MarcATL
Diamond Member
- Aug 12, 2009
- 44,120
- 23,291
- 2,605
Hmmm....Guess what folks!
It doesn't matter where Obama was born.
A YUP.
His mother was a U.S. citizen, so he was born a U.S. citizen no matter where he was born.
The whole discussion is idiotic!
Not true.
Under the current law (8 USC §1401) if a person born outside the United States to one parent who is a United States Citizen and one who is an alien, the citizen parent must have been a citizen for 5 years prior to the birth, 2 of which must be after reaching the age of 14.
At the time of Obama's birth, the applicable section of the United States Code was written under the Immigration and Nationalization Act of 1952 (Section 301). At the time the requirement was to have been a citizen for 10 years, 5 of which had to be after the age of 14. Stanley Dunham was born November 29, 1942, Barrack Obama was born August 4, 1961. Stanley Dunham couldn't pass citizenship to an offspring born outside US territory until her 19th birthday which was on November 29, 1961. Obama was born 3-months shy of that mark. So if his birth had been outside the territory or the United States, no he wouldn't have been a citizen at birth.
Not making a claim either way on where Obama was born. Just pointing out a factual error in the law.
United States Code: Title 8,1401. Nationals and citizens of United States at birth | LII / Legal Information Institute
1952 Immigration and Nationality Act Title3 Chapter1
>>>>
You, sir, are right...and when you're right...you're right.
