The discovery of a Philistine cemetery in Israel that was there centuries before Christ

Don't NK also believe in the Torah and Tanakh?

How can you still claim there was no temple?
Yes they do and because the is no evidence in reality.

So the NK are idiots to believe in the temple, because the temple was torn down by the romans?

and all the outside sources...are they not real or the whole world is a liar except you?
 
the mount itself was build by jews for the temple. The last temple was destroyed by the romans. They built their own temple there, along with military barracks.

No "the Mount" was built by the Canaanites. The Jews were invaders.
And that's true, which it isn't, then find some Canaanites. Ooops sorry last I checked they no longer exist.
 
built by arabs, nothing to do with palestinians

The dome was originally for pilgrims, not muslims

Dome of Chains....>>it is not a mosque or shrine, but is used as a prayer house. It was built by the Umayyads, became a Christian chapel under the Crusaders<< it is an open pavilion.

Umayyads came as conquerors from arabia, they were not palestinian.
And nothing built by jews.

"Palestine" since 12 BCE. "Israel" since 1948.

Wake up.
Nothing built by Jews?! Bwahahahahaha! There's literally hundreds of thousands of artifacts and archeological sites with Hebrew writing on it, moron. The entire country is like a museum and Irrefutable proof of the existence of Israel and the history of the Jewish people in the land. You on the other hand have shown nothing that proves the existence of a Palestinian nation.
 
[
Whatever, "Palestine" was used by the world 12 centuries before Christ. "Israel" has been used by the world since 1948.

Think.

You are so hilarious. You are insisting upon the argument that the use of a similar name in antiquity creates continuity with the current people for Arab Palestinians while simultaneously rejecting the VERY SAME argument for the Jewish people.

You can't have it both ways.
 
Yet another cyber jihad fail.

:fu:
 
You are so hilarious. You are insisting upon the argument that the use of a similar name in antiquity creates continuity with the current people for Arab Palestinians while simultaneously rejecting the VERY SAME argument for the Jewish people.
No, illiterate.

You can't have it both ways.
Good, because I don't want it both ways.
 
Glad to clear up that European ancient Philistines have nothing today's Arab Palestinians.
 
Back
Top Bottom