The debates





(Comment)

There're WAY MORE people from the outside invested in the conflict,
rather than on either sides of those directly involved.

Just look at the posters on this forum - the radicals
are usually the least involved and furthest from the consequences.
 
Last edited:
Pay attention to who's more confrontational,
it's not the people involved...

...but they sure think
they have more say than anyone else.

 
Pay attention to who's more confrontational,
it's not the people involved...

...but they sure think
they have more say than anyone else.


I don't see a big problem on the ground. The problem is that the government is fucked up. It has to go or there will never be peace.
 
Pay attention to who's more confrontational,
it's not the people involved...

...but they sure think
they have more say than anyone else.


I don't see a big problem on the ground. The problem is that the government is fucked up. It has to go or there will never be peace.


Of course you "don't see a problem on the ground",
thousands of miles away on another continent -
you don't even see the ground.

And yet you think you see "THE PROBLEM",
and act as if you know more than anyone involved.

That is the problem, more than all here on the ground combined,
dishonest people like you, working to fuel both suffering, from the outside.
 
Last edited:

Israeli Arabs: Who do you want as your government? Israel or Palestine?


 

Zionists and Muslims debate Gaza war

Waleed and Zoubida el Arabia
from Speakers Corner,

debate -

Joseph and Alexandr Menashe
on the Am Yisrael Live podcast.

 
Bernard Lewis and Leon Wieseltier vs. Edward Said and Christopher Hitchens



Although I appreciate You bringing this unique presentation of some of the most influential intellectuals on West's perspective of the Middle East in one place - but this is not debate.

They only present their subjective perspective on the situation,
without arguing anything specific.

The one thing they all seem to agree,
is that "the West" has no clue about the Middle East,
and the notion, that almost as if intellectually incapable.

They only present their subjective perspective on the situation,
without arguing anything specific.
Indeed, it was a wimpy debate.

I would love to see a real debate. Both sides at facing tables challenging each other.

I would like to see people like Susan Akram, Rashid Khalidi, Virginia Tilley, Nur Masalha, Ilan Pappe
Noura Erakat, Lamis Deek, Salma Karmi-Ayyoub,Nadia Hijab. Of course there are more but more than a half dozen or so on each side would be unworkable.

Who are some of the people you would want on your side? Just curious.

Still interested in a debate, Who would you want on your side?
 


Noura Erekat, the niece of the PA oligarchs,
boycott of Jews and vile Nazi propaganda is "fighting antisemitism"?

Or her supremacist demand for exclusive Arab domination in the entire middle east,
is a movement that's going to "liberate the Jews"???

Classic Al-Jazeera...

E3OZbRoVUAADzmR
 


What does it say about the quality of your argument,
when in a panel of one who's not Israeli, against 3 anti-Israel voices,
you still can't directly address anything but to parrot a party-line in unison?

Sums it up neatly, like it's always been -
quality over quantity...

635715148908241472-german.jpg
 

Who to stop it? Scramble to prevent all-out war in the Middle East​


 

Muslim Debates Zionist: Were Jews Oppressed Under Islam?

They really want to convince Jews
it was better being a minority under Muslim rule...

 
Last edited:

Who controls the media message on the Israel-Palestine conflict? | Inside Story​


 

Forum List

Back
Top