Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The article, btw, is brilliant,
mostly because it elaborates on exactly what people like myself have been trying to explain to you ineducable fools for years.
Here's the truth
The Conservative Fantasy History of Civil Rights -- NYMag
The civil rights movement was never a far left wing movement. More revisionist history.
The article, btw, is brilliant,
mostly because it elaborates on exactly what people like myself have been trying to explain to you ineducable fools for years.
Here's the truth
The Conservative Fantasy History of Civil Rights -- NYMag
The civil rights movement was never a far left wing movement. More revisionist history.
The left tries to take credit for anything they think is good. Not surprising when you consider so much of what they actually do turns out badly. I can understand that they started to love blacks under LBJ, of course he used a different name then blacks for them. But it is beyond my understanding of how the democrats can not apologize for the sins of their past and blacks call themselves democrats.
Translation: That man's brilliant observations went waaay over my head,.A typically misleading article that the rubes on the Left eat up.
What does it mean to be "left" or "right" on civil rights issues today? It sure isnt the same thing it meant in 1965. In 1965 those on the "right" presumably were in favor of racial restrictions, in favor of racial quotas. In 2014 those same positions are held by those on the "left".
Racism never left the Democratic Party.
OMG lol.
The article, btw, is brilliant,
mostly because it elaborates on exactly what people like myself have been trying to explain to you ineducable fools for years.
Here's the truth
The Conservative Fantasy History of Civil Rights -- NYMag
The civil rights movement was never a far left wing movement. More revisionist history.
The left tries to take credit for anything they think is good. Not surprising when you consider so much of what they actually do turns out badly. I can understand that they started to love blacks under LBJ, of course he used a different name then blacks for them. But it is beyond my understanding of how the democrats can not apologize for the sins of their past and blacks call themselves democrats.
It isn't 'their' past. Those Democrats are dead
What part of history do you claim that article attempts to rewrite?This is rich. Lefwing hacksite Politico has a bit of racialist propaganda aimed at Low Info types. They are attempting to gin up the GOP Racism canard...with a photo of George Wallace.
Race and the Modern GOP - Doug McAdam and Karina Kloos - POLITICO Magazine
Too funny by half.
View attachment 32421
>>>>>>>>>>The article, btw, is brilliant,
mostly because it elaborates on exactly what people like myself have been trying to explain to you ineducable fools for years.
................ 
Point? Wallace was a racist as the article points out and a dimwit, go figure.You idiots should at least read the material you post:
No figure was more crucial to the spread of the movement than Alabama Gov. George Wallace, a Democrat, who burst on to the national scene in 1963, first by demanding “segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever” during his inaugural address and a few months later by physically blocking two African-American students—the first in the school’s history—from attending the University of Alabama. Overnight, Wallace became not only a hero to the white South, but also the most potent symbol of racial resistance in the country.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/09/race-and-the-modern-gop-111218_Page2.html#ixzz3EskCRLzX
What part of history do you claim that article attempts to rewrite?This is rich. Lefwing hacksite Politico has a bit of racialist propaganda aimed at Low Info types. They are attempting to gin up the GOP Racism canard...with a photo of George Wallace.
Race and the Modern GOP - Doug McAdam and Karina Kloos - POLITICO Magazine
Too funny by half.
View attachment 32421
Yes, Wallace was a Democrat. Show me where the article tried to assert otherwise.What part of history do you claim that article attempts to rewrite?This is rich. Lefwing hacksite Politico has a bit of racialist propaganda aimed at Low Info types. They are attempting to gin up the GOP Racism canard...with a photo of George Wallace.
Race and the Modern GOP - Doug McAdam and Karina Kloos - POLITICO Magazine
Too funny by half.
View attachment 32421
The article, btw, is brilliant,mostly because it elaborates on exactly what people like myself have been trying to explain to you ineducable fools for years.
brilliant by liberscum standards is my guess.
Yes, Wallace was a Democrat. Show me where the article tried to assert otherwise.
I won't believe it until they put up a photo of the Koch Brothers.
You idiots should at least read the material you post:
No figure was more crucial to the spread of the movement than Alabama Gov. George Wallace, a Democrat, who burst on to the national scene in 1963, first by demanding “segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever” during his inaugural address and a few months later by physically blocking two African-American students—the first in the school’s history—from attending the University of Alabama. Overnight, Wallace became not only a hero to the white South, but also the most potent symbol of racial resistance in the country.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/09/race-and-the-modern-gop-111218_Page2.html#ixzz3EskCRLzX
Apparently not since the article identified Wallace was a Democrat.Yes, Wallace was a Democrat. Show me where the article tried to assert otherwise.
Stephanie's not much of a reader, either.
What part of history do you claim that article attempts to rewrite?This is rich. Lefwing hacksite Politico has a bit of racialist propaganda aimed at Low Info types. They are attempting to gin up the GOP Racism canard...with a photo of George Wallace.
Race and the Modern GOP - Doug McAdam and Karina Kloos - POLITICO Magazine
Too funny by half.
View attachment 32421
No,no, they all moved to the GOP. Don't you read these boards?The article, btw, is brilliant,
mostly because it elaborates on exactly what people like myself have been trying to explain to you ineducable fools for years.
Here's the truth
The Conservative Fantasy History of Civil Rights -- NYMag
The civil rights movement was never a far left wing movement. More revisionist history.
The left tries to take credit for anything they think is good. Not surprising when you consider so much of what they actually do turns out badly. I can understand that they started to love blacks under LBJ, of course he used a different name then blacks for them. But it is beyond my understanding of how the democrats can not apologize for the sins of their past and blacks call themselves democrats.
It isn't 'their' past. Those Democrats are dead.
Quotas for blacks.Translation: That man's brilliant observations went waaay over my head,.A typically misleading article that the rubes on the Left eat up.
What does it mean to be "left" or "right" on civil rights issues today? It sure isnt the same thing it meant in 1965. In 1965 those on the "right" presumably were in favor of racial restrictions, in favor of racial quotas. In 2014 those same positions are held by those on the "left".
Racism never left the Democratic Party.
OMG lol.
You're an idiot. What racial restrictions that were supported by Southern segregationists are now supported by liberals?
