The Democrat Party: A vast sleeper cell (Ann Coulter)

I wouldn't be too sure about the female part...Have you seen her Adam's Apple? As for being the the right's Michael Moore, Moore provides documentation to support his allegations, or pretends to at least. Coulter avoids the pretense entirely and just spews her (his?) BS without out regard to factual content.
As much as the allegations that Ann might be a man was funny, she is a woman. Or she's a transvestite, which would make absolutely NO sense at all consider her rabid bile spewed against the homosexuals and the transgendered community.

But they both do about the same thing.
 
Andrew Sullivan is a boring, one dimensional hack along the same lines as that fake accented Arianna Huffingshit. The left hates Ann Coulter for the same reason they hate mirrors, she forces them to see who they really are.
 
How 'bout this one? It's a bunch of crap.

Liberals spent the Vietnam War rooting for the enemy and clamoring for America's defeat, a tradition they have brought back for the Iraq war

How sick does this bitch have to be before she's too sick for you guys?

What is untrue about this statement gump.....errr... i mean Jiliann? Being an attorney, it must suck to know you will never come even remotely close to Coulter in law, writing or political knowledge.
 
Andrew Sullivan is a boring, one dimensional hack along the same lines as that fake accented Arianna Huffingshit. The left hates Ann Coulter for the same reason they hate mirrors, she forces them to see who they really are.
Yes, because obviously that's the same reason the right hates Michael Moore.

:rolleyes:
 
Now that's more like it. Two misstatements found so far.

1.) No evidence to prove Kennedy ordered the Vietnamese president killed.

2.) Liberals didn't root for the Viet Cong, except for the few liberals who did. Most of the rest simply rooted for the U.S. to lose, and were indifferent to the effects of their actions on the welfare of either the Vietnamese people or the U.S. A distinction without a difference. Still, a distinction.

So, it looks like we can conclude that people here have no objection to the rest of the points Coulter made?

There's a fine line between rooting against the U.S. and rooting for soldiers to come home to protect them, especially during a war like Vietnam where a draft was conducted. Ann Coulter likes to morph all war dissenters into unpatriotic Americans and it's unfair and false.

Plus, let's think about this-- What did we gain from Vietnam? Our initial invasion was intended to enforce the Truman Doctrine...Was it really worth the loss of that many lives to contain the spread of Communism in Vietnam?

And the Vietnamese were not our enemies, we made them into our enemies. To have so many boys die in vain, not making the U.S. any safer at all, just so the U.S. could flex its muscle in the Cold War is a shame that this country will have to endure for the rest of its existence.

Throughout most of U.S. history, the President, be him Democrat or Republican, has too often forgotten the value of life. War is not a game-- it should be used in self-defense or to combat an imminent threat that cannot be resolved diplomatically, not simply to show the prowess of the U.S. and create a global market of capitalism.
 
Yes, because obviously that's the same reason the right hates Michael Moore.

:rolleyes:

sure, I can understand why the left worships Mikey Moore..... He is the ultimate twister of truth to fit an anti-American agenda. Algore made a cute effort but the award for biggest Democrat-socialist-communist slob award definitely goes to Mikey. Where is he, did he take all of the money he made off the terminally stupid and move in with Osama?
 
Throughout most of U.S. history, the President, be him Democrat or Republican, has too often forgotten the value of life. War is not a game-- it should be used in self-defense or to combat an imminent threat that cannot be resolved diplomatically, not simply to show the prowess of the U.S. and create a global market of capitalism.

The sad thing about this is you don't understand that there was a real threat there.

If communism had one, or if Islamic fascism wins, we are dead. Either that or we are slaves. Neither one is very pleasant to me. I don't like it any more than anyone else, but putting your head in the sand and denying the threat exist isn't going to make it go away, its just going to give us more 911s.
 
The sad thing about this is you don't understand that there was a real threat there.

If communism had one, or if Islamic fascism wins, we are dead. Either that or we are slaves. Neither one is very pleasant to me. I don't like it any more than anyone else, but putting your head in the sand and denying the threat exist isn't going to make it go away, its just going to give us more 911s.


The real threat is a president locked into some sick messianic vision which is impervious to reason.

As for being slaves, Chimpy and Co are selling America's future to China to finance the ill concieved, immoral foreign adventurism. So unless Chimpy and his merry band are stopped, and soon, I would start brushing up on your Mandarin.
 
The real threat is a president locked into some sick messianic vision which is impervious to reason.

As for being slaves, Chimpy and Co are selling America's future to China to finance the ill concieved, immoral foreign adventurism. So unless Chimpy and his merry band are stopped, and soon, I would start brushing up on your Mandarin.

Bah...we survived Clinton selling out to the Koreans (so far) and I suspect we'll survive your fabricated story about foreign adventurism too.

If we do "lose" to the Chinese, it will be because the braying left wingers sold the US out for the sake of political correctness and the "moral high ground".
 
As for being slaves, Chimpy and Co are selling America's future to China to finance the ill concieved, immoral foreign adventurism. So unless Chimpy and his merry band are stopped, and soon, I would start brushing up on your Mandarin.

It doesn't look as though curbing trade with China is high the Dim's agenda. In fact they seem alot more interested in raising the cost of doing business in America with their minimum wage/health care agenda, thus giving countries like China even more of an edge.
 
The real threat is a president locked into some sick messianic vision which is impervious to reason.

As for being slaves, Chimpy and Co are selling America's future to China to finance the ill concieved, immoral foreign adventurism. So unless Chimpy and his merry band are stopped, and soon, I would start brushing up on your Mandarin.

Seriously, what do you smoke? Are you even grounded in reality?

Do you honestly think the President would be doing any of if America hadn't been attacked and he didnt feel he needed to protect the nation.

As for selling out to China, where the heck do you get this stuff? Who exactly was it that sold China nuclear materials for campaign funds and then prevented any sort of investigation into it?

Besides, Brushing up on Mandarin would be wise regardless. As would studying any other language.
 
Seriously, what do you smoke? Are you even grounded in reality?

Do you honestly think the President would be doing any of if America hadn't been attacked and he didnt feel he needed to protect the nation.

As for selling out to China, where the heck do you get this stuff? Who exactly was it that sold China nuclear materials for campaign funds and then prevented any sort of investigation into it?

Besides, Brushing up on Mandarin would be wise regardless. As would studying any other language.

Going into Iraq had <i><b>nothing</b></i> to do with protecting America.
 
Going into Iraq had <i><b>nothing</b></i> to do with protecting America.

The fact that you are still making this claim despite nearly 5 years of discussion and evidence otherwise is down right astounding. What is it going to take for you take this war on terror seriously? Do terrorist have to destroy an entire city?
 
Relax, Avatar. There's an old saying about casting pearls to swine that applies here.

People like Bully aren't even aware there's a war on terror, or even a threat. They are consumed with a hatred for conservatives, and can only direct their attention to whichever one is in power, with the goal of getting rid of him. That's George Bush at present, plus Cheney and the other Republicans. They aren't even all that conservative, but that makes no difference to the Bully boys.

Talking rationalily to these people is like describing color to the blind. They can't even begin to grasp the concept, so they ignore it.
 
Relax, Avatar. There's an old saying about casting pearls to swine that applies here.

People like Bully aren't even aware there's a war on terror, or even a threat. They are consumed with a hatred for conservatives, and can only direct their attention to whichever one is in power, with the goal of getting rid of him. That's George Bush at present, plus Cheney and the other Republicans. They aren't even all that conservative, but that makes no difference to the Bully boys.

Talking rationalily to these people is like describing color to the blind. They can't even begin to grasp the concept, so they ignore it.
I would agree, with the exception that they are now driving public policy, which could be disasterous in the long run.

FDR used over 3 years to get the people behind him, it would take longer for the legislature, not sure we have that kind of time. I do know that FDR was more 'liked' than GW by the masses, if not the legislature.
 

Forum List

Back
Top