama! Is there any real difference in that sort of deification of Mao Zedong than the Democrat referring to Obama as god, Jesus, and the messiah?
4. Even more similarity with the Democrats can be seen in the motto of Mao… “Never Forget Class Struggle”—a constant motivation seen in ‘the wealthy,’ ‘the rich,’ ‘income inequality,’…
“The Left has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it.” Dennis Prager
5. The Left is never about debating the issues, or discussing principles, it has a method for demonizing their political enemies, and that method is based on control of almost every avenue of the dissemination of information, and using that control to repeat the propaganda, giving the illusion that their slant is the truth. It is one more mirror image of how the public is manipulated under totalitarian regimes.
“In line with this, our teacher said we had to be careful whom we helped on our do- good errands. We must not help “class enemies.”… To fill us with hatred for class enemies, the schools started regular sessions of “recalling bitterness and reflecting on happiness,” at which older people would tell us about the miseries of pre-Communist China.” Chang, Op. Cit.
Wake up, Democrats, and notice the aroma of jasmine tea.
1.Let’s face it….without the very successful fulfillment of its mission by government schooling, there’d be no DemocratSocialist Party.
I’m making an assumption here, but there is the possibility that huge numbers of the currently indoctrinated would have actually read books, studied history, and learned how correct Santayana was: “'Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it. '”
The point being that the current iteration of the Democrat Party stands for the very same aims and doctrines that the Communist Party USA did. They’re certainly no longer an American Party, and government schooling manages to keep that from its captive audience.
2. In the memoir “Wild Swans,” Jung Chang walks us through the turbulent Cultural Revolution of Mao, and what is striking is how similar the methods and motives are to those of our current Democrats/Liberals/Progressives.
While earlier Democrats put Americans in concentration camps, currently, this is how far they can go today: “…smearing opponents is not only a left-wing value; it is the left’s modus operandi. And the reason for that is: The left does not win through argument. It wins through smear. If you differ with the left, you are, by definition, sexist, racist, bigoted, intolerant, homophobic, Islamophobic, xenophobic, fascist, and/or a hater. The proof? You cannot name a single opponent of the left who has not been so labeled.” Why the Left Calls Good People Racist | RealClearPolitics
3. Here’s a beginning you may recognize: “…during the course of 1964, the emphasis began to shift … to the cult of Mao. … “boundless love and devotion to Chairman Mao.”… a pledge like: “I must study Chairman Mao’s works, heed Chairman Mao’s words, follow Chairman Mao’s instructions, and be a good soldier of Chairman Mao’s.”… to “submit ourselves unquestioningly to the control of the Great Leader”—Mao.” Chang, “Wild Swans”
Hollywood celebs actually made the same sort of pledges to Obama! Is there any real difference in that sort of deification of Mao Zedong than the Democrat referring to Obama as god, Jesus, and the messiah?
4. Even more similarity with the Democrats can be seen in the motto of Mao… “Never Forget Class Struggle”—a constant motivation seen in ‘the wealthy,’ ‘the rich,’ ‘income inequality,’…
“The Left has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it.” Dennis Prager
5. The Left is never about debating the issues, or discussing principles, it has a method for demonizing their political enemies, and that method is based on control of almost every avenue of the dissemination of information, and using that control to repeat the propaganda, giving the illusion that their slant is the truth. It is one more mirror image of how the public is manipulated under totalitarian regimes.
“In line with this, our teacher said we had to be careful whom we helped on our do- good errands. We must not help “class enemies.”… To fill us with hatred for class enemies, the schools started regular sessions of “recalling bitterness and reflecting on happiness,” at which older people would tell us about the miseries of pre-Communist China.” Chang, Op. Cit.
Wake up, Democrats, and notice the aroma of jasmine tea.
Last edited: