Thanks for this piece.
I had heard about a piece mentioned in this article, in a publication called revolver, I had forgot to look it up. . . I appreciate that. It has made quite a stir, I suggest one and all read it.
Very concise analytical, and good piece for critical thinkers.
Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge
Unindicted co-conspirators could unravel the full story of what the FBI knew in advance about the January 6th Capitol Riots.
www.revolver.news
". . . If it turns out that the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, or a similar agency) had undercover agents or confidential informants embedded in any of the groups involved in 1/6, the “federal intelligence agencies failing to warn of a potential for violence” looks less like an innocent mistake and more like something sinister.
Indeed, if the federal government knew of a potential for violence in or around the Capitol on 1/6 and failed to call for heightened security, the agencies responsible may in fact be legally liable for the damages incurred during that day.
It is unsettling to entertain the possibility that the federal government knew of a potential for violence on 1/6 and did nothing to stop it. It presents the question: why would agencies, or certain elements within, sit back and let something like this happen on purpose?
A still more disturbing possibility arises from a careful study of the unindicted co-conspirators listed throughout the various charging documents of individuals facing the most serious charges related to 1/6.. . ."
It is unsettling to know that you people are too stupid to know fake news when you see it.
O.K.
I'm willing to learn, if you believe you are so smart.
Please, tell the forum, what is the hallmark in this piece that should queue us into the fact that this is "fake news?"
IMO? It presents an alternative paradigm that makes you so uncomfortable, yet? Because it relies on a hypothesis that can neither be proved nor disproved . . . you are using hyperbole and disparaging terms.
Now, I know this "revolver" site is sketchy, and it doesn't reveal who owns it, or who writes for it, and it largely just aggregates news for other conservative sites. . . that doesn't take away from a very real narrative.
For those of us who live in Michigan, and followed that stupid Gov. Whitmer kidnapping hoax, if you followed the defense of the perps. in court, and their plea deals, the whole reason they acted on their plans, and took them so far? IT WAS THE FBI!
So how do you really know that the same thing isn't going on here, and that the "kidnapping plot," wasn't just another dry run?
I honestly don't believe you read enough, or even have a clue what is going on in the nation.
(The first link is from a far lefty site.)
We Shouldn’t Trust the FBI’s Narrative on the Gretchen Whitmer Kidnapping Scheme
The details of the kidnapping plot targeting Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer are disturbing and show the real danger of the far right. But given the FBI’s very recent history of using undercover informants as provocateurs to push people into planning “terror plots” that otherwise would have...
www.jacobinmag.com
A recent plot thwarted to take Michigan Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer hostage could have been an FBI entrapment, a defense attorney suggested.
thefederalist.com
Lawyers for the suspects in the Gov. Whitmer kidnap plot say there was no real plan to kidnap anyone, but just "big talk" by "military wannabes."
www.freep.com