The Constitution is Junk

Your silly asses just can't comprehend anything after the description of it being junk because of constitutional dogma.
Your contention is asinine and it only makes sense to tell you when you’re wrong.

Is it perfect? Obviously not. It was crafted by humans and it requires that humans use it. Accordingly, it implicates the unavoidable making of some errors and mistakes. And those need to be recognized and attended to.

But that doesn’t make it “junk.” Use your adult words, if you have any.
 
Your silly asses just can't comprehend anything after the description of it being junk because of constitutional dogma.
maxresdefault.jpg
 
He is going to tell the people that the separation of powers is erroneous, and he is going to recommend the brilliant lawyers begin deliberating the separation model I have designed. Guaranteed.
Thanks, Nostradumbass, for foretelling what other people “will” do. 🙄

Toddle off now, child.
 
$ecular#eckler

You sort of imitate Lysander Spooner.

My position is that the USC is a good document, but being created by humans it cannot be perfect. Utopia is not an option.

That the document is ignored is testimony to the failure of the humans administering it.
 
Every week now, there is another pedestrian argument proclaiming the virtues of the Almighty United States Constitution. It goes on and on because political science is not a science. Some colleges call it "government studies," but it is all the same - none of the scholars are sophisticated enough to critique the Three-part Separation Theory.

The Three-part Separation Theory was miscalculated and improperly deployed, and the result is a system of Constitutional theology and dogma preventing the search for a more reliable government charter system.

The starting point for understanding the perpetually cycling problems of the erroneous three-branch governing system is that all of the executive power is in the executive branch, and the subsequent security departments lack an orderly organization of that power. The partisan problem is that the legislative assemblies are generally commissioned, publicly elected, and unsupervised. The judicial problem is because the administrative powers are distributed among the three branches, and the political contest in the legislative branch stabilized into its erroneous duopoly; ultimately, disseminating partisanship into the society including the judicial servants. The erroneous governing system causes political chaos that trickles down into society because that is why we institute government - to guide society.

Even if the government were to reach political order, and society is peaceful, the perpetual election cycle is going to destroy that, because the system is not designed to manage the elected offices when new laws are not necessary. The candidates have to campaign for change because they cannot campaign for "no new laws," because then the citizenry would question the need for politicians.

The absolute truth is that the three-branch separation only prevents any one person from ascending to a dictatorship. The inconvenient truth is that neither the separation nor the checks and balances prevent corruption or control the quality of the inevitable oligarchy created in the echelons of the government. The checks and balances cannot be reliably constructed for a simple three-branch separation model because the three branches are inherently cooperative entities for the stable administration of civil law; legislate, execute, and review.

The American charter system was inaccurately deployed, consequently, justice was established in unamendable error, domestic tranquility has since been forfeited, and the remaining parameters for the American Experiment; defense, general welfare, and liberty, are all at risk, as well.

Attached is a map for a six-part separation and a treatise
Feel free to start your own country and experiment with any system you want.

Good luck.
 
The Constitution was written for a moral and religious people. It is wholly unsuited to govern any other.
John Adams.

We are now neither moral and certainly not religious. We are unsuited for the Constitution.

Ben Franklin said
In these Sentiments, Sir, I agree to this Constitution, with all its Faults, if they are such: because I think a General Government necessary for us, and there is no Form of Government but what may be a Blessing to the People if well administred; and I believe farther that this is likely to be well administred for a Course of Years, and can only end in Despotism as other Forms have done before it, when the People shall become so corrupted as to need Despotic Government, being incapable of any other.

We are that corrupted. I hope Trump can save us from democrats.
 
Every week now, there is another pedestrian argument proclaiming the virtues of the Almighty United States Constitution. It goes on and on because political science is not a science. Some colleges call it "government studies," but it is all the same - none of the scholars are sophisticated enough to critique the Three-part Separation Theory.

The Three-part Separation Theory was miscalculated and improperly deployed, and the result is a system of Constitutional theology and dogma preventing the search for a more reliable government charter system.

The starting point for understanding the perpetually cycling problems of the erroneous three-branch governing system is that all of the executive power is in the executive branch, and the subsequent security departments lack an orderly organization of that power. The partisan problem is that the legislative assemblies are generally commissioned, publicly elected, and unsupervised. The judicial problem is because the administrative powers are distributed among the three branches, and the political contest in the legislative branch stabilized into its erroneous duopoly; ultimately, disseminating partisanship into the society including the judicial servants. The erroneous governing system causes political chaos that trickles down into society because that is why we institute government - to guide society.

Even if the government were to reach political order, and society is peaceful, the perpetual election cycle is going to destroy that, because the system is not designed to manage the elected offices when new laws are not necessary. The candidates have to campaign for change because they cannot campaign for "no new laws," because then the citizenry would question the need for politicians.

The absolute truth is that the three-branch separation only prevents any one person from ascending to a dictatorship. The inconvenient truth is that neither the separation nor the checks and balances prevent corruption or control the quality of the inevitable oligarchy created in the echelons of the government. The checks and balances cannot be reliably constructed for a simple three-branch separation model because the three branches are inherently cooperative entities for the stable administration of civil law; legislate, execute, and review.

The American charter system was inaccurately deployed, consequently, justice was established in unamendable error, domestic tranquility has since been forfeited, and the remaining parameters for the American Experiment; defense, general welfare, and liberty, are all at risk, as well.

Attached is a map for a six-part separation and a treatise
ernie1.webp
 
I'd mentioned some place around here just recently that one could make an argument that groundwork is being laid to reinterpret the constitution as well as the roles of the government branches in terms of the framework of checks and balances.

Pay attention, folks...
 
Every week now, there is another pedestrian argument proclaiming the virtues of the Almighty United States Constitution. It goes on and on because political science is not a science. Some colleges call it "government studies," but it is all the same - none of the scholars are sophisticated enough to critique the Three-part Separation Theory.

The Three-part Separation Theory was miscalculated and improperly deployed, and the result is a system of Constitutional theology and dogma preventing the search for a more reliable government charter system.

The starting point for understanding the perpetually cycling problems of the erroneous three-branch governing system is that all of the executive power is in the executive branch, and the subsequent security departments lack an orderly organization of that power. The partisan problem is that the legislative assemblies are generally commissioned, publicly elected, and unsupervised. The judicial problem is because the administrative powers are distributed among the three branches, and the political contest in the legislative branch stabilized into its erroneous duopoly; ultimately, disseminating partisanship into the society including the judicial servants. The erroneous governing system causes political chaos that trickles down into society because that is why we institute government - to guide society.

Even if the government were to reach political order, and society is peaceful, the perpetual election cycle is going to destroy that, because the system is not designed to manage the elected offices when new laws are not necessary. The candidates have to campaign for change because they cannot campaign for "no new laws," because then the citizenry would question the need for politicians.

The absolute truth is that the three-branch separation only prevents any one person from ascending to a dictatorship. The inconvenient truth is that neither the separation nor the checks and balances prevent corruption or control the quality of the inevitable oligarchy created in the echelons of the government. The checks and balances cannot be reliably constructed for a simple three-branch separation model because the three branches are inherently cooperative entities for the stable administration of civil law; legislate, execute, and review.

The American charter system was inaccurately deployed, consequently, justice was established in unamendable error, domestic tranquility has since been forfeited, and the remaining parameters for the American Experiment; defense, general welfare, and liberty, are all at risk, as well.

Attached is a map for a six-part separation and a treatise


gggbbhhnjjbhhnnnhj.webp


gghmhnmmmnmmmmmjmmmm.webp
 
Every week now, there is another pedestrian argument proclaiming the virtues of the Almighty United States Constitution. It goes on and on because political science is not a science. Some colleges call it "government studies," but it is all the same - none of the scholars are sophisticated enough to critique the Three-part Separation Theory.

The Three-part Separation Theory was miscalculated and improperly deployed, and the result is a system of Constitutional theology and dogma preventing the search for a more reliable government charter system.

The starting point for understanding the perpetually cycling problems of the erroneous three-branch governing system is that all of the executive power is in the executive branch, and the subsequent security departments lack an orderly organization of that power. The partisan problem is that the legislative assemblies are generally commissioned, publicly elected, and unsupervised. The judicial problem is because the administrative powers are distributed among the three branches, and the political contest in the legislative branch stabilized into its erroneous duopoly; ultimately, disseminating partisanship into the society including the judicial servants. The erroneous governing system causes political chaos that trickles down into society because that is why we institute government - to guide society.

Even if the government were to reach political order, and society is peaceful, the perpetual election cycle is going to destroy that, because the system is not designed to manage the elected offices when new laws are not necessary. The candidates have to campaign for change because they cannot campaign for "no new laws," because then the citizenry would question the need for politicians.

The absolute truth is that the three-branch separation only prevents any one person from ascending to a dictatorship. The inconvenient truth is that neither the separation nor the checks and balances prevent corruption or control the quality of the inevitable oligarchy created in the echelons of the government. The checks and balances cannot be reliably constructed for a simple three-branch separation model because the three branches are inherently cooperative entities for the stable administration of civil law; legislate, execute, and review.

The American charter system was inaccurately deployed, consequently, justice was established in unamendable error, domestic tranquility has since been forfeited, and the remaining parameters for the American Experiment; defense, general welfare, and liberty, are all at risk, as well.

Attached is a map for a six-part separation and a treatise
A rambling thesaurus heavy rant that doesn't say shit other than America bad.What exactly do you think should replace the current form of Government ?
 
You're comparing a Republic to a Constitutional Monarchy. Clown.
You stated that the Constitution of my country was out of date. I reciprocated by pointed out the antiquity of your countries ruling system. If I'm a clown you are a retarded hypocrite.
 
You stated that the Constitution of my country was out of date. I reciprocated by pointed out the antiquity of your countries ruling system. If I'm a clown you are a retarded hypocrite.
It is, the US constitution is out of date. Your Constitution is codified. The UK's Constitution is uncodified -

A constitution that is not written in a single document. Instead, it is made up of a variety of documents, including statutes, court decisions, and conventions. The UK has an uncodified constitution.

Thus the UK's Constitution is continually updated. Republics, constitutional monarchy, communist state etc.. are systems. The thread topic is about constitutions, and Americas' being out-of-date. Clown shoes.
 
Back
Top Bottom