The Commonalities Between the Rise of the Nazis and the Tactics of the American Left Cannot be Ignored

This should make the heads of the SJWs explode:


Six striking parallels.
I recently wrote a column wherein I accused the American Left and its wholly owned subsidiary, the Democrat party, of using Fascist or Nazi tactics in their determination to permanently transform the nation into a one-party hybrid socialist state by exploiting nonexistent “systemic racism” and baseless fears of “white supremacy.” This characterization did not set well with the gullible and self-righteous Democrat voters I know or those who contacted me. They, rather vociferously, claimed that the utilization of Nazi tactics only applies to the American right and that they, the left, are only motivated by caring for the people.
However, any thoughtful and unemotional examination of the tactics the Nazi Party used to gain and maintain power in the 1920’s and 30’s will reveal numerous stark similarities to those being used by the left and the Democrat Party today.
First, racial division was a central component of Nazi political strategy and philosophy. The Nazi Party was, without doubt, the most racially obsessed political party in human history. Today’s Democrat party is second only to the Nazi Party in their racial obsession. Every piece of legislation, every accusation against their opponents, every aspect of American society, even weather and climate is framed in racism.
The Nazi Party’s obsession with race focused on their perverted belief in the inferiority and superiority of the races. This opened the door for blaming various racial groups for all the problems facing the country. The American left are claiming the root cause of virtually all problems facing the nation is “systemic racism” as theoretically instigated by one particular race.
SNIP
Second, the Nazi Party was fixated on censorship and eliminating any cultural institution, publication or speech that did not fully support them.

LOLOL.. This idiotic crap is from American Thinker.
So?

Oh dear. You don't have enough basic education to know the difference.
 
This should make the heads of the SJWs explode:


Six striking parallels.
I recently wrote a column wherein I accused the American Left and its wholly owned subsidiary, the Democrat party, of using Fascist or Nazi tactics in their determination to permanently transform the nation into a one-party hybrid socialist state by exploiting nonexistent “systemic racism” and baseless fears of “white supremacy.” This characterization did not set well with the gullible and self-righteous Democrat voters I know or those who contacted me. They, rather vociferously, claimed that the utilization of Nazi tactics only applies to the American right and that they, the left, are only motivated by caring for the people.
However, any thoughtful and unemotional examination of the tactics the Nazi Party used to gain and maintain power in the 1920’s and 30’s will reveal numerous stark similarities to those being used by the left and the Democrat Party today.
First, racial division was a central component of Nazi political strategy and philosophy. The Nazi Party was, without doubt, the most racially obsessed political party in human history. Today’s Democrat party is second only to the Nazi Party in their racial obsession. Every piece of legislation, every accusation against their opponents, every aspect of American society, even weather and climate is framed in racism.
The Nazi Party’s obsession with race focused on their perverted belief in the inferiority and superiority of the races. This opened the door for blaming various racial groups for all the problems facing the country. The American left are claiming the root cause of virtually all problems facing the nation is “systemic racism” as theoretically instigated by one particular race.
SNIP
Second, the Nazi Party was fixated on censorship and eliminating any cultural institution, publication or speech that did not fully support them.

LOLOL.. This idiotic crap is from American Thinker.
So?

Oh dear. You don't have enough basic education to know the difference.
The difference between what?
 
They talked about jailing Hillary, but she is obviously a criminal.
They chanted in unison about jailing political opponents, and it wasn’t just an isolated incident. It was a theme.

Fascists often come up with imagined crimes to justify their desire to end opposition by force.
 
Also, it's a bad comparison because Hitler, fucked up as he was, did what he thought was best FOR Germany; modern Liberals would have been working to turn German over to Stalin.

Hitler got rid of everyone with an education.. and he shut down most of the newspapers. He couldn't allow dissent from the intellectuals. You should work on your education or at the very least read Rise and Fall of the Third Reich.
Both claims are false.
 
They talked about jailing Hillary, but she is obviously a criminal.
They chanted in unison about jailing political opponents, and it wasn’t just an isolated incident. It was a theme.

Fascists often come up with imagined crimes to justify their desire to end opposition by force.
They chanted only about Hillary, moron.
 
What's "conservative" about it?
Specifically it is expresses a desire to preserve a way of life, often harkening back to some bygone era of dominance (which is often given a false overinflated presence).
 
Hitler got rid of everyone with an education.. and he shut down most of the newspapers. He couldn't allow dissent from the intellectuals. You should work on your education or at the very least read Rise and Fall of the Third Reich.
Right. Expunging anyone who lacked ideological purity.

That's true.. Any outspoken educated person was at risk. Out of self preservation some shut up and others got out of Germany.
 
This should make the heads of the SJWs explode:


Six striking parallels.
I recently wrote a column wherein I accused the American Left and its wholly owned subsidiary, the Democrat party, of using Fascist or Nazi tactics in their determination to permanently transform the nation into a one-party hybrid socialist state by exploiting nonexistent “systemic racism” and baseless fears of “white supremacy.” This characterization did not set well with the gullible and self-righteous Democrat voters I know or those who contacted me. They, rather vociferously, claimed that the utilization of Nazi tactics only applies to the American right and that they, the left, are only motivated by caring for the people.
However, any thoughtful and unemotional examination of the tactics the Nazi Party used to gain and maintain power in the 1920’s and 30’s will reveal numerous stark similarities to those being used by the left and the Democrat Party today.
First, racial division was a central component of Nazi political strategy and philosophy. The Nazi Party was, without doubt, the most racially obsessed political party in human history. Today’s Democrat party is second only to the Nazi Party in their racial obsession. Every piece of legislation, every accusation against their opponents, every aspect of American society, even weather and climate is framed in racism.
The Nazi Party’s obsession with race focused on their perverted belief in the inferiority and superiority of the races. This opened the door for blaming various racial groups for all the problems facing the country. The American left are claiming the root cause of virtually all problems facing the nation is “systemic racism” as theoretically instigated by one particular race.
SNIP
Second, the Nazi Party was fixated on censorship and eliminating any cultural institution, publication or speech that did not fully support them.
Hmmm, Hitler lost an election but was installed as leader of Germany anyway ... Trump lost an election but his nazis tried to install him as leader of the U.S. anyway.

Nice comparison you drew up, fucking moron.
Both claims are false.
 
What's "conservative" about it?
Specifically it is expresses a desire to preserve a way of life, often harkening back to some bygone era of dominance (which is often given a false overinflated presence).
Wrong. Objecting to the leftwing plan to allow guys with dicks to pee in the same restroom as your daughter is not "harkening back to some bygone era." Opposing socialism is not "harkening back to some bygone era."
 
This should make the heads of the SJWs explode:


Six striking parallels.
I recently wrote a column wherein I accused the American Left and its wholly owned subsidiary, the Democrat party, of using Fascist or Nazi tactics in their determination to permanently transform the nation into a one-party hybrid socialist state by exploiting nonexistent “systemic racism” and baseless fears of “white supremacy.” This characterization did not set well with the gullible and self-righteous Democrat voters I know or those who contacted me. They, rather vociferously, claimed that the utilization of Nazi tactics only applies to the American right and that they, the left, are only motivated by caring for the people.
However, any thoughtful and unemotional examination of the tactics the Nazi Party used to gain and maintain power in the 1920’s and 30’s will reveal numerous stark similarities to those being used by the left and the Democrat Party today.
First, racial division was a central component of Nazi political strategy and philosophy. The Nazi Party was, without doubt, the most racially obsessed political party in human history. Today’s Democrat party is second only to the Nazi Party in their racial obsession. Every piece of legislation, every accusation against their opponents, every aspect of American society, even weather and climate is framed in racism.
The Nazi Party’s obsession with race focused on their perverted belief in the inferiority and superiority of the races. This opened the door for blaming various racial groups for all the problems facing the country. The American left are claiming the root cause of virtually all problems facing the nation is “systemic racism” as theoretically instigated by one particular race.
SNIP
Second, the Nazi Party was fixated on censorship and eliminating any cultural institution, publication or speech that did not fully support them.
Hmmm, Hitler lost an election but was installed as leader of Germany anyway ... Trump lost an election but his nazis tried to install him as leader of the U.S. anyway.

Nice comparison you drew up, fucking moron.
Both claims are false.
Also, it's a bad comparison because Hitler, fucked up as he was, did what he thought was best FOR Germany; modern Liberals would have been working to turn German over to Stalin.

Hitler got rid of everyone with an education.. and he shut down most of the newspapers. He couldn't allow dissent from the intellectuals. You should work on your education or at the very least read Rise and Fall of the Third Reich.
Both claims are false.

Adolf Hitler and Education - History Learning Site
After his failure to get into the Academy of Fine Arts in Vienna Hitler developed a loathing of intellectuals who in his opinion based their teaching on what could be learned behind desks or in lectures halls. Hitler
 
Wrong. Objecting to the leftwing plan to allow guys with dicks to pee in the same restroom as your daughter is not "harkening back to some bygone era." Opposing socialism is not "harkening back to some bygone era."
The Trump slogan was “make America great again”, which is a conservative slogan, and would be consistent with fascist ideals.

It preys upon the dominant cultural group, makes them feel victimized so they can harass and oppress minorities.
 
A stolen election doesn't mean anyone rejected anything.
Ironically susceptibility and adherence to conspiracy theories fueling grievances is a common characteristic of fascism.
ROFL! No matter what Republicans do, turds like you call it fascism.

You believe the Democrat Reich doesn't "fuel grievances?"

"Hands up! Don't shoot!"
 
This should make the heads of the SJWs explode:


Six striking parallels.
I recently wrote a column wherein I accused the American Left and its wholly owned subsidiary, the Democrat party, of using Fascist or Nazi tactics in their determination to permanently transform the nation into a one-party hybrid socialist state by exploiting nonexistent “systemic racism” and baseless fears of “white supremacy.” This characterization did not set well with the gullible and self-righteous Democrat voters I know or those who contacted me. They, rather vociferously, claimed that the utilization of Nazi tactics only applies to the American right and that they, the left, are only motivated by caring for the people.
However, any thoughtful and unemotional examination of the tactics the Nazi Party used to gain and maintain power in the 1920’s and 30’s will reveal numerous stark similarities to those being used by the left and the Democrat Party today.
First, racial division was a central component of Nazi political strategy and philosophy. The Nazi Party was, without doubt, the most racially obsessed political party in human history. Today’s Democrat party is second only to the Nazi Party in their racial obsession. Every piece of legislation, every accusation against their opponents, every aspect of American society, even weather and climate is framed in racism.
The Nazi Party’s obsession with race focused on their perverted belief in the inferiority and superiority of the races. This opened the door for blaming various racial groups for all the problems facing the country. The American left are claiming the root cause of virtually all problems facing the nation is “systemic racism” as theoretically instigated by one particular race.
SNIP
Second, the Nazi Party was fixated on censorship and eliminating any cultural institution, publication or speech that did not fully support them.
Hmmm, Hitler lost an election but was installed as leader of Germany anyway ... Trump lost an election but his nazis tried to install him as leader of the U.S. anyway.

Nice comparison you drew up, fucking moron.
Both claims are false.
Also, it's a bad comparison because Hitler, fucked up as he was, did what he thought was best FOR Germany; modern Liberals would have been working to turn German over to Stalin.

Hitler got rid of everyone with an education.. and he shut down most of the newspapers. He couldn't allow dissent from the intellectuals. You should work on your education or at the very least read Rise and Fall of the Third Reich.
Both claims are false.

Adolf Hitler and Education - History Learning Site
After his failure to get into the Academy of Fine Arts in Vienna Hitler developed a loathing of intellectuals who in his opinion based their teaching on what could be learned behind desks or in lectures halls. Hitler
Wrong. Objecting to the leftwing plan to allow guys with dicks to pee in the same restroom as your daughter is not "harkening back to some bygone era." Opposing socialism is not "harkening back to some bygone era."
The Trump slogan was “make America great again”, which is a conservative slogan, and would be consistent with fascist ideals.

It preys upon the dominant cultural group, makes them feel victimized so they can harass and oppress minorities.
Wrong. There's nothing fascist about it.
 
Hitler got rid of everyone with an education.. and he shut down most of the newspapers. He couldn't allow dissent from the intellectuals. You should work on your education or at the very least read Rise and Fall of the Third Reich.
Right. Expunging anyone who lacked ideological purity.

That's true.. Any outspoken educated person was at risk. Out of self preservation some shut up and others got out of Germany.
It's not true.
 
Nazi Propaganda and Censorship | Holocaust Encyclopedia
...
Nazi censors removed some textbooks from classrooms. New textbooks taught students to obey the Nazi Party, love Hitler, and hate Jews. Key Dates. May 10, 1933 Nazi Book Burnings During the spring of 1933, Nazi university student organizations, professors, and librarians put together long lists of books they think are un-German.
 
The Nazi Expulsion of Professors
www.jbuff.com/c013102.htm
The Expulsion of the Professors from the Universities in Nazi Germany, 1933-1941. The expulsion of scholars from the countries of their birth has occurred repeatedly in the course of human civilization. Notable examples are the migration of the Greek scholars from Constantinople to Italy both before and after the capture of that city by the Turks in 1453, the expulsion of the Huguenots from France after …
 
A stolen election doesn't mean anyone rejected anything.
Ironically susceptibility and adherence to conspiracy theories fueling grievances is a common characteristic of fascism.
ROFL! No matter what Republicans do, turds like you call it fascism.

You believe the Democrat Reich doesn't "fuel grievances?"

"Hands up! Don't shoot!"
Of course, politics always talks about grievances. But fascism makes the dominant force in the country feel like they’re being attacked by the minorities. So Trump tells white men that immigrants are taking their jobs. He tells white women that poor urban people are coming to their suburban neighborhoods.

It’s about telling them that the majority is being harmed by the minorities and they need to go back to where the majority had more control.

Fascism is about power. How to get it and how to use it.
 
Also, it's a bad comparison because Hitler, fucked up as he was, did what he thought was best FOR Germany; modern Liberals would have been working to turn German over to Stalin.

Hitler got rid of everyone with an education.. and he shut down most of the newspapers. He couldn't allow dissent from the intellectuals. You should work on your education or at the very least read Rise and Fall of the Third Reich.


Kind of like how Democrats are shutting down any media that has an opposing view to theirs. Thanks for the accurate analogy of fascist and Democrat methods.

Twitter and Facebook are private.. Like this place. They have the right to boot you off this forum.
Maybach Motors, Junkers Aircraft, and Krupp Arms were the same such "private" bidnesses.

Keep digging, ignoramus.
 

Forum List

Back
Top