The Dumbest Moscow Voyage Nobody Talks About/the worst ship in naval history, Kamchatka

Litwin

Platinum Member
Sep 3, 2017
33,146
4,943
1,015
GDL&Sweden

The Dumbest Moscow Voyage Nobody Talks About/the worst ship in naval history, Kamchatka​

video about the worst ship in naval history, Kamchatka:




Muscovite sailors: "I fear no man, but that Thing ..." [looks to the repair ship Kamchatka] "It scares me." LOL)) Putin´s TV/Forum/FB propaganda suggest that Moscow´s horde has always been unstoppable )) Imaginary Japanese torpedo boats(Real English fishing boats), the Kamchatka (admiral Kuznetsov) , almost starting a war with a global superpower, accidentally shooting up their own ships, the Kamchatka, disease, mountainous seas, the Kamchatka, poisonous snakes, prophets of the end times, the Kamchatka, highborn officers running rat hunts through the fleet and being saddled with a bunch of obsolete floating targets that only served to slow them down, and of course, the Kamchatka

Putin´s Kamchatka )) LOL
aircraftcarriermeme1.jpg
 
propaganda suggest that Moscow´s horde has always been unstoppable
It is wrong to call it a horde. Muscovy in the narrow sense of the word has always been and remains an appendage of North Europe.
The Horde itself, the great Huns country were starts only from the beginning of the Don Valley and to East, and the policy of Moscow does not inherit that culture, everything is exactly the opposite.
Moskow is 3-d Rome
And since the Russian Federation is now dominated by the northwest, the Moscow region is a "metropolis", and the entire federation is subordinated precisely to the Eurocentric policy and not to the eastern one. Despite the fact that most of it comes precisely from the eastern culture, from the Horde, and so on.
original.gif
 
Last edited:
It is wrong to call it a horde. Muscovy in the narrow sense of the word has always been and remains an appendage of North Europe.
The Horde itself, the great Huns country were starts only from the beginning of the Don Valley and to East, and the policy of Moscow does not inherit that culture, everything is exactly the opposite.
Moskow is 3-d Rome
And since the Russian Federation is now dominated by the northwest, the Moscow region is a "metropolis", and the entire federation is subordinated precisely to the Eurocentric policy and not to the eastern one. Despite the fact that most of it comes precisely from the eastern culture, from the Horde, and so on.
original.gif
Batu Khan was the true founder of Moscow statehood..... For him, “it is so difficult for Moscow to learn to be free; they always need a strong hand to rule them." Moscow ’s isolationism is also Tatar in nature. Foreigners are seen as enemies. Telegram, the instant messaging service, has been blocked.



DhfsRJXVQAAMZeX.jpg
 
Batu Khan was the true founder of Moscow statehood..
But this is not the Horde power, but on the contrary the Timurid Islamists who destroyed the Great Horde.
These "Moscow" authorities have always played on the side of the Islamists, starting with the Caliphate, when they attacked Khazaria from the rear, and ending with the Ottomans, when they and the Swedes did the same with the Poles right up to the Battle of Vienna.
 
The current propaganda of Moscow is also strictly Eurocentric, and the Hun question is swept under the carpet as it is in Europe.
They try to mix the history of Ukraine, Don and Volga steppes with the history of the Old Russian state, as if there were no Horde and Huns, and as if there was an ancient Russian state.
 
Last edited:
In fact, this is at odds with the facts, even the official history. Most of Ukraine was Lesser Poland, and Moscow owned only the Hetmanate there, attempts to colonize the Don Valley began only under Peter, and were stopped, and the Don, as part of the state, never entered the empire, only in the 19th century as sovereign federates. Etc. And the ancient Russian state itself was mostly in Belarus land and not in Russia(exept Novgorod)
 
By the way, if you say this on behalf of Lithuania, then it is Lithuania that is closer to the original Moscow power, this statehood was formed on the basis of the Baltic group of cultures, Lithuania, like the Eastern Slavs, before the arrival of the Huns belonged to the Baltic group of peoples, and there was the same language that in modern Lithuania and Latvia. The difference between the Balts (except for the Aesties) and the Baltic lands of the ancient Russian state is only that the Avars did not reach the Baltic states, and they are not Slavicized.
 
Around this time, there was a division of the Balts into "Eastern Slavs" and the Balts.

14-sre-630-26-85-jpg.267947


And not they came from the Huns, but the Western Slavs and Ukrainians, hence the name of the Poles, from the Polovtsians(Ukraine used to be a part of Poland as Lesser Poland)
 
And the word "Balts" does not come from the Baltic Sea, on the contrary, the Baltic Sea from the Balts. The root itself means swamp. These are the forest swamps of Belarus and the west of the Russian Federation.
So it is precisely between the Balts and Moscow that they have a common origin, the culture has changed quite recently.
That is why the Russian queens of the 18th century came from the Baltic states
 
Btw this is reason why western slavs in appearance look more like Ukrainians than Balts
a7eac1de78bef7c4bcd65a279bfcf0d1.jpg



they are generally indistinguishable from the native Ukrainian type. This is because they are one and the same people.
 
here is Ukrainian Svetlana Vesna.
svitlana.jpg


They are the same type of face. There is also a Serbian type from Novoserbia on the Ukraine, and it is closer to the Balts.
 
But this is not the Horde power, but on the contrary the Timurid Islamists who destroyed the Great Horde.
These "Moscow" authorities have always played on the side of the Islamists, starting with the Caliphate, when they attacked Khazaria from the rear, and ending with the Ottomans, when they and the Swedes did the same with the Poles right up to the Battle of Vienna.
"But this is not the Horde power, but on the contrary the Timurid Islamists who destroyed the Great Horde."

do you know that Moscow is juchi ulus de facto, de jure it existed up to end of 18c

The Crimean Khanate (Crimean Tatar: Qırım Hanlığı, قرم خانلغى‎ or Qırım Yurtu, قرم يورتى‎), own name — Great Horde and Desht-i Kipchak[2] (Uluğ Orda ve Deşt-i Qıpçaq, اولوغ اوردا و دشت قپچاق), in old European historiography and geography — Little Tartary (Latin: Tartaria Minor) was a Crimean Tatar state existing from 1441 to 1783, the longest-lived of the Turkic khanates that succeeded the empire of the Golden Horde. Established by Hacı I Giray in 1441, it was regarded as the direct heir to the Golden Horde and to Desht-i-Kipchak.[3][4]

In 1783, violating the 1774 Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca (which had guaranteed non-interference of both Russia and the Ottoman Empire in the affairs of the Crimean Khanate), the Russian Empire annexed the khanate


read this

Tsarev ulus: Moscow in the Golden Horde - JSTOR

https://www.jstor.org › stable



by CJ Halperin · 1982 · Cited by 16 — TSAREV ULUS: Moscow IN THE GOLDEN HORDE. One of the consequences of the Mongol conquest of Moscow was that the Moscow became familiar with numerous Mongol ...


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarai_(city)
 
do you know that Moscow is juchi ulus de facto, de jure it existed up to end of 18c
Ulus Jochi is the Golden Horde. With the invasion of the Timurids, after which it disappeared, and at the same time Muscovy rose.
But there were peoples who retained their independence, these are the Cossack lands, Ukrainians, Poles, and so on. They are all heirs of Horde.
Muscovy was not included there.
 
Last edited:
yes, de facto, we can even say that before 1917. But then why the horde only, why not the Kipchat Kaganate, Khazaria, Great Bulgaria, Turkestan, Turan and so on up to the Aryans of the Bronze Age
 
By the way, the essence of this phenomenon is now misunderstood. The Horde has nothing to do with the Evenks, who are now called "Mongols". Including the European knights descended from the same peoples, they came with Attila and their orders are the same hordes. So there is nothing to be ashamed of. But historical Muscovy has nothing to do with this, it was only a tributary of the Horde. The horde began from the Don Valley.
 
yes, de facto, we can even say that before 1917. But then why the horde only, why not the Kipchat Kaganate, Khazaria, Great Bulgaria, Turkestan, Turan and so on up to the Aryans of the Bronze Age
 
This conditional "Golden Horde" is the region most affected by Bolshevism. The main part of the civil war took place on the Don land, later they completely exterminated the Cossacks, the Glodomors marched through the Golden Horde, without touching either Muscovy or the Baltic states, and so on. It was, in fact, the occupation of the Golden Horde and terror in its land.
 

Forum List

Back
Top