SeaMajor7
Diamond Member
No. I'm talking about the accusations of TRUMP/RUSSIA COLLUSION, but I'm sure you knew that.
The Election Was Stolen, President Is Illegitimate
- Thread starter Independent thinker
- Start date
Pete7469
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #42
Everyone who has the capacity to know more than a parrot is aware that the ruskies had no impact on the election in 2016.
If they wanted anyone to win it would have been hitlary because after she sold them our uranium they could have told her and her fuckstick husband to eat shit on their way to Paris.
.
Bought and paid for by Hilda and the DNC.
Muhammed
Diamond Member
What proof is there that Russia did that? None has been provided to date.
Also, why would exposing her emails help Trump? Was she doing something illegal or immoral?
You’re basically saying that because Americans knew the truth of Hillary they voted against her.
One day after she DESTROYED the green room.
Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 65,087
- 59,286
- 3,600
Hey Einstein, when you don't lose, you don't concede.
- Nov 10, 2019
- 58,417
- 37,667
- 2,490
- Moderator
- #49
That charge stems from the belief he intentionally and overtly coordinated with Russia, never proven, but considered underhanded use of their help, even if not coordinated. Donny harping on collusion is kind of a master class stroke, since there is no federal statute on collusion anyway, so the more talk about collusion, the better for Donny, and diverts attention from other things that were illegal, such as some of the things that got some of his cronies convicted or admitted of crimes.No. I'm talking about the accusations of TRUMP/RUSSIA COLLUSION, but I'm sure you knew that.
Clipper
Diamond Member
- Dec 22, 2018
- 21,677
- 14,124
- 1,290
Go suck your thumb & pray that The Kraken Lady & that booze hound aren't indicted because they will rat Trump out in a half second.
Please indict them.
jknowgood
Diamond Member
The Democrats said they were hacked, then provided no evidence. Reminds me of the Jan 6 kangaroo court.
1. Shrillary was stupidly mouthing loser-excuse -making bull$hit... her ego won't allow her to believe that her Flyover States Negligence hurt her badly
2. Shrillary actually behaved like an adult on Trump's inauguration day and attended the Inauguration of her election rival - unlike the Orange Baboon-God
3. Shrillary talks trash like that once-in-a-blue-moon... the Orange Baboon-God does it every day... hell, the silly bastard probably believes his own Big Lie
4. Keep in mind that the "The Other Guy Did It Too" defense stopped working in elementary school... and in no way excuses that from a former President
Re: (4) (above)... in case no one has told you Rump-Lovers this before... a President is held to a higher standard of conduct than a mere contender.
But that's never stopped you guys before from Defending the Indefensible and making excuses-for and enabling that arrogant Orange Benedict Arnold.
The January 6th Committee is not a court of law... you'll get your day in court if-and-when a Grand Jury indicts and trial(s) get underway.
It's a *****-kitty being on the Wrong Side of History and being stuck backing a traitorous Orange piece-of-$hit like that, ain't it? But you can't back-out now.
In for penny... in for a pound... you poor bastards...
Quasar44
Diamond Member
They illegally went around the state legislatures and counted many illegal votes with zero signatures , dates or signature verifications
Seems their findings were based upon what they got from Crowdstrike;
EXCERPT:
...
The disclosure that CrowdStrike found no evidence that alleged Russian hackers exfiltrated any data from the DNC server raises a critical question: On what basis, then, did it accuse them of stealing the emails? Further, on what basis did Obama administration officials make far more forceful claims about Russian hacking?
The January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA), which formally accused Russia of a sweeping influence campaign involving the theft of Democratic emails, claimed the Russian intelligence service "exfiltrated large volumes of data from the DNC." A July 2018 indictment claimed that GRU officers "stole thousands of emails from the work accounts of DNC employees."
According to everyone concerned, the cyber-firm played a critical role in the FBI's investigation of the DNC data theft. Henry told the panel that CrowdStrike "shared intelligence with the FBI" on a regular basis, making "contact with them over a hundred times in the course of many months." In congressional testimony that same year, former FBI Director James Comey acknowledged that the FBI "never got direct access to the machines themselves," and instead relied on CrowdStrike, which "shared with us their forensics from their review of the system." According to Comey, the FBI would have preferred direct access to the server, and made "multiple requests at different levels," to obtain it. But after being rebuffed, "ultimately it was agreed to… [CrowdStrike] would share with us what they saw."
...
Hidden Over 2 Years: Dem Cyber-Firm's Sworn Testimony It Had No Proof of Russian Hack of DNC
CrowdStrike, the private cyber-security firm that first accused Russia of hacking Democratic Party emails and served as a critical source for U.S. intelligence officials in the years-long Trump-Russia
BTW and FWIW, the link provided was from Real Clear Investigations, which was citing CrowdStrike.
Tom Paine 1949
Diamond Member
- Mar 15, 2020
- 5,407
- 4,513
- 1,938
Only lunatics can make this comparison, since Hillary, like Gore in 2000, conceded defeat and did not try to stop the peaceful and legitimate transfer of power.
This doesn’t mean Hillary or Gore would have been good Presidents — anymore than it means Bush or Trump were good Presidents. That is not the point here.
Folks who still regurgitate Trump’s “Big Lie,” or who make stupid comparisons like this, either don’t care about defending democratic norms, or are simply cynical and disloyal Trump fanatics.
This doesn’t mean Hillary or Gore would have been good Presidents — anymore than it means Bush or Trump were good Presidents. That is not the point here.
Folks who still regurgitate Trump’s “Big Lie,” or who make stupid comparisons like this, either don’t care about defending democratic norms, or are simply cynical and disloyal Trump fanatics.
Quasar44
Diamond Member
Georgia, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin all close but stolen
jknowgood
Diamond Member
Lol, the kangaroo court leaders will have to answer for their lies next year.The January 6th Committee is not a court of law... you'll get your day in court if-and-when a Grand Jury indicts and trial(s) get underway.
It's a *****-kitty being on the Wrong Side of History and being stuck backing a traitorous Orange piece-of-$hit like that, ain't it? But you can't back-out now.
In for penny... in for a pound... you poor bastards...
bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,427
- 2,180
You have no proof of that. No one knows who hacked the DNC servers.
You seem to be admitting that the truth on the servers was damaging to Hillary's campaign. That's because it proved that Hillary is a douchebag. The fact that it helped Trump doesn't prove he's the source of the information, moron. If it was a crime for Trump to mention proven facts, then why doesn't AG Garland have him arrested?
That's OK... so long as the Rumpian traitors of January 6, 2021, answer THIS year...
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Judge blocks Trump order to end funding for National Public Radio and Public Broadcasting Service
- Started by C_Clayton_Jones
- Replies: 5
-
-
