The Fruits Of Democrat Success -

[Rustic]

Now with President Trump revoking the executive orders the shit **** Obama did, jobs are coming back and more people are getting JOBS. Now once again, tell me how the rich "TAKE" your money , while liberal politicians FORCE you go give up your money so they can make their millions?

Except nothing of the sort is happening. Trump is merely coasting on the job growth of the last 7 years....

But, but but, Obama didn't fix things fast enough!!!!

Na, a Large federal government makes for a poor nation. Fact
The well is dry jack ass

 

[Rustic]

Don't worry, when those cities go broke, you can bet the lame stream media will be blaming President Trump for it, like Obama blamed Bush for Obama's failed economic policies....

Uh, the economy was in full roaring recession when Obama got there.

But you keep on with your alternative history.

The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists andpolitical activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty".

Except what is overloading the system now? Look, back in 1966, if you were poor, you could get a job that put food on the table, even if you had a barely HS Education.

Now we have College grads who can't find jobs, even in a period of supposed "Full Employment".

Jobs don't offer pensions anymore, and 401K's are a joke. We are increasingly going to the "Gig Economy" of Uber and Dog Walkers and Thumbtack.com.

So, yeah, those ******* working people, they just refuse to ******* starve because the Rich want more Dressage Horsies.

You see, I get where you come from. Been there, done that, wore the t-shirt.

You miss the old America of your fathers where you could get a good union job and make a good living and only the most useless people got welfare.

But now 40% of households on food stamps have jobs.

A "universal income" is probably going to be inevitable. Maybe that's not a good thing, but it's not like your side is coming up with a better alternative. Trump finding people for white trash to hate on is not an answer.

Trump finding people for white trash to hate on is not an answer.

It is in a way. As long as you convince people like the writer of this OP. That it is the other sides fault, most people are perfectly happy to overlook that the top incomes take a ridiculous amount of the total income. What's more they will fight any legislation designed to come to a fair income distribution. The problem lies not in a bloated military establishment, nor does it lie with the rich. No the problem is Joe getting a pension. It would be funny if it wouldn't be so damn tragic.U.S. inequality keeps getting uglier

Nothing good can come out of the federal government re-distributing anything

 

[Rustic]

Don't worry, when those cities go broke, you can bet the lame stream media will be blaming President Trump for it, like Obama blamed Bush for Obama's failed economic policies....

Uh, the economy was in full roaring recession when Obama got there.

But you keep on with your alternative history.

The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists andpolitical activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty".

Except what is overloading the system now? Look, back in 1966, if you were poor, you could get a job that put food on the table, even if you had a barely HS Education.

Now we have College grads who can't find jobs, even in a period of supposed "Full Employment".

Jobs don't offer pensions anymore, and 401K's are a joke. We are increasingly going to the "Gig Economy" of Uber and Dog Walkers and Thumbtack.com.

So, yeah, those ******* working people, they just refuse to ******* starve because the Rich want more Dressage Horsies.

You see, I get where you come from. Been there, done that, wore the t-shirt.

You miss the old America of your fathers where you could get a good union job and make a good living and only the most useless people got welfare.

But now 40% of households on food stamps have jobs.

A "universal income" is probably going to be inevitable. Maybe that's not a good thing, but it's not like your side is coming up with a better alternative. Trump finding people for white trash to hate on is not an answer.

Trump finding people for white trash to hate on is not an answer.

It is in a way. As long as you convince people like the writer of this OP. That it is the other sides fault, most people are perfectly happy to overlook that the top incomes take a ridiculous amount of the total income. What's more they will fight any legislation designed to come to a fair income distribution. The problem lies not in a bloated military establishment, nor does it lie with the rich. No the problem is Joe getting a pension. It would be funny if it wouldn't be so damn tragic.U.S. inequality keeps getting uglier

.S. inequality keeps getting uglier

The past 8 years we had a Socialist community agitator who wanted to fundamentally transform America, how could inequality keep getting uglier?

Couple of things. First of calling Obama a socialist is ridiculous. He didn't go for single payer. In fact ACA subsidizes private insurance companies, about the least socialist thing you can do. Second the reason income inequality is getting uglier is not because of Democrats or Republicans, but campaign finance. As long as it takes hundreds of millions of dollars to get elected and as long as it's big business funding those campaigns, nothing will change because both sides are not about to bite the hand that feeds them.
Lastly, its a deflection. The premise wasn't Democrats vs Republicans, it was how you are convinced that only one side is the cause of the problem.

Just existing does not mean anyone deserves anything. Ambition and a sense of urgency is a good thing...

 

[forkup]

Don't worry, when those cities go broke, you can bet the lame stream media will be blaming President Trump for it, like Obama blamed Bush for Obama's failed economic policies....

Uh, the economy was in full roaring recession when Obama got there.

But you keep on with your alternative history.

The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists andpolitical activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty".

Except what is overloading the system now? Look, back in 1966, if you were poor, you could get a job that put food on the table, even if you had a barely HS Education.

Now we have College grads who can't find jobs, even in a period of supposed "Full Employment".

Jobs don't offer pensions anymore, and 401K's are a joke. We are increasingly going to the "Gig Economy" of Uber and Dog Walkers and Thumbtack.com.

So, yeah, those ******* working people, they just refuse to ******* starve because the Rich want more Dressage Horsies.

You see, I get where you come from. Been there, done that, wore the t-shirt.

You miss the old America of your fathers where you could get a good union job and make a good living and only the most useless people got welfare.

But now 40% of households on food stamps have jobs.

A "universal income" is probably going to be inevitable. Maybe that's not a good thing, but it's not like your side is coming up with a better alternative. Trump finding people for white trash to hate on is not an answer.

Trump finding people for white trash to hate on is not an answer.

It is in a way. As long as you convince people like the writer of this OP. That it is the other sides fault, most people are perfectly happy to overlook that the top incomes take a ridiculous amount of the total income. What's more they will fight any legislation designed to come to a fair income distribution. The problem lies not in a bloated military establishment, nor does it lie with the rich. No the problem is Joe getting a pension. It would be funny if it wouldn't be so damn tragic.U.S. inequality keeps getting uglier

.S. inequality keeps getting uglier

The past 8 years we had a Socialist community agitator who wanted to fundamentally transform America, how could inequality keep getting uglier?

Couple of things. First of calling Obama a socialist is ridiculous. He didn't go for single payer. In fact ACA subsidizes private insurance companies, about the least socialist thing you can do. Second the reason income inequality is getting uglier is not because of Democrats or Republicans, but campaign finance. As long as it takes hundreds of millions of dollars to get elected and as long as it's big business funding those campaigns, nothing will change because both sides are not about to bite the hand that feeds them.
Lastly, its a deflection. The premise wasn't Democrats vs Republicans, it was how you are convinced that only one side is the cause of the problem.

That it is the other sides fault, most people are perfectly happy to overlook that the top incomes take a ridiculous amount of the total income.

Just as a reminder what you said before, but now blame campaign finance once you are proven wrong. Then you do the typical liberal bullshit argument, that if one side ruins the country then the other side is just as bad. Obama did nothing to bring Jobs back to the US, but made GE, Apple, GM and other leave for China because over there it is cheaper to make goods and Obama gave them his blessing by bringing up TPP. Now with President Trump revoking the executive orders the shit **** Obama did, jobs are coming back and more people are getting JOBS. Now once again, tell me how the rich "TAKE" your money , while liberal politicians FORCE you go give up your money so they can make their millions?

What have you disproved? Income inequality is getting worse. Your argument seems to be that rich people have a right to be so rich. Something I have not once disputed. I dispute their right to be so rich while at the same time them having to pay relatively speaking a smaller share. While all the while services for those who aren't rich are under attack.

 

[Rustic]

Until the liberals made it so hard that you have to have 2 people working just to make a living, because the liberals destroyed the nuclear family.

And how did they do that, exactly? No, seriously, I would love to hear this logic.

Here's why you need two people to make a living. Because the Right Wing got rid of all the union jobs like the one my Dad had. Because we went from a country where you could work at the same company from high school to retirement, to one where we change jobs every five years on average and could be fired on a whim. Has this weakened the family? Maybe. Or maybe people just concluded you don't stay in a marriage that doesn't work "for the children", because frankly, you aren't doing the kids a lot of good, anyway.

Who was the president for the past 8 years and how great was his economic plan?

Considering it got us out of Bush's disaterous recession, pretty good. But the problem was there long before Obama got there. It'll be there long after he's gone.

But Ooooobama didn't fix the problems after we sabotaged everything he tried to do.

GM and Chrylser had a pension plan and ended up going bankrupt and only the TAX payers bailed them out because Obama made it so.

It went bankrupt because they were too busy paying shareholders instead of putting money aside like they were supposed to.... All Obama did was make sure the pensions gotten taken care of before the gamblers.

So the liberals want everyone on foodstamps, so those people will owe the government for being fed.

I'm not sure anyone 'wants' that, but that's the end result in a Gig Economy, isn't it.

47% don't pay taxes....

47% don't pay income taxes. They do pay FICA, Medicare, Sales Taxes, Sin Taxes, Property taxes (directly or indirectly), fees and other ways the government generates revenues.

The income tax initially was ONLY supposed to be a tax on the rich. It just got expanded to nearly everyone else.

**** your collective, why don’t you keep your collective to yourselves leave the rest of us out of it?

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Uh, the economy was in full roaring recession when Obama got there.

But you keep on with your alternative history.

Except what is overloading the system now? Look, back in 1966, if you were poor, you could get a job that put food on the table, even if you had a barely HS Education.

Now we have College grads who can't find jobs, even in a period of supposed "Full Employment".

Jobs don't offer pensions anymore, and 401K's are a joke. We are increasingly going to the "Gig Economy" of Uber and Dog Walkers and Thumbtack.com.

So, yeah, those ******* working people, they just refuse to ******* starve because the Rich want more Dressage Horsies.

You see, I get where you come from. Been there, done that, wore the t-shirt.

You miss the old America of your fathers where you could get a good union job and make a good living and only the most useless people got welfare.

But now 40% of households on food stamps have jobs.

A "universal income" is probably going to be inevitable. Maybe that's not a good thing, but it's not like your side is coming up with a better alternative. Trump finding people for white trash to hate on is not an answer.

Trump finding people for white trash to hate on is not an answer.

It is in a way. As long as you convince people like the writer of this OP. That it is the other sides fault, most people are perfectly happy to overlook that the top incomes take a ridiculous amount of the total income. What's more they will fight any legislation designed to come to a fair income distribution. The problem lies not in a bloated military establishment, nor does it lie with the rich. No the problem is Joe getting a pension. It would be funny if it wouldn't be so damn tragic.U.S. inequality keeps getting uglier

overlook that the top incomes take a ridiculous amount of the total income.

Please explain how they "TAKE"?

Semantics is really the best counterargument you have?
1.take
lay hold of (something) with one's hands; reach for and hold.
"he leaned forward to take her hand"
synonyms: lay hold of, take hold of, get hold of, get into one's hands
That's the meaning of take a I was referring too.
Unless you can question the validity of the rise in income inequality, my argument stands.

How is it take, when people are willingly giving up their monies for products or services provided, while your politicians TAKE by FORCE your taxes then pay themselves from those taxes? Are you a stupid **** who has wealth envy because you aren't smart enough to be a crooked politician(redundant statement) or able to provide something that someone else wants? I would say yes, you are a stupid ****.

I think you are confusing take with steal. If you give me money wouldn't me receiving that money equal taking it? For someone calling someone else an idiot you seem to have troubles with reading comprehension. And no I have absolutely no problem with people earning money. I have a problem with people earning money and not paying as much as they can afford, while other people lack basic necessities that are provided in all other industrialized nations.

You are talking like the RICH steal the money from the poor as all the liberals have been saying. Why else has the liberals been talking about the 1% vs the dumbass 99%? How the rich got richer by taking all the money from the poor and now President Trump is going to reward the Rich by not taking more of the rich's money but allowing the rich to keep more of what they make. Ah yes, I am not confused, but you and 2 house Joe are very confused and wont blame the real people who made your sorry life such a miserable mess. Liberals have raised your taxes so much that now you have to have 2 members of the household working just to make ends meet. Their minimum wage hikes have caused inflation so much that a burger fry and drink at McDonalds used to cost 95 cents, today it costs over $4 for the same. Stupid ***** like you deserve all the misery the liberals have forced upon you.

The Misery of the Liberal Mind

The liberal mind, writes Dr. Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr. in his book, The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness, views the world through the prism of "pity, sorrow, neediness, misfortune, poverty, suspicion, mistrust, anger, exploitation, discrimination, victimization, alienation and injustice" for people who are "poor, weak, sick, wronged, cheated, oppressed, disenfranchised and exploited."

Of course, these "victims" bear zero responsibility for their plight, have no control over the rising waters of their circumstances, and must sit on the rooftop of their despair waiting for their government savior to rescue them. Liberals believe any malady known to man has nothing to do with poor choices, bad judgment or weak character. Instead it's the fault of capitalism, discrimination, global warming, white people, conservatism, big corporations, Christianity, the wealthy, Bush 43, Reagan….and so on.

Now ignore this information as you always do, call me racist and run away like a spoiled petulant little girl.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Uh, the economy was in full roaring recession when Obama got there.

But you keep on with your alternative history.

Except what is overloading the system now? Look, back in 1966, if you were poor, you could get a job that put food on the table, even if you had a barely HS Education.

Now we have College grads who can't find jobs, even in a period of supposed "Full Employment".

Jobs don't offer pensions anymore, and 401K's are a joke. We are increasingly going to the "Gig Economy" of Uber and Dog Walkers and Thumbtack.com.

So, yeah, those ******* working people, they just refuse to ******* starve because the Rich want more Dressage Horsies.

You see, I get where you come from. Been there, done that, wore the t-shirt.

You miss the old America of your fathers where you could get a good union job and make a good living and only the most useless people got welfare.

But now 40% of households on food stamps have jobs.

A "universal income" is probably going to be inevitable. Maybe that's not a good thing, but it's not like your side is coming up with a better alternative. Trump finding people for white trash to hate on is not an answer.

Trump finding people for white trash to hate on is not an answer.

It is in a way. As long as you convince people like the writer of this OP. That it is the other sides fault, most people are perfectly happy to overlook that the top incomes take a ridiculous amount of the total income. What's more they will fight any legislation designed to come to a fair income distribution. The problem lies not in a bloated military establishment, nor does it lie with the rich. No the problem is Joe getting a pension. It would be funny if it wouldn't be so damn tragic.U.S. inequality keeps getting uglier

.S. inequality keeps getting uglier

The past 8 years we had a Socialist community agitator who wanted to fundamentally transform America, how could inequality keep getting uglier?

Couple of things. First of calling Obama a socialist is ridiculous. He didn't go for single payer. In fact ACA subsidizes private insurance companies, about the least socialist thing you can do. Second the reason income inequality is getting uglier is not because of Democrats or Republicans, but campaign finance. As long as it takes hundreds of millions of dollars to get elected and as long as it's big business funding those campaigns, nothing will change because both sides are not about to bite the hand that feeds them.
Lastly, its a deflection. The premise wasn't Democrats vs Republicans, it was how you are convinced that only one side is the cause of the problem.

That it is the other sides fault, most people are perfectly happy to overlook that the top incomes take a ridiculous amount of the total income.

Just as a reminder what you said before, but now blame campaign finance once you are proven wrong. Then you do the typical liberal bullshit argument, that if one side ruins the country then the other side is just as bad. Obama did nothing to bring Jobs back to the US, but made GE, Apple, GM and other leave for China because over there it is cheaper to make goods and Obama gave them his blessing by bringing up TPP. Now with President Trump revoking the executive orders the shit **** Obama did, jobs are coming back and more people are getting JOBS. Now once again, tell me how the rich "TAKE" your money , while liberal politicians FORCE you go give up your money so they can make their millions?

What have you disproved? Income inequality is getting worse. Your argument seems to be that rich people have a right to be so rich. Something I have not once disputed. I dispute their right to be so rich while at the same time them having to pay relatively speaking a smaller share. While all the while services for those who aren't rich are under attack.

I used to be a poor ***** like you, but instead of feeling sorry for myself, I got skills and educated to make wealth. Today I am rich, I got there by making very smart investments, shouldn't I have a right my wealth?

 

[Rustic]

The progressive/liberal mind = petty, envious and lacking of all common sense

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

The progressive/liberal mind = petty, envious and lacking of all common sense

And lacking any intelligence to make something of themselves

See typical liberal voter...

 

[forkup]

It is in a way. As long as you convince people like the writer of this OP. That it is the other sides fault, most people are perfectly happy to overlook that the top incomes take a ridiculous amount of the total income. What's more they will fight any legislation designed to come to a fair income distribution. The problem lies not in a bloated military establishment, nor does it lie with the rich. No the problem is Joe getting a pension. It would be funny if it wouldn't be so damn tragic.U.S. inequality keeps getting uglier

overlook that the top incomes take a ridiculous amount of the total income.

Please explain how they "TAKE"?

Semantics is really the best counterargument you have?
1.take
lay hold of (something) with one's hands; reach for and hold.
"he leaned forward to take her hand"
synonyms: lay hold of, take hold of, get hold of, get into one's hands
That's the meaning of take a I was referring too.
Unless you can question the validity of the rise in income inequality, my argument stands.

How is it take, when people are willingly giving up their monies for products or services provided, while your politicians TAKE by FORCE your taxes then pay themselves from those taxes? Are you a stupid **** who has wealth envy because you aren't smart enough to be a crooked politician(redundant statement) or able to provide something that someone else wants? I would say yes, you are a stupid ****.

I think you are confusing take with steal. If you give me money wouldn't me receiving that money equal taking it? For someone calling someone else an idiot you seem to have troubles with reading comprehension. And no I have absolutely no problem with people earning money. I have a problem with people earning money and not paying as much as they can afford, while other people lack basic necessities that are provided in all other industrialized nations.

You are talking like the RICH steal the money from the poor as all the liberals have been saying. Why else has the liberals been talking about the 1% vs the dumbass 99%? How the rich got richer by taking all the money from the poor and now President Trump is going to reward the Rich by not taking more of the rich's money but allowing the rich to keep more of what they make. Ah yes, I am not confused, but you and 2 house Joe are very confused and wont blame the real people who made your sorry life such a miserable mess. Liberals have raised your taxes so much that now you have to have 2 members of the household working just to make ends meet. Their minimum wage hikes have caused inflation so much that a burger fry and drink at McDonalds used to cost 95 cents, today it costs over $4 for the same. Stupid ***** like you deserve all the misery the liberals have forced upon you.

The Misery of the Liberal Mind

The liberal mind, writes Dr. Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr. in his book, The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness, views the world through the prism of "pity, sorrow, neediness, misfortune, poverty, suspicion, mistrust, anger, exploitation, discrimination, victimization, alienation and injustice" for people who are "poor, weak, sick, wronged, cheated, oppressed, disenfranchised and exploited."

Of course, these "victims" bear zero responsibility for their plight, have no control over the rising waters of their circumstances, and must sit on the rooftop of their despair waiting for their government savior to rescue them. Liberals believe any malady known to man has nothing to do with poor choices, bad judgment or weak character. Instead it's the fault of capitalism, discrimination, global warming, white people, conservatism, big corporations, Christianity, the wealthy, Bush 43, Reagan….and so on.

Now ignore this information as you always do, call me racist and run away like a spoiled petulant little girl.

Now ignore this information as you always do, call me racist and run away like a spoiled petulant little girl.

I'm going to go away, the reason being that you are the one calling me names not vice versa. Furthermore not once have you entertained the premise of my posts. Instead you deflect and like now revert to name calling. I don't mind, I'm used to it.
Yes income inequality is getting higher. Yes you are against all legislation that would aim at reducing that. And yes you think all the problems are the liberals fault. Those are the 3 claims I made in this post. You have confirmed every single one of them.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Please explain how they "TAKE"?

Semantics is really the best counterargument you have?
1.take
lay hold of (something) with one's hands; reach for and hold.
"he leaned forward to take her hand"
synonyms: lay hold of, take hold of, get hold of, get into one's hands
That's the meaning of take a I was referring too.
Unless you can question the validity of the rise in income inequality, my argument stands.

How is it take, when people are willingly giving up their monies for products or services provided, while your politicians TAKE by FORCE your taxes then pay themselves from those taxes? Are you a stupid **** who has wealth envy because you aren't smart enough to be a crooked politician(redundant statement) or able to provide something that someone else wants? I would say yes, you are a stupid ****.

I think you are confusing take with steal. If you give me money wouldn't me receiving that money equal taking it? For someone calling someone else an idiot you seem to have troubles with reading comprehension. And no I have absolutely no problem with people earning money. I have a problem with people earning money and not paying as much as they can afford, while other people lack basic necessities that are provided in all other industrialized nations.

You are talking like the RICH steal the money from the poor as all the liberals have been saying. Why else has the liberals been talking about the 1% vs the dumbass 99%? How the rich got richer by taking all the money from the poor and now President Trump is going to reward the Rich by not taking more of the rich's money but allowing the rich to keep more of what they make. Ah yes, I am not confused, but you and 2 house Joe are very confused and wont blame the real people who made your sorry life such a miserable mess. Liberals have raised your taxes so much that now you have to have 2 members of the household working just to make ends meet. Their minimum wage hikes have caused inflation so much that a burger fry and drink at McDonalds used to cost 95 cents, today it costs over $4 for the same. Stupid ***** like you deserve all the misery the liberals have forced upon you.

The Misery of the Liberal Mind

The liberal mind, writes Dr. Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr. in his book, The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness, views the world through the prism of "pity, sorrow, neediness, misfortune, poverty, suspicion, mistrust, anger, exploitation, discrimination, victimization, alienation and injustice" for people who are "poor, weak, sick, wronged, cheated, oppressed, disenfranchised and exploited."

Of course, these "victims" bear zero responsibility for their plight, have no control over the rising waters of their circumstances, and must sit on the rooftop of their despair waiting for their government savior to rescue them. Liberals believe any malady known to man has nothing to do with poor choices, bad judgment or weak character. Instead it's the fault of capitalism, discrimination, global warming, white people, conservatism, big corporations, Christianity, the wealthy, Bush 43, Reagan….and so on.

Now ignore this information as you always do, call me racist and run away like a spoiled petulant little girl.

Now ignore this information as you always do, call me racist and run away like a spoiled petulant little girl.

I'm going to go away, the reason being that you are the one calling me names not vice versa. Furthermore not once have you entertained the premise of my posts. Instead you deflect and like now revert to name calling. I don't mind, I'm used to it.
Yes income inequality is getting higher. Yes you are against all legislation that would aim at reducing that. And yes you think all the problems are the liberals fault. Those are the 3 claims I made in this post. You have confirmed every single one of them.

I am sorry that you are a liberal idiot. There I apologized.

How could after 8 years of Obamanomics could the income inequality get higher?

Obama Causes Income Inequality - DickMorris.com

To distract attention from the ObamaCare disaster, the President is seeking to focus on income inequality. But here, for him, the ground is even shakier.

Make sure to avoid this link, so that way you can shove your had farther up your ass.

 

[forkup]

Don't worry, when those cities go broke, you can bet the lame stream media will be blaming President Trump for it, like Obama blamed Bush for Obama's failed economic policies....

Uh, the economy was in full roaring recession when Obama got there.

But you keep on with your alternative history.

The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists andpolitical activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty".

Except what is overloading the system now? Look, back in 1966, if you were poor, you could get a job that put food on the table, even if you had a barely HS Education.

Now we have College grads who can't find jobs, even in a period of supposed "Full Employment".

Jobs don't offer pensions anymore, and 401K's are a joke. We are increasingly going to the "Gig Economy" of Uber and Dog Walkers and Thumbtack.com.

So, yeah, those ******* working people, they just refuse to ******* starve because the Rich want more Dressage Horsies.

You see, I get where you come from. Been there, done that, wore the t-shirt.

You miss the old America of your fathers where you could get a good union job and make a good living and only the most useless people got welfare.

But now 40% of households on food stamps have jobs.

A "universal income" is probably going to be inevitable. Maybe that's not a good thing, but it's not like your side is coming up with a better alternative. Trump finding people for white trash to hate on is not an answer.

Trump finding people for white trash to hate on is not an answer.

It is in a way. As long as you convince people like the writer of this OP. That it is the other sides fault, most people are perfectly happy to overlook that the top incomes take a ridiculous amount of the total income. What's more they will fight any legislation designed to come to a fair income distribution. The problem lies not in a bloated military establishment, nor does it lie with the rich. No the problem is Joe getting a pension. It would be funny if it wouldn't be so damn tragic.U.S. inequality keeps getting uglier

Nothing good can come out of the federal government re-distributing anything

Really? Look up healthcare cost in all countries, look up life expectancy and child mortality or a dozen other health indices. You will find that providing the most expensive healthcare in the world provides bad results to all other industrialized nation of which most have single payer.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Don't worry, when those cities go broke, you can bet the lame stream media will be blaming President Trump for it, like Obama blamed Bush for Obama's failed economic policies....

Uh, the economy was in full roaring recession when Obama got there.

But you keep on with your alternative history.

The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists andpolitical activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty".

Except what is overloading the system now? Look, back in 1966, if you were poor, you could get a job that put food on the table, even if you had a barely HS Education.

Now we have College grads who can't find jobs, even in a period of supposed "Full Employment".

Jobs don't offer pensions anymore, and 401K's are a joke. We are increasingly going to the "Gig Economy" of Uber and Dog Walkers and Thumbtack.com.

So, yeah, those ******* working people, they just refuse to ******* starve because the Rich want more Dressage Horsies.

You see, I get where you come from. Been there, done that, wore the t-shirt.

You miss the old America of your fathers where you could get a good union job and make a good living and only the most useless people got welfare.

But now 40% of households on food stamps have jobs.

A "universal income" is probably going to be inevitable. Maybe that's not a good thing, but it's not like your side is coming up with a better alternative. Trump finding people for white trash to hate on is not an answer.

Trump finding people for white trash to hate on is not an answer.

It is in a way. As long as you convince people like the writer of this OP. That it is the other sides fault, most people are perfectly happy to overlook that the top incomes take a ridiculous amount of the total income. What's more they will fight any legislation designed to come to a fair income distribution. The problem lies not in a bloated military establishment, nor does it lie with the rich. No the problem is Joe getting a pension. It would be funny if it wouldn't be so damn tragic.U.S. inequality keeps getting uglier

Nothing good can come out of the federal government re-distributing anything

Really? Look up healthcare cost in all countries, look up life expectancy and child mortality or a dozen other health indices. You will find that providing the most expensive healthcare in the world provides bad results to all other industrialized nation of which most have single payer.

U.S. Life Expectancy Declines Under Obama and ObamaCare - GraniteGrok

In 2015 US Life Expectancy declined for the first time since 1993. I say we blame ObamaCare. And why not? We’re this to happen under a Republican administration (and keep in mind the last time was also under a Democrat), they and their policies would be the leading cause.

The liberals were howling when it was found out how bad the VA was, so now those same liberals want all of the healthcare to be like the VA. Why is this, because the liberal elites wrote themselves out of the law, but now everyone should all be equal. Equally poor and equally miserable, the liberal dumbfucks who vote for them are just that, poor and miserable.

 

[Rustic]

Don't worry, when those cities go broke, you can bet the lame stream media will be blaming President Trump for it, like Obama blamed Bush for Obama's failed economic policies....

Uh, the economy was in full roaring recession when Obama got there.

But you keep on with your alternative history.

The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists andpolitical activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty".

Except what is overloading the system now? Look, back in 1966, if you were poor, you could get a job that put food on the table, even if you had a barely HS Education.

Now we have College grads who can't find jobs, even in a period of supposed "Full Employment".

Jobs don't offer pensions anymore, and 401K's are a joke. We are increasingly going to the "Gig Economy" of Uber and Dog Walkers and Thumbtack.com.

So, yeah, those ******* working people, they just refuse to ******* starve because the Rich want more Dressage Horsies.

You see, I get where you come from. Been there, done that, wore the t-shirt.

You miss the old America of your fathers where you could get a good union job and make a good living and only the most useless people got welfare.

But now 40% of households on food stamps have jobs.

A "universal income" is probably going to be inevitable. Maybe that's not a good thing, but it's not like your side is coming up with a better alternative. Trump finding people for white trash to hate on is not an answer.

Trump finding people for white trash to hate on is not an answer.

It is in a way. As long as you convince people like the writer of this OP. That it is the other sides fault, most people are perfectly happy to overlook that the top incomes take a ridiculous amount of the total income. What's more they will fight any legislation designed to come to a fair income distribution. The problem lies not in a bloated military establishment, nor does it lie with the rich. No the problem is Joe getting a pension. It would be funny if it wouldn't be so damn tragic.U.S. inequality keeps getting uglier

Nothing good can come out of the federal government re-distributing anything

Really? Look up healthcare cost in all countries, look up life expectancy and child mortality or a dozen other health indices. You will find that providing the most expensive healthcare in the world provides bad results to all other industrialized nation of which most have single payer.

Well, Keep your single payer to yourselves leave the rest of us out of it it does not require Our participation.
Millions and millions of Americans want nothing to do with single payer/Obamacare they will never use it, and cannot afford it

 

[forkup]

Don't worry, when those cities go broke, you can bet the lame stream media will be blaming President Trump for it, like Obama blamed Bush for Obama's failed economic policies....

Uh, the economy was in full roaring recession when Obama got there.

But you keep on with your alternative history.

The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists andpolitical activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty".

Except what is overloading the system now? Look, back in 1966, if you were poor, you could get a job that put food on the table, even if you had a barely HS Education.

Now we have College grads who can't find jobs, even in a period of supposed "Full Employment".

Jobs don't offer pensions anymore, and 401K's are a joke. We are increasingly going to the "Gig Economy" of Uber and Dog Walkers and Thumbtack.com.

So, yeah, those ******* working people, they just refuse to ******* starve because the Rich want more Dressage Horsies.

You see, I get where you come from. Been there, done that, wore the t-shirt.

You miss the old America of your fathers where you could get a good union job and make a good living and only the most useless people got welfare.

But now 40% of households on food stamps have jobs.

A "universal income" is probably going to be inevitable. Maybe that's not a good thing, but it's not like your side is coming up with a better alternative. Trump finding people for white trash to hate on is not an answer.

Trump finding people for white trash to hate on is not an answer.

It is in a way. As long as you convince people like the writer of this OP. That it is the other sides fault, most people are perfectly happy to overlook that the top incomes take a ridiculous amount of the total income. What's more they will fight any legislation designed to come to a fair income distribution. The problem lies not in a bloated military establishment, nor does it lie with the rich. No the problem is Joe getting a pension. It would be funny if it wouldn't be so damn tragic.U.S. inequality keeps getting uglier

Nothing good can come out of the federal government re-distributing anything

Really? Look up healthcare cost in all countries, look up life expectancy and child mortality or a dozen other health indices. You will find that providing the most expensive healthcare in the world provides bad results to all other industrialized nation of which most have single payer.

Well, Keep your single payer to yourselves leave the rest of us out of it it does not require Our participation.
Millions and millions of Americans want nothing to do with single payer/Obamacare they will never use it, and cannot afford it

Nothing good can come out of the federal government re-distributing anything

That's proving your statement how?

 

[JoeB131]

You are talking like the RICH steal the money from the poor as all the liberals have been saying. Why else has the liberals been talking about the 1% vs the dumbass 99%? How the rich got richer by taking all the money from the poor and now President Trump is going to reward the Rich by not taking more of the rich's money but allowing the rich to keep more of what they make. Ah yes, I am not confused, but you and 2 house Joe are very confused and wont blame the real people who made your sorry life such a miserable mess. Liberals have raised your taxes so much that now you have to have 2 members of the household working just to make ends meet. Their minimum wage hikes have caused inflation so much that a burger fry and drink at McDonalds used to cost 95 cents, today it costs over $4 for the same. Stupid ***** like you deserve all the misery the liberals have forced upon you.

Dude, you are totally confused.

First and foremost, the fact is, the minimum wage has not kept up with inflation, much less caused it.

When I went to College in 1981, the Minimum Wage was 3.35 after a period of hyper-inflation in the 1970's. after that, inflation hasn't been as bad, but the minimum wage didn't keep up.

If the min wage had kept up, it would be 9.45 now.

But it gets a little worse. You see, back when I was in college, you could work a minimum wage job and pay for a college like UIC. Tuition back then was only $435 a quarter. So you could earn your tuition money after working 130 hours, or about 4 weeks work.

Now compare that to where we are now. The Minimum wage today is 7.25. It has not increased in 8 years. Tuition at UIC is $4882.00 per semester. (they changed to a semester system) You'd have to work 700 hours to pay it. And that's not including fees and other stuff.

So not surprisingly, even though UIC was originally built for those inner city kids to get a shot at college, the current African American enrollment in the school is 9%.

But, no, no, the Rich need tax cuts.... um, because stuff.

 

[JoeB131]

And lacking any intelligence to make something of themselves

See typical liberal voter...

How is that any different from the Stupid Racist White guy who voted for Trump because he was going to bring the jobs back. Oh, wait, the economy lost 33,000 jobs last month. Whoops.

 

[JoeB131]

The liberals were howling when it was found out how bad the VA was, so now those same liberals want all of the healthcare to be like the VA. Why is this, because the liberal elites wrote themselves out of the law, but now everyone should all be equal. Equally poor and equally miserable, the liberal dumbfucks who vote for them are just that, poor and miserable.

Hey, if rich people had to go the same clinics as poor people, maybe we'd make the quality of care for poor people better.

so why was the VA so bad? Well, because while the number of clinical visits at VA hospitals increased by 46%, the amount of funding to the VA was only increased by 16%. But they won't tell you that.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Don't worry, when those cities go broke, you can bet the lame stream media will be blaming President Trump for it, like Obama blamed Bush for Obama's failed economic policies....

Uh, the economy was in full roaring recession when Obama got there.

But you keep on with your alternative history.

The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists andpolitical activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty".

Except what is overloading the system now? Look, back in 1966, if you were poor, you could get a job that put food on the table, even if you had a barely HS Education.

Now we have College grads who can't find jobs, even in a period of supposed "Full Employment".

Jobs don't offer pensions anymore, and 401K's are a joke. We are increasingly going to the "Gig Economy" of Uber and Dog Walkers and Thumbtack.com.

So, yeah, those ******* working people, they just refuse to ******* starve because the Rich want more Dressage Horsies.

You see, I get where you come from. Been there, done that, wore the t-shirt.

You miss the old America of your fathers where you could get a good union job and make a good living and only the most useless people got welfare.

But now 40% of households on food stamps have jobs.

A "universal income" is probably going to be inevitable. Maybe that's not a good thing, but it's not like your side is coming up with a better alternative. Trump finding people for white trash to hate on is not an answer.

Democrat mortgage policies caused the Great Recession and then they blamed Bush for it.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Democrat economics is based on stealing and when they run out of other people's money to steal they go bankrupt.