The Clausewitz Failure

[Phoenall]

And it seems to me that the first step with this is to establish the EQUAL claims of both the Jewish people and the Arab Muslim/Christian Palestinian people.​

Interesting, that is what BDS is calling for.

No, it is not. BDS is calling for three things (from their website):

1. Ending (Israel's) occupation and colonization of all Arab lands and dismantling the Wall
2. Recognizing the fundamental rights of the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality; and
3. Respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and properties as stipulated in UN resolution 194.

IF BDS was actually to recognize the EQUAL claims of both the Jewish people and the Arab Muslim/Christian Palestinian people it would look more like this:

1. Establishing, through negotiation and treaty, two States -- one for the Jewish people and one for the Arab Palestinian people -- based on mutually agreed borders and a commitment to permanently end the conflict.

2. (this already exists in law)

3. Respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Palestinian and Jewish refugees by committing to end their refugee status; ensure they find permanent homes and citizenship in a national homeland which is meaningful to them; provide compensation for their losses; while protecting the security and future of both the Jewish and the Arab Palestinian States.

No, it is not. BDS is calling for three things (from their website):

1. Ending (Israel's) occupation and colonization of all Arab lands and dismantling the Wall
2. Recognizing the fundamental rights of the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality; and
3. Respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and properties as stipulated in UN resolution 194.​

What is not equal about that?

It is one sided in the favour of islam, and is not based on international laws or charters. It is just calling for the genocide of the Jews and the destruction of Israel


THIS IS WHY BDS IS ILLEGAL IN MOST OF THE WORLD

Where does it Mention Islam? It applies to all religions equally.

What part violates international law?

It doesn't need to as we all know arab's mean muslims

None of your items are based on International laws

No colonisation as the arab's dont own the land

Already in existence, unless you can show otherwise

No legal right of return, squashed by the islamonazi nations when it was shown they would have to give up Mecca and Medina to their original owners. Then give up all the nations outside of Saudi that they have stolen

 

[RoccoR]

Bleipriester, et al,

I apologize for being tardy in this response.

Biased. When the Zionists had no superior military they were rolling barrels full of nails and glass and explosives towards Palestinian civilians.

(COMMENT)

In 1942, the Wallis "Spherical Bomb" (Vickers Type 464) was developed that rolled or skipped across water. In 1948, the Paglin "Barrel Bomb" was developed as a land version, designed to breach defenses. More recently a variation of that model was used by Iraqi insurgents against tall T-Walls from an adjacent road; without much success.

At the beginning of the 1948 War of Independence, most of the Israeli Weapons came from the Check Republic and France (not the US). The US imposed an arms embargo in December of 1947 almost immediately after Resolution 181(II) was adopted. At the opening of the conflict, the US Administration was not interested in assisting the Jewish People in the bid for the establishment of the Jewish National Home. Our friend "Bieipriester" is correct, in that this same timeframe --- Israel made use of improvised weapons. While privately, Israel managed to raise ≈ $40-50 Million Dollars (non-taxpayer money), most of this money went to pay for Israel overseas purchases (not domestic).

Legal sources of arms in the U.S. and most European countries were blocked to the Yishuv (the Jewish community in Eretz Israel during the British mandate) due to arms embargo declared by the USA and Britain (and the UN as well once Israel became a state). The alternative was to engage in illegal arms procurement and to appeal to the Soviet bloc. Unlike the USA and Britain, the USSR, which enthusiastically supported the UN partition resolution, continued to stand behind the resolution, even after it led to the beginning of the armed conflict. One of the manifestations of the USSR’s support was a "green light" to broad scale arms deals between Czechoslovakia and the Yishuv/Israel. The USSR hoped that in light of the USA arms embargo imposed on the Middle East, military assistance to Israel, which was yet to be born, would promote her to be pro-Soviet. The main motivation of Czechoslovakia for the deals was clearly the money.
SOURCE: The Czechoslovak Arms Deals during the War Of Independence LTG Tzvi Ben-tzur, former Chief of Staff, Israeli Defense Force
​

In 1947-48, the US was not the greatest of allies to the Jewish People. It was only because of domestic grassroots movement political influence did the Truman Administration become motivated to become involved in the Middle East. Until then, Israel was not a priority or political imperative of the White House. By the mid-to-late 1950s, the Egypt was beginning successfully lured to the dark side and Israel seemed to be the only remaining ally in the Middle East. That was the point at which the domestic grassroots and the socially separate affluent driving the White House intersected. The political position of both the Truman Doctrine and that of the Eisenhower Doctrine had some common themes.

• One was to keep the anti-American influence of President Nasser spreading to other Arab countries.
• The second common theme was the "containment of Soviet expansion." (The Cold War!)
​

There is no argument that the influence of the Russian Bear is no the rise in the Middle East. Although, that influence is not the threat as it once was.

The dominant narrative of modern Middle East history emphasizes the depredations visited upon the region by European colonization and accepts as a truism that the former colonial powers prioritized the protection of their material interests—in oil, above all—above the dignity and self-determination of the region’s inhabitants. Thus did botched decolonization result in endless instability. The most intractable of the regional conflicts to which this gave rise, that between the Arabs and Israelis, is attributed in this narrative to Israel’s unwillingness to accede to Palestinian national aspirations. Thus did the region become a breeding ground for radicalism, intensified by Cold War rivalry between the superpowers, who replaced the European colonizers as the region’s meddling overlords. Then came Mikhail Gorbachev—a Westernizing reformer. At last, the Cold War was over. A new world order was at hand.
SOURCE: THE COLD WAR’S ARAB SPRING: HOW THE SOVIETS CREATED TODAY’S MIDDLE EAST
​

As you can see, the other Brand-named Allied Power has a completely different view on the influences that shaped the Middle east.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Bleipriester]

Bleipriester, et al,

I apologize for being tardy in this response.

Biased. When the Zionists had no superior military they were rolling barrels full of nails and glass and explosives towards Palestinian civilians.

(COMMENT)

In 1942, the Wallis "Spherical Bomb" (Vickers Type 464) was developed that rolled or skipped across water. In 1948, the Paglin "Barrel Bomb" was developed as a land version, designed to breach defenses. More recently a variation of that model was used by Iraqi insurgents against tall T-Walls from an adjacent road; without much success.

At the beginning of the 1948 War of Independence, most of the Israeli Weapons came from the Check Republic and France (not the US). The US imposed an arms embargo in December of 1947 almost immediately after Resolution 181(II) was adopted. At the opening of the conflict, the US Administration was not interested in assisting the Jewish People in the bid for the establishment of the Jewish National Home. Our friend "Bieipriester" is correct, in that this same timeframe --- Israel made use of improvised weapons. While privately, Israel managed to raise ≈ $40-50 Million Dollars (non-taxpayer money), most of this money went to pay for Israel overseas purchases (not domestic).

Legal sources of arms in the U.S. and most European countries were blocked to the Yishuv (the Jewish community in Eretz Israel during the British mandate) due to arms embargo declared by the USA and Britain (and the UN as well once Israel became a state). The alternative was to engage in illegal arms procurement and to appeal to the Soviet bloc. Unlike the USA and Britain, the USSR, which enthusiastically supported the UN partition resolution, continued to stand behind the resolution, even after it led to the beginning of the armed conflict. One of the manifestations of the USSR’s support was a "green light" to broad scale arms deals between Czechoslovakia and the Yishuv/Israel. The USSR hoped that in light of the USA arms embargo imposed on the Middle East, military assistance to Israel, which was yet to be born, would promote her to be pro-Soviet. The main motivation of Czechoslovakia for the deals was clearly the money.
SOURCE: The Czechoslovak Arms Deals during the War Of Independence LTG Tzvi Ben-tzur, former Chief of Staff, Israeli Defense Force
​

In 1947-48, the US was not the greatest of allies to the Jewish People. It was only because of domestic grassroots movement political influence did the Truman Administration become motivated to become involved in the Middle East. Until then, Israel was not a priority or political imperative of the White House. By the mid-to-late 1950s, the Egypt was beginning successfully lured to the dark side and Israel seemed to be the only remaining ally in the Middle East. That was the point at which the domestic grassroots and the socially separate affluent driving the White House intersected. The political position of both the Truman Doctrine and that of the Eisenhower Doctrine had some common themes.

• One was to keep the anti-American influence of President Nasser spreading to other Arab countries.
• The second common theme was the "containment of Soviet expansion." (The Cold War!)
​

There is no argument that the influence of the Russian Bear is no the rise in the Middle East. Although, that influence is not the threat as it once was.

The dominant narrative of modern Middle East history emphasizes the depredations visited upon the region by European colonization and accepts as a truism that the former colonial powers prioritized the protection of their material interests—in oil, above all—above the dignity and self-determination of the region’s inhabitants. Thus did botched decolonization result in endless instability. The most intractable of the regional conflicts to which this gave rise, that between the Arabs and Israelis, is attributed in this narrative to Israel’s unwillingness to accede to Palestinian national aspirations. Thus did the region become a breeding ground for radicalism, intensified by Cold War rivalry between the superpowers, who replaced the European colonizers as the region’s meddling overlords. Then came Mikhail Gorbachev—a Westernizing reformer. At last, the Cold War was over. A new world order was at hand.
SOURCE: THE COLD WAR’S ARAB SPRING: HOW THE SOVIETS CREATED TODAY’S MIDDLE EAST
​

As you can see, the other Brand-named Allied Power has a completely different view on the influences that shaped the Middle east.

Most Respectfully,
R

You have greatly misunderstood my point. Nowhere did I mention Israel or the Jews. Not even the Zionists but Zionists. I also do not equalize the Palestinians with radical Islamism. To focus the point I wanted to make clear, that the oppressed status of what is used to be Palestine is a hotbed of radicalism.

 

[Bleipriester]

America has very little room to talk in terms of converting "military success" in to a "Political Achievement." In the case of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, the have had Palestinians no real "military successes;" --- but they have had some significant and very damaging "political successes."

In play are several "cognitive distortions" mounted by and successfully exploited by them.

• The Hostile Arab-Palestinians (HoAP) have successfully convinced the international that Jihadism, Deadly Fedayeen Action, Insurgency, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Resistance Violence are entirely legal by distorting the intention and legality of these means.
• The HoAP have convinced the international community that it is the Israelis fault that peace initiatives have failed.
• The HoAP have convinced the international community that:

∆ Israel has been the invader from the very beginning.
∆ That all the land, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, was always Palestinian. Territory.
∆ That the Allied Powers, having by treaty, received the title and rights to the Mandate Territory, did not have the authority to set the conditions to recreate the Jewish National Home, that can preserve and protect the Jewish People from further exploitation and near annihilation under the false color of law.
​

• The HoAP and pro-Palestinian movement have somehow attached the tag of "apartheid" to Israel.​

These are just among the many distortions put out in the virtual knowledge space that have politically injured Israel.

The Question becomes how does Israel convert its "military successes" into "political achievements." How does Israel unmask that hides the radicalized Jihadist and Fedayeen --- as well as --- the Islamic terrorist and false resistance fighters for what they are?

V/R
R

Biased. When the Zionists had no superior military they were rolling barrels full of nails and glass and explosives towards Palestinian civilians.

LINKS, or is this from the hate sites you frequent and so wont produce the evidence

Crying for links again while do not back your own claims with evidence?

List of Irgun attacks - Wikipedia

 

[Phoenall]

America has very little room to talk in terms of converting "military success" in to a "Political Achievement." In the case of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, the have had Palestinians no real "military successes;" --- but they have had some significant and very damaging "political successes."

In play are several "cognitive distortions" mounted by and successfully exploited by them.

• The Hostile Arab-Palestinians (HoAP) have successfully convinced the international that Jihadism, Deadly Fedayeen Action, Insurgency, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Resistance Violence are entirely legal by distorting the intention and legality of these means.
• The HoAP have convinced the international community that it is the Israelis fault that peace initiatives have failed.
• The HoAP have convinced the international community that:

∆ Israel has been the invader from the very beginning.
∆ That all the land, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, was always Palestinian. Territory.
∆ That the Allied Powers, having by treaty, received the title and rights to the Mandate Territory, did not have the authority to set the conditions to recreate the Jewish National Home, that can preserve and protect the Jewish People from further exploitation and near annihilation under the false color of law.
​

• The HoAP and pro-Palestinian movement have somehow attached the tag of "apartheid" to Israel.​

These are just among the many distortions put out in the virtual knowledge space that have politically injured Israel.

The Question becomes how does Israel convert its "military successes" into "political achievements." How does Israel unmask that hides the radicalized Jihadist and Fedayeen --- as well as --- the Islamic terrorist and false resistance fighters for what they are?

V/R
R

Biased. When the Zionists had no superior military they were rolling barrels full of nails and glass and explosives towards Palestinian civilians.

LINKS, or is this from the hate sites you frequent and so wont produce the evidence

Crying for links again while do not back your own claims with evidence?

List of Irgun attacks - Wikipedia

And you use wiki that is know to be faked on many of its entries, you can edit any entry you want once you have been accepted. Ask monte as he edits entries to meet with his POV .


Found one entry for a barrel and this was as a bomb not being rolled towards its intended target. So you dont have any evidence to support your claim again making you a LIAR


If you refuse to produce evidence why should I bother ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

 

[Bleipriester]

America has very little room to talk in terms of converting "military success" in to a "Political Achievement." In the case of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, the have had Palestinians no real "military successes;" --- but they have had some significant and very damaging "political successes."

In play are several "cognitive distortions" mounted by and successfully exploited by them.

• The Hostile Arab-Palestinians (HoAP) have successfully convinced the international that Jihadism, Deadly Fedayeen Action, Insurgency, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Resistance Violence are entirely legal by distorting the intention and legality of these means.
• The HoAP have convinced the international community that it is the Israelis fault that peace initiatives have failed.
• The HoAP have convinced the international community that:

∆ Israel has been the invader from the very beginning.
∆ That all the land, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, was always Palestinian. Territory.
∆ That the Allied Powers, having by treaty, received the title and rights to the Mandate Territory, did not have the authority to set the conditions to recreate the Jewish National Home, that can preserve and protect the Jewish People from further exploitation and near annihilation under the false color of law.
​

• The HoAP and pro-Palestinian movement have somehow attached the tag of "apartheid" to Israel.​

These are just among the many distortions put out in the virtual knowledge space that have politically injured Israel.

The Question becomes how does Israel convert its "military successes" into "political achievements." How does Israel unmask that hides the radicalized Jihadist and Fedayeen --- as well as --- the Islamic terrorist and false resistance fighters for what they are?

V/R
R

Biased. When the Zionists had no superior military they were rolling barrels full of nails and glass and explosives towards Palestinian civilians.

LINKS, or is this from the hate sites you frequent and so wont produce the evidence

Crying for links again while do not back your own claims with evidence?

List of Irgun attacks - Wikipedia

And you use wiki that is know to be faked on many of its entries, you can edit any entry you want once you have been accepted. Ask monte as he edits entries to meet with his POV .


Found one entry for a barrel and this was as a bomb not being rolled towards its intended target. So you dont have any evidence to support your claim again making you a LIAR


If you refuse to produce evidence why should I bother ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

You do bother or else would not have suffered another hissy-fit.

"In Jerusalem, two days later, Irgun members in a stolen police van rolled a barrel bomb into a large group of civilians who were waiting for a bus by the Jaffa Gate, killing around sixteen."
Irgun - Wikipedia

 

[Shusha]

1. Ending (Israel's) occupation and colonization of all Arab lands and dismantling the Wall
2. Recognizing the fundamental rights of the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality; and
3. Respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and properties as stipulated in UN resolution 194.​

What is not equal about that?

1. Ending the occupation and colonization of all Jewish lands and all Arab lands.
2. Recognizing the fundamental rights of Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality and the fundamental rights of Jewish citizens of Gaza and the West Bank to full equality.
3. Respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Jewish and Arab Palestinian refugees.

P F Tinmore

So? Thoughts? Why is BDS not using this kind of language to represent its desire for equality?

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al;
You and the BSD Movement --- just have not thought this out...

No, it is not. BDS is calling for three things (from their website):

1. Ending (Israel's) occupation and colonization of all Arab lands and dismantling the Wall
2. Recognizing the fundamental rights of the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality; and
3. Respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and properties as stipulated in UN resolution 194.​

What is not equal about that?

(RESPONSE)

1a: Dismantling the Security Barrier/Wall presupposes that either every other country in the world have no right to control its borders and protect its citizens and territory; or that Israel having exercised sovereign control over all things from the security barrier to the Mediterranean Sea is being treated differently. The issue is domestic in nature and is not subject to International Oversight (Chapter I, Article 2(7) of UN Charter). If another sovereignty had a complaint or dispute over the border issue, the complainant; international law has but one directive: (Paragraph 1, Sub-Paragraph 1, Sub-clause 4)

Every State has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate the existing international boundaries of another State or as a means of solving international disputes, including territorial disputes and problems concerning frontiers of States. See: A/RES/25/2625
​

1b: Their is no application of colonialism in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt). There is no true Non-self Governing Territory (NSGT) any where in the Middle East. See the UN Committee of 24 (Special Committee on Decolonization) Listing: Non-Self-Governing Territories

2. Again, this is a domestic matter for the Israelis to work and find a solution. (Chapter I, Article 2(7) of UN Charter)

Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter VII.
​

3. UN Resolution 194 (III) (11 December 1948), is a non-binding General Assembly Resolution. Although Arab leaders point to Resolution 194 as proof that Arab refugees have a right to return or be compensated, it is important to note that the Arab States: Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Yemen voted against Resolution 194. Why, because Paragraph 11 says:

Resolves that the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or in equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible; Instructs the Conciliation Commission to facilitate the repatriation, resettlement and economic and social rehabilitation of the refugees and the payment of compensation, and to maintain close relations with the Director of the United Nations Relief for Palestine Refugees and, through him, with the appropriate organs and agencies of the United Nations;
​

It does not levy a requirement on the Israelis to pay the Palestinians, but it also works in reverse. So, any attack in violation of the UN Charter or conduct contrary to the Geneva Convention; including Customary and IHL, applies equally as well to the Palestinians. The Palestinians not able to pay anything.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

1a: Dismantling the Security Barrier/Wall presupposes that either every other country in the world have no right to control its borders and protect its citizens and territory;

The wall is not on a border.

 

[P F Tinmore]

1b: Their is no application of colonialism in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt). There is no true Non-self Governing Territory (NSGT) any where in the Middle East. See the UN Committee of 24 (Special Committee on Decolonization) Listing: Non-Self-Governing Territories

Britain itself called Palestine a non self governing "legal entity" when its governance was passed to the UNPC.

Of course the UN dropped the ball and failed to protect the people and territory under its trust. And it still sits around with its thumb up its ass.

 

[Phoenall]

America has very little room to talk in terms of converting "military success" in to a "Political Achievement." In the case of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, the have had Palestinians no real "military successes;" --- but they have had some significant and very damaging "political successes."

In play are several "cognitive distortions" mounted by and successfully exploited by them.

• The Hostile Arab-Palestinians (HoAP) have successfully convinced the international that Jihadism, Deadly Fedayeen Action, Insurgency, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Resistance Violence are entirely legal by distorting the intention and legality of these means.
• The HoAP have convinced the international community that it is the Israelis fault that peace initiatives have failed.
• The HoAP have convinced the international community that:

∆ Israel has been the invader from the very beginning.
∆ That all the land, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, was always Palestinian. Territory.
∆ That the Allied Powers, having by treaty, received the title and rights to the Mandate Territory, did not have the authority to set the conditions to recreate the Jewish National Home, that can preserve and protect the Jewish People from further exploitation and near annihilation under the false color of law.
​

• The HoAP and pro-Palestinian movement have somehow attached the tag of "apartheid" to Israel.​

These are just among the many distortions put out in the virtual knowledge space that have politically injured Israel.

The Question becomes how does Israel convert its "military successes" into "political achievements." How does Israel unmask that hides the radicalized Jihadist and Fedayeen --- as well as --- the Islamic terrorist and false resistance fighters for what they are?

V/R
R

Biased. When the Zionists had no superior military they were rolling barrels full of nails and glass and explosives towards Palestinian civilians.

LINKS, or is this from the hate sites you frequent and so wont produce the evidence

Crying for links again while do not back your own claims with evidence?

List of Irgun attacks - Wikipedia

And you use wiki that is know to be faked on many of its entries, you can edit any entry you want once you have been accepted. Ask monte as he edits entries to meet with his POV .


Found one entry for a barrel and this was as a bomb not being rolled towards its intended target. So you dont have any evidence to support your claim again making you a LIAR


If you refuse to produce evidence why should I bother ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

You do bother or else would not have suffered another hissy-fit.

"In Jerusalem, two days later, Irgun members in a stolen police van rolled a barrel bomb into a large group of civilians who were waiting for a bus by the Jaffa Gate, killing around sixteen."
Irgun - Wikipedia

So where does it mention nails and glass, which was your claim ?

 

[P F Tinmore]

3. UN Resolution 194 (III) (11 December 1948), is a non-binding General Assembly Resolution.

Indeed, but it was based on currently applicable international law.

 

[Phoenall]

1a: Dismantling the Security Barrier/Wall presupposes that either every other country in the world have no right to control its borders and protect its citizens and territory;

The wall is not on a border.

Not until one is agreed under the terms of UN resolutions that you cherry pick the parts from that suit your POV

 

[Phoenall]

1b: Their is no application of colonialism in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt). There is no true Non-self Governing Territory (NSGT) any where in the Middle East. See the UN Committee of 24 (Special Committee on Decolonization) Listing: Non-Self-Governing Territories

Britain itself called Palestine a non self governing "legal entity" when its governance was passed to the UNPC.

Of course the UN dropped the ball and failed to protect the people and territory under its trust. And it still sits around with its thumb up its ass.

Which it was until the Jews declared independance, then it became Israel at war with hostile arab league forces

 

[Phoenall]

3. UN Resolution 194 (III) (11 December 1948), is a non-binding General Assembly Resolution.

Indeed, but it was based on currently applicable international law.

Which was what exactly, state the law and what it said ?

 

[Bleipriester]

Biased. When the Zionists had no superior military they were rolling barrels full of nails and glass and explosives towards Palestinian civilians.

LINKS, or is this from the hate sites you frequent and so wont produce the evidence

Crying for links again while do not back your own claims with evidence?

List of Irgun attacks - Wikipedia

And you use wiki that is know to be faked on many of its entries, you can edit any entry you want once you have been accepted. Ask monte as he edits entries to meet with his POV .


Found one entry for a barrel and this was as a bomb not being rolled towards its intended target. So you dont have any evidence to support your claim again making you a LIAR


If you refuse to produce evidence why should I bother ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

You do bother or else would not have suffered another hissy-fit.

"In Jerusalem, two days later, Irgun members in a stolen police van rolled a barrel bomb into a large group of civilians who were waiting for a bus by the Jaffa Gate, killing around sixteen."
Irgun - Wikipedia

So where does it mention nails and glass, which was your claim ?

So it was sweets and congratulation cards?

 

[P F Tinmore]

3. UN Resolution 194 (III) (11 December 1948), is a non-binding General Assembly Resolution.

Indeed, but it was based on currently applicable international law.

Which was what exactly, state the law and what it said ?

It is probably too complicated for you but this is a good overview.

 

[Hollie]

3. UN Resolution 194 (III) (11 December 1948), is a non-binding General Assembly Resolution.

Indeed, but it was based on currently applicable international law.

Which was what exactly, state the law and what it said ?

It is probably too complicated for you but this is a good overview.

That's not an overview at all. It's another silly YouTube video you have cut and pasted multiple times across multiple threads.

 

[P F Tinmore]

3. UN Resolution 194 (III) (11 December 1948), is a non-binding General Assembly Resolution.

Indeed, but it was based on currently applicable international law.

Which was what exactly, state the law and what it said ?

It is probably too complicated for you but this is a good overview.

3. UN Resolution 194 (III) (11 December 1948), is a non-binding General Assembly Resolution.

Indeed, but it was based on currently applicable international law.

Which was what exactly, state the law and what it said ?

It is probably too complicated for you but this is a good overview.

That's not an overview at all. It's another silly YouTube video you have cut and pasted multiple times across multiple threads.

That is too complicated for you.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

America has very little room to talk in terms of converting "military success" in to a "Political Achievement." In the case of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, the have had Palestinians no real "military successes;" --- but they have had some significant and very damaging "political successes."

In play are several "cognitive distortions" mounted by and successfully exploited by them.

• The Hostile Arab-Palestinians (HoAP) have successfully convinced the international that Jihadism, Deadly Fedayeen Action, Insurgency, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Resistance Violence are entirely legal by distorting the intention and legality of these means.
• The HoAP have convinced the international community that it is the Israelis fault that peace initiatives have failed.
• The HoAP have convinced the international community that:

∆ Israel has been the invader from the very beginning.
∆ That all the land, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, was always Palestinian. Territory.
∆ That the Allied Powers, having by treaty, received the title and rights to the Mandate Territory, did not have the authority to set the conditions to recreate the Jewish National Home, that can preserve and protect the Jewish People from further exploitation and near annihilation under the false color of law.
​

• The HoAP and pro-Palestinian movement have somehow attached the tag of "apartheid" to Israel.​

These are just among the many distortions put out in the virtual knowledge space that have politically injured Israel.

The Question becomes how does Israel convert its "military successes" into "political achievements." How does Israel unmask that hides the radicalized Jihadist and Fedayeen --- as well as --- the Islamic terrorist and false resistance fighters for what they are?

V/R
R

Palestinians no real "military successes;" --- but they have had some significant and very damaging "political successes."​

That is because the Palestinians hold the legal and moral high ground.

Israel cannot bomb it way to legitimacy. ~ Ali Abunimah

"That is because the Palestinians hold the legal and moral high ground."

It's a truly distorted worldview to suggest that Islamic terrorists hold any legal or moral high ground.

The Holy Land Was Hollow Until the Jews Returned

The Paleonasties should go back to the No Man's Land desert where they belong. They are evolutionary-reject descendants of prehistoric criminal gangs. They only used what is once again Israel as a nomadic pit stop. Any American who did not become a Zionist after 9/11 is a traitor.