The Homosexual Dilemma

[bodecea]

They do...unless when overiding a Presidential veto. But are they allowed to pass UnConstitutional laws? (Actually they are, but those laws will not stand)

Good point, Obamacare will not stand the test of constitutionality.

It already has.

Nope, the state mandate is about to be ruled unconstitutional. Then the whole house of cards will fall.

Interesting that you think so.

The arrogant shall fall and the meek will inherit the earth.

Yes...so the suggestion is that we should be meek in the face of Islamic Terrorism so that we can inherit the Earth...............no, wait.

 

[bodecea]

Just as with all the other unfulfilled prophecies the rubes here make, this one, too, will be conveniently forgotten when it does not come to pass.

its already happening dingleberry. The ACLU is gearing up for multiple marriage (polysexual). They will use exactly the same legal arguments currently being made for gay marriage, and they will have a valid precedent that the SC will have a very hard time denying.

That's interesting. Your source?

google it. I am here to guide you, not to teach you.

Doesn't exist outside your head then, eh?

I stand corrected:

ACLU of Utah to Join Polygamists in Bigamy Fight American Civil Liberties Union

Interesting read. But as the article says, there are a few legal hurdles that do not exist with gay marriage........so no, it is not exactly the same.

It will prevail nonetheless. We've gone from reading the Constitution for what it says to finding hidden meanings and rights. Pedophiles, polygamists, queers, and all other sexual deviants understand that the holes in the dike (no pun intended) mean that the whole thing is about to collapse.

There you go again.

 

[Lilah]

Just as with all the other unfulfilled prophecies the rubes here make, this one, too, will be conveniently forgotten when it does not come to pass.

its already happening dingleberry. The ACLU is gearing up for multiple marriage (polysexual). They will use exactly the same legal arguments currently being made for gay marriage, and they will have a valid precedent that the SC will have a very hard time denying.

That's interesting. Your source?

google it. I am here to guide you, not to teach you.

Doesn't exist outside your head then, eh?

I stand corrected:

ACLU of Utah to Join Polygamists in Bigamy Fight American Civil Liberties Union

Interesting read. But as the article says, there are a few legal hurdles that do not exist with gay marriage........so no, it is not exactly the same.

It will prevail nonetheless. We've gone from reading the Constitution for what it says to finding hidden meanings and rights. Pedophiles, polygamists, queers, and all other sexual deviants understand that the holes in the dike (no pun intended) mean that the whole thing is about to collapse.

Oopsy, I think you have a leak.

 

[JakeStarkey]

We the perceptive intellectuals are cursed with being 2 steps ahead of everyone else. What we're saying will soon become evident to all.

Just as with all the other unfulfilled prophecies the rubes here make, this one, too, will be conveniently forgotten when it does not come to pass.

its already happening dingleberry. The ACLU is gearing up for multiple marriage (polysexual). They will use exactly the same legal arguments currently being made for gay marriage, and they will have a valid precedent that the SC will have a very hard time denying.

They will fail, and the sun will rise in the east.

on what legal basis do you support discrimination against polygamists?

Immaterial question. Dismissed.

 

[JakeStarkey]

its already happening dingleberry. The ACLU is gearing up for multiple marriage (polysexual). They will use exactly the same legal arguments currently being made for gay marriage, and they will have a valid precedent that the SC will have a very hard time denying.

That's interesting. Your source?

google it. I am here to guide you, not to teach you.

Doesn't exist outside your head then, eh?

I stand corrected:

ACLU of Utah to Join Polygamists in Bigamy Fight American Civil Liberties Union

Interesting read. But as the article says, there are a few legal hurdles that do not exist with gay marriage........so no, it is not exactly the same.

It will prevail nonetheless. We've gone from reading the Constitution for what it says to finding hidden meanings and rights. Pedophiles, polygamists, queers, and all other sexual deviants understand that the holes in the dike (no pun intended) mean that the whole thing is about to collapse.

Oopsy, I think you have a leak.

Not at all. The document protects us from social defunctions like you and Where R My Keys.

 

[JakeStarkey]

They do...unless when overiding a Presidential veto. But are they allowed to pass UnConstitutional laws? (Actually they are, but those laws will not stand)

Good point, Obamacare will not stand the test of constitutionality.

It already has.

Nope, the state mandate is about to be ruled unconstitutional. Then the whole house of cards will fall.

Interesting that you think so.

The arrogant shall fall and the meek will inherit the earth.

Then the mandate is safe. If not, it will be fixed within two weeks.

 

[Redfish]

We the perceptive intellectuals are cursed with being 2 steps ahead of everyone else. What we're saying will soon become evident to all.

Just as with all the other unfulfilled prophecies the rubes here make, this one, too, will be conveniently forgotten when it does not come to pass.

its already happening dingleberry. The ACLU is gearing up for multiple marriage (polysexual). They will use exactly the same legal arguments currently being made for gay marriage, and they will have a valid precedent that the SC will have a very hard time denying.

They will fail, and the sun will rise in the east.

on what legal basis do you support discrimination against polygamists?

Immaterial question. Dismissed.

no its not, that is THE PRIMARY question in this debate. You want gay marriage but you want to prohibit polysexual marriage--------on what legal basis do you want to prohibit multiple marriage? If you answer truthfully you will repeat the exact reasons many give for opposing gay marriage, but you won't answer truthfully so its a moot point

 

[Redfish]

Good point, Obamacare will not stand the test of constitutionality.

It already has.

Nope, the state mandate is about to be ruled unconstitutional. Then the whole house of cards will fall.

Interesting that you think so.

The arrogant shall fall and the meek will inherit the earth.

Then the mandate is safe. If not, it will be fixed within two weeks.

obamacare is terrible legislation. it is hurting the people it claimed to be trying to help. it is costing the country billions and is driving doctors out of medicine. It must be repealed or drastically changed.

 

[g5000]

no its not, that is THE PRIMARY question in this debate. You want gay marriage but you want to prohibit polysexual marriage--------on what legal basis do you want to prohibit multiple marriage? If you answer truthfully you will repeat the exact reasons many give for opposing gay marriage, but you won't answer truthfully so its a moot point

So you need a rational basis for banning polygamy.

Here you go: The Perils of Polygamy

You really are attached to your slippery slope!

What next? "Then tell me why you can't marry a dog"?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Because no gender is being told they can't marry.

They are being told which gender they cannot marry. That is gender discrimination.

No different than being told what race you have to marry.

Your argument is as stupid as when interracial marriages were illegal and some bigoted idiot (redundant phrase) like you would say, "No race is being told they can't marry."

a union of two men or two women is NOT a marriage.

Yes, it is. Sorry about that!

They should be able to legally commit to each other and have that union recognized, but it is NOT a marriage.

Your stupid little semantics game is transparent.

If you folks down at Westboro Baptist don't want to call a gay marriage a marriage, that's your right. But you don't get to force them not to call their marriage a marriage.

As for having their union recognized, that won't be true until they receive the exact same state and federal government cash and prizes we heteros get for being married.

That's all they want. You can stomp your feet and blow a lot of retard smoke about the word "marriage", but until you get it through your thick skull that that is all they want then you will continue to sound like a retard.

Now focus: Government cash and prizes. They want the same. "Equal protection of the laws."

Get that through your head. It isn't about a word, idiot. It is about tangible things. Real world shit that actually matters. Legal stuff.

a gay civil union would give them exactly the same govt cash and prizes as a man/woman marriage.

IT IS ALL ABOUT THE WORD, DEAL WITH THAT REALITY.

They Sexually abnormal NEED it to be MARRIAGE... because they recognize the inherent legitimacy of Marriage.

What they're not sufficiently heeled, intellectually speaking, is that the standard which provides for the inherent legitimacy of Marriage, precludes their participation.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

no its not, that is THE PRIMARY question in this debate. You want gay marriage but you want to prohibit polysexual marriage--------on what legal basis do you want to prohibit multiple marriage? If you answer truthfully you will repeat the exact reasons many give for opposing gay marriage, but you won't answer truthfully so its a moot point

So you need a rational basis for banning polygamy.

Here you go: The Perils of Polygamy

You really are attached to your slippery slope!

What next? "Then tell me why you can't marry a dog"?

Why can't you marry a dog? Specifically?

 

[bodecea]

Just as with all the other unfulfilled prophecies the rubes here make, this one, too, will be conveniently forgotten when it does not come to pass.

its already happening dingleberry. The ACLU is gearing up for multiple marriage (polysexual). They will use exactly the same legal arguments currently being made for gay marriage, and they will have a valid precedent that the SC will have a very hard time denying.

They will fail, and the sun will rise in the east.

on what legal basis do you support discrimination against polygamists?

Immaterial question. Dismissed.

no its not, that is THE PRIMARY question in this debate. You want gay marriage but you want to prohibit polysexual marriage--------on what legal basis do you want to prohibit multiple marriage? If you answer truthfully you will repeat the exact reasons many give for opposing gay marriage, but you won't answer truthfully so its a moot point

Where have any of us said that?

 

[bodecea]

no its not, that is THE PRIMARY question in this debate. You want gay marriage but you want to prohibit polysexual marriage--------on what legal basis do you want to prohibit multiple marriage? If you answer truthfully you will repeat the exact reasons many give for opposing gay marriage, but you won't answer truthfully so its a moot point

So you need a rational basis for banning polygamy.

Here you go: The Perils of Polygamy

You really are attached to your slippery slope!

What next? "Then tell me why you can't marry a dog"?

Why can't you marry a dog? Specifically?

Marriage is a contract between two consenting adults (at least it is today) How can a dog consent? How can a dog understand and sign a contract?

 

[JakeStarkey]

no its not, that is THE PRIMARY question in this debate. You want gay marriage but you want to prohibit polysexual marriage--------on what legal basis do you want to prohibit multiple marriage? If you answer truthfully you will repeat the exact reasons many give for opposing gay marriage, but you won't answer truthfully so its a moot point

We are discussing marriage equality, not polygamy, which is in no way similar. You can say it is all you want, but you are wrong.

 

[JakeStarkey]

obamacare is terrible legislation. it is hurting the people it claimed to be trying to help. it is costing the country billions and is driving doctors out of medicine. It must be repealed or drastically changed.

No, it's not terrible. There are some fixes that will be done.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Where_r_my_Keys' attempts despite his inability to discuss this issue intellectually has given us months of entertainment.

 

[Syriusly]

Just as with all the other unfulfilled prophecies the rubes here make, this one, too, will be conveniently forgotten when it does not come to pass.

its already happening dingleberry. The ACLU is gearing up for multiple marriage (polysexual). They will use exactly the same legal arguments currently being made for gay marriage, and they will have a valid precedent that the SC will have a very hard time denying.

That's interesting. Your source?

google it. I am here to guide you, not to teach you.

Doesn't exist outside your head then, eh?

I stand corrected:

ACLU of Utah to Join Polygamists in Bigamy Fight American Civil Liberties Union

Interesting read. But as the article says, there are a few legal hurdles that do not exist with gay marriage........so no, it is not exactly the same.

It will prevail nonetheless. We've gone from reading the Constitution for what it says to finding hidden meanings and rights. Pedophiles, polygamists, queers, and all other sexual deviants understand that the holes in the dike (no pun intended) mean that the whole thing is about to collapse.

Yeah- once again- a bigot who can't tell the difference between raping a child and consensual sex between adults.

Do they send you to special schools to learn this crap?

 

[Syriusly]

It already has.

Nope, the state mandate is about to be ruled unconstitutional. Then the whole house of cards will fall.

Interesting that you think so.

The arrogant shall fall and the meek will inherit the earth.

Then the mandate is safe. If not, it will be fixed within two weeks.

obamacare is terrible legislation. it is hurting the people it claimed to be trying to help. it is costing the country billions and is driving doctors out of medicine. It must be repealed or drastically changed.

So is it proper to change Obamacare by going through courts- or only by changing it through legislation?

 

[Syriusly]

Just as with all the other unfulfilled prophecies the rubes here make, this one, too, will be conveniently forgotten when it does not come to pass.

its already happening dingleberry. The ACLU is gearing up for multiple marriage (polysexual). They will use exactly the same legal arguments currently being made for gay marriage, and they will have a valid precedent that the SC will have a very hard time denying.

They will fail, and the sun will rise in the east.

on what legal basis do you support discrimination against polygamists?

Immaterial question. Dismissed.

no its not, that is THE PRIMARY question in this debate. You want gay marriage but you want to prohibit polysexual marriage----t

Where did Jake say he wants to prohibit 'polysexual' marriage?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Redfish is flibbertegetting because he is not allowed to frame the discussion. Where r my Keys gets bent out of shape as well.