The First Black Republican Presidential Nominee Will Be.....

[Correll]

Your goal is to deny any validity to white interests, because you are so deeply hostile to them.


My example of a minority interest was an Indian interest in having a casino to get some money for their community.

Your goal there was to not get yourself tied up trying to actually identify a legitimate non-racist "white interest" and to fling shit. The pattern is beyond boring now. You can give it a rest.

There was a legitimate non-racist "white interest" in the example of the Indian casino, ie the desire of the local white population as a group, to not have casinos in their area.

Lying doesn't help you.

A group of whites, not wanting a casino in their area is a legit white interest.


Communities have a right to define themselves.

You are the one lying.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Your goal is to deny any validity to white interests, because you are so deeply hostile to them.


My example of a minority interest was an Indian interest in having a casino to get some money for their community.

Your goal there was to not get yourself tied up trying to actually identify a legitimate non-racist "white interest" and to fling shit. The pattern is beyond boring now. You can give it a rest.

There was a legitimate non-racist "white interest" in the example of the Indian casino, ie the desire of the local white population as a group, to not have casinos in their area.


That you dismissed it, because it does not fit your fantasy of all white interesting being "white supremacy" is just you being retarded, it is still an fine example.

Um, dumbass.. When you can provide some evidence that the only locals opposing said casinos were "white" you might begin having a leg to stand on. Then you'd have to figure out how not to make it an anti-"Indian" thing. Why, they can't have a business? They pay their taxes. Take and employ all comers. What's YOUR FUCKING PROBLEM other than racism?

 

[IM2]

The democrats didn't do that. But you are evidence of why blacks won't vote republican.

He told his publisher he was "born in Kenya" he told his colleges and universities, his grandmother said he was born in Kenya, so did his half brother, are they all lying?

All those stories have been debunked. The only people that continue believing them are white racists that still hang on to the birther lie.

Debunked?

Obama was the first birther, Hillary was the second

More debunked bullshit.

LOLz. It's not "debunked" just because you don't like it

It's debunked because it's been proven to be untrue.

No, the publishers made up a story that can't be true and you're just a follower

The story was debunked. You have chosen to believe a lie, because you could not deal with the fact that a black man was running America.

Obama told his publisher that he was born in Kenya and that sat there for 20 years. Much later, when it was obvious that Obama had told even his colleges and Universities about his Kenya birth, Obamaroids panicked. They sealed his foreign student educational records, but what to do about the bio he submitted to his publisher? They made the publisher fall on her sword.

See, apparently, all of the authors send in their own biography. Look on the page with Barack "born in Kenya" Obama and you see 2 other writers, neither of whom described where they were born, only Barack did that.

Now, we're to believe that the publisher of her own accord felt that "the first African American President of the Harvard Law Review" was somehow insufficient and she took it upon herself to find out where Barack "born in Kenya" Obama was born and raised, and - darn it- she got it wrong.

You're gullible.

That's fake and it has been debunked and recanted. .

 

[IM2]

Example, Tulsi Gabbard seemed like a great candidate to me. Dropped out and endorsed Biden. Wtf?

I had problems with Gabbard, and if they were a viable party, I'd vote green party with a quickness.

 

[IM2]

Almost a month later......and the question is still unanswered....

I will break the news to Diamond & Silk

The point of this thread was not to discuss actual potential candidates,


but just to smear your partisan enemies as Evul Wacists.


That is the point I have addressed and refuted.

Your pretense otherwise, just shows how dishonest you are, and how your words, are not to be given any weight.


THis is something we need to keep in mind, as you insist that you have not had your ass kicked.


Evul Wacists? LOL!!!

I discussed more potential black republican candidates than anyone else did -- especially you...

you still arguing about a guy in 1996 who you call a traitor now....

But you guys are used to cheerleading people and then calling them evil traitors later....

How is that any different from Democrats calling certain blacks sellouts and Uncle Toms?

If I may, I don't think Biff is saying it isn't necessarily. Depends on context. I gather in this case he was referring to this:

During the time of the 2016 presidential election, Keyes emerged as a strong critic of Donald Trump. He criticized many conservative Christians for supporting "a candidate whose life could be used to illustrate the deceitfully seductive quality of sin summarized in the phrase 'the glamour of evil.'"

Plus he had attacked Romney for effectively supporting gay marriage in Massachusetts. He'd remained a reliable rightwing nutjob prior, including acting as a key (pun intended) birther against Obama. That said, I generally strive to hear what folks like IM2 have to say about such things before flapping my gums.

Thanks.

 

[Correll]

Your goal is to deny any validity to white interests, because you are so deeply hostile to them.


My example of a minority interest was an Indian interest in having a casino to get some money for their community.

Your goal there was to not get yourself tied up trying to actually identify a legitimate non-racist "white interest" and to fling shit. The pattern is beyond boring now. You can give it a rest.

There was a legitimate non-racist "white interest" in the example of the Indian casino, ie the desire of the local white population as a group, to not have casinos in their area.


That you dismissed it, because it does not fit your fantasy of all white interesting being "white supremacy" is just you being retarded, it is still an fine example.

Um, dumbass.. When you can provide some evidence that the only locals opposing said casinos were "white" you might begin having a leg to stand on. Then you'd have to figure out how not to make it an anti-"Indian" thing. Why, they can't have a business? They pay their taxes. Take and employ all comers. What's YOUR FUCKING PROBLEM other than racism?

1. If other groups or individuals also opposed the casinos, that does not effect the actions or thought of the local whites as a group.


2. No, I do not have to "make it not an anti-Indian thing". YOu do not get to just assume any white interest or action is "wacism", and thus to be denied.

3. The reasons for opposing the casino are irrelevant. It is legit for a community to not want to have casinos. Again, you do not just get to assume "wacism".



Three times, in your short post, you just assume racism in a discussion about a very minor white interest.


THAT IS MY POINT. YOU ARE DEEPLY HOSTILE TO THE IDEA OF WHITES HAVING INTERESTS AND ADVOCATING FOR THEM, WHILE YOU ARE FINE WITH EVERY OTHER GROUP DOING IT.


And that is text book racism.

 

[Correll]

Almost a month later......and the question is still unanswered....

I will break the news to Diamond & Silk

The point of this thread was not to discuss actual potential candidates,


but just to smear your partisan enemies as Evul Wacists.


That is the point I have addressed and refuted.

Your pretense otherwise, just shows how dishonest you are, and how your words, are not to be given any weight.


THis is something we need to keep in mind, as you insist that you have not had your ass kicked.


Evul Wacists? LOL!!!

I discussed more potential black republican candidates than anyone else did -- especially you...

you still arguing about a guy in 1996 who you call a traitor now....

But you guys are used to cheerleading people and then calling them evil traitors later....

How is that any different from Democrats calling certain blacks sellouts and Uncle Toms?

If I may, I don't think Biff is saying it isn't necessarily. Depends on context. I gather in this case he was referring to this:

During the time of the 2016 presidential election, Keyes emerged as a strong critic of Donald Trump. He criticized many conservative Christians for supporting "a candidate whose life could be used to illustrate the deceitfully seductive quality of sin summarized in the phrase 'the glamour of evil.'"

Plus he had attacked Romney for effectively supporting gay marriage in Massachusetts. He'd remained a reliable rightwing nutjob prior, including acting as a key (pun intended) birther against Obama. That said, I generally strive to hear what folks like IM2 have to say about such things before flapping my gums.

Thanks.

He is deferring to you, because of your skin color, and you don't see the racism?

LOL!!!

 

[Grumblenuts]

Deferring to IM2 is racism. It says so right in Correll's dictionary.

 

[Grumblenuts]

that is text book racism.

In no textbook ever..

 

[Correll]

Deferring to IM2 is racism. It says so right in Correll's dictionary.

You are judging his words, not on their content, but on the skin color of the person making them.


YES, THAT IS RACISM, YOU INSUFFERABLE MORON!!!

 

[Correll]

that is text book racism.

In no textbook ever..

You have consistently had different rules for different people based on race. And your rules for whites are far harsher than for other races.


That is the text book definition of racism.


YOu are insane.

 

[IM2]

that is text book racism.

In no textbook ever..

Let me know when Correll can produce that house resolution or executive order that created anti white discrimination.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Deferring to IM2 is racism. It says so right in Correll's dictionary.

You are judging his words, not on their content, but on the skin color of the person making them.


YES, THAT IS RACISM, YOU INSUFFERABLE MORON!!!

When you say "white interests" you are referring to skin color.
Not to the content of any's speech, racist dumbass.

 

[Grumblenuts]

that is text book racism.

In no textbook ever..

You have consistently had different rules for different people based on race. And your rules for whites are far harsher than for other races.


That is the text book definition of racism.


YOu are insane.

You own multiple textbooks with conflicting definitions?

 

[IM2]

Correll, shut the fuck up. Please do us all a favor. You must be fucking retarded to believe the shit you post and you are a prime example of the psychosis within the white community that must be addressed. There ain't no such thing as colorblind and not everybody that notices a persons skin color is a fucking racist. But you are.

And there are some things whereby the consideration of a persons skin color is important, such as when you talk to a person of color about their motherfucking experiences as an American. Your bitch ass talks about white interests. When in the hell ever have white interests not been addressed in this motherfucker?

Your white interest is the elimination of non whites or a return to the denial of rights for non whites and extra rights for whites. You have believed a delusion about this country all your life whereby you could ignore what and how things were actually done because you could live comfortably and had every opportunity available for you whenever you decided to take it.

Now you spend your days sniveling because you have to compete because your ass think your skin color entitles you to everything. You're a white male. White males are 31 percent of the population. 2/3's of the American population is not you. But white boys have the majority of jobs, own the most businesses, run all the institutions that control this country, earn the most money and have the most accumulated wealth. And they did this by excluding everybody else from 1776 until 1965 by written law and still today by covert practices. There is no motherfucking anti white discrimination punk, white women even get most of the benefits from affirmative action. So shut the fuck up.

 

[Correll]

Deferring to IM2 is racism. It says so right in Correll's dictionary.

You are judging his words, not on their content, but on the skin color of the person making them.


YES, THAT IS RACISM, YOU INSUFFERABLE MORON!!!

When you say "white interests" you are referring to skin color.
Not to the content of any's speech, racist dumbass.

Correct. I'm not judging the content of their speech by their skin color. I support their right to have that right, regardless of skin color.

You are the one that judges them, based on their skin color.


That is why you are a racist, while I am not.

 

[Correll]

that is text book racism.

In no textbook ever..

You have consistently had different rules for different people based on race. And your rules for whites are far harsher than for other races.


That is the text book definition of racism.


YOu are insane.

You own multiple textbooks with conflicting definitions?

Racism has as few definitions. None of them fit my actions. Several of them fit yours.

You have consistently had different rules for different people based on race. And your rules for whites are far harsher than for other races.

 

[Correll]

Correll, shut the fuck up.

No. So now what you going to do, tough guy?

Please do us all a favor. You must be fucking retarded to believe the shit you post and you are a prime example of the psychosis within the white community that must be addressed. There ain't no such thing as colorblind and not everybody that notices a persons skin color is a fucking racist. But you are.

I've kindly asked you, to please use the term "Evul Wacist" when you accuse someone of "evul wacism".

I explained my reasoning, and I think you have to admit it made a lot of sense.

I mean, your logic, such as it is, IS something that a retarded child would come up with, so.... come on, work with me here.

And there are some things whereby the consideration of a persons skin color is important, such as when you talk to a person of color about their motherfucking experiences as an American. Your bitch ass talks about white interests. When in the hell ever have white interests not been addressed in this motherfucker?

All the time now and for the last several generations, you race baiting asshole.

Your white interest is the elimination of non whites or a return to the denial of rights for non whites and extra rights for whites. You have believed a delusion about this country all your life whereby you could ignore what and how things were actually done because you could live comfortably and had every opportunity available for you whenever you decided to take it.

It is nice that you tell me about your fantasies about what you think my "white interests" are.

And by "nice" I mean an "amusing but useless look into your stupid mind".

Now you spend your days sniveling because you have to compete because your ass think your skin color entitles you to everything. You're a white male. White males are 31 percent of the population. 2/3's of the American population is not you. But white boys have the majority of jobs, own the most businesses, run all the institutions that control this country, earn the most money and have the most accumulated wealth. And they did this by excluding everybody else from 1776 until 1965 by written law and still today by covert practices. There is no motherfucking anti white discrimination punk, white women even get most of the benefits from affirmative action. So shut the fuck up.

Looking back does not justify asshats like you and grumble, discriminating against white people today.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Racism has as few definitions.

The is the only definite article in English, for both singular and plural nouns.
"The textbook definition" asserts there being only one.
Must suck being such a duplicitous gasbag.

 

[Correll]

Racism has as few definitions.

The is the only definite article in English, for both singular and plural nouns.
"The textbook definition" asserts there being only one.
Must suck being such a duplicitous gasbag.

You sad little man, reduced to playing semantics to try to distract from your hate filled racism.

Definition of RACISM

a belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race; also : behavior or attitudes that reflect and foster this belief : racial discrimination or prejudice… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

"
1: a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

2a: a doctrine or political program based on the assumption of racism and designed to execute its principles
b: a political or social system founded on racism

3: racial prejudice or discrimination
"


Your actions fit all three of them. Mine, none of them. YOu are a racist.