Your answer is to magically make poor kids disappear. Retarded. You can’t build a reasonable argument.And why is that? Bad decisions. So you ll throw money at it and they ll still be in poverty. How about people don’t have kids if they can’t afford them Vs relying on the Govt aka the taxpayer to bail them out. Responsibility is on them not on me. Want to Build Back Better, then throw money at finding a solution. I d rather pay people not to have kids than pay them to have them and have the cycle keep repeating itself. This is why you are a failure as a person and as a C Level executive. You just don’t get it.
You can support programs to help lift people out of poverty but you can’t wish them away. In the mean time providing food for poor kids seems like a decent thing to do.
Poor kids should just disappear.
- Azog strategy 101.