No. That's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is that if it's not against the law, it's not a ******* crime.
Jesus ******* Christ, are you this retarded in real life?
Once again you want the Nanny state to tell you what you can and not can do..
That's pathetic ...
Do you have a soul?
I'm going to try one more time, and if you don't get it then, I'm just going to give up, because you're too ******* stupid to live.
You are talking about feelings and morals - what you think people should do.
I am talking about the law. The law is not about what people
should do. It's about what our society has decided people will be
punished for doing.
What you should do, or not do, is a personal decision. Everyone is entitled to their own moral compass.
What the law says is not a personal decision. It's written down, in very specific ways, and it's the same for everyone. We don't, as a state, punish people in this country based on feelings. We punish people based on the law.
Now, if you think that a crime was committed during the "tarmac incident", it shouldn't be hard for you to tell me what law was broken.
If you
don't think a crime was committed, but still feel that something morally wrong happened, that's fine. Just say so, and we'll move on.