The Impeachment Report Does Not Cite One Law Violated

[IM2]

You don't need to wait. The next Democrat primary is all white.

There hasn't been a democratic primary.

Debate. Yo black ass ain't represented bioch

The debates don't vote. And there damn sure ain't no black representation in the republican party.

And then they got escorted out by a black lol

That was a white dude who interrupted the meeting.

 

[IM2]

I don't need to idiot. Impeachment is not a legal situation. The report hasn't skipped anything. You're just a trump butt licking liar.

Thanks for admitting the impeachment attempt is really a coup attempt.

Wrong.

The constitution makes it so impeachment is political. Impeachment is a legitimate procedure to check a corrupt president. It is a disciplinary action taken when a president violates company policy.

Impeachment in general is legitimate, but this impeachment isn't.

What "company policy" are you referring to?

The executive branch of the US government. The policy is called the constitution.

This is a legitimate impeachment.

Don't flatter yourself. Trump didn't violate the Constitution.

He did indeed violate the constitution.

 

[bripat9643]

When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.

300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.

Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

This shows how ignorant some of us are about the government and constitution. trump has obstructed congress and I believe that was mentioned along with many other things. Your "they have no evidence" line is a lie. Period.

Cite the law then, Dufus. The 300 page report skipped that for some reason. Let Schiff know too.

I don't need to idiot. Impeachment is not a legal situation. The report hasn't skipped anything. You're just a trump butt licking liar.

Then just admit Trump didn't break any laws and that this impeachment is illegitimate.

Then just admit Trump didn't break any laws and that this impeachment is illegitimate.

Trump made an attempt to bribe a foreign government into interfering in the upcoming 2020 election, so he violated the US Constitution which is the bedrock of this country's legal system. He will be impeached, removed from office, prosecuted in court, convicted, and die in prison (just so you have something to look forward to)

Will you SOB?

Total ******* bullshit.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

And the majority of the public supports impeachment.

Entirely false. But it wouldn't matter anyways because Democrats are not smart enough to see the writting on the wall. If they want to sign their own pink slips fuckem

 

[IM2]

No it hasn't.

It sure as hell did.

Actually it hasn't. The real world exists outside of fox news.

Actually, it has. You're the last person who should be commenting on anyone's grasp of reality.

I am the first because I am right. There has been no show trial because the inquiry is not a trial dumb ass. And the majority of the public supports impeachment.

We know it's not a trial. It's a show trial.

It is neither.

 

[Care4all]

That a crime doesn't actually have to be committed in order to be impeached, weasel dick.

No one said it did. I simply noted the historical record. Dims can be as sleazy and despicable as they want to be.

in this case the House is following the Constitution to the letter making damn sure they protect themselves.

they have Trump by the shorthairs and that fat ass bastard knows it -

The Constitution doesn't say a thing about how an impeachment is supposed to be conducted, so your post is obvious bullshit. Why do the scumbags running the show trials need protection? From what, their own criminality? How is Schiff going protect himself for being called as a witness by the Senate?

The have nothing on Trump, and the whole country knows it.

the whole country knows they do have Trump, on several impeachable things like soliciting a foreign country to help him in his own 2020 election bid.

your side KNOWS he did this as well, you just don't care about our constitution and future of our Nation....

Only dumbasses know that. The show trial convinced the public that he didn't.

nope! If you actually watch the hearings, it convinced you that it is real and factual....

Trump was trying to cheat in the 2020 election coming up....

Would you be supporting Obama so feverishly if he were the cheater instead of Trump?

 

[bripat9643]

Thanks for admitting the impeachment attempt is really a coup attempt.

Wrong.

The constitution makes it so impeachment is political. Impeachment is a legitimate procedure to check a corrupt president. It is a disciplinary action taken when a president violates company policy.

Impeachment in general is legitimate, but this impeachment isn't.

What "company policy" are you referring to?

The executive branch of the US government. The policy is called the constitution.

This is a legitimate impeachment.

Hilarious. You can’t cite anything.

I don't have to. The president has violated the constitution. That's all I need to say.

Wrong.

 

[IM2]

This shows how ignorant some of us are about the government and constitution. trump has obstructed congress and I believe that was mentioned along with many other things. Your "they have no evidence" line is a lie. Period.

Cite the law then, Dufus. The 300 page report skipped that for some reason. Let Schiff know too.

I don't need to idiot. Impeachment is not a legal situation. The report hasn't skipped anything. You're just a trump butt licking liar.

Then just admit Trump didn't break any laws and that this impeachment is illegitimate.

Then just admit Trump didn't break any laws and that this impeachment is illegitimate.

Trump made an attempt to bribe a foreign government into interfering in the upcoming 2020 election, so he violated the US Constitution which is the bedrock of this country's legal system. He will be impeached, removed from office, prosecuted in court, convicted, and die in prison (just so you have something to look forward to)

Will you SOB?

Total ******* bullshit.

Truth.

 

[georgephillip]

When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.

300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.

Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

Trump solicited foreign interference in the upcoming 2020 election; would you worry more if Barry did it?

Cite the law, the 300 page report skipped it for some reason.

Cite the law, the 300 page report skipped it for some reason.

The Constitution specifically mentions bribery as an impeachable offense:

Scholars Call Trump’s Actions on Ukraine an Impeachable Abuse of Power

"The three law professors invited by Democrats said that Mr. Trump’s behavior was not only an egregious abuse of his power for personal gain, but the textbook definition of the kind of conduct that the nation’s founders sought to guard against when they drafted the impeachment clause of the Constitution.

"'If what we’re talking about is not impeachable, then nothing is impeachable,' Michael J. Gerhardt, a professor at the University of North Carolina, told the panel. 'This is precisely the misconduct that the framers created the Constitution, including impeachment, to protect against.'"

 

[SAYIT]

When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.

300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.

Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

The high crimes are enumerated between the lines and in code. It reads (and I quote) "TRUMP - IS - A - POOPY-HEAD."

 

[Weatherman2020]

When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.

300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.

Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

Trump solicited foreign interference in the upcoming 2020 election; would you worry more if Barry did it?

Cite the law, the 300 page report skipped it for some reason.

Cite the law, the 300 page report skipped it for some reason.

The Constitution specifically mentions bribery as an impeachable offense:

Scholars Call Trump’s Actions on Ukraine an Impeachable Abuse of Power

"The three law professors invited by Democrats said that Mr. Trump’s behavior was not only an egregious abuse of his power for personal gain, but the textbook definition of the kind of conduct that the nation’s founders sought to guard against when they drafted the impeachment clause of the Constitution.

"'If what we’re talking about is not impeachable, then nothing is impeachable,' Michael J. Gerhardt, a professor at the University of North Carolina, told the panel. 'This is precisely the misconduct that the framers created the Constitution, including impeachment, to protect against.'"

Google the Constitution and cite the section. Cutting and pasting deranged Leftards on the street means nothing.

 

[Weatherman2020]

No one said it did. I simply noted the historical record. Dims can be as sleazy and despicable as they want to be.

in this case the House is following the Constitution to the letter making damn sure they protect themselves.

they have Trump by the shorthairs and that fat ass bastard knows it -

The Constitution doesn't say a thing about how an impeachment is supposed to be conducted, so your post is obvious bullshit. Why do the scumbags running the show trials need protection? From what, their own criminality? How is Schiff going protect himself for being called as a witness by the Senate?

The have nothing on Trump, and the whole country knows it.

the whole country knows they do have Trump, on several impeachable things like soliciting a foreign country to help him in his own 2020 election bid.

your side KNOWS he did this as well, you just don't care about our constitution and future of our Nation....

Only dumbasses know that. The show trial convinced the public that he didn't.

nope! If you actually watch the hearings, it convinced you that it is real and factual....

Trump was trying to cheat in the 2020 election coming up....

Would you be supporting Obama so feverishly if he were the cheater instead of Trump?

Joe ain’t gonna get the nomination.

 

[Kondor3]

Their main argument will be Obstruction...

The question for the House is will they convict Trump on this and my answer is no...

Trump opponents - myself included - will be content with (a) Impeachment and (b) forcing Republicans to go on-record to defend your POS.

 

[bripat9643]

No one said it did. I simply noted the historical record. Dims can be as sleazy and despicable as they want to be.

in this case the House is following the Constitution to the letter making damn sure they protect themselves.

they have Trump by the shorthairs and that fat ass bastard knows it -

The Constitution doesn't say a thing about how an impeachment is supposed to be conducted, so your post is obvious bullshit. Why do the scumbags running the show trials need protection? From what, their own criminality? How is Schiff going protect himself for being called as a witness by the Senate?

The have nothing on Trump, and the whole country knows it.

the whole country knows they do have Trump, on several impeachable things like soliciting a foreign country to help him in his own 2020 election bid.

your side KNOWS he did this as well, you just don't care about our constitution and future of our Nation....

Only dumbasses know that. The show trial convinced the public that he didn't.

nope! If you actually watch the hearings, it convinced you that it is real and factual....

Trump was trying to cheat in the 2020 election coming up....

Would you be supporting Obama so feverishly if he were the cheater instead of Trump?

You can repeat this bullshit 10,000 times, but that doesn't mean anyone is going to believe it. I did watch the hearings, but all they did is convince me that Dims will believe anything.

What I believe is the evidence, not who's reporting it.

 

[bripat9643]

Thanks for admitting the impeachment attempt is really a coup attempt.

Wrong.

The constitution makes it so impeachment is political. Impeachment is a legitimate procedure to check a corrupt president. It is a disciplinary action taken when a president violates company policy.

Impeachment in general is legitimate, but this impeachment isn't.

What "company policy" are you referring to?

The executive branch of the US government. The policy is called the constitution.

This is a legitimate impeachment.

Don't flatter yourself. Trump didn't violate the Constitution.

He did indeed violate the constitution.

NOT. He didn't even violate any traffic laws.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

According to the democrat law professors:
You do not need a high crime to impeach, and a high crime does not necessarily justify impeachment?!

A 'high' crime is merely an act committed by someone in power such as a president. You need a high crime in order to impeach. Since this is a political process and since it's not possible to indict a sitting president by normal powers such as the DOJ and impeachment is not based on actual criminal law. Benjamin Franklin once said that impeachment was to be considered when the president "rendered himself obnoxious".

I wouldn't look to this report to draw out specific laws, I think this report is a summary of the presidents actions only. If you're looking for actual crimes to be listed whether they are in the criminal code or not then I'd look at the soon to be drawn articles of impeachment.

And there is the post that completely destroyed this worthless thread.

 

[L.K.Eder]

You mean besides the illegal solicitation of foreign assistance in our election, the illegal withholding of military aid, and obstruction of a congressional inquiry? Besides those things?

Do you folks have collective amnesia? Cuz you can't seem to keep these simple facts in your heads.

You expect too much. This board is rife with objective independent and unemotional thinkers who come to the conclusion that no bribing occurred because the words "this is not a bribe" are offered by the corrupt queef months after bribing just prior to the bribing being made public.

 

[IM2]

And the majority of the public supports impeachment.

Entirely false. But it wouldn't matter anyways because Democrats are not smart enough to see the writting on the wall. If they want to sign their own pink slips fuckem

It ain't false.

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - Trump Impeachment and Removal From Office: Support/Oppose

 

[Billy_Bob]

I just spent 50 minuets reading the dim wits try and defend their position and they failed miserably.

When this gets to the senate, it will be presided on by the Chief Justice Of the Supreme Court. He will use legally defined rules on evidence which will cause all the so called evidence collected by dim wits to be thrown out as hearsay and second hand innuendo. There will be nothing left for the senate to vote on and the Justice will have to declare it a gross negligence of those preparing the charges.

These left wing fools cant see the forest due to the trees.... And the trees are pulled back so hard the slap is going to launch them into oblivion... The smack down is going to be epic!

 

[Billy_Bob]

You mean besides the illegal solicitation of foreign assistance in our election, the illegal withholding of military aid, and obstruction of a congressional inquiry? Besides those things?

Do you folks have collective amnesia? Cuz you can't seem to keep these simple facts in your heads.

You expect too much. This board is rife with objective independent and unemotional thinkers who come to the conclusion that no bribing occurred because the words "this is not a bribe" are offered by the corrupt queef months after bribing just prior to the bribing being made public.

You idiots are so busy jumping to conclusions and fabricating things you dont know your asses from your mouths... Sounds the same and smells like shit!