“The FBI has so far found no evidence that Trump or people directly around him were involved in organizing the violence, according to 4 LEO's

[tyroneweaver]

looks like dems way over played their hands.

Breaking: Pelosi Hit with Massive Lawsuit from Trump’s Former Chief of Staff, Jan. 6 Committee Included in Lawsuit Too - Truth Tent

Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows is suing Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Jan. 6 committee.

truthtent.com

Pelosi Hit With Massive Lawsuit From Trump’s Former Chief Of Staff, Jan. 6 Committee Included In Lawsuit Too​

 

[Lesh]

looks like dems way over played their hands.

Breaking: Pelosi Hit with Massive Lawsuit from Trump’s Former Chief of Staff, Jan. 6 Committee Included in Lawsuit Too - Truth Tent

Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows is suing Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Jan. 6 committee.

truthtent.com

Pelosi Hit With Massive Lawsuit From Trump’s Former Chief Of Staff, Jan. 6 Committee Included In Lawsuit Too​

Still relying from an anonymous statement from a year ago?

 

[Moonglow]

The judge will toss it just like with Bannon's attempt at dodging Congress.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Time for another investigation.

 

[kyzr]

Time for another investigation.

Yep, in 2023 when the Republicans take the House back and subpoena Nancy Pelosi.

 

[Chillicothe]

"Pelosi Hit With Massive Lawsuit"

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ummmm? ..... "Massive'?

How would such a suit be 'massive'?
Number of pages?
Number of laws allegedly violated?
Number of lawyers on each side?
Filed in thousands of jurisdictions?
Filed against thousands or millions of defendants?
What makes it massive?
Could it just be a pinch of headline-hyperbole from 'TruthTent.com"?

Just askin'.

----------------------------------------------------

Merriam: Massive

1: forming or consisting of a large mass:
a: BULKYmassive furniture
b: WEIGHTY, HEAVYmassive walls

 

[Magnus]

looks like dems way over played their hands.

Breaking: Pelosi Hit with Massive Lawsuit from Trump’s Former Chief of Staff, Jan. 6 Committee Included in Lawsuit Too - Truth Tent

Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows is suing Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Jan. 6 committee.

truthtent.com

Pelosi Hit With Massive Lawsuit From Trump’s Former Chief Of Staff, Jan. 6 Committee Included In Lawsuit Too​

How is this breaking news? This is based on The Hill report from last year!!! Guess this wingnut site finally caught up with the news!

In fact, not only is this old news, but the committee has also decided not to charge Meadows. Most probably because he did co-operate with the committee.

The former White House chief of staff provided thousands of documents to the committee before he stopped cooperating. The panel held him in contempt of Congress last December, but the Department of Justice has indicated in recent days it will not charge Meadows.

Here’s a list of the people who have been subpoenaed by the Jan. 6 committee

The House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol will hold a primetime hearing on Thursday as it seeks to bring its findings to the public. While many people have s…

thehill.com

As for the "FBI has so far found no evidence that Trump or people directly around him were involved in organizing the violence" BS? That too was from last year. Since the FBI is actively charging people with the crime, that too has been discredited.

You idiots really need to keep up. Stop relying on pillow-guy or Alex jones for your news.

 

[bluzman61]

Donald Trump will remain a free man. They've got NOTHING on him. The End.

 

[Chillicothe]

Donald Trump will remain a free man. They've got NOTHING on him.

Well, I ain't gonna argue too vigorously against the idea of Trump remaining free.
If it came down to an indictment from the DOJ after these Committee hearings....well, I wouldn't be surprised if Biden pardons him so as to sidestep the nation going through an alarming convulsion. Ala' Ford pardoning Nixon.

But as far as having "NOTHING" (your words, not mine)......I dunno.
That cake is baking.

That 'Obstructing an Official Proceeding' is a thing.
Even more so, 'Conspiracy to Obstruct'. With that one you don't need to succeed in obstructing. You don't even need to try. You just need to conspire with someone to obstruct. You know, someone like, oh, say, John Eastman, Jeff Clark, maybe some others who have been in the news?

So poster bluzman, let's see what develops.

Let the cake bake.

 

[Chillicothe]

Hey poster, 'bluzman'......as long as we were talking legal strategy (see post #9).......well, in another nearby thread the following was offered as a post:



".... Jeffery Clark's home was raided by the FBI and laptops and cell-phones were confiscated. Clearly, some judge was persuaded there was probable cause to believe a crime had been committed.

So let's say just for the story.....they arrest him, indict him on some serious stuff where he get disbarred in his profession, but also 'iron-barred' in a federal pen.

But, with bigger fish to fry.....could they offer him immunity in exchange for testimony? Testimony about who said what, when, and to whom."

 

[easyt65]

looks like dems way over played their hands.

Breaking: Pelosi Hit with Massive Lawsuit from Trump’s Former Chief of Staff, Jan. 6 Committee Included in Lawsuit Too - Truth Tent

Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows is suing Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Jan. 6 committee.

truthtent.com

Pelosi Hit With Massive Lawsuit From Trump’s Former Chief Of Staff, Jan. 6 Committee Included In Lawsuit Too​

Duh

 

[buckeye45_73]

Still relying from an anonymous statement from a year ago?

Holy shit, that's your teams whole game.......if it wasn't for made up anonymous sources you had none at all.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

They haven't found anyone cause they're the ones who instigated it

 

[easyt65]

Far more evidence of crimes committed by tbe FBI exists...

 

[Chillicothe]

".....that's your teams whole game.......if it wasn't for made up anonymous sources you had none at all.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Well, yes a lot of the early reportage of what 'insiders' said vis-a-vis January 6th was attributed to anonymous sources. So stipulated.

But, as l no doubt noted as you watched the hearings, poster buckeye.......a large share of those anonymously sourced facts have now been verified, validated, and repeated.....in the 5 hearing we've had to date. And by folks with a name, a face, a title, ......and importantly .....under oath.

So, personally, I don't dismiss 'anonymous sources' automatically.

But you be you.

 

[berg80]

looks like dems way over played their hands.

Let's wait for the hearings to conclude before making any assumptions.

Is the Jan. 6 committee sitting on explosive evidence of Trump's role in the Capitol assault?

The Jan. 6 Committee has hinted of potentially explosive information tying people in Trump's orbit to the planning of the violent Capitol attack

www.usatoday.com

 

[bodecea]

looks like dems way over played their hands.

Breaking: Pelosi Hit with Massive Lawsuit from Trump’s Former Chief of Staff, Jan. 6 Committee Included in Lawsuit Too - Truth Tent

Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows is suing Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Jan. 6 committee.

truthtent.com

Pelosi Hit With Massive Lawsuit From Trump’s Former Chief Of Staff, Jan. 6 Committee Included In Lawsuit Too​

Nice try gaslighting.

 

[22lcidw]

Let's wait for the hearings to conclude before making any assumptions.

Is the Jan. 6 committee sitting on explosive evidence of Trump's role in the Capitol assault?

The Jan. 6 Committee has hinted of potentially explosive information tying people in Trump's orbit to the planning of the violent Capitol attack

www.usatoday.com

There is a massive and growing amount of people who will watch those Prog traitorous politicians involved be exterminated. But we are in a nation that is moving to a totalitarian lovefest.

 

[BluesLegend]

Let's wait for the hearings to conclude before making any assumptions.

Said no Democrat ever.

 

[buckeye45_73]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Well, yes a lot of the early reportage of what 'insiders' said vis-a-vis January 6th was attributed to anonymous sources. So stipulated.

But, as l no doubt noted as you watched the hearings, poster buckeye.......a large share of those anonymously sourced facts have now been verified, validated, and repeated.....in the 5 hearing we've had to date. And by folks with a name, a face, a title, ......and importantly .....under oath.

So, personally, I don't dismiss 'anonymous sources' automatically.

But you be you.

What was verified?