The Dems' Desperation To Rewrite History

[Dad2three]

Yup, segregation is great. We're now trying integration- very difficult with the racist GOP. I'm afraid you blew your cover a while ago.

The GOP forced the Clintons to move to a town with a 0.7% black population?

Yes, they should've moved to Harlem right? lol


GET HONEST ONCE. Use what little brains you have!

 

[NYcarbineer]

Do you believe that a business should have the right to discriminate based on race? Do you believe that business should have the right to serve or not serve anyone, for any reason?

When was the last time that you went to eat at a Chinese restaurant and were served by a red-headed Irish lass or a lanky Ethiopian man?

It's a yes or no question.

Why do you put profits ahead of human rights?

I believe that a business should not be able to discriminate against customers based on their race.

 

[francoHFW]

Do you believe that a business should have the right to discriminate based on race? Do you believe that business should have the right to serve or not serve anyone, for any reason?

When was the last time that you went to eat at a Chinese restaurant and were served by a red-headed Irish lass or a lanky Ethiopian man?

WTF does that have to do with anything lol?

 

[Rikurzhen]

I believe that a business should not be able to discriminate against customers based on their race.

Why do you value profits over human rights? That stance make you evil and heartless.

 

[Dad2three]

the old democrat party believed in owning black people as,slaves...and when forced to release those slaves by the republicans...the younger democrats realized that instead of using state power to own black Americans, they could use Federal power to control all Americans....so they began with the New Deal....and followed that with the great society...and now to they will finish with obamacare....

You meant to say, the CONSERVATIVES Who owned slaves were forced by those LIBERAL/PROGRESSIVES to free them?


JUST ONE POLICY CONSERVATIVES HAVE EVER BEEN ON THE CORRECT SIDE OF HISTORY ON? LOL

 

[Rikurzhen]

Do you believe that a business should have the right to discriminate based on race? Do you believe that business should have the right to serve or not serve anyone, for any reason?

When was the last time that you went to eat at a Chinese restaurant and were served by a red-headed Irish lass or a lanky Ethiopian man?

WTF does that have to do with anything lol?

When was the last time that happened to you? Describe the last waitress who served you at a Chinese restaurant.

 

[Dad2three]

Do you believe that a business should have the right to discriminate based on race? Do you believe that business should have the right to serve or not serve anyone, for any reason?

The question wasn't aimed at me, but yes.

We have freedom of association per the 1st Amendment:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The government should not force people to associate against their will. Anyone who is stupid enough to deny their business to others is self-destructive, but the Constitution isn't there to protect an individual from himself.

Glad to see an honest enough conservative/libertarian that admits it's OK to discriminate, we need more of them like you

But YES the Constitution IS there to protect the minority from the majority!

 

[JakeStarkey]

I believe that a business should not be able to discriminate against customers based on their race.

Why do you value profits over human rights? That stance make you evil and heartless.

You are right: every one should be served regardless of race.

 

[Political Junky]

This is rich. Lefwing hacksite Politico has a bit of racialist propaganda aimed at Low Info types. They are attempting to gin up the GOP Racism canard...with a photo of George Wallace.

Race and the Modern GOP - Doug McAdam and Karina Kloos - POLITICO Magazine

Too funny by half.

View attachment 32421

What part of history do you claim that article attempts to rewrite?

Of course he was a Democrat.. Geezez.

What ideology was he Stephanie?

Liberal or Conservative?

Wallace was a progressive.
/oops.

Bull Shit, Wallace was so Conservative he offered to run as VP with Goldwater.

 

[paperview]

Do you believe that a business should have the right to discriminate based on race? Do you believe that business should have the right to serve or not serve anyone, for any reason?

When was the last time that you went to eat at a Chinese restaurant and were served by a red-headed Irish lass or a lanky Ethiopian man?

It's a yes or no question.

Why do you put profits ahead of human rights?

Yeah.

Why?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Do you believe that a business should have the right to discriminate based on race? Do you believe that business should have the right to serve or not serve anyone, for any reason?

When was the last time that you went to eat at a Chinese restaurant and were served by a red-headed Irish lass or a lanky Ethiopian man?

WTF does that have to do with anything lol?

When was the last time that happened to you? Describe the last waitress who served you at a Chinese restaurant.

Do you agree with state Senator Jensen's position?

GOP Lawmaker Says Businesses Should Be Allowed To Deny Services To Black People

 

[boedicca]

Do you believe that a business should have the right to discriminate based on race? Do you believe that business should have the right to serve or not serve anyone, for any reason?

The question wasn't aimed at me, but yes.

We have freedom of association per the 1st Amendment:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The government should not force people to associate against their will. Anyone who is stupid enough to deny their business to others is self-destructive, but the Constitution isn't there to protect an individual from himself.

Glad to see an honest enough conservative/libertarian that admits it's OK to discriminate, we need more of them like you

But YES the Constitution IS there to protect the minority from the majority!

The Constitution is there to protect individuals from government power. It is not there to force individuals to interact with each other. I can just as easily turn your argument back on you by claiming that the Antigay baker is a minority who needs to be protected from the PC majority (which is actually another minority). The the extent The Constitution protects a minority from the majority, it's along the lines of The Right To Be Left Alone.

 

[mudwhistle]

Someone in another thread wanted a Republican racist to be named. My response was that the left would name George Wallace. Funny stuff. Not sure what the article of the OP states, I try not to read stuff where one side is trying to tell me what the other side thinks.

Reagan's Race Legacy


Philadelphia, county seat of Mississippi's Neshoba County, is famous for a couple of things. That is where three civil rights workers -- Michael Schwerner, James Chaney and Andrew Goodman -- were murdered in 1964. And that is where, in 1980, Republican presidential candidate Ronald Reagan chose to launch his election campaign, with a ringing endorsement of "states' rights."


I don't accuse Reagan of racism, though while he served, I did note what seemed to be his indifference to the concerns of black Americans -- issues ranging from civil rights enforcement and attacks on "welfare queens" to his refusal to act seriously against the apartheid regime in South Africa. He gets full credit from me for the good things he did -- including presiding over the end of international communism. But he also legitimized, by his broad wink at it, racial indifference -- and worse.
Reagan s Race Legacy washingtonpost.com

Yup, not patronizing blacks means you're a racist apparently.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Do you believe that a business should have the right to discriminate based on race? Do you believe that business should have the right to serve or not serve anyone, for any reason?

When was the last time that you went to eat at a Chinese restaurant and were served by a red-headed Irish lass or a lanky Ethiopian man?

It's a yes or no question.

Why do you put profits ahead of human rights?

Yeah.

Why?

Be nice, now. These people get uncomfortable when they're reminded of what they really believe.

 

[Dad2three]

Do you believe that a business should have the right to discriminate based on race? Do you believe that business should have the right to serve or not serve anyone, for any reason?

When was the last time that you went to eat at a Chinese restaurant and were served by a red-headed Irish lass or a lanky Ethiopian man?

WTF does that have to do with anything lol?

When was the last time that happened to you? Describe the last waitress who served you at a Chinese restaurant.

Anti-gay baker Melissa Klein cried at the Values Voter Summit last week over the closing of her business after she and her husband, Aaron, faced severe backlash from their refusal to make a cake for a lesbian couple's wedding.

In January 2013, Sweet Cakes By Melissa, located in Gresham, Ore., refused service to a lesbian couple looking for a wedding cake.

...Following outrage over the business's anti-gay actions, Sweet Cakes By Melissa eventually chose to shut down their storefront rather than serve gay clients but the bakery is currently operating out of a home kitchen and is still taking orders online.

Melissa Klein Anti-Gay Baker Cries At Values Voter Summit Over Business Closing


Colorado Baker Jack Phillips Appeals Order To Provide Gay Wedding Cakes
Colorado Baker Jack Phillips Appeals Order To Provide Gay Wedding Cakes

 

[NYcarbineer]

Do you believe that a business should have the right to discriminate based on race? Do you believe that business should have the right to serve or not serve anyone, for any reason?

The question wasn't aimed at me, but yes.

We have freedom of association per the 1st Amendment:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The government should not force people to associate against their will. Anyone who is stupid enough to deny their business to others is self-destructive, but the Constitution isn't there to protect an individual from himself.

Glad to see an honest enough conservative/libertarian that admits it's OK to discriminate, we need more of them like you

But YES the Constitution IS there to protect the minority from the majority!

The Constitution is there to protect individuals from government power. It is not there to force individuals to interact with each other. I can just as easily turn your argument back on you by claiming that the Antigay baker is a minority who needs to be protected from the PC majority (which is actually another minority). The the extent The Constitution protects a minority from the majority, it's along the lines of The Right To Be Left Alone.

In the area of rights, the simplest most basic purpose of the Consitution is to protect equal rights, The Constitution was never meant to endorse discrimination.

 

[boedicca]

Do you believe that a business should have the right to discriminate based on race? Do you believe that business should have the right to serve or not serve anyone, for any reason?

The question wasn't aimed at me, but yes.

We have freedom of association per the 1st Amendment:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The government should not force people to associate against their will. Anyone who is stupid enough to deny their business to others is self-destructive, but the Constitution isn't there to protect an individual from himself.

Glad to see an honest enough conservative/libertarian that admits it's OK to discriminate, we need more of them like you

But YES the Constitution IS there to protect the minority from the majority!

The Constitution is there to protect individuals from government power. It is not there to force individuals to interact with each other. I can just as easily turn your argument back on you by claiming that the Antigay baker is a minority who needs to be protected from the PC majority (which is actually another minority). The the extent The Constitution protects a minority from the majority, it's along the lines of The Right To Be Left Alone.

In the area of rights, the simplest most basic purpose of the Consitution is to protect equal rights, The Constitution was never meant to endorse discrimination.

You clearly have no idea what The Constitution is.

 

[Dad2three]

Do you believe that a business should have the right to discriminate based on race? Do you believe that business should have the right to serve or not serve anyone, for any reason?

The question wasn't aimed at me, but yes.

We have freedom of association per the 1st Amendment:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The government should not force people to associate against their will. Anyone who is stupid enough to deny their business to others is self-destructive, but the Constitution isn't there to protect an individual from himself.

Glad to see an honest enough conservative/libertarian that admits it's OK to discriminate, we need more of them like you

But YES the Constitution IS there to protect the minority from the majority!

The Constitution is there to protect individuals from government power. It is not there to force individuals to interact with each other. I can just as easily turn your argument back on you by claiming that the Antigay baker is a minority who needs to be protected from the PC majority (which is actually another minority). The the extent The Constitution protects a minority from the majority, it's along the lines of The Right To Be Left Alone.

Right, EXCEPT the bakers keep losing in court. Oops

No the Constitution ISN'T there to protect FROM ONLY Gov't power!

 

[LordBrownTrout]

The article, btw, is brilliant,

mostly because it elaborates on exactly what people like myself have been trying to explain to you ineducable fools for years.

Here's the truth

The Conservative Fantasy History of Civil Rights -- NYMag

The civil rights movement was never a far left wing movement. More revisionist history.

REALLY? lol

Yeah, really.

 

[Dad2three]

Do you believe that a business should have the right to discriminate based on race? Do you believe that business should have the right to serve or not serve anyone, for any reason?

The question wasn't aimed at me, but yes.

We have freedom of association per the 1st Amendment:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The government should not force people to associate against their will. Anyone who is stupid enough to deny their business to others is self-destructive, but the Constitution isn't there to protect an individual from himself.

Glad to see an honest enough conservative/libertarian that admits it's OK to discriminate, we need more of them like you

But YES the Constitution IS there to protect the minority from the majority!

The Constitution is there to protect individuals from government power. It is not there to force individuals to interact with each other. I can just as easily turn your argument back on you by claiming that the Antigay baker is a minority who needs to be protected from the PC majority (which is actually another minority). The the extent The Constitution protects a minority from the majority, it's along the lines of The Right To Be Left Alone.

In the area of rights, the simplest most basic purpose of the Consitution is to protect equal rights, The Constitution was never meant to endorse discrimination.

You clearly have no idea what The Constitution is.

Sure, we'll believe conservatives who NEVER stand on the correct side of ANY history, to be a better judge of the Constitution, lol