Let’s start with the first claimed example, that of the Soviet Union. Anyone who claims that an armed group of civilians could have stopped Stalin clearly has never opened a history book. First of all, the only reason the Bolsheviks were able to come to power in the first place was that they had access to guns. Armed civilians wouldn’t have solved the problem; they were the cause of it. Stalin, Lenin and the Bolsheviks had a minority of votes and were only able to seize power in a military coup. Second of all, armed citizens did try to stop them; it was called the Russian Civil War and lasted between 1917 and 1922. So to claim that armed civilians could have stopped the Bolsheviks is to be ignorant of the fact that they tried and failed to do so.
Next there is everyone’s favourite internet debate tool,
Hitler and the Nazis. An examination of
the historical record shows that most of the gun control in Germany came not from the Nazis but from the Versailles Treaty. The Nazis actively campaigned against gun control legislation and supported the 1928 law which weakened gun control. In fact, there is a pattern from 1919 onwards of
weakening gun control not strengthening. The best gun control opponents can do is use a quote allegedly from Hitler in 1935 (which is almost certainly fake) or mention the 1938 law. However, the 1938 law
actually weakenedgun control and made it easier for everyone except the Jews to own guns. So while the Jews were excluded from gun ownership, by 1938 the Nazis were deeply entrenched in power and it was far too late for the Jews to try to overthrow them.
It is also hard to take seriously the notion that the Jews, who comprised 1% of the German population, could militarily defeat the other 99%. How could a handful of Jews armed with a few pistols defeat the Wehrmacht which conquered Europe? Not even France, which had tanks, could do that. Any armed uprising by the Jews would have played right into the Nazis hands and only hastened their destruction. It should be noted that Jews in the rest of Europe were not disarmed but that did little to save them. Opponents of gun control fail to realise that making guns easily available to Jews would also make them easily available to Nazis and in all likelihood lead to a pogrom. Seeing as the Jews were so outnumbered by their enemies, a guns-for-everyone policy would not have worked in their favour. Remember that the largest armed insurrection in Germany at the time came not from Jews but in the form of Hitler’s 1923 Beer Hall Putsch.
The Genocide And Gun Control Myth
The Russian people did not have guns......not in numbers needed to hold back their government...that is why, twit, that we fight to preserve the 2nd Amendment here...so that we don't end up like them.......
give up your guns today, and genocide, mass murder and ethnic cleansing are more possible and likely in the future.....
And no.....Read Gun Control in the 3rd Reich twit........
What is it with you morons. You keep saying the nazis allowed Jews and their political enemies to have guns.........these poor people registered their hunting rifles and shotguns and turned in their other guns after WW1 when the government mandated it.......the nazis then used the registration records to disarm Jews and their political enemies.....twit.
And Switzerland, with 435,000 civilians with small arms kept the Germans from invading Switzerland.....vast numbers of guns, in the hands of vast numbers of people deter invasion, genocide, mass murder and ethnic cleansing...
And a few pistols was the problem...the Jews gave up their few guns in the 1920s thinking that the police would protect them.........arm hundreds of thousands of civilians in each of the countries invaded by the Germans and they can't hold the territory....
That is why we don't want to give up our guns...in each case you cite the people surrendered their guns long before the murder began...believing people like you who said....what....are you crazy....there is no need for civilians to have guns....
See......we understand history...you anti-gun nuts do not......you see the slaughter of unarmed people and say..see, guns wouldn't have helped....not realizing the whole time the people didn't have guns...and had they had guns history would have been changed...the nazis couldn't have assumed power, because their socialist brown shirts couldn't have beaten their political opposition into silence, as the police stood by.....
Giving up our guns is insane....you people are insane.....you have no sense of history or human behavior....