The Hidden Threat of Communism in America

The majority in the US advocates each person worship as they see fit.
And if the majority changes its mind. You ok with that?
It's the RWers who want to stop Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism, and some (notably the neoNazis) want to end Judaism.
They're poo poo heads!
The majority in the US advocates private or public education as people see fit.
As the majority sees fit.
It's the right that wants to end public education.
Well good for them. I don't agree with them on much these days, but that's better than nothing.
The price of gas is not subject to such advocacy.
Why not? If Congress passed a bill to lower gas prices, would you oppose it?
So it seems you've just indicted the right as the political force that represents what you oppose.
In a number of ways, yes (probably not what you're thinking of though). Of course, so does the left.
Do you find any time in the last 100 years to be a time when conditions in the US were to your liking?
Nothing is ever ideal. Some were better, some worse. How'd you like the last 100? Also, why are you asking?

Anyway, you've managed to successfully miss the entire point of my post. Congrats!
 
Well, I've never talked about or advocated communist ideology, and no communist socio-economic system has ever existed, right? You do know that don't you? Your article doesn't.
Of course you don’t advocate communism as communism is a stain on history, but that doesn’t guarantee that once you established socialism in this nation, it wouldn’t turn into communism.

You will play the Pied Piper of Socialism and advocate a system of government that has failed time and time again.



1654288059044.jpeg
 
And if the majority changes its mind. You ok with that?
Not on religion.

They're poo poo heads!
Who? Are you confirming my observation about the right and different religions? Seems so.

As the majority sees fit.
The "majority" has never tried to shut down public or private education. Only the right has.

Well good for them. I don't agree with them on much these days, but that's better than nothing.
Ok, so you agree that only the right fits your objection and not the majority regarding education.

Why not? If Congress passed a bill to lower gas prices, would you oppose it?
No. In fact I've been calling for Biden to do as Nixon did and impose a wage and price freeze. But the problem is not "shortage". The US is very, very near being self-sufficient in petroleum. We export more than we import. But the oil companies keep their ties to OPEC because they know OPEC will keep prices up and it give US oil companies cover for keeping their prices high and to reap huge profits when there really is no need. Look into it. The US oil industry raised prices while objecting that they had to do it to survive due to a "shortage", and at the same time their profits shot up.

Nothing is ever ideal. Some were better, some worse. How'd you like the last 100? Also, why are you asking?
I didn't ask about your "ideal". You're moving the goalposts to save your butt again. I'm wondering if there's anything you like or whether you're just fantasizing "good times under fascism".
 
Of course you don’t advocate communism as communism is a stain on history, but that doesn’t guarantee that once you established socialism in this nation, it wouldn’t turn into communism.

You will play the Pied Piper of Socialism and advocate a system of government that has failed time and time again.
I couldn't help but notice that you failed to answer my question as to whether you know that no communist socio-economic system has ever existed. Can't decide? Too complicated?

And here you're talking about some "socialist government" failing but apparently thinking about a socialist economy which never existed.
 
And STILL, none of you has attempted to define socialism or communism as socio-economic systems.
 
I'm wondering if there's anything you like or whether you're just fantasizing "good times under fascism".
You're just another partisan, douchebag troll. You're deliberately missing the point and refusing to engage honestly. Go fuck yourself. Painfully. With something rusty.
 
And STILL, none of you has attempted to define socialism or communism as socio-economic systems.
Oh, I've tried that dozens of times. No luck.

Either (a) they are simply ignorant on the topic but like using words that scare them, or (b) they know that admitting the actual definitions of the words would make them look foolish for constantly spraying them around out of context.

They simply repeat what Hannity and Tucker and Levin and the rest keep pounding into them 24/7/365. It's all they know. That's good enough for them.
 
Communist "intellectuals", arguing with commies on the ground, about who's the real comtard.

Newsflash: you're BOTH comtards. You're ALL comtards. You're all a bunch of deluded fools, swallowing all that old German social welfare bullshit.

I swear to God, more evil and more bullshit has come out of the Germans than just about any other culture in the world. They're way too smart for their own good. (lol - that was a dig, not a compliment). :p
 
Oh, I've tried that dozens of times. No luck.

Either (a) they are simply ignorant on the topic but like using words that scare them, or (b) they know that admitting the actual definitions of the words would make them look foolish for constantly spraying them around out of context.
Or, (c) they know exactly what socialism is and think it sucks.

Here's what I find confusing. Leftists spend half their time defending socialism and half their time denying that they're socialists. WTF? What kind of game are they playing?
 
You're just another partisan, douchebag troll. You're deliberately missing the point and refusing to engage honestly. Go fuck yourself. Painfully. With something rusty.
You're the troll who refuses to answer a direct question, and now you're trying to put me on the defensive so you can escape.
 
Oh, I've tried that dozens of times. No luck.

Either (a) they are simply ignorant on the topic but like using words that scare them, or (b) they know that admitting the actual definitions of the words would make them look foolish for constantly spraying them around out of context.

They simply repeat what Hannity and Tucker and Levin and the rest keep pounding into them 24/7/365. It's all they know. That's good enough for them.
It's my observation that there is a much greater prevalence of ignorance among the right than the left. By far.
 
Don't you think definitions are important?

What is the definition of the term, in your own words?
I'm fine with the standard dictionary definition. If you're not, if you have a "very special" definition, then you need to produce it.
What is the definition of the term, in the words of the average Trumpster?
I don't give a fuck.
Those are perfectly legitimate things to know before I respond.
Well, now you know.
 

Forum List

Back
Top