The Culture of IDF Cowardice!

[Jarlaxle]

Every problem Israel has is from being soft. Had they done things right 45 years ago, things would be much easier now.

Oh but according to the Israeli leaders in 67 they did exactly what they had planned: expand Israeli territory through state-terror...you probably meant an expulsion--and or----slaughter of all the remaining Palestinian population...you trash learned quite a bit from the SS and Gestapo huh?

You flunked math in grade school, didn't you. (That's not a question.) In the Yom Kippur War (you know...45 years ago!), the Israelis should not have stopped. They should have rolled into Cairo, and razed it to the ground. They should have rolled into Damascus, and leveled the place. They should have razed Suez to the ground, nowhere with one stone atop another. They should have wiped out the Egyptian Third Army to the last man. They should have occupied and controlled the Suez Canal...if that wasn't possible, they should have destroyed it completely.

 

[Hollie]

Backtracking as usual.

Israelis have a right to defend themselves from your Islamic terrorist heroes. I understand that pains you but you Islamic terrorists have no inherent right to acts of depravity you define as a religious duty.

People laugh at your keyboard gee-had.

Not at all skip-brain...you merely cannot wrap your toxic thoughts around the idea that all of the accusations I make against the IDF are a matter of documentation...your pathetic attempt to stigmatize Palestinian offenses against the Israelis clearly waves off basic cause-n-effect: essentially resistance is an inexorable consequence of the criminal occupation maintained by Israel...if you choose to whine and moan about the mild variable of Palestinian resistance then I am obligated to explain to you that you are on the wrong end of the argument princess...Palestinians enjoy a legal right to resistance...by contrast Israel cannot invoke its standard 'self-defense' as an occupier....please go back to school where they teach basic logic and clarity of thought....sigh

It's a shame your tender islamo-sensibilities are stigmatized.

On the other hand;

I.D.F. Video of Purported Hamas Attack

Do I need to explain yet again that Hamas reprisals against the IDF are a legal right princess? How far did you advance in school hon?

Backtracking as usual.

Israelis have a right to defend themselves from your Islamic terrorist heroes. I understand that pains you but you Islamic terrorists have no inherent right to acts of depravity you define as a religious duty.

People laugh at your keyboard gee-had.

Not at all skip-brain...you merely cannot wrap your toxic thoughts around the idea that all of the accusations I make against the IDF are a matter of documentation...your pathetic attempt to stigmatize Palestinian offenses against the Israelis clearly waves off basic cause-n-effect: essentially resistance is an inexorable consequence of the criminal occupation maintained by Israel...if you choose to whine and moan about the mild variable of Palestinian resistance then I am obligated to explain to you that you are on the wrong end of the argument princess...Palestinians enjoy a legal right to resistance...by contrast Israel cannot invoke its standard 'self-defense' as an occupier....please go back to school where they teach basic logic and clarity of thought....sigh

It's a shame your tender islamo-sensibilities are stigmatized.

On the other hand;

I.D.F. Video of Purported Hamas Attack

Do I need to explain yet again that Hamas reprisals against the IDF are a legal right princess? How far did you advance in school hon?

Do I need to explain to you again that you have no inherent rights to acts of Islamic terrorism?

Do I need to explain that labeling Palestinian rights of resistance as 'Islamo-terrorism' is the act of a propaganda -parrot> ??? In other words its quite irrelevant princess!

You can make all the excuses for Islamic terrorism you wish to endorse acts of Islamic terrorism by designated Islamic terrorist franchises. Just be aware that the Israelis have a right to both resistance and retaliation to islamic terrorism.

Your gee-had of none is a paltry excuse for cowardice on your part. Flailing your Pom Poms is a poor excuse for an online gee-had that is silly and ineffectual.

 

[Ventura77]

Every problem Israel has is from being soft. Had they done things right 45 years ago, things would be much easier now.

Oh but according to the Israeli leaders in 67 they did exactly what they had planned: expand Israeli territory through state-terror...you probably meant an expulsion--and or----slaughter of all the remaining Palestinian population...you trash learned quite a bit from the SS and Gestapo huh?

You flunked math in grade school, didn't you. (That's not a question.) In the Yom Kippur War (you know...45 years ago!), the Israelis should not have stopped. They should have rolled into Cairo, and razed it to the ground. They should have rolled into Damascus, and leveled the place. They should have razed Suez to the ground, nowhere with one stone atop another. They should have wiped out the Egyptian Third Army to the last man. They should have occupied and controlled the Suez Canal...if that wasn't possible, they should have destroyed it completely.

...and YOU flunked basic morality and law, among many other subjects you SS-slug...apparently the theft of Palestine by the Zio-filth didn't nearly satiate you thirst for blood and criminal conquest...where was this brio when the SS and Gestapo were herding you cowards into death-camps...?

 

[Ventura77]

Not at all skip-brain...you merely cannot wrap your toxic thoughts around the idea that all of the accusations I make against the IDF are a matter of documentation...your pathetic attempt to stigmatize Palestinian offenses against the Israelis clearly waves off basic cause-n-effect: essentially resistance is an inexorable consequence of the criminal occupation maintained by Israel...if you choose to whine and moan about the mild variable of Palestinian resistance then I am obligated to explain to you that you are on the wrong end of the argument princess...Palestinians enjoy a legal right to resistance...by contrast Israel cannot invoke its standard 'self-defense' as an occupier....please go back to school where they teach basic logic and clarity of thought....sigh

It's a shame your tender islamo-sensibilities are stigmatized.

On the other hand;

I.D.F. Video of Purported Hamas Attack

Do I need to explain yet again that Hamas reprisals against the IDF are a legal right princess? How far did you advance in school hon?

Not at all skip-brain...you merely cannot wrap your toxic thoughts around the idea that all of the accusations I make against the IDF are a matter of documentation...your pathetic attempt to stigmatize Palestinian offenses against the Israelis clearly waves off basic cause-n-effect: essentially resistance is an inexorable consequence of the criminal occupation maintained by Israel...if you choose to whine and moan about the mild variable of Palestinian resistance then I am obligated to explain to you that you are on the wrong end of the argument princess...Palestinians enjoy a legal right to resistance...by contrast Israel cannot invoke its standard 'self-defense' as an occupier....please go back to school where they teach basic logic and clarity of thought....sigh

It's a shame your tender islamo-sensibilities are stigmatized.

On the other hand;

I.D.F. Video of Purported Hamas Attack

Do I need to explain yet again that Hamas reprisals against the IDF are a legal right princess? How far did you advance in school hon?

Do I need to explain to you again that you have no inherent rights to acts of Islamic terrorism?

Do I need to explain that labeling Palestinian rights of resistance as 'Islamo-terrorism' is the act of a propaganda -parrot> ??? In other words its quite irrelevant princess!

You can make all the excuses for Islamic terrorism you wish to endorse acts of Islamic terrorism by designated Islamic terrorist franchises. Just be aware that the Israelis have a right to both resistance and retaliation to islamic terrorism.

Your gee-had of none is a paltry excuse for cowardice on your part. Flailing your Pom Poms is a poor excuse for an online gee-had that is silly and ineffectual.

Okay please post a link to this putative 'Israeli right of resistance' you mindless liar? Please find someone a bit better educated to explain that occupiers inhere zero right of 'self-defense' because their victims are the one's defending themselves...good grief what a fatal dullard

 

[Hollie]

Every problem Israel has is from being soft. Had they done things right 45 years ago, things would be much easier now.

Oh but according to the Israeli leaders in 67 they did exactly what they had planned: expand Israeli territory through state-terror...you probably meant an expulsion--and or----slaughter of all the remaining Palestinian population...you trash learned quite a bit from the SS and Gestapo huh?

You flunked math in grade school, didn't you. (That's not a question.) In the Yom Kippur War (you know...45 years ago!), the Israelis should not have stopped. They should have rolled into Cairo, and razed it to the ground. They should have rolled into Damascus, and leveled the place. They should have razed Suez to the ground, nowhere with one stone atop another. They should have wiped out the Egyptian Third Army to the last man. They should have occupied and controlled the Suez Canal...if that wasn't possible, they should have destroyed it completely.

...and YOU flunked basic morality and law, among many other subjects you SS-slug...apparently the theft of Palestine by the Zio-filth didn't nearly satiate you thirst for blood and criminal conquest...where was this brio when the SS and Gestapo were herding you cowards into death-camps...?

There was no theft of your imagined “Pal’istan”. Do you realize you make yourself the object of ridicule with your ignorant tirades?

 

[Hollie]

It's a shame your tender islamo-sensibilities are stigmatized.

On the other hand;

I.D.F. Video of Purported Hamas Attack

Do I need to explain yet again that Hamas reprisals against the IDF are a legal right princess? How far did you advance in school hon?

It's a shame your tender islamo-sensibilities are stigmatized.

On the other hand;

I.D.F. Video of Purported Hamas Attack

Do I need to explain yet again that Hamas reprisals against the IDF are a legal right princess? How far did you advance in school hon?

Do I need to explain to you again that you have no inherent rights to acts of Islamic terrorism?

Do I need to explain that labeling Palestinian rights of resistance as 'Islamo-terrorism' is the act of a propaganda -parrot> ??? In other words its quite irrelevant princess!

You can make all the excuses for Islamic terrorism you wish to endorse acts of Islamic terrorism by designated Islamic terrorist franchises. Just be aware that the Israelis have a right to both resistance and retaliation to islamic terrorism.

Your gee-had of none is a paltry excuse for cowardice on your part. Flailing your Pom Poms is a poor excuse for an online gee-had that is silly and ineffectual.

Okay please post a link to this putative 'Israeli right of resistance' you mindless liar? Please find someone a bit better educated to explain that occupiers inhere zero right of 'self-defense' because their victims are the one's defending themselves...good grief what a fatal dullard

It’s in article 51.

Silly wannabe. Your flaming tirades are hilarious.

 

[Ventura77]

Every problem Israel has is from being soft. Had they done things right 45 years ago, things would be much easier now.

Oh but according to the Israeli leaders in 67 they did exactly what they had planned: expand Israeli territory through state-terror...you probably meant an expulsion--and or----slaughter of all the remaining Palestinian population...you trash learned quite a bit from the SS and Gestapo huh?

You flunked math in grade school, didn't you. (That's not a question.) In the Yom Kippur War (you know...45 years ago!), the Israelis should not have stopped. They should have rolled into Cairo, and razed it to the ground. They should have rolled into Damascus, and leveled the place. They should have razed Suez to the ground, nowhere with one stone atop another. They should have wiped out the Egyptian Third Army to the last man. They should have occupied and controlled the Suez Canal...if that wasn't possible, they should have destroyed it completely.

...and YOU flunked basic morality and law, among many other subjects you SS-slug...apparently the theft of Palestine by the Zio-filth didn't nearly satiate you thirst for blood and criminal conquest...where was this brio when the SS and Gestapo were herding you cowards into death-camps...?

There was no theft of your imagined “Pal’istan”. Do you realize you make yourself the object of ridicule with your ignorant tirades?

Legalizing the theft of Palestinian land has been Israeli policy since Day 1


Last night, the Israeli Knesset passed a law that retroactively legalizes the theft of Palestinian land property by Jewish settlers.

The law, officially called the “Regularization Law”, has been deemed an outright legalization of theft by politicians from both right and left as well as Haaretz. Even Attorney General Avichai Mendelblit says it is unconstitutional and violates the 4th Geneva Convention and he would not defend it in court. Not to worry: Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked says the state can get a private attorney if necessary.

The law would retroactively legalize about 4,000 settler homes built in what is known as ‘outposts’, outside the ‘settlement blocs’ and on privately owned Palestinian land. Until now, such construction has been deemed illegal even by the bizarre set of Israeli laws applying, indirectly as it were, to the occupation. Thus the law crosses a line Israel has never violated before, even according to right-wingers like Dan Meridor, member of Knesset for Likud and a former minister, who called the law “evil and dangerous”; Israel’s Parliament never regulated Palestinian property ownership in the West Bank because “the Arabs of Judea and Samaria did not vote for the Knesset, and it has no authority to legislate for them,” Meridor says. “These are basic principles of democracy and Israeli law.”

Indeed, the law can be seen as a de facto legal annexation of the West Bank. Israel has so far only applied military law to its occupied subjects. If Israel is to be held to its standard in the fact of legislating on Palestinian property in occupied territory, it should arguably offer immediate citizenship to all its occupied subjects.

But lest we get carried away, to think that Israel has just done something that is radically different to what it has done in the past, we must remember that land theft has been a policy of Israel since day 1. The law that exemplifies this policy best is the Absentee Property law of 1950. This law facilitated the state takeover of Palestinian property, by considering those who had fled or not been present between 29th November 1947 (date of UN 181 ‘Partition Plan’) and Israel’s Declaration of Independence (May 14, 1948) as ‘absentees’, whose property would be taken over by the state. This law is one law inside a set of laws designed to deliver land to the hands of the State of Israel. For at the time of Partition, Jews owned merely about 5% of Palestine. By 1951, the Jewish State would own 92% of the territories over which it had control (at that time, 78% of historical Palestine).

 

[Hollie]

Every problem Israel has is from being soft. Had they done things right 45 years ago, things would be much easier now.

Oh but according to the Israeli leaders in 67 they did exactly what they had planned: expand Israeli territory through state-terror...you probably meant an expulsion--and or----slaughter of all the remaining Palestinian population...you trash learned quite a bit from the SS and Gestapo huh?

You flunked math in grade school, didn't you. (That's not a question.) In the Yom Kippur War (you know...45 years ago!), the Israelis should not have stopped. They should have rolled into Cairo, and razed it to the ground. They should have rolled into Damascus, and leveled the place. They should have razed Suez to the ground, nowhere with one stone atop another. They should have wiped out the Egyptian Third Army to the last man. They should have occupied and controlled the Suez Canal...if that wasn't possible, they should have destroyed it completely.

...and YOU flunked basic morality and law, among many other subjects you SS-slug...apparently the theft of Palestine by the Zio-filth didn't nearly satiate you thirst for blood and criminal conquest...where was this brio when the SS and Gestapo were herding you cowards into death-camps...?

There was no theft of your imagined “Pal’istan”. Do you realize you make yourself the object of ridicule with your ignorant tirades?

Legalizing the theft of Palestinian land has been Israeli policy since Day 1


Last night, the Israeli Knesset passed a law that retroactively legalizes the theft of Palestinian land property by Jewish settlers.

The law, officially called the “Regularization Law”, has been deemed an outright legalization of theft by politicians from both right and left as well as Haaretz. Even Attorney General Avichai Mendelblit says it is unconstitutional and violates the 4th Geneva Convention and he would not defend it in court. Not to worry: Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked says the state can get a private attorney if necessary.

The law would retroactively legalize about 4,000 settler homes built in what is known as ‘outposts’, outside the ‘settlement blocs’ and on privately owned Palestinian land. Until now, such construction has been deemed illegal even by the bizarre set of Israeli laws applying, indirectly as it were, to the occupation. Thus the law crosses a line Israel has never violated before, even according to right-wingers like Dan Meridor, member of Knesset for Likud and a former minister, who called the law “evil and dangerous”; Israel’s Parliament never regulated Palestinian property ownership in the West Bank because “the Arabs of Judea and Samaria did not vote for the Knesset, and it has no authority to legislate for them,” Meridor says. “These are basic principles of democracy and Israeli law.”

Indeed, the law can be seen as a de facto legal annexation of the West Bank. Israel has so far only applied military law to its occupied subjects. If Israel is to be held to its standard in the fact of legislating on Palestinian property in occupied territory, it should arguably offer immediate citizenship to all its occupied subjects.

But lest we get carried away, to think that Israel has just done something that is radically different to what it has done in the past, we must remember that land theft has been a policy of Israel since day 1. The law that exemplifies this policy best is the Absentee Property law of 1950. This law facilitated the state takeover of Palestinian property, by considering those who had fled or not been present between 29th November 1947 (date of UN 181 ‘Partition Plan’) and Israel’s Declaration of Independence (May 14, 1948) as ‘absentees’, whose property would be taken over by the state. This law is one law inside a set of laws designed to deliver land to the hands of the State of Israel. For at the time of Partition, Jews owned merely about 5% of Palestine. By 1951, the Jewish State would own 92% of the territories over which it had control (at that time, 78% of historical Palestine).

I knew you would resort to your usual cowardice and deflection. Your claims are ignorant and fraudulent which leaves you to spam the board with your usual piffle.

Your blustering tirade and false claims about article 51 were a laughable joke.

 

[Anathema]

Congrats that is among the single dumbest things I've read online in quite a while...

Yet, the only response you can come up with is to attempt to insult me rather than countering the arguement I make.

A pregnant woman holding a Kalashnikov or a suicide vest is still a legitimate military target. Her pregnancy does not change that.

 

[Hollie]

Palestinians Are Building Illegal Settlements to Extend Their Claims to Jerusalem

Palestinians Are Building Illegal Settlements to Extend Their Claims to Jerusalem

Just about everything frequently alleged against Israeli settlements in the West Bank can be said, truthfully, about recent Palestinian construction on the outskirts of Jerusalem, writes Bassam Tawil. Such construction is illegal; it is intended to impede the possibility of a two-state solution; and it often takes place on land stolen from private Palestinian owners.

Apparently, settlements are only a “major obstacle to peace” when they are constructed by Jews. In recent years, and continuing to the present, Palestinians, with the aid of Western donors for whom only Jewish construction is anathema, have been working night and day to create irreversible facts on the ground. . . .

Recently, entire Arab neighborhoods with crowded high-rises have shot up around Jerusalem. Only a handful of steps separate some of the buildings, and most lack proper sewage systems. Apartment prices range from $25,000 to $50,000. These are ridiculous prices compared with the market costs of apartments in both Arab and Jewish neighborhoods in Jerusalem. Today, it is almost impossible to purchase a three-room apartment in the city for less than $250,000. . . .

t is not an Arab housing crisis that is prompting this spree of illegal Palestinian construction. Rather, the goal is political: to show the world that Jerusalem is an Arab, and not a Jewish, city. By and large, the apartments remain empty: there is simply no real demand.

 

[Ventura77]

Congrats that is among the single dumbest things I've read online in quite a while...

Yet, the only response you can come up with is to attempt to insult me rather than countering the arguement I make.

A pregnant woman holding a Kalashnikov or a suicide vest is still a legitimate military target. Her pregnancy does not change that.

perhaps a 'legitimate target' for the seasoned cowards of the IDF, however the salient point of the T-shirts completely eludes you...as if to underscore the spineless character of IDF soldiers the shirt itself is a valid reference to the culture of hate imposed upon the Palestinians by Eastern European Jew trash who have zero claim to one square foot on historic Palestine...

 

[Jarlaxle]

Do you masturbate to pictures of concentration camps?

 

[Ventura77]

Do you masturbate to pictures of concentration camps?

apparently YOU do imbecile...tell me have you always been bone-dumb and full of irrational hate?

 

[Hollie]

Congrats that is among the single dumbest things I've read online in quite a while...

Yet, the only response you can come up with is to attempt to insult me rather than countering the arguement I make.

A pregnant woman holding a Kalashnikov or a suicide vest is still a legitimate military target. Her pregnancy does not change that.

perhaps a 'legitimate target' for the seasoned cowards of the IDF, however the salient point of the T-shirts completely eludes you...as if to underscore the spineless character of IDF soldiers the shirt itself is a valid reference to the culture of hate imposed upon the Palestinians by Eastern European Jew trash who have zero claim to one square foot on historic Palestine...

Wow. How quickly you ran like a coward when your feeble cutting and pasting of what you don’t understand was exposed as fraud.

Can’t address the salient points? Ask the Imam at your madrassah for your money back.

 

[Ventura77]

Congrats that is among the single dumbest things I've read online in quite a while...

Yet, the only response you can come up with is to attempt to insult me rather than countering the arguement I make.

A pregnant woman holding a Kalashnikov or a suicide vest is still a legitimate military target. Her pregnancy does not change that.

perhaps a 'legitimate target' for the seasoned cowards of the IDF, however the salient point of the T-shirts completely eludes you...as if to underscore the spineless character of IDF soldiers the shirt itself is a valid reference to the culture of hate imposed upon the Palestinians by Eastern European Jew trash who have zero claim to one square foot on historic Palestine...

Wow. How quickly you ran like a coward when your feeble cutting and pasting of what you don’t understand was exposed as fraud.

Can’t address the salient points? Ask the Imam at your madrassah for your money back.

Wow!!!! how quickly you revert into a realm of profound self-delusions when your pious, hate-saturated rants are exposed as lies...

 

[Hollie]

Congrats that is among the single dumbest things I've read online in quite a while...

Yet, the only response you can come up with is to attempt to insult me rather than countering the arguement I make.

A pregnant woman holding a Kalashnikov or a suicide vest is still a legitimate military target. Her pregnancy does not change that.

perhaps a 'legitimate target' for the seasoned cowards of the IDF, however the salient point of the T-shirts completely eludes you...as if to underscore the spineless character of IDF soldiers the shirt itself is a valid reference to the culture of hate imposed upon the Palestinians by Eastern European Jew trash who have zero claim to one square foot on historic Palestine...

Wow. How quickly you ran like a coward when your feeble cutting and pasting of what you don’t understand was exposed as fraud.

Can’t address the salient points? Ask the Imam at your madrassah for your money back.

Wow!!!! how quickly you revert into a realm of profound self-delusions when your pious, hate-saturated rants are exposed as lies...

Your febrile tirades are a hoot.

Just remember that it’s a simple matter to crush your silly cutting and pasting with facts as was done in this thread and others.

Run along now,

 

[Ventura77]

Congrats that is among the single dumbest things I've read online in quite a while...

Yet, the only response you can come up with is to attempt to insult me rather than countering the arguement I make.

A pregnant woman holding a Kalashnikov or a suicide vest is still a legitimate military target. Her pregnancy does not change that.

perhaps a 'legitimate target' for the seasoned cowards of the IDF, however the salient point of the T-shirts completely eludes you...as if to underscore the spineless character of IDF soldiers the shirt itself is a valid reference to the culture of hate imposed upon the Palestinians by Eastern European Jew trash who have zero claim to one square foot on historic Palestine...

Wow. How quickly you ran like a coward when your feeble cutting and pasting of what you don’t understand was exposed as fraud.

Can’t address the salient points? Ask the Imam at your madrassah for your money back.

Wow!!!! how quickly you revert into a realm of profound self-delusions when your pious, hate-saturated rants are exposed as lies...

Your febrile tirades are a hoot.

Just remember that it’s a simple matter to crush your silly cutting and pasting with facts as was done in this thread and others.

Run along now,

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA...the drool-queen looked up the word: ( febrile ) OMG THAT'S FUNNY!!!!

 

[Hollie]

Yet, the only response you can come up with is to attempt to insult me rather than countering the arguement I make.

A pregnant woman holding a Kalashnikov or a suicide vest is still a legitimate military target. Her pregnancy does not change that.

perhaps a 'legitimate target' for the seasoned cowards of the IDF, however the salient point of the T-shirts completely eludes you...as if to underscore the spineless character of IDF soldiers the shirt itself is a valid reference to the culture of hate imposed upon the Palestinians by Eastern European Jew trash who have zero claim to one square foot on historic Palestine...

Wow. How quickly you ran like a coward when your feeble cutting and pasting of what you don’t understand was exposed as fraud.

Can’t address the salient points? Ask the Imam at your madrassah for your money back.

Wow!!!! how quickly you revert into a realm of profound self-delusions when your pious, hate-saturated rants are exposed as lies...

Your febrile tirades are a hoot.

Just remember that it’s a simple matter to crush your silly cutting and pasting with facts as was done in this thread and others.

Run along now,

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA...the drool-queen looked up the word: ( febrile ) OMG THAT'S FUNNY!!!!

Your febrile tirades and juvenile name-calling may impress your co-religionists at your madrassah but it’s a simple matter to send you packing when your silly cutting and pasting is exposed as fraudulent and unsupportable.

Run along now.

 

[Anathema]

... who have zero claim to one square foot on historic Palestine...

Possession is 11/10ths of the Law. Until the Palis have the capability to remove the Israelis, that territory will be Israel.

 

[Hollie]

Congrats that is among the single dumbest things I've read online in quite a while...

Yet, the only response you can come up with is to attempt to insult me rather than countering the arguement I make.

A pregnant woman holding a Kalashnikov or a suicide vest is still a legitimate military target. Her pregnancy does not change that.

perhaps a 'legitimate target' for the seasoned cowards of the IDF, however the salient point of the T-shirts completely eludes you...as if to underscore the spineless character of IDF soldiers the shirt itself is a valid reference to the culture of hate imposed upon the Palestinians by Eastern European Jew trash who have zero claim to one square foot on historic Palestine...

Where does one find your invented “country of “Pal’istan” as opposed to your invented “Hysteric Pal’istan”?