Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Radiating a negative P has to come from some source emitting it. So now you better explain how something that is an emitter of positive P can do that. Maybe all these strawman scientists who you say all say so put it in these textbooks for strawman brained people who keep publishing HYPERPHYSICS for uber "scientists" like you to quote.You built a strawman. "Negative emission" is a phrase you made up as far as the SB equation is concerned. No source we gave you says negative emission is another name for absorption.Shit is when somebody calls absorption a "negative emission"...and shit is when somebody else says all physicists and all text books call absorption "negative emission"
Wow that author calles it "Hyperphysics" and probably dresses up like Spock to look the part of a "hyper scientist."
I am still waiting for you to show me a statement from Planck or Einstein about something radiating negative P
Radiating a negative P has to come from some source emitting it.
Nothing is "radiating a negative P".
Net Power is either negative or positive.
If your strawman is warmer, its Net Power is positive, because it radiates more than it absorbs.
If your strawman is cooler, its Net Power is negative, because it absorbs more than it radiates.
In neither case is there a "negative emission"