The Figures Are In: Obama Has Spent 3.2 Million Dollars To Keep His College Admissions Sealed

Obama’s ‘Sealed’ Records


Q: Are Obama’s early records “sealed”?


A: No. Many records that presidential candidates don’t ordinarily release do remain confidential, but they are not “sealed” by a court. The 16 claims in a widely distributed graphic are mostly false or distorted.




FULL QUESTION


Is this true?


Subj: What?


…and they want 12 years of Romney’s tax returns? THIS should be on billboards all over our nation!


Forward this to others who are interested in re-claiming America and saving our future


FULL ANSWER


This is an example of mostly old baloney in a new casing. It mainly recycles years-old falsehoods and insinuations, most of which we covered long ago, in connection with an earlier viral email.


But with President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign heating up, this new graphic has appeared on countless anti-Obama websites and in viral emails like the one we’ve reprinted here. Very little that it contains is new, and the old falsehoods have not improved with age.


Nothing ‘Sealed’


The idea that any Obama record is “sealed” is a falsehood, to start. The word “sealed” when applied to documents ordinarily refers to records that would normally be public, but that a judge has ruled cannot be released without the court’s permission. Common examples of truly “sealed” documents include records of crimes committed as a juvenile or records of adoptions. None of the claims in this message refers to records actually “sealed” in that usual sense.


In some cases, the records this screed claims are “sealed” are actually public, and open for anyone to see. Other supposedly “sealed” records are normally private documents that Obama hasn’t released — and that other presidential candidates haven’t released either.


So as with earlier versions, this is little more than an attempt to raise suspicions by asking for records that aren’t ordinarily made public, without any evidence that those records contain anything derogatory. We’ll take the claims and questions in the order they appear.





NOTHING IS "SEALED".


:dance:


What are his grades then?

Obama's grades are exactly the same as Mitt Romney's- just look up Mitt's and you will know Obama's grades.
 
Obama’s ‘Sealed’ Records


Q: Are Obama’s early records “sealed”?


A: No. Many records that presidential candidates don’t ordinarily release do remain confidential, but they are not “sealed” by a court. The 16 claims in a widely distributed graphic are mostly false or distorted.




FULL QUESTION


Is this true?


Subj: What?


…and they want 12 years of Romney’s tax returns? THIS should be on billboards all over our nation!


Forward this to others who are interested in re-claiming America and saving our future


FULL ANSWER


This is an example of mostly old baloney in a new casing. It mainly recycles years-old falsehoods and insinuations, most of which we covered long ago, in connection with an earlier viral email.


But with President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign heating up, this new graphic has appeared on countless anti-Obama websites and in viral emails like the one we’ve reprinted here. Very little that it contains is new, and the old falsehoods have not improved with age.


Nothing ‘Sealed’


The idea that any Obama record is “sealed” is a falsehood, to start. The word “sealed” when applied to documents ordinarily refers to records that would normally be public, but that a judge has ruled cannot be released without the court’s permission. Common examples of truly “sealed” documents include records of crimes committed as a juvenile or records of adoptions. None of the claims in this message refers to records actually “sealed” in that usual sense.


In some cases, the records this screed claims are “sealed” are actually public, and open for anyone to see. Other supposedly “sealed” records are normally private documents that Obama hasn’t released — and that other presidential candidates haven’t released either.


So as with earlier versions, this is little more than an attempt to raise suspicions by asking for records that aren’t ordinarily made public, without any evidence that those records contain anything derogatory. We’ll take the claims and questions in the order they appear.





NOTHING IS "SEALED".


:dance:
We need to see those college admissions. It's imperative.

Because Obama is black
Nope!
 
one Birfer says its imperative .. I ask why ... NO ANSWER

another Birfer says we need to see them then ... I ask why ... NO ANSWER


there you have it. Birfers.
 
one Birfer says its imperative .. I ask why ... NO ANSWER

another Birfer says we need to see them then ... I ask why ... NO ANSWER


there you have it. Birfers.
That's because, the birther shite is .... wait for it...... birtherbullshite

Moreover, President George W. Bush's records at Yale became public only after they were leaked to The New Yorker in November 1999. Bush had declined to release his academic transcripts.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/08/02/limbaugh-uses-dishonest-college-transcripts-arg/189096
 
Incredible! I think we now know why?

Obama-Closeup-2.png



Double Standard Trump Rips News Media For Going After Walker s Records But Not Obama s - Birther Report
Wow, Breitbart and Drudge, too.
 
Obama needs to prove to us things other presidents haven't had to prove because .... well, there's just something about the guy that seems a little shifty and unbelievable. I can't quite put my finger on it, but there's something.
Hmmm, very interesting.
 
Obama’s ‘Sealed’ Records


Q: Are Obama’s early records “sealed”?


A: No. Many records that presidential candidates don’t ordinarily release do remain confidential, but they are not “sealed” by a court. The 16 claims in a widely distributed graphic are mostly false or distorted.




FULL QUESTION


Is this true?


Subj: What?


…and they want 12 years of Romney’s tax returns? THIS should be on billboards all over our nation!


Forward this to others who are interested in re-claiming America and saving our future


FULL ANSWER


This is an example of mostly old baloney in a new casing. It mainly recycles years-old falsehoods and insinuations, most of which we covered long ago, in connection with an earlier viral email.


But with President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign heating up, this new graphic has appeared on countless anti-Obama websites and in viral emails like the one we’ve reprinted here. Very little that it contains is new, and the old falsehoods have not improved with age.


Nothing ‘Sealed’


The idea that any Obama record is “sealed” is a falsehood, to start. The word “sealed” when applied to documents ordinarily refers to records that would normally be public, but that a judge has ruled cannot be released without the court’s permission. Common examples of truly “sealed” documents include records of crimes committed as a juvenile or records of adoptions. None of the claims in this message refers to records actually “sealed” in that usual sense.


In some cases, the records this screed claims are “sealed” are actually public, and open for anyone to see. Other supposedly “sealed” records are normally private documents that Obama hasn’t released — and that other presidential candidates haven’t released either.


So as with earlier versions, this is little more than an attempt to raise suspicions by asking for records that aren’t ordinarily made public, without any evidence that those records contain anything derogatory. We’ll take the claims and questions in the order they appear.





NOTHING IS "SEALED".


:dance:


What are his grades then?


Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act FERPA
 
Maybe it has something to do with the fact that he lies blatantly.

Not sure how that would explain the blatant Birther lies, speculation and innuendo.

Maybe you can elaborate?

What the hell are you talking about?

I am talking about blatant Birther lies, speculation and innuendo- you know- this thread.

Er..no, your bizarre and unrelated birther ranting has nothing to do with the OP.
 
Maybe it has something to do with the fact that he lies blatantly.

Not sure how that would explain the blatant Birther lies, speculation and innuendo.

Maybe you can elaborate?

What the hell are you talking about?

I am talking about blatant Birther lies, speculation and innuendo- you know- this thread.

Er..no, your bizarre and unrelated birther ranting has nothing to do with the OP.

LOL_ the OP is one of the battle cries of Birthers everywhere.

And that makes since- because the original poster- Stevie the racist/anti-semite- just coincidentally happens to be a Birther.
 
Maybe it has something to do with the fact that he lies blatantly.

Not sure how that would explain the blatant Birther lies, speculation and innuendo.

Maybe you can elaborate?

What the hell are you talking about?

I am talking about blatant Birther lies, speculation and innuendo- you know- this thread.

Er..no, your bizarre and unrelated birther ranting has nothing to do with the OP.

LOL_ the OP is one of the battle cries of Birthers everywhere.

And that makes since- because the original poster- Stevie the racist/anti-semite- just coincidentally happens to be a Birther.

Really far left drone? Making more far left fallacy comments?
 
Maybe it has something to do with the fact that he lies blatantly.

Not sure how that would explain the blatant Birther lies, speculation and innuendo.

Maybe you can elaborate?

What the hell are you talking about?

I am talking about blatant Birther lies, speculation and innuendo- you know- this thread.

Er..no, your bizarre and unrelated birther ranting has nothing to do with the OP.

LOL_ the OP is one of the battle cries of Birthers everywhere.

And that makes since- because the original poster- Stevie the racist/anti-semite- just coincidentally happens to be a Birther.

*yawn*
 

Forum List

Back
Top