The Devastating Reality of the Arizona Forensic Audit

[lennypartiv]

So where's this report? Supposed to be out weeks ago.

When it comes out, you'll wish it hadn't.

 

[Lesh]

When it comes out, you'll wish it hadn't.

How can any sane person make that claim not knowing what, if anything will be in that report...

Oh wait...

 

[MadChemist]

'
The counts and recounts have already been done. Maricopa county already had a forensic audit in February....and found no irregularities.

But to a conspiracy theorist.....anything that doesn't ape the conspiracy, becomes part of it. So they ignored the forensic audit and every other election tally. And just folded the republican lead Election board that conducted february's forensic audit into their conspiracy.

Good luck with that.

You would hope all that would be reflected in the final audit report.

I do wish Trump would shut up and let this run to completion.

 

[lennypartiv]

How can any sane person make that claim not knowing what, if anything will be in that report...
Oh wait...

Yep, you're expecting it to be bad news for your side.

 

[schmidlap]

Yep, you're expecting it to be bad news for your side.

"Your side" being the American people whose democratic system is being crapped on by the Cry Baby Sore Loser and his goons.

Fortunately, the farce to appease the dead-ender cult is fizzling rapidly.

An Arizona GOP state senator who backed the election audit​

withdrew her support, attacking the process as botched​

"Sadly, it's now become clear that the audit has been botched. The total lack of competence by @FannKfann over the last 5 months has deprived the voters of Arizona a comprehensive accounting of the 2020 election," she wrote...​

​

The GOP-controlled chamber authorized the audit in April, using around $150,000 of taxpayer money. Most of the funding came from Trump-supporting private donors.​

​

... there had already been two prior audits which did not reveal evidence of widespread fraud​

​

An Arizona GOP state senator who backed the election audit withdrew her support, attacking the process as botched

"I supported the audit, but I do not support the Trump audit any longer," said Sen. Michelle Ugenti-Rita.

news.yahoo.com

​

 

[lennypartiv]

Libs like schmidlap are hoping the audit doesn't uncover the fraud. It's a forensic audit, so it will surely uncover the fraud that occurred.

 

[schmidlap]

Libs like schmidlap are hoping the audit doesn't uncover the fraud. It's a forensic audit, so it will surely uncover the fraud that occurred.

Legitimate audits differ from pretend audits calculated to "uncover" what the hyper-partisans who stage them demand.

This fiasco was a joke from the start. They only compensatory aspect - besides the laughs it provided - was that Trump crackpots bankrolled it.

“Not even a shred of being salvaged at this point,” said Sen. Paul Boyer, the first Republican state senator to publicly come out against the audit in May. “They’ve botched it at so many points along the way that it's irrecoverable.”​

​

Boyer's gained company last weekend when another Republican, Sen. Michelle Ugenti-Rita, one of the Legislature's strongest advocates for stricter voting laws, agreed that “the Trump audit” was “botched.” ​

​

A majority of the Arizona Senate, which commissioned the audit, is now against it.​

​

['Botched': Arizona GOP's ballot count ends, troubles persist]​

 

[busybee01]

deny

debunk

They have debunked it. Your opinion is not fact.

 

[busybee01]

Democrats think it's been debunked, Republicans know the election was stolen.

The majority of the country says the election was not stolen. Republicans are attacking our democracy.

 

[busybee01]

The poster used a known never-Trumper as a source. It's valid to call him out for that.

Your definition of a anti-Trumper is anyone who faces the reality that Trump lost.

 

[lennypartiv]

The majority of the country says the election was not stolen. Republicans are attacking our democracy.

And what would you Dems be doing if you thought the election was stolen?

 

[schmidlap]

And what would you Dems be doing if you thought the election was stolen?

Producing credible evidence, and acknowledging reality if none can be found?

Hyper-partisans in the Republican-run Arizona Senate hiring a Trumpy conspiracy nut with no experience in auditing (after a couple of reputable auditors had confirmed the election's result) paid for by Trump cronies, both convicted and under indictment? The blatant lack of seriousness makes one chortle.

The Republican Maricopa County Board of Supervisors chairman blasted state senators of his own party over their audit of the 2020 presidential election results, calling it an "adventure in never-never land," in a letter on Monday.​

​

"It is now August of 2021. The election of November 2020 is over," Jack Sellers, a Republican, wrote. "If you haven't figured out that the election in Maricopa County was free, fair, and accurate yet, I'm not sure you ever will."​

​

In the letter, tweeted by Brahm Resnik, a reporter for Phoenix-based news station KPNX-TV, Sellers wrote the State Senate GOP has not finished the audit because they "hired people who have no experience and little understanding of how professional elections are run."​

​

He said the Board "has real work to do and little time to entertain this adventure in never-never land."​

​

"Please finish whatever it is that you are doing and release whatever it is you are going to release," he wrote. "I am confident that our staff and volunteers ran the election as prescribed by federal and state law. There was no fraud, there wasn't an injection of ballots from Asia nor was there a satellite that beamed votes into our election equipment."​

[https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...ver-never-land/ar-AAMR62W?ocid=BingNewsSearch]​

(bathos: an effect created by an unintentional lapse in mood from the sublime to the trivial or ridiculous.)

'Tis a consummation Devoutly to be wished.

A little song, a little dance, a little seltzer down your pants.​

 

[lennypartiv]

​

"It is now August of 2021. The election of November 2020 is over," Jack Sellers, a Republican, wrote. "If you haven't figured out that the election in Maricopa County was free, fair, and accurate yet, I'm not sure you ever will."​

Wow, you found a quote from a RINO.

 

[schmidlap]

Wow, you found a quote from a RINO.

The RINOs of Trumpery are in a tizzy.

The invasive species did not infest the GOP (Founded 1854) until 2016, and their hilarious Big Bamboozle Caper in Arizona is sputtering like a surplus WWII whoopie cushion bought at a jumble sale from the boot of a 1986 Yugo in Canarsie.

Arizona Senate President Karen Fann and Republican Senator Warren Petersen issued the subpoenas on July 26, seeking materials to help private contractors finish a controversial audit of Maricopa County's November election ballots...​

​

Maricopa County again refused to turn over its routers, citing possible security risks. Thomas Liddy, a county attorney, said that producing the equipment could expose "confidential data belonging to Maricopa County citizens" or make law enforcement's communications' infrastructure "extremely vulnerable to hackers."​

​

Liddy also said that previous audits demonstrated the tabulation equipment was never connected to the Internet and that the county already provided information to prove that.​

​

"Anyone with sufficient knowledge and understanding of elections is able to confirm, through a review of these logs or through an inspection of the tabulators, that the equipment was not connected to the internet and had no wifi devices installed," Liddy wrote.​

Maricopa County and Dominion refuse to comply with Arizona election audit subpoenas

The Arizona state Senate demanded more information from the county and voting systems company to help contractors complete a controversial 2020 election audit.

www.cbsnews.com

​

​

​

CRY BABY SORE LOSER​

 

[lennypartiv]

schmidlap, RINOs were around before 2016. It wasn't until recently that I became aware that so many of them were traitors to the party.

 

[schmidlap]

Maricopa county is going to have to find or explain the 200,000 missing ballots.

Those imaginary 20,000 ballots were pulled directly out of the Loser's voluminous trumper.

Verdict: False​

​

There is no evidence the audit found there were over 200,000 fewer ballots than the 2.1 million recorded. A spokesperson for the audit said the claim is “untrue.”​

​

Fact Check:​

​

No announcement of such a finding has been posted on the Arizona state legislature’s website or the Twitter account associated with the audit... ​

​

FACT CHECK: Did The Arizona Audit Find There Were 200,000 Fewer Ballots Than Reported?

'The report and audit data have not been released'

checkyourfact.com

​

​

...​

"My boy is still crapping.......​

on American democracy!......​

Can I pick' em or can I pick 'em?"​

 

[schmidlap]

schmidlap, RINOs were around before 2016. It wasn't until recently that I became aware that so many of them were traitors to the party.

Hilarious! The preponderance of Republicans from 1854 until 2016 were actually RINOs and traitors to their Party, until a failed casino operator and faded reality tv entertainer and his cult infested the GOP.

Funny stuff!

Prior to the Party's Second Coming...

POLITICS ISN'T ABOUT THE WEIRD WORSHIP OF ONE DUDE.
​

After the divine visitation...

​

 

[Dragonlady]

When it comes out, you'll wish it hadn't.

No, when it comes out, it'll be tossed in the garbage where it belongs. They've found NOTHING because they don't know what they're doing. They're not accountants or auditors. They're volunteers with no skill or training in performing an audit. A real "audit" requires trained and certified accountants. Not volunteers with an agenda.

Their original contention that 700,000 ballots were printed "on different paper" ignored the fact that same day ballots are printed by the voting machines on different paper than the printed and mailed ballots. Yes, they are just that dumb.

Last but not least, they've found NOTHING. If they had found something, they wouldn't be asking for more documentation.

 

[Lastamender]

Those imaginary 20,000 ballots were pulled directly out of the Loser's voluminous trumper.

Verdict: False​

​

There is no evidence the audit found there were over 200,000 fewer ballots than the 2.1 million recorded. A spokesperson for the audit said the claim is “untrue.”​

​

Fact Check:​

​

No announcement of such a finding has been posted on the Arizona state legislature’s website or the Twitter account associated with the audit... ​

​

FACT CHECK: Did The Arizona Audit Find There Were 200,000 Fewer Ballots Than Reported?

'The report and audit data have not been released'

checkyourfact.com

​

​

​

View attachment 521817...​

"My boy is still crapping.......​

on American democracy!......​

Can I pick' em or can I pick 'em?"​

Fact checkers do not cut it, shill.

 

[schmidlap]

Fact checkers do not cut it, shill.

Not if they contradict the item of dogmatic faith you have been issued. Of course not.
The reality that upsets you is that no credible source has been able to substantiate the fairy tale.

The Cry Baby Loser has a documented, sordid history of crapping on the democratic process, lying about the certified results whenever he doesn't like them:

When he lost the Iowa caucuses, the Lying Loser tweeted, that Cruz,

"... didn't win Iowa, he stole it!
That is why all of the polls were so wrong and
why he got far more votes than anticipated.
Bad!"​

Nov. 2012 Trump, who had endorsed Republican nominee Mitt Romney, tweeted about apocryphal reports of “voting machines switching Romney votes to Obama” after previously warning supporters in October to “be careful of voter fraud!”​

​

Feb. 2016 Trump repeatedly chalked up his narrow loss to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) in the Iowa caucus to voter fraud, pushing vague, unsubstantiated claims Cruz "cheated" and "stole" the election and demanding, “either a new election should take place or Cruz results nullified.​

​

Nov. 2016 Despite defeating Hillary Clinton in the Electoral College, Trump tweeted baseless allegations of “millions of FRAUD votes” and claiming, “Serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire and California!”​

Dec. 2017 Trump subtly pushed doubts about the legitimacy of Alabama’s special Senate election, which Democrat Doug Jones won in an upset, conceding “a win is a win,” but adding, “The write-in votes played a very big factor.”​

​

Nov. 2018 Trump took aim at Senate elections in Arizona and Florida and a gubernatorial race in Georgia – the latter two of which Republicans won – falsely claiming Florida counties “miraculously started finding Democrat votes” and proposing a new election in Arizona because of unexplained “electoral corruption.”​

​

Aug. 2020 A rare example where Trump lacked a direct personal stake, he called to re-run the late-decided Democratic primary in New York’s 12th District, pointing to it as a prime example of the failings of mail-in voting – though analysts argue such examples serve better as a display of New York’s subpar election.​

​

Nov. 2020 Trump has made some of his most outlandish voter fraud claims yet in an effort to hang onto power despite Democrat Joe Biden’s clear win, repeatedly pushing claims about voting machines changing votes that even his own officials rebuked.​

​

[administration.https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewsolender/2020/11/29/all-the-elections-trump-has-claimed-were-stolen-through-voter-fraud/?sh=75b877e41d30]​

​

Loser's dozens of court challenges to adverse election results have met with failure, as have all his attempts to pressure state lawmakers to block certification of their states’ results.

“I do whine because I want to win and
I’m not happy about not winning. And I am a whiner and
I keep whining and whining until I win!”
[Donald Trump: I whine until I win]

Such a pathetic formula to build a cult.​