1. Oppression is defined thus: the state of being subject to unjust treatment or control.
I'm gonna put that in juxtaposition to freedom.
2. As civilization developed, the idea of a leader, king, someone in charge seemed the proper route. Modern civilization can be traced to the two revolutions, the French and the American. Let focus on the one that was based on oppression, the French.
The French Revolution, which gave rise to the Russian Revolution, the Nazi, and that of Mao. Rousseau believed private property was the cause of the corruption of the human character, and private property should be abolished, and ending it would purify humanity. He believed that any who disagreed with the general will should be treated like a wild beast (killed). Government used terror as a policy.
Every Leftist administration conforms to this view.
3. The violence of the Frence Revolution was mirrored by one faction during the Russian Revolution:
" It became clear that the party was split between two groups, the Bolsheviks (‘majority’) and the Mensheviks (‘minority’).
Both groups were enthusiasts for the destruction of capitalism and the overthrow of the Tsarist regime, but the Mensheviks, led by Martov, favoured a large, loosely organised democratic party whose members could agree to differ on many points. They were prepared to work with the liberals in Russia and they had scruples about the use of violence. The Bolsheviks, led by Lenin, were hardline revolutionaries who would not have known a scruple if it bought them a drink.
4. Slaughter proved to be quite labor intensive. The improvement was the use of manipulation rather than violence: take over the dissemination of information.....the value of propaganda, lies.
......the plan was posited by the briliant communist theoretician
Antonio Gramschi.
“Antonio Gramsci, the philosopher who became the iconic thinker of the 1960s, laid down the blueprint for precisely what has happened in Britain: the capture of all society's institutions, such as schools, universities, churches, the media, the legal profession, the police and voluntary groups. This intellectual elite was persuaded to sing from the same subversive hymn-sheet so that the moral beliefs of the majority would be replaced by the values of those on the margins of society, the perfect ambience in which the Muslim grievance culture could be fanned into the flames of extremism.
Phillips, “Londonistan,” P.118-119
5. A change in American culture added to the sea change in morality: the acceptance of envy as motivation.
By the 20th century, the new ‘equality’ became a threat to freedom. FDR’s New Deal and Truman’s Fair Deal claimed the rectification of inequalities as within the purview of government. LBJ’s Great Society championed the redistribution of wealth and status in the name of equality. Realize that the concomitant movement toward collectivism meant a decline in the freedoms of business, private associations, families, and individuals.
a. The desire for equality of income or of wealth is, of course, but one aspect of a more general desire for equality. “The essence of the moral idea of socialism is that human equality is the supreme value in life.” Martin Malia, “A Fatal Logic,” The National Interest, Spring 1993, pp. 80, 87
b. Sociologist Helmut Schoeck’s observation: “Since the end of the Second World War, however, a new ‘ethic’ has come into being, according to which the envious man is perfectly acceptable. Progressively fewer individuals and groups are ashamed of their envy, but instead make out that its existence in their temperaments axiomatically proves the existence of ‘social injustice,’ which must be eliminated for their benefit.” Helmut Schoeck, “Envy: A Theory of Social Behavior,” p. 179
Not oppression, nor violence, nor envy dominated American culture....that's why so many of us came here.
But when the Democrats chose power over American culture, and filled America with immigrants who brought a very different ethos, .....we saw that party pull off the mask and wave the banner of communism.....
......of oppression.
I'm gonna put that in juxtaposition to freedom.
2. As civilization developed, the idea of a leader, king, someone in charge seemed the proper route. Modern civilization can be traced to the two revolutions, the French and the American. Let focus on the one that was based on oppression, the French.
The French Revolution, which gave rise to the Russian Revolution, the Nazi, and that of Mao. Rousseau believed private property was the cause of the corruption of the human character, and private property should be abolished, and ending it would purify humanity. He believed that any who disagreed with the general will should be treated like a wild beast (killed). Government used terror as a policy.
Every Leftist administration conforms to this view.
3. The violence of the Frence Revolution was mirrored by one faction during the Russian Revolution:
" It became clear that the party was split between two groups, the Bolsheviks (‘majority’) and the Mensheviks (‘minority’).
Both groups were enthusiasts for the destruction of capitalism and the overthrow of the Tsarist regime, but the Mensheviks, led by Martov, favoured a large, loosely organised democratic party whose members could agree to differ on many points. They were prepared to work with the liberals in Russia and they had scruples about the use of violence. The Bolsheviks, led by Lenin, were hardline revolutionaries who would not have known a scruple if it bought them a drink.
4. Slaughter proved to be quite labor intensive. The improvement was the use of manipulation rather than violence: take over the dissemination of information.....the value of propaganda, lies.
......the plan was posited by the briliant communist theoretician
Antonio Gramschi.
“Antonio Gramsci, the philosopher who became the iconic thinker of the 1960s, laid down the blueprint for precisely what has happened in Britain: the capture of all society's institutions, such as schools, universities, churches, the media, the legal profession, the police and voluntary groups. This intellectual elite was persuaded to sing from the same subversive hymn-sheet so that the moral beliefs of the majority would be replaced by the values of those on the margins of society, the perfect ambience in which the Muslim grievance culture could be fanned into the flames of extremism.
Phillips, “Londonistan,” P.118-119
5. A change in American culture added to the sea change in morality: the acceptance of envy as motivation.
By the 20th century, the new ‘equality’ became a threat to freedom. FDR’s New Deal and Truman’s Fair Deal claimed the rectification of inequalities as within the purview of government. LBJ’s Great Society championed the redistribution of wealth and status in the name of equality. Realize that the concomitant movement toward collectivism meant a decline in the freedoms of business, private associations, families, and individuals.
a. The desire for equality of income or of wealth is, of course, but one aspect of a more general desire for equality. “The essence of the moral idea of socialism is that human equality is the supreme value in life.” Martin Malia, “A Fatal Logic,” The National Interest, Spring 1993, pp. 80, 87
b. Sociologist Helmut Schoeck’s observation: “Since the end of the Second World War, however, a new ‘ethic’ has come into being, according to which the envious man is perfectly acceptable. Progressively fewer individuals and groups are ashamed of their envy, but instead make out that its existence in their temperaments axiomatically proves the existence of ‘social injustice,’ which must be eliminated for their benefit.” Helmut Schoeck, “Envy: A Theory of Social Behavior,” p. 179
Not oppression, nor violence, nor envy dominated American culture....that's why so many of us came here.
But when the Democrats chose power over American culture, and filled America with immigrants who brought a very different ethos, .....we saw that party pull off the mask and wave the banner of communism.....
......of oppression.
