“The FBI has so far found no evidence that Trump or people directly around him were involved in organizing the violence, according to 4 LEO's

tyroneweaver

tyroneweaver

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2012
Messages
28,753
Reaction score
15,189
Points
1,405
Location
Burley, Idaho
tyroneweaver said:
looks like dems way over played their hands.




truthtent.com

Breaking: Pelosi Hit with Massive Lawsuit from Trump’s Former Chief of Staff, Jan. 6 Committee Included in Lawsuit Too - Truth Tent

Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows is suing Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Jan. 6 committee.
truthtent.com truthtent.com


Pelosi Hit With Massive Lawsuit From Trump’s Former Chief Of Staff, Jan. 6 Committee Included In Lawsuit Too​

Click to expand...
Still relying from an anonymous statement from a year ago?
 
tyroneweaver said:
"Pelosi Hit With Massive Lawsuit"
Click to expand...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ummmm? ..... "Massive'?

How would such a suit be 'massive'?
Number of pages?
Number of laws allegedly violated?
Number of lawyers on each side?
Filed in thousands of jurisdictions?
Filed against thousands or millions of defendants?
What makes it massive?
Could it just be a pinch of headline-hyperbole from 'TruthTent.com"?

Just askin'.

----------------------------------------------------

Merriam: Massive

1: forming or consisting of a large mass:
a: BULKYmassive furniture
b: WEIGHTY, HEAVYmassive walls
 
tyroneweaver said:
looks like dems way over played their hands.




truthtent.com

Breaking: Pelosi Hit with Massive Lawsuit from Trump’s Former Chief of Staff, Jan. 6 Committee Included in Lawsuit Too - Truth Tent

Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows is suing Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Jan. 6 committee.
truthtent.com truthtent.com


Pelosi Hit With Massive Lawsuit From Trump’s Former Chief Of Staff, Jan. 6 Committee Included In Lawsuit Too​

Click to expand...
How is this breaking news? This is based on The Hill report from last year!!! Guess this wingnut site finally caught up with the news! :auiqs.jpg:

In fact, not only is this old news, but the committee has also decided not to charge Meadows. Most probably because he did co-operate with the committee.

The former White House chief of staff provided thousands of documents to the committee before he stopped cooperating. The panel held him in contempt of Congress last December, but the Department of Justice has indicated in recent days it will not charge Meadows.
thehill.com

Here’s a list of the people who have been subpoenaed by the Jan. 6 committee

The House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol will hold a primetime hearing on Thursday as it seeks to bring its findings to the public. While many people have s…
thehill.com thehill.com

As for the "FBI has so far found no evidence that Trump or people directly around him were involved in organizing the violence" BS? That too was from last year. Since the FBI is actively charging people with the crime, that too has been discredited.

You idiots really need to keep up. Stop relying on pillow-guy or Alex jones for your news. :itsok:
 
Last edited:
bluzman61 said:
Donald Trump will remain a free man. They've got NOTHING on him.
Click to expand...

Well, I ain't gonna argue too vigorously against the idea of Trump remaining free.
If it came down to an indictment from the DOJ after these Committee hearings....well, I wouldn't be surprised if Biden pardons him so as to sidestep the nation going through an alarming convulsion. Ala' Ford pardoning Nixon.

But as far as having "NOTHING" (your words, not mine)......I dunno.
That cake is baking.

That 'Obstructing an Official Proceeding' is a thing.
Even more so, 'Conspiracy to Obstruct'. With that one you don't need to succeed in obstructing. You don't even need to try. You just need to conspire with someone to obstruct. You know, someone like, oh, say, John Eastman, Jeff Clark, maybe some others who have been in the news?

So poster bluzman, let's see what develops.

Let the cake bake.
 
Hey poster, 'bluzman'......as long as we were talking legal strategy (see post #9).......well, in another nearby thread the following was offered as a post:



".... Jeffery Clark's home was raided by the FBI and laptops and cell-phones were confiscated. Clearly, some judge was persuaded there was probable cause to believe a crime had been committed.

So let's say just for the story.....they arrest him, indict him on some serious stuff where he get disbarred in his profession, but also 'iron-barred' in a federal pen.

But, with bigger fish to fry.....could they offer him immunity in exchange for testimony? Testimony about who said what, when, and to whom."
 
Lesh said:
Still relying from an anonymous statement from a year ago?
Click to expand...
Holy shit, that's your teams whole game.......if it wasn't for made up anonymous sources you had none at all.
 
buckeye45_73 said:
".....that's your teams whole game.......if it wasn't for made up anonymous sources you had none at all.
Click to expand...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Well, yes a lot of the early reportage of what 'insiders' said vis-a-vis January 6th was attributed to anonymous sources. So stipulated.

But, as l no doubt noted as you watched the hearings, poster buckeye.......a large share of those anonymously sourced facts have now been verified, validated, and repeated.....in the 5 hearing we've had to date. And by folks with a name, a face, a title, ......and importantly .....under oath.

So, personally, I don't dismiss 'anonymous sources' automatically.

But you be you.
 
15th post
berg80 said:
Let's wait for the hearings to conclude before making any assumptions.

www.usatoday.com

Is the Jan. 6 committee sitting on explosive evidence of Trump's role in the Capitol assault?

The Jan. 6 Committee has hinted of potentially explosive information tying people in Trump's orbit to the planning of the violent Capitol attack
www.usatoday.com
Click to expand...
There is a massive and growing amount of people who will watch those Prog traitorous politicians involved be exterminated. But we are in a nation that is moving to a totalitarian lovefest.
 
Chillicothe said:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Well, yes a lot of the early reportage of what 'insiders' said vis-a-vis January 6th was attributed to anonymous sources. So stipulated.

But, as l no doubt noted as you watched the hearings, poster buckeye.......a large share of those anonymously sourced facts have now been verified, validated, and repeated.....in the 5 hearing we've had to date. And by folks with a name, a face, a title, ......and importantly .....under oath.

So, personally, I don't dismiss 'anonymous sources' automatically.

But you be you.
Click to expand...
What was verified?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

HEY!! The Supreme Court Did NOT Say "No Abortions Allowed!!"

< Previous Thread

Do babies have more of a right to life, than the mom has to kill her baby?

Next Thread >

Similar threads

DonGlock26
Seattle Found Liable for $30 Million Over Death During the “Summer of Love”
Replies
4
Views
177
ColonelAngus
ColonelAngus
Doc7505
White Trump supporter murdered by Black left-winger, and nobody’s talking about it…
2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
803
August West
A
citygator
GOP Staffer Charged with Trafficking 11 Underaged Girls in Alaska
6 7 8
Replies
156
Views
2K
Seymour Flops
Seymour Flops
C_Clayton_Jones
  • Locked
Trump knows he's losing on immigration -- and he doesn't know how to turn things around
Replies
1
Views
109
OKTexas
OKTexas
EvilEyeFleegle
A Jan. 6 rioter pardoned by Trump was convicted of sexually abusing children
2
Replies
24
Views
578
toobfreak
toobfreak

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom