TheOldSchool
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1
Today I learned from members of the alt-right here at USMB that the Chinese and Russians oppose "globalism," whatever that is. I also learned from them that Europeans and American Democrats support "globalism," and that it will destroy their countries somehow.
Part of this realization came about in a thread about how the crazy new Philippines "President" said "fuck you" to the UN, but also said that the Philippines needs the US to defend itself against China. And I'm confused. Does the Filipino "President" oppose "globalism" because he thinks the Philippines are better off left alone? Or does he support "globalism" because he's afraid the anti-"globalist" Chinese are going to ram their metaphorical cock down the Philippines throat unless the rest of the "globe" does something about it?
Anyways, my point is that I think whenever an alt-righty or cuckservative RINO gets angry about "globalism," they're actually just venting their hatred of Muslims, Hispanics, and inner city youths. And thus "globalist" and "globalism" are meaningless terms.
Thoughts?
Part of this realization came about in a thread about how the crazy new Philippines "President" said "fuck you" to the UN, but also said that the Philippines needs the US to defend itself against China. And I'm confused. Does the Filipino "President" oppose "globalism" because he thinks the Philippines are better off left alone? Or does he support "globalism" because he's afraid the anti-"globalist" Chinese are going to ram their metaphorical cock down the Philippines throat unless the rest of the "globe" does something about it?
Anyways, my point is that I think whenever an alt-righty or cuckservative RINO gets angry about "globalism," they're actually just venting their hatred of Muslims, Hispanics, and inner city youths. And thus "globalist" and "globalism" are meaningless terms.
Thoughts?