No, it is a fact. Carlson's lawyer said only an idiot would believe anything Carlson says. That's was his primary defense in a defamation lawsuit.
Yet you cannot actually place these worthless people at SpaceX. Why don't you tell us about $10.00 lettuce and $15.00 strawberries.
They have been conditioned to believe this one-sided, distorted crap since Limbaugh.As Defendant notes, Mr. Carlson himself aims to “challenge[] political correctness and media bias.” This “general tenor” of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not “stating actual facts” about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in “exaggeration” and “non-literal commentary.” Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson’s reputation, any reasonable viewer “arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism” about the statements he makes. 600 W. 115th Corp. v. Von Gutfeld, 80 N.Y.2d 130, 141, 603 N.E.2d 930, 936 (1992). Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson’s statements as “exaggeration,” “non-literal commentary,” or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same—the statements are not actionable.
McDougal v. Fox News Network, LLC, No. 1:2019cv11161 - Document 39 (S.D.N.Y. 2020)
McDougal v. Fox News Network, LLC, No. 1:2019cv11161 - Document 39 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) case opinion from the Southern District of New York US Federal District Court
law.justia.com
Like I said, any retard who has not yet figured out Tucker Carlson lies to them is brain damaged beyond all hope.
As Defendant notes, Mr. Carlson himself aims to “challenge[] political correctness and media bias.” This “general tenor” of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not “stating actual facts” about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in “exaggeration” and “non-literal commentary.” Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson’s reputation, any reasonable viewer “arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism” about the statements he makes. 600 W. 115th Corp. v. Von Gutfeld, 80 N.Y.2d 130, 141, 603 N.E.2d 930, 936 (1992). Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson’s statements as “exaggeration,” “non-literal commentary,” or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same—the statements are not actionable.
McDougal v. Fox News Network, LLC, No. 1:2019cv11161 - Document 39 (S.D.N.Y. 2020)
McDougal v. Fox News Network, LLC, No. 1:2019cv11161 - Document 39 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) case opinion from the Southern District of New York US Federal District Court
law.justia.com
Like I said, any retard who has not yet figured out Tucker Carlson lies to them is brain damaged beyond all hope.
Cool story….so political commentators are quite animated and they sometimes over-sell….Damn, thats a revolutionary find.
You apparently just can't stop it with the racism.
Wayciss! WAYCISSSS! vaya con WAYCISS! OOOH that felt way good.
So white people shouldn't be allowed to have political opinions?
Mmmm. Your racist tears are delicious indeed.
Are you kidding! I am laughing at you. They are worthless. That's what they are doing here. They are Nothing in their homelands. They are nothing here. All you got is DA WAYCISSSMMMM. It's actually amusing that you can be so intellectually bankrupt that you imagine calling me racist has some meaning besides you diddling yourself.
If I were you I would just pull up some data and show core Americans where/how dark people, as a whole have benefited them ….but you can’t so you won’t. What does that mean…what do you want for America?
If you were me you wouldn't be a ridiculous chickenshit who has the FEEEELZ about skin color.
Hey breath...it DEFINES you...and your every post shows that
This coming from a devoted follower of the party of delusions, strong emotions & pagina plumbing is pretty rich.
Carlson's lawyers have admitted it, The Kraken Lady's attorneys have admitted it, Alex Jones' lawyers have admitted it, Dripping Rudy himself has admitted it.
And I don't care! Not a bit. Wwwaaaaayyyycccciiiisss!!! That and ten bucks gets you a latte at Starbucks.
