The evolution of race - how evolution debunks racism




Science reveals that genetic diversity leads to better offspring, who are better able to adapt to new environments.

Conversely, we see that a lack of genetic diversity results in genetically inferior offspring. This is why we avoid practicing incest, for example. And, indeed, if one wanted to preserve homogeneity as much as possible, then practicing incest would be the way to do it.

Based on these facts, it seems that science has thoroughly debunked racism, and shown that mixing races leads to superior offspring. Racism, like incest, is archaic and holds back the evolution of the species.

Genetic diversity is crucial for the evolution of species. It allows for the development of new traits and adaptations that enable organisms to survive in changing environments. When a population or species has low genetic diversity, it is more susceptible to disease, environmental changes, and other threats. In contrast, a population with high genetic diversity is more resilient and has a greater chance of survival.
Diversity destroys everything and everywhere it’s deployed.
Diversity is and will be at the root of demise.
 



Science reveals that genetic diversity leads to better offspring, who are better able to adapt to new environments.

Conversely, we see that a lack of genetic diversity results in genetically inferior offspring. This is why we avoid practicing incest, for example. And, indeed, if one wanted to preserve homogeneity as much as possible, then practicing incest would be the way to do it.

Based on these facts, it seems that science has thoroughly debunked racism, and shown that mixing races leads to superior offspring. Racism, like incest, is archaic and holds back the evolution of the species.

Genetic diversity is crucial for the evolution of species. It allows for the development of new traits and adaptations that enable organisms to survive in changing environments. When a population or species has low genetic diversity, it is more susceptible to disease, environmental changes, and other threats. In contrast, a population with high genetic diversity is more resilient and has a greater chance of survival.
Let's start with an easy one. Do you understand what "Politics" means?
 
Emotions determine how intelligence is applied
So do values.

But the fact remains that MOST people are not capable of a graduate degree in electrical engineering or a PhD in physics - even WITH the right emotions or values. They just don’t have the innate intelligence required.
 
Trans is a mental illness caused by a premorbid personality disorder or emotional disturbance. So yes thats experience and socially transmitted.
Gay is normal and only partly genetic. Twin studies prove that.
Identical twins are both gay 52 % of the time. fraternal twins 43% non twin siblings 23 %. Sp we can deduce that Identical twins are not 100% both gay there is another factor. We also see as the genes become less identical the incandesce drops. Which proves its both gens and the experience that trigger homosexuality
You realize that your peers have all embraced being trans as normal, right? You are now outside the realm of ever-changing scientific views on the matter. It is a mental illness one day, and normal the next. Thanks, medical establishment.

Also, in ancient Sparta did they all have the "gay gene" as to why all the men practiced homosexuality?

Sorry, don't see how that is possible.
 
Oh dear, someone questions the father of evolutionary theory, Charles Darwin. Are you a science denier?

Darwin believed in white supremacy, he offers a biological explanation for it, namely that white people are further evolved. He writes that the “western nations of Europe … now so immeasurably surpass their former savage progenitors and stand at the summit of civilization” (178). Darwin imagines that Europeans are more advanced versions of the rest of the world. As previously mentioned, this purported superiority justified to Darwin the domination of inferior races by Europeans. As white Europeans “exterminate and replace” the world’s “savage races,” and as great apes go extinct, Darwin says that the gap between civilized man and his closest evolutionary ancestor will widen. The gap will eventually be between civilized man “and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla” (201). Read that last line again if you missed it: Darwin’s theory claims that Africans and Australians are more closely related to apes than Europeans are. The spectrum of organisms is a hierarchy here, with white Europeans at the top and apes at the bottom. In Darwin’s theory, colored people fall somewhere in between. Modern human is essentially restricted only to white Europeans, with all other races viewed as somehow sub-human.
Oh silly, you shouldn't shouldn't talk about things like "science" that you don't have a child's understanding of.

Darwin's "beliefs" about race aren't anymore scientific than his beliefs about the man on the moon. Darwin had some outdated beliefs on race and such which were merely the product of a bygone day and age, much as how Darwin himself is dated, and there are far more contemporary scientists who have surpassed him. However, Darwin was rather progressive in many regards, and was a noted abolitionist:

Darwin believed that the enslavement of people was barbaric and, like the rest of his family, supported the abolition movement. Using his letters and journals we discover what he encountered and learn more about the background and impact of the transatlantic slave trade.


People will deny whatever science they damn well want to. Unlike truth, it doesn't have any power here.

And, if we look at the actual science, rather than your misunderstanding of what science is. We can clearly see that there is more genetic variation within "races" than between them:

In 2003, Phase 1 of the Human Genome Project (HGP) demonstrated that humans populating the earth today are on average 99.9% identical at the DNA level, there is no genetic basis for race, and there is more genetic variation within a race than between them [2].

So, are you a science denier, or are you not. Are you going to deny all of the scientific evidence that shows that a black evolutionary biologist like Joseph L. Graves Jr. is more socially evolved than a white, meth-addicted felon?

1756946803804.webp

1756946831337.webp
 
Oh silly, you shouldn't shouldn't talk about things like "science" that you don't have a child's understanding of.

Darwin's "beliefs" about race aren't anymore scientific than his beliefs about the man on the moon. Darwin had some outdated beliefs on race and such which were merely the product of a bygone day and age, much as how Darwin himself is dated, and there are far more contemporary scientists who have surpassed him. However, Darwin was rather progressive in many regards, and was a noted abolitionist:

Darwin believed that the enslavement of people was barbaric and, like the rest of his family, supported the abolition movement. Using his letters and journals we discover what he encountered and learn more about the background and impact of the transatlantic slave trade.


People will deny whatever science they damn well want to. Unlike truth, it doesn't have any power here.

And, if we look at the actual science, rather than your misunderstanding of what science is. We can clearly see that there is more genetic variation within "races" than between them:

In 2003, Phase 1 of the Human Genome Project (HGP) demonstrated that humans populating the earth today are on average 99.9% identical at the DNA level, there is no genetic basis for race, and there is more genetic variation within a race than between them [2].

So, are you a science denier, or are you not. Are you going to deny all of the scientific evidence that shows that a black evolutionary biologist like Joseph L. Graves Jr. is more socially evolved than a white, meth-addicted felon?

View attachment 1157997
View attachment 1157998
I believe my lying eyes…I look around the world at EVERY SINGLE dark community, city, state and nation and I know what I see…Disgusting, dangerous shitholes…ALL OF THEM!
That’s no bizarre coincidence…It’s time that nutless pukes stop denying the obvious out of fear.

Unkotare
 
I believe my lying eyes…I look around the world at EVERY SINGLE dark community, city, state and nation and I know what I see…Disgusting, dangerous shitholes…ALL OF THEM!
That’s no bizarre coincidence…It’s time that nutless pukes stop denying the obvious out of fear.

Unkotare
Your eyes don't show you much.
 
I believe my lying eyes…I look around the world at EVERY SINGLE dark community, city, state and nation and I know what I see…Disgusting, dangerous shitholes…ALL OF THEM!
That’s no bizarre coincidence…It’s time that nutless pukes stop denying the obvious out of fear.

Unkotare
Broken record of un-American weakness and fear. ^^^
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom