The Democratic Party, the party of Race Baiting, Socialism and Infanticide

[jknowgood]

I know the baby can be murdered up till delivery. The one in Virginia the baby can be murdered after birth.

Why would a woman carry a baby for 9 months up to the point of delivery if they are eager to kill it? Does that really make sense to you? And why do you gloss right over the term “not viable” which is how the bill refers to the baby. You’re missing a big part of the equation here. I’d think you’d want to fully understand the issue before arguing it so you can sound intelligent or at least like you know what you are talking about. So I’ll ask again. Can you be objective enough to present the case of your opponents who support this bill? Give it a try

What happens if the woman doesn't like the way the baby looks? She wanted blonde hair instead of dark hair or blue eyes. You loons are sick.

You don't know shit about mothering, do you.

No i'm a guy, but if you don't think there are women out there that would'nt do that, your crazy.

Let's see 'em.

There will be. Liberals has been saying for years. Abortion is just a woman's choice, so in a few years after birth abortion will be known as that. Good going, next will be old people.

 

[Aba Incieni]

I know the baby can be murdered up till delivery. The one in Virginia the baby can be murdered after birth.

Why would a woman carry a baby for 9 months up to thebpoint if delivery of they are eager to kill it? Does that really make sense to you? And why do you gloss right over the term “not viable” which is how the bill refers to the baby. You’re missing a big part of the equation here. I’d think you’d want to fully understand the issue before arguing it so you can sound intelligent or at least like you know what you are talking about. So I’ll ask again. Can you be objective enough to present the case of your opponents who support this bill? Give it a try

No newborn is viable.

Why are you so intent on killing innocent human beings?

I think you meant to say “non-viable” is that right? Why aren’t you asking what the definition of non-viable is instead of making idiotic proclaimations like “No newborn is viable” whatever that means.

All newborns need care to survive. None can live without it. No newborn is viable.

Is that really what you think the argument is about?

What if your newborn is born in a vegetative state, brain dead and in need of medication and machines to keep it alive. Is that viable?

And providing food and a bed for a newborn does not mean it is not viable. You really are clueless as to what is going on here aren’t you?

ALL newborns are non-viable. Your argument can be used for perfectly healthy newborn people.

 

[Kilroy2]

America is a democracy as such people vote for their representatives

America has capitalism but history has shown that pure capitalism leads to greed which will destroy the economy

examples include depression, recessions, child labor, low wages, poverty and unsafe working conditions

So the government is the only thing that stand up to pure capitalism and insure that its fair and equitable and will not destroy peoples life

Ultimately it the people who have to bail out companies with taxes that they pay

Still the government heavily subsidizes business with tax breaks and bankruptcy laws.

The government deregulates and how has that worked

regulation generally came after the great depression

Regan began pushing for government to deregulation

The great recession had a few that cause it but mortgage lenders who were non depository bank were not regulated like depository banks and when this non depository banks failed then it was a catalyst