The Hare-Brained Three-Hop Plot Against Trump

[alang1216]

…or, the Deep State attack on Trump.
In 9 posts in this thread, the full story of the last three year.



Let’s put it this way: Difference between Watergate and the Obama Spying?
Watergate was a failed attempt by a political party to spy on their political enemies.



1.The Deep State cannot allow an outsider to insinuate his way into their fiefdom, and block their system of spinning straw into gold….the worthless becoming millionaires. And Trump is the quintessential outsider….even, disrupter.
The exposure of the Biden Crime Family and their selling out our government for beaucoup bucks has revealed how so many politicians go to Washington to do good, and wind up doing well.

Can you say ‘Clintons…’


2.Not only was the Deep State, and everyone associated with it, in a huddle even before Trump was elected…but they were so confident of Hillary’s election, that they didn’t feel the need to hide it.

October 25, 2016...”NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.”
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?


Schumer Warns Trump: Intel Community Has Many Ways to 'Get Back at You'





“Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails “A text message sent by former FBI agent Peter Strzok to Lisa Page, a former FBI lawyer with whom Strzok was having an affair, in August 2016 that mentioned an "insurance policy" has long been a subject of concern among Republican investigators who believe there could have been a plot to undermine then-candidate Donald Trump.”
Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails




3. Hop #1
This was the plan….and mighty successful it was.

First, pick a target. Trump had several unknowns who gravitated to his campaign and the one they picked was Carter Page. Page had some legit business with Russians, and the Deep State think tank needed to use that Russian connection, no matter how peripheral, to hand around Trump’s neck.

Two considerations: 1) Page was squeaky clean, and had even worked for one of the agencies providing info on Russia to our government, and 2) the need for the cover of a warrant.


Next… how easily both considerations were covered.

Ironic that Hillary was laughed at when she talked about a vast Right Wing conspiracy. I guess we've come full circle with a vast Left Wing conspiracy.

 

[PoliticalChic]

…or, the Deep State attack on Trump.
In 9 posts in this thread, the full story of the last three year.



Let’s put it this way: Difference between Watergate and the Obama Spying?
Watergate was a failed attempt by a political party to spy on their political enemies.



1.The Deep State cannot allow an outsider to insinuate his way into their fiefdom, and block their system of spinning straw into gold….the worthless becoming millionaires. And Trump is the quintessential outsider….even, disrupter.
The exposure of the Biden Crime Family and their selling out our government for beaucoup bucks has revealed how so many politicians go to Washington to do good, and wind up doing well.

Can you say ‘Clintons…’


2.Not only was the Deep State, and everyone associated with it, in a huddle even before Trump was elected…but they were so confident of Hillary’s election, that they didn’t feel the need to hide it.

October 25, 2016...”NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.”
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?


Schumer Warns Trump: Intel Community Has Many Ways to 'Get Back at You'





“Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails “A text message sent by former FBI agent Peter Strzok to Lisa Page, a former FBI lawyer with whom Strzok was having an affair, in August 2016 that mentioned an "insurance policy" has long been a subject of concern among Republican investigators who believe there could have been a plot to undermine then-candidate Donald Trump.”
Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails




3. Hop #1
This was the plan….and mighty successful it was.

First, pick a target. Trump had several unknowns who gravitated to his campaign and the one they picked was Carter Page. Page had some legit business with Russians, and the Deep State think tank needed to use that Russian connection, no matter how peripheral, to hand around Trump’s neck.

Two considerations: 1) Page was squeaky clean, and had even worked for one of the agencies providing info on Russia to our government, and 2) the need for the cover of a warrant.


Next… how easily both considerations were covered.

Ironic that Hillary was laughed at when she talked about a vast Right Wing conspiracy. I guess we've come full circle with a vast Left Wing conspiracy.

I can see where the truth gets under the scales of you brain-less government school grads, so it comes as no surprise that the thread would irk you no end....


....and, inadvertently admitting same, by linking to it.....

...what you couldn't do was find a single error in this perfectly constructed, well documented, accurate OP.


Wanna try again, you dunce?


…or, the Deep State attack on Trump.
In 9 posts in this thread, the full story of the last three year.



Let’s put it this way: Difference between Watergate and the Obama Spying?
Watergate was a failed attempt by a political party to spy on their political enemies.



1.The Deep State cannot allow an outsider to insinuate his way into their fiefdom, and block their system of spinning straw into gold….the worthless becoming millionaires. And Trump is the quintessential outsider….even, disrupter.
The exposure of the Biden Crime Family and their selling out our government for beaucoup bucks has revealed how so many politicians go to Washington to do good, and wind up doing well.

Can you say ‘Clintons…’


2.Not only was the Deep State, and everyone associated with it, in a huddle even before Trump was elected…but they were so confident of Hillary’s election, that they didn’t feel the need to hide it.

October 25, 2016...”NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.”
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?


Schumer Warns Trump: Intel Community Has Many Ways to 'Get Back at You'





“Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails “A text message sent by former FBI agent Peter Strzok to Lisa Page, a former FBI lawyer with whom Strzok was having an affair, in August 2016 that mentioned an "insurance policy" has long been a subject of concern among Republican investigators who believe there could have been a plot to undermine then-candidate Donald Trump.”
Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails




3. Hop #1
This was the plan….and mighty successful it was.

First, pick a target. Trump had several unknowns who gravitated to his campaign and the one they picked was Carter Page. Page had some legit business with Russians, and the Deep State think tank needed to use that Russian connection, no matter how peripheral, to hand around Trump’s neck.

Two considerations: 1) Page was squeaky clean, and had even worked for one of the agencies providing info on Russia to our government, and 2) the need for the cover of a warrant.


Next… how easily both considerations were covered.

 

[alang1216]

the Deep State attack on Trump.

What is this Deep State that you just want us to accept exists? Do they have meetings? A secret handshake? Or are these just government officials who, like most Americans, don't care for Trump? Did everyone in the Gov't and the military love Obama?

You are deeply and fundamentally wrong.

 

[PoliticalChic]

the Deep State attack on Trump.

What is this Deep State that you just want us to accept exists? Do they have meetings? A secret handshake? Or are these just government officials who, like most Americans, don't care for Trump? Did everyone in the Gov't and the military love Obama?

You are deeply and fundamentally wrong.

Let's check:
“Those who roped Mr. Mueller, about whom a halo of impeccable integrity had been cast, into this role had such high hopes. They were sure that his team of crack Trump-hating, Hillary Clinton-loving legal beagles would find something that could be used to destroy Trump and his odious presidency.

Alas for the Deep State, such was not to be. In a Thud Heard Round the World, Mueller’s investigative report landed like a telephone book on the Deep State’s stoop, and with a comparable amount of excitement contained within.
They found nothing.

No Russian-Trump collusion and no obstruction (though deftly trying to leave the door open on that score with spurious claims that it was up to Congress to determine whether obstruction occurred.)”
William Taylor Joins Robert Mueller on the Ash Heap of the Deep State's Altar



"Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump"
Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump | Investor's Business Daily




Here, from the former CIA Moscow Station head...


1. ".... the denizens of the Deep State that everyone in Washington likes to tell us doesn’t exist....made up of thousands of similarly credentialed, remarkably “un-diverse” civil servants and political appointees who saw themselves promoted rapidly during the eight years of the Obama administration. The appointees have left, but make no mistake — the progressive civil servants remain.


2. The present culture of the intelligence community and the shameless political shenanigans of the Obama administration combined to create this disaster. ....CIA leadership famously stood up to the Nixon administration when asked to domestically spy on Justice during Watergate, for example.

3. It seems that today we lack the character and the competence to ensure that the intelligence community honors the trust of the American people."
How the intel community was turned into a political weapon against President Trump



“People capable of feeling shame would not have immediately followed up the Russiagate hoax fiasco with another transparently phony—and in “substance” nearly identical—attempt to remove President Trump from office, overturn the 2016 election, and shower deplorable-Americans with contempt and hatred. But our ruling elites have no shame.”
The Empire Strikes Back


Those people….described here…..ran, and testified at the recent Democrat committee hearing, mislabeled as the ‘Impeachment Inquiry,’…

“Beginning in the late 19th century and intensifying in the mid-1960s, elites inside and outside our government have centralized authority in a “fourth branch,” the executive branch’s agencies and bureaucracies. Marini refers to those institutions, the people in them, and their governing philosophy and methods as “the administrative state.” Administrative state rule is fundamentally anti-democratic and anti-constitutional, intended to be rule by “expert consensus.” Ibid.



This is the Deep State.





Now, on the topic of the existence of the Deep State....
"And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field." Dean H. Kenyon (Professor of Biology, San Francisco State University), affidavit presented to the U.S. Supreme Court, No. 85-1513, Brief of Appellants, prepared under the direction of William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, October 1985, p. A-16.



Of which is there more proof....the Deep State, or evolution?

 

[PoliticalChic]

…or, the Deep State attack on Trump.
In 9 posts in this thread, the full story of the last three year.



Let’s put it this way: Difference between Watergate and the Obama Spying?
Watergate was a failed attempt by a political party to spy on their political enemies.



1.The Deep State cannot allow an outsider to insinuate his way into their fiefdom, and block their system of spinning straw into gold….the worthless becoming millionaires. And Trump is the quintessential outsider….even, disrupter.
The exposure of the Biden Crime Family and their selling out our government for beaucoup bucks has revealed how so many politicians go to Washington to do good, and wind up doing well.

Can you say ‘Clintons…’


2.Not only was the Deep State, and everyone associated with it, in a huddle even before Trump was elected…but they were so confident of Hillary’s election, that they didn’t feel the need to hide it.

October 25, 2016...”NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.”
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?


Schumer Warns Trump: Intel Community Has Many Ways to 'Get Back at You'





“Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails “A text message sent by former FBI agent Peter Strzok to Lisa Page, a former FBI lawyer with whom Strzok was having an affair, in August 2016 that mentioned an "insurance policy" has long been a subject of concern among Republican investigators who believe there could have been a plot to undermine then-candidate Donald Trump.”
Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails




3. Hop #1
This was the plan….and mighty successful it was.

First, pick a target. Trump had several unknowns who gravitated to his campaign and the one they picked was Carter Page. Page had some legit business with Russians, and the Deep State think tank needed to use that Russian connection, no matter how peripheral, to hand around Trump’s neck.

Two considerations: 1) Page was squeaky clean, and had even worked for one of the agencies providing info on Russia to our government, and 2) the need for the cover of a warrant.


Next… how easily both considerations were covered.

Translation. Another pack of lies.

There is no deep state. You couldn't sell that in a James Bond picture. Yet Trump supporters have no problems with it as it allows you people to ignore reality. That all of Trump's problems are self-inflicted.

There is no Biden crime family. Trump has used his Presidency to line his pockets. His Presidency and his businesses are fused together into a money making enterprise.

There was no insurance policy. Strzok was clearly joking. You ignore the fact that Strzok also supported re-opening the investigation into Clinton's e-mails the few weeks before the election. He was hardly a partisan.

There is a huge problem with Page. He was not connected with the Trump campaign when they sought the warrant to monitor Page. Page had extensive ties to Russia.

 

[alang1216]

the Deep State attack on Trump.

What is this Deep State that you just want us to accept exists? Do they have meetings? A secret handshake? Or are these just government officials who, like most Americans, don't care for Trump? Did everyone in the Gov't and the military love Obama?

You are deeply and fundamentally wrong.

Let's check:
“Those who roped Mr. Mueller, about whom a halo of impeccable integrity had been cast, into this role had such high hopes. They were sure that his team of crack Trump-hating, Hillary Clinton-loving legal beagles would find something that could be used to destroy Trump and his odious presidency.

Alas for the Deep State, such was not to be. In a Thud Heard Round the World, Mueller’s investigative report landed like a telephone book on the Deep State’s stoop, and with a comparable amount of excitement contained within.
They found nothing.

No Russian-Trump collusion and no obstruction (though deftly trying to leave the door open on that score with spurious claims that it was up to Congress to determine whether obstruction occurred.)”
William Taylor Joins Robert Mueller on the Ash Heap of the Deep State's Altar



"Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump"
Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump | Investor's Business Daily




Here, from the former CIA Moscow Station head...


1. ".... the denizens of the Deep State that everyone in Washington likes to tell us doesn’t exist....made up of thousands of similarly credentialed, remarkably “un-diverse” civil servants and political appointees who saw themselves promoted rapidly during the eight years of the Obama administration. The appointees have left, but make no mistake — the progressive civil servants remain.


2. The present culture of the intelligence community and the shameless political shenanigans of the Obama administration combined to create this disaster. ....CIA leadership famously stood up to the Nixon administration when asked to domestically spy on Justice during Watergate, for example.

3. It seems that today we lack the character and the competence to ensure that the intelligence community honors the trust of the American people."
How the intel community was turned into a political weapon against President Trump



“People capable of feeling shame would not have immediately followed up the Russiagate hoax fiasco with another transparently phony—and in “substance” nearly identical—attempt to remove President Trump from office, overturn the 2016 election, and shower deplorable-Americans with contempt and hatred. But our ruling elites have no shame.”
The Empire Strikes Back


Those people….described here…..ran, and testified at the recent Democrat committee hearing, mislabeled as the ‘Impeachment Inquiry,’…

“Beginning in the late 19th century and intensifying in the mid-1960s, elites inside and outside our government have centralized authority in a “fourth branch,” the executive branch’s agencies and bureaucracies. Marini refers to those institutions, the people in them, and their governing philosophy and methods as “the administrative state.” Administrative state rule is fundamentally anti-democratic and anti-constitutional, intended to be rule by “expert consensus.” Ibid.



This is the Deep State.





Now, on the topic of the existence of the Deep State....
"And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field." Dean H. Kenyon (Professor of Biology, San Francisco State University), affidavit presented to the U.S. Supreme Court, No. 85-1513, Brief of Appellants, prepared under the direction of William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, October 1985, p. A-16.



Of which is there more proof....the Deep State, or evolution?

Telling. Contrasting a vast left wing conspiracy with a century-old scientific conspiracy. I'm detecting a pattern here. Let me know if you need more tin foil.

 

[PoliticalChic]

the Deep State attack on Trump.

What is this Deep State that you just want us to accept exists? Do they have meetings? A secret handshake? Or are these just government officials who, like most Americans, don't care for Trump? Did everyone in the Gov't and the military love Obama?

You are deeply and fundamentally wrong.

Let's check:
“Those who roped Mr. Mueller, about whom a halo of impeccable integrity had been cast, into this role had such high hopes. They were sure that his team of crack Trump-hating, Hillary Clinton-loving legal beagles would find something that could be used to destroy Trump and his odious presidency.

Alas for the Deep State, such was not to be. In a Thud Heard Round the World, Mueller’s investigative report landed like a telephone book on the Deep State’s stoop, and with a comparable amount of excitement contained within.
They found nothing.

No Russian-Trump collusion and no obstruction (though deftly trying to leave the door open on that score with spurious claims that it was up to Congress to determine whether obstruction occurred.)”
William Taylor Joins Robert Mueller on the Ash Heap of the Deep State's Altar



"Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump"
Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump | Investor's Business Daily




Here, from the former CIA Moscow Station head...


1. ".... the denizens of the Deep State that everyone in Washington likes to tell us doesn’t exist....made up of thousands of similarly credentialed, remarkably “un-diverse” civil servants and political appointees who saw themselves promoted rapidly during the eight years of the Obama administration. The appointees have left, but make no mistake — the progressive civil servants remain.


2. The present culture of the intelligence community and the shameless political shenanigans of the Obama administration combined to create this disaster. ....CIA leadership famously stood up to the Nixon administration when asked to domestically spy on Justice during Watergate, for example.

3. It seems that today we lack the character and the competence to ensure that the intelligence community honors the trust of the American people."
How the intel community was turned into a political weapon against President Trump



“People capable of feeling shame would not have immediately followed up the Russiagate hoax fiasco with another transparently phony—and in “substance” nearly identical—attempt to remove President Trump from office, overturn the 2016 election, and shower deplorable-Americans with contempt and hatred. But our ruling elites have no shame.”
The Empire Strikes Back


Those people….described here…..ran, and testified at the recent Democrat committee hearing, mislabeled as the ‘Impeachment Inquiry,’…

“Beginning in the late 19th century and intensifying in the mid-1960s, elites inside and outside our government have centralized authority in a “fourth branch,” the executive branch’s agencies and bureaucracies. Marini refers to those institutions, the people in them, and their governing philosophy and methods as “the administrative state.” Administrative state rule is fundamentally anti-democratic and anti-constitutional, intended to be rule by “expert consensus.” Ibid.



This is the Deep State.





Now, on the topic of the existence of the Deep State....
"And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field." Dean H. Kenyon (Professor of Biology, San Francisco State University), affidavit presented to the U.S. Supreme Court, No. 85-1513, Brief of Appellants, prepared under the direction of William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, October 1985, p. A-16.



Of which is there more proof....the Deep State, or evolution?

Telling. Contrasting a vast left wing conspiracy with a century-old scientific conspiracy. I'm detecting a pattern here. Let me know if you need more tin foil.

Soooo.....what's the reason you couldn't answer the query?

 

[alang1216]

the Deep State attack on Trump.

What is this Deep State that you just want us to accept exists? Do they have meetings? A secret handshake? Or are these just government officials who, like most Americans, don't care for Trump? Did everyone in the Gov't and the military love Obama?

You are deeply and fundamentally wrong.

Let's check:
“Those who roped Mr. Mueller, about whom a halo of impeccable integrity had been cast, into this role had such high hopes. They were sure that his team of crack Trump-hating, Hillary Clinton-loving legal beagles would find something that could be used to destroy Trump and his odious presidency.

Alas for the Deep State, such was not to be. In a Thud Heard Round the World, Mueller’s investigative report landed like a telephone book on the Deep State’s stoop, and with a comparable amount of excitement contained within.
They found nothing.

No Russian-Trump collusion and no obstruction (though deftly trying to leave the door open on that score with spurious claims that it was up to Congress to determine whether obstruction occurred.)”
William Taylor Joins Robert Mueller on the Ash Heap of the Deep State's Altar



"Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump"
Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump | Investor's Business Daily




Here, from the former CIA Moscow Station head...


1. ".... the denizens of the Deep State that everyone in Washington likes to tell us doesn’t exist....made up of thousands of similarly credentialed, remarkably “un-diverse” civil servants and political appointees who saw themselves promoted rapidly during the eight years of the Obama administration. The appointees have left, but make no mistake — the progressive civil servants remain.


2. The present culture of the intelligence community and the shameless political shenanigans of the Obama administration combined to create this disaster. ....CIA leadership famously stood up to the Nixon administration when asked to domestically spy on Justice during Watergate, for example.

3. It seems that today we lack the character and the competence to ensure that the intelligence community honors the trust of the American people."
How the intel community was turned into a political weapon against President Trump



“People capable of feeling shame would not have immediately followed up the Russiagate hoax fiasco with another transparently phony—and in “substance” nearly identical—attempt to remove President Trump from office, overturn the 2016 election, and shower deplorable-Americans with contempt and hatred. But our ruling elites have no shame.”
The Empire Strikes Back


Those people….described here…..ran, and testified at the recent Democrat committee hearing, mislabeled as the ‘Impeachment Inquiry,’…

“Beginning in the late 19th century and intensifying in the mid-1960s, elites inside and outside our government have centralized authority in a “fourth branch,” the executive branch’s agencies and bureaucracies. Marini refers to those institutions, the people in them, and their governing philosophy and methods as “the administrative state.” Administrative state rule is fundamentally anti-democratic and anti-constitutional, intended to be rule by “expert consensus.” Ibid.



This is the Deep State.





Now, on the topic of the existence of the Deep State....
"And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field." Dean H. Kenyon (Professor of Biology, San Francisco State University), affidavit presented to the U.S. Supreme Court, No. 85-1513, Brief of Appellants, prepared under the direction of William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, October 1985, p. A-16.



Of which is there more proof....the Deep State, or evolution?

Telling. Contrasting a vast left wing conspiracy with a century-old scientific conspiracy. I'm detecting a pattern here. Let me know if you need more tin foil.

Soooo.....what's the reason you couldn't answer the query?

The answer is simple, you have not convinced me there is any such thing as a 'Deep Start' whereas evolution (descent from a common ancestor) is a fact. Proof of the later, no proof of the former.

 

[PoliticalChic]

the Deep State attack on Trump.

What is this Deep State that you just want us to accept exists? Do they have meetings? A secret handshake? Or are these just government officials who, like most Americans, don't care for Trump? Did everyone in the Gov't and the military love Obama?

You are deeply and fundamentally wrong.

Let's check:
“Those who roped Mr. Mueller, about whom a halo of impeccable integrity had been cast, into this role had such high hopes. They were sure that his team of crack Trump-hating, Hillary Clinton-loving legal beagles would find something that could be used to destroy Trump and his odious presidency.

Alas for the Deep State, such was not to be. In a Thud Heard Round the World, Mueller’s investigative report landed like a telephone book on the Deep State’s stoop, and with a comparable amount of excitement contained within.
They found nothing.

No Russian-Trump collusion and no obstruction (though deftly trying to leave the door open on that score with spurious claims that it was up to Congress to determine whether obstruction occurred.)”
William Taylor Joins Robert Mueller on the Ash Heap of the Deep State's Altar



"Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump"
Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump | Investor's Business Daily




Here, from the former CIA Moscow Station head...


1. ".... the denizens of the Deep State that everyone in Washington likes to tell us doesn’t exist....made up of thousands of similarly credentialed, remarkably “un-diverse” civil servants and political appointees who saw themselves promoted rapidly during the eight years of the Obama administration. The appointees have left, but make no mistake — the progressive civil servants remain.


2. The present culture of the intelligence community and the shameless political shenanigans of the Obama administration combined to create this disaster. ....CIA leadership famously stood up to the Nixon administration when asked to domestically spy on Justice during Watergate, for example.

3. It seems that today we lack the character and the competence to ensure that the intelligence community honors the trust of the American people."
How the intel community was turned into a political weapon against President Trump



“People capable of feeling shame would not have immediately followed up the Russiagate hoax fiasco with another transparently phony—and in “substance” nearly identical—attempt to remove President Trump from office, overturn the 2016 election, and shower deplorable-Americans with contempt and hatred. But our ruling elites have no shame.”
The Empire Strikes Back


Those people….described here…..ran, and testified at the recent Democrat committee hearing, mislabeled as the ‘Impeachment Inquiry,’…

“Beginning in the late 19th century and intensifying in the mid-1960s, elites inside and outside our government have centralized authority in a “fourth branch,” the executive branch’s agencies and bureaucracies. Marini refers to those institutions, the people in them, and their governing philosophy and methods as “the administrative state.” Administrative state rule is fundamentally anti-democratic and anti-constitutional, intended to be rule by “expert consensus.” Ibid.



This is the Deep State.





Now, on the topic of the existence of the Deep State....
"And let us dispose of a common misconception. The complete transmutation of even one animal species into a different species has never been directly observed either in the laboratory or in the field." Dean H. Kenyon (Professor of Biology, San Francisco State University), affidavit presented to the U.S. Supreme Court, No. 85-1513, Brief of Appellants, prepared under the direction of William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana, October 1985, p. A-16.



Of which is there more proof....the Deep State, or evolution?

Telling. Contrasting a vast left wing conspiracy with a century-old scientific conspiracy. I'm detecting a pattern here. Let me know if you need more tin foil.

Soooo.....what's the reason you couldn't answer the query?

The answer is simple, you have not convinced me there is any such thing as a 'Deep Start' whereas evolution (descent from a common ancestor) is a fact. Proof of the later, no proof of the former.

But every reader knows you were never 'convincible'....you're a simple-minded government school grad.....isn't that the case.


Here's the proof: "evolution (descent from a common ancestor) is a fact."

Only a fool....er, government school grad could say that.




Can you provide some of that 'proof' of evolution????

 

[PoliticalChic]

8. “…the Department of Justice released copies of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) applications used to obtain a secret court order to conduct electronic surveillance on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

The documents also provide additional evidence that the Obama administration’s Department of Justice and career DOJ, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and State Department employees misused the FISA court system to spy on the Trump campaign.


… it now appears that the Obama administration’s State Department bore equal responsibility for presenting the FISA court unverified hearsay to justify spying on the Trump campaign.
In charging the DOJ and FBI with abusing the FISA system, Republicans have long maintained that the FISA applications relied heavily on the Steele dossier’s unverified information—information the former British spook compiled for the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee.

Democrats challenge that assertion, stressing the bulk of the FISA applications and other information included. Although the redactions make it impossible to fully refute these claims, the FISA applications demonstrate the DOJ’s heavy reliance on the Steele dossier.

Only a relatively small portion of the total applications go to the question of whether probable cause exists to surveil Page. Those sections rely on the information the Steele dossier provided.”
10 Key Takeaways From Released FISA Warrants Against Carter Page

 

[MACAULAY]

…or, the Deep State attack on Trump.
In 9 posts in this thread, the full story of the last three year.



Let’s put it this way: Difference between Watergate and the Obama Spying?
Watergate was a failed attempt by a political party to spy on their political enemies.



1.The Deep State cannot allow an outsider to insinuate his way into their fiefdom, and block their system of spinning straw into gold….the worthless becoming millionaires. And Trump is the quintessential outsider….even, disrupter.
The exposure of the Biden Crime Family and their selling out our government for beaucoup bucks has revealed how so many politicians go to Washington to do good, and wind up doing well.

Can you say ‘Clintons…’


2.Not only was the Deep State, and everyone associated with it, in a huddle even before Trump was elected…but they were so confident of Hillary’s election, that they didn’t feel the need to hide it.

October 25, 2016...”NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.”
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?


Schumer Warns Trump: Intel Community Has Many Ways to 'Get Back at You'





“Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails “A text message sent by former FBI agent Peter Strzok to Lisa Page, a former FBI lawyer with whom Strzok was having an affair, in August 2016 that mentioned an "insurance policy" has long been a subject of concern among Republican investigators who believe there could have been a plot to undermine then-candidate Donald Trump.”
Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails




3. Hop #1
This was the plan….and mighty successful it was.

First, pick a target. Trump had several unknowns who gravitated to his campaign and the one they picked was Carter Page. Page had some legit business with Russians, and the Deep State think tank needed to use that Russian connection, no matter how peripheral, to hand around Trump’s neck.

Two considerations: 1) Page was squeaky clean, and had even worked for one of the agencies providing info on Russia to our government, and 2) the need for the cover of a warrant.


Next… how easily both considerations were covered.

Translation. Another pack of lies.

There is no deep state. You couldn't sell that in a James Bond picture. Yet Trump supporters have no problems with it as it allows you people to ignore reality. That all of Trump's problems are self-inflicted.

There is no Biden crime family. Trump has used his Presidency to line his pockets. His Presidency and his businesses are fused together into a money making enterprise.

There was no insurance policy. Strzok was clearly joking. You ignore the fact that Strzok also supported re-opening the investigation into Clinton's e-mails the few weeks before the election. He was hardly a partisan.

There is a huge problem with Page. He was not connected with the Trump campaign when they sought the warrant to monitor Page. Page had extensive ties to Russia.

________

This post brings two things immediately to mind:

1) Blind Partisan; and

2) Dumb-Ass.

 

[PoliticalChic]

…or, the Deep State attack on Trump.
In 9 posts in this thread, the full story of the last three year.



Let’s put it this way: Difference between Watergate and the Obama Spying?
Watergate was a failed attempt by a political party to spy on their political enemies.



1.The Deep State cannot allow an outsider to insinuate his way into their fiefdom, and block their system of spinning straw into gold….the worthless becoming millionaires. And Trump is the quintessential outsider….even, disrupter.
The exposure of the Biden Crime Family and their selling out our government for beaucoup bucks has revealed how so many politicians go to Washington to do good, and wind up doing well.

Can you say ‘Clintons…’


2.Not only was the Deep State, and everyone associated with it, in a huddle even before Trump was elected…but they were so confident of Hillary’s election, that they didn’t feel the need to hide it.

October 25, 2016...”NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.”
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?


Schumer Warns Trump: Intel Community Has Many Ways to 'Get Back at You'





“Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails “A text message sent by former FBI agent Peter Strzok to Lisa Page, a former FBI lawyer with whom Strzok was having an affair, in August 2016 that mentioned an "insurance policy" has long been a subject of concern among Republican investigators who believe there could have been a plot to undermine then-candidate Donald Trump.”
Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails




3. Hop #1
This was the plan….and mighty successful it was.

First, pick a target. Trump had several unknowns who gravitated to his campaign and the one they picked was Carter Page. Page had some legit business with Russians, and the Deep State think tank needed to use that Russian connection, no matter how peripheral, to hand around Trump’s neck.

Two considerations: 1) Page was squeaky clean, and had even worked for one of the agencies providing info on Russia to our government, and 2) the need for the cover of a warrant.


Next… how easily both considerations were covered.

Translation. Another pack of lies.

There is no deep state. You couldn't sell that in a James Bond picture. Yet Trump supporters have no problems with it as it allows you people to ignore reality. That all of Trump's problems are self-inflicted.

There is no Biden crime family. Trump has used his Presidency to line his pockets. His Presidency and his businesses are fused together into a money making enterprise.

There was no insurance policy. Strzok was clearly joking. You ignore the fact that Strzok also supported re-opening the investigation into Clinton's e-mails the few weeks before the election. He was hardly a partisan.

There is a huge problem with Page. He was not connected with the Trump campaign when they sought the warrant to monitor Page. Page had extensive ties to Russia.

________

This post brings two things immediately to mind:

1) Blind Partisan; and

2) Dumb-Ass.

It appears that the Leftists have discovered a method of making indoctrination indelible.


Not facts, nor experience, nor insight, can move their drones to the light.

 

[PoliticalChic]

9. This is directed to all of those Liberals/Democrats who laughed when those of us on the Right said the Obamunists spied on….surveilled…..wire tapped….the Trump administration.

And you laughed uproariously when we pointed to a Deep State that organized that spying in favor of Hillary and the Democrat Party.


Now, everyone knows what fools you are. You should go home, stand in front of the mirror, point and keep saying “You Fool!!” ….just so you never doubt us again.


The Deep State:

“These individuals represent a loosely-connected web of unelected bureaucrats, often left over from previous administrations, allegedly who utilize their intel and reach in order to disrupt the agenda of the president and his allies.”
INTERVIEW (Part II): Former CIA Officer On What The ‘Deep State’ Looks Like If A Democrat Wins In 2020, And What Can Be Done To Recover




“Eric Ciaramella, Sean Misko discussed how to ‘take out’ President Trump in 2017: Report

Eric Ciaramella (who may or may not be the whistleblower) and Sean Misko (who may or may not be a close friend of the whistleblower) had some interesting watercooler talk shortly after President Trump was inaugurated.
Eric Ciaramella, Sean Misko discussed how to ‘take out’ President Trump in 2017: Report

 

[alang1216]

But every reader knows you were never 'convincible'....you're a simple-minded government school grad.....isn't that the case.

Here's the proof: "evolution (descent from a common ancestor) is a fact."

Only a fool....er, government school grad could say that.

Can you provide some of that 'proof' of evolution????

I'd be happy to. Which field do you prefer, geology, paleontology, biochemistry, or anatomy?

 

[PoliticalChic]

But every reader knows you were never 'convincible'....you're a simple-minded government school grad.....isn't that the case.

Here's the proof: "evolution (descent from a common ancestor) is a fact."

Only a fool....er, government school grad could say that.

Can you provide some of that 'proof' of evolution????

I'd be happy to. Which field do you prefer, geology, paleontology, biochemistry, or anatomy?

All of 'em, dunce.

 

[alang1216]

But every reader knows you were never 'convincible'....you're a simple-minded government school grad.....isn't that the case.

Here's the proof: "evolution (descent from a common ancestor) is a fact."

Only a fool....er, government school grad could say that.

Can you provide some of that 'proof' of evolution????

I'd be happy to. Which field do you prefer, geology, paleontology, biochemistry, or anatomy?

All of 'em, dunce.

OK, let's start easy. Trillions of fossils have been found and not a single one has been found to contradict evolution.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Watergate was a failed attempt by a political party to spy on their political enemies.

bravo..."a third rate burglary" is how it was characterized at the time which is why the phrase "what did the president know and when did he know it"? became the clarion call for the liberals, there was nothing impeachable connecting Nixon so they went looking for something AFTER THE FACT..
.his decision not to engage a hostile media with further information because they just used it to look other places resulted in claim of a cover up [nixon didn't help his own cause here] but it would not have been necessary if the media had used evidence of a crime instead of 24/7 bombarding of the Whitehouse from several directions...
Wategate was bogus, Nixon played no role in it but the reason trump is so successful in fending off the liberals now is because the GOP, out of repetitive necessity, has learned to play this game very effectively from defense due to the liberal dependency on litigating away the presidencies of the opposition.

 

[PoliticalChic]

But every reader knows you were never 'convincible'....you're a simple-minded government school grad.....isn't that the case.

Here's the proof: "evolution (descent from a common ancestor) is a fact."

Only a fool....er, government school grad could say that.

Can you provide some of that 'proof' of evolution????

I'd be happy to. Which field do you prefer, geology, paleontology, biochemistry, or anatomy?

All of 'em, dunce.

OK, let's start easy. Trillions of fossils have been found and not a single one has been found to contradict evolution.

This is what you are best at.....absolute lies.


If Darwin was correct, the geological stockpile should provide examples of organisms with a partial accumulation of said new traits and features, but not complete enough to have quite made it into the menagerie of life. Although they didn't produce new lines of living things, these 'attempts' would be, should be, preserved as fossils.


To save time and effort, although input from every perspective is desired, this discussion requires an understanding of terms such as Cambrian Explosion, fauna, and perhaps taxonomy. Here, see what I mean.....


"The Chengjiang fauna makes the Cambrian explosion more difficult to reconcile with the Darwinian view for yet another reason. The Chengjiang discoveries intensify the top-down pattern of appearances in which individual representatives of the higher taxonomic categories (phyla, subphyla, and classes) appear and only later diversify into the lower taxonomic categories (families, genera, and species).
Meyer, "Darwin's Doubt," p.74

The sudden appearance of complex organism.....followed by simpler.



Now....you wanna retract your claim that there is proof of Darwin's theory, and that it is a fact?


'Cause neither is true.

 

[alang1216]

If Darwin was correct, the geological stockpile should provide examples of organisms with a partial accumulation of said new traits and features, but not complete enough to have quite made it into the menagerie of life. Although they didn't produce new lines of living things, these 'attempts' would be, should be, preserved as fossils.

Straw men don't fossilize well. I don't know where this snippet came from but it is either out of context or just plain stupid. Can you explain it in your own words? I thought not.

 

[PoliticalChic]

If Darwin was correct, the geological stockpile should provide examples of organisms with a partial accumulation of said new traits and features, but not complete enough to have quite made it into the menagerie of life. Although they didn't produce new lines of living things, these 'attempts' would be, should be, preserved as fossils.

Straw men don't fossilize well. I don't know where this snippet came from but it is either out of context or just plain stupid. Can you explain it in your own words? I thought not.

It came from a scientific journal.

But...it gets worse. Chinese paleontologist J.Y. Chen excavated a new discovery of Cambrian fossils in southern China, he brought to light an even greater variety of body plans from an even older layer of Cambrian rock than those of Burgess! And the Chinese fossils established that the Cambrian animals appeared even more explosively than previously imagined!!!

" A few of the gaps (which are systematic in the fossil record) they claim to fill, but there’s another deposit in the region that throws the whole evolutionary story into disrepute: the Chengyiang bed in southern China. Here, the Cambrian Explosion has been documented in fine detail; all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors."
Chinese Fossil Beds Astound Paleontologists (http://www.nature.com/index.html?file=/nature/journal/v421/n6925/full/nature01420_fs.html)

Poor, poor Darwin.



Even from Time magazine:

"Over the decades, evolutionary theorists beginning with Charles Darwin have tried to argue that the appearance of multicelled animals during the Cambrian merely seemed sudden, and in fact had been preceded by a lengthy period of evolution for which the geological record was missing. But this explanation, while it patched over a hole in an otherwise masterly theory, now seems increasingly unsatisfactory. Since 1987, discoveries of major fossil beds in Greenland, in China, in Siberia, and now in Namibia have shown that the period of biological innovation occurred at virtually the same instant in geologic time all around the world."
Extrait de:


I realize you never mind being revealed as a liar....so, just one more example.