mal
Diamond Member
Why the **** is this now in the Conspiracy Theories section??? We have TAPE of them saying these things!
The Random Moving of Threads and Deletion of them is one of the Worst things about this otherwise GREAT Site...
peace...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why the **** is this now in the Conspiracy Theories section??? We have TAPE of them saying these things!
I suspect someone on the left whined like a little ***** and to shut them up a kindly mod placated them. (no offense mods, I don't blame you for wanting to shut em up.)Why the **** is this now in the Conspiracy Theories section??? We have TAPE of them saying these things!
The Random Moving of Threads and Deletion of them is one of the Worst things about this otherwise GREAT Site...
peace...
I suspect someone on the left whined like a little ***** and to shut them up a kindly mod placated them. (no offense mods, I don't blame you for wanting to shut em up.)Why the **** is this now in the Conspiracy Theories section??? We have TAPE of them saying these things!
The Random Moving of Threads and Deletion of them is one of the Worst things about this otherwise GREAT Site...
peace...

File under "No Shit Sherlock." That was the point I was making. Religion is separate from politics or it damn well should be.It sure as shit isn't a liberal religion either.
Seeing that being a Liberal is a political stance, rather than a religious one, this is a pretty stupid statement.
I like to assume I have a sentient audience that can pick up nuance and read between the lines. I don't dumb down what I'm saying unless it's either A) important to me that you get it or B) mocking you.File under "No Shit Sherlock." That was the point I was making. Religion is separate from politics or it damn well should be.Seeing that being a Liberal is a political stance, rather than a religious one, this is a pretty stupid statement.
If that is the point that you were making, why did you not say it?
I like to assume I have a sentient audience that can pick up nuance and read between the lines. I don't dumb down what I'm saying unless it's either A) important to me that you get it or B) mocking you.File under "No Shit Sherlock." That was the point I was making. Religion is separate from politics or it damn well should be.
If that is the point that you were making, why did you not say it?
Did I make that clear enough or do I need to talk slower and louder?
BTW, ever compare political philosophies to scripture? I'm fairly certain, given honest study, you would quickly discover which follows more in a true Christ-like walk if you can strip away the demagoguery and frantic desire to be right rather than know truth.
I strongly suspect you would also not be happy with the honest result either.
"The truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off." Solomon Short nee David Gerrold
I neither attacked you or tried to talk my way out of it. I laid the situation out in front of you and you chose to get offended.I like to assume I have a sentient audience that can pick up nuance and read between the lines. I don't dumb down what I'm saying unless it's either A) important to me that you get it or B) mocking you.If that is the point that you were making, why did you not say it?
Did I make that clear enough or do I need to talk slower and louder?
BTW, ever compare political philosophies to scripture? I'm fairly certain, given honest study, you would quickly discover which follows more in a true Christ-like walk if you can strip away the demagoguery and frantic desire to be right rather than know truth.
I strongly suspect you would also not be happy with the honest result either.
"The truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off." Solomon Short nee David Gerrold
This is total bullshit, trying to talk your way out of a situation by attacking me.
No, Unbalanced Organized Labor is a bad word to economic growth.About time.
Republicans have been at war against the middle class, teachers, blacks, gays, Hispanics, the Unemployed and like cannibals, they went after their most loyal followers, the elderly. I'm thinking the GOP leadership realized they don't need human people anymore after discovering corporations are ALSO people.
Absolutely.
Labor is a bad word to conservatives.
You may thank the Clinton Admin for allowing China to get most priviledged trade status, NAFTA and CAFTA as well as the FTAA.No, Unbalanced Organized Labor is a bad word to economic growth.Absolutely.
Labor is a bad word to conservatives.
Since the 80s Unions have been crushed and guess what.
Wage earners have flat salaries..and executives have seen jumps of some 300%.
That along with erosions in benefits.
Hmm..what's changed?
Oh look, Another Teamster's Rally! And they're acting patriotic!
WW II Video, Nazi National Anthem - YouTube
Shrill cries of "Godwin Godwin!" in 3...2...1...

No, Unbalanced Organized Labor is a bad word to economic growth.Absolutely.
Labor is a bad word to conservatives.
Since the 80s Unions have been crushed and guess what.
Wage earners have flat salaries..and executives have seen jumps of some 300%.
That along with erosions in benefits.
Hmm..what's changed?
No, Unbalanced Organized Labor is a bad word to economic growth.
Since the 80s Unions have been crushed and guess what.
Wage earners have flat salaries..and executives have seen jumps of some 300%.
That along with erosions in benefits.
Hmm..what's changed?
as usual, you are talking excrement, do you ever ever read or think before posting? really?
You may thank the Clinton Admin for allowing China to get most priviledged trade status, NAFTA and CAFTA as well as the FTAA.No, Unbalanced Organized Labor is a bad word to economic growth.
Since the 80s Unions have been crushed and guess what.
Wage earners have flat salaries..and executives have seen jumps of some 300%.
That along with erosions in benefits.
Hmm..what's changed?
Before that, offshoring was a minimal problem.

You may thank the Clinton Admin for allowing China to get most priviledged trade status, NAFTA and CAFTA as well as the FTAA.Since the 80s Unions have been crushed and guess what.
Wage earners have flat salaries..and executives have seen jumps of some 300%.
That along with erosions in benefits.
Hmm..what's changed?
Before that, offshoring was a minimal problem.
Well considering most off and near shoring occurred under George W. Bush..I can see why you wanna pin it on Clinton...who's economy created like 33 million jobs.
Here.
In this country.![]()
The left is awesome at ginning up crazy.Oh look, Another Teamster's Rally! And they're acting patriotic!
WW II Video, Nazi National Anthem - YouTube
Shrill cries of "Godwin Godwin!" in 3...2...1...
gotta say, those nazis, they sure could summon up a driving, swaggering sing along...![]()
of course. Let's ignore the groundwork laid in by liberal ideas and then when the fruits of their labor come pouring in, blame those who's watch it was for not stopping them from doing what they did.You may thank the Clinton Admin for allowing China to get most priviledged trade status, NAFTA and CAFTA as well as the FTAA.Since the 80s Unions have been crushed and guess what.
Wage earners have flat salaries..and executives have seen jumps of some 300%.
That along with erosions in benefits.
Hmm..what's changed?
Before that, offshoring was a minimal problem.
Well considering most off and near shoring occurred under George W. Bush..I can see why you wanna pin it on Clinton...who's economy created like 33 million jobs.
Here.
In this country.![]()
Since the 80s Unions have been crushed and guess what.
Wage earners have flat salaries..and executives have seen jumps of some 300%.
That along with erosions in benefits.
Hmm..what's changed?
as usual, you are talking excrement, do you ever ever read or think before posting? really?
True story.
Most of the world's billionaires are here.
The World's Billionaires - Forbes.com
You'd think they'd share with the people that made them so rich..wouldn't ya?
Guess not.
What's missing?
There's a huge difference between Biden rightly calling someone a terrorist and him equating "his political enemies to the murders responsible for 9/11".
Some of A = B is not the same as ALL of A = B.
Logic 101 bub.
So you think it is appropriate for a sitting Vice President to label a PEACEFUL, LAWFUL political movement that elected 58 people to Congress as terrorists?
Of course they do.
Are we forgetting who wrote his memoirs for him, admitted terrorist Bill Ayers and his ******* wife, and his strong support for Palestine?So you think it is appropriate for a sitting Vice President to label a PEACEFUL, LAWFUL political movement that elected 58 people to Congress as terrorists?
Of course they do.
Or the president sympathetic to "terrorists"? Oh, that's right. It's different. He's black. Oops.