The Golden Path For The Democrat Party

You forgot the Moosheviks, e.g. The View and their herd. What, too mean? :auiqs.jpg:


I posted this this morning



“History Doesn't Repeat Itself, but It Often Rhymes” – Mark Twain.

.....sometimes it does repeat.


1. What we are witnessing today is a civil war in the Democrat Party between the establishment Democrats, the moderates, and the Radical Communist Violent element. The former wishes to jettison the insane woke, open border, violent Far Left agenda, with the view that being openly communist will not play well in a national election.


2. The Bolsheviks and Mensheviks were the two main factions of the party which led to the Russian Revolution. Both groups subscribed to Marxism, but but they diverged on the methods that they believed would lead to world-wide socialism.


3. The Bolsheviks had a more tightly disciplined group of radical revolutionaries. The Mensheviks favored a more inclusive democratic party with more opinions allowed.


4. The Bolshevikss believed in a more radical and violent revolution to achieve socialism, sans any capitalism, with the central aim of abolishing private property at any cost (genocide). Mensheviks believed in a more gradual, political approach, based on co-opting the political process.....that included capitalism (crony capitalism).
One need be ignorant of history to miss the comparison with the war in the Democrat Party today.



5.Now the Bolsheviks have taken over the party.

About half of the Party’s supporter always came from the interchangeable terms socialist/communist/Progressive/ etc. Professor Kengor said this, describing the Menshevik element:

"The progressive left, and the liberal left, while not themselves communists, share many of the same sympathies, such of redistribution of wealth, and worker’s rights, nationalizations of industry, etc, but are not quite as far left as the communists, and would not go to the same lengths as the communists to achieve their goals. This does not mean, though, that the help of these dupes is not necessary in order for the communists to achieve victory. Even at their peak, in the ‘30’s, the Communist Party of the United States never had more than 100 thousand members: so deception of the ‘dupes’ was critical. "
Dr. Paul Kengor, Hoover Institution, Stanford “DUPES: How America's Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century


1759760856936.webp
 
And several times, I've presented this challenge: If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or extremist for the Right, or radical Right, or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

You just laid out a string of radical right wing views. Not one of them is true. Then you have violation of free speech rights. Violation of civil rights. Blackmail.
 
You just laid out a string of radical right wing views. Not one of them is true. Then you have violation of free speech rights. Violation of civil rights. Blackmail.
The question was can you show any right wing politions contrary to American traditions, values, and history.

And, of course, you couldn't proving that syphlitic idiots like you simply swallow every lie the Democrat Party orders you to.




To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.



The premise
here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."


"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means
"especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)





QED.....there is no Far Right in this country......only a Far Left.
 
For your edification:

Still awaiting your eplanation...
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom