The Clarence Thomas Follies!

[taichiliberal]

http://www.truth-out.org/judicial-in...nni/1307895791


The "Judicial Insider Trading" of Justice Clarence Thomas and Wife "Ginni"

At LEAST Holder could go after the wife with all this evidence....but somehow I doubt if he or Obama will have the stones to do so.

 

[George Costanza]

Bad link, I'm afraid. Got another one?

 

[whitehall]

The source, "truthout" is a left wing tax exempt propaganda site funded by guess who? The godfather of left wing propaganda, George Soros. The radical left wing today is an evolution of the racist segregationist democrat party of the 50's and 60's.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

The source, "truthout" is a left wing tax exempt propaganda site funded by guess who? The godfather of left wing propaganda, George Soros. The radical left wing today is an evolution of the racist segregationist democrat party of the 50's and 60's.

This is how they're going to try and get ObamaCare upheld by the Supreme Court. They need to get one of the Republican justices out of the way so they end up with a 4 - 4 decision worst case scenario and the law becomes upheld. Thomas seems to be the one the Marxists feel is most vulnerable to public attack.

 

[whitehall]

Look what the democrat liberals did to Dr. Condie Rice. It wasn't just partisan politics. Democrats went back to their racist roots and protrayed her as a slave mammy in outrageous cartoons printed in major newapapers. Nobody apologized. Justice Thomas is a favorite target for racist left wingers who view successful Blacks as being too upity.

 

[Dot Com]

The source, "truthout" is a left wing tax exempt propaganda site funded by guess who? The godfather of left wing propaganda, George Soros. The radical left wing today is an evolution of the racist segregationist democrat party of the 50's and 60's.

This is how they're going to try and get ObamaCare upheld by the Supreme Court. They need to get one of the Republican justices out of the way so they end up with a 4 - 4 decision worst case scenario and the law becomes upheld. Thomas seems to be the one the Marxists feel is most vulnerable to public attack.

She wasn't just randomly chosen. She affiliated herself w/ the T Party who is, apparently, vehemently against the Affordable Care Act. He also didn't report 100's of 1000's of dollars from groups like Heritage. Conflict of interest.
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/mar/06/opinion/la-oe-turley-clarence-thomas-20110306

Common Cause discovered that Thomas had failed to disclose a source of income for 13 years on required federal forms. Thomas stated that his wife, Virginia, had no income, when in truth she had hundreds of thousands of dollars of income from conservative organizations, including roughly $700,000 from the Heritage Foundation between 2003 and 2007. Thomas reported "none" in answering specific questions about "spousal non-investment income" on annual forms — answers expressly made "subject to civil and criminal sanctions."

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

She wasn't just randomly chosen. She affiliated herself w/ the T Party who is, apparently, vehemently against the Affordable Care Act.

The TPM is more vehemently opposed to the president who signed it into law, than the law itself.

The source, "truthout" is a left wing tax exempt propaganda site funded by guess who? The godfather of left wing propaganda, George Soros. The radical left wing today is an evolution of the racist segregationist democrat party of the 50's and 60's.

Whatever.

Cite a source documenting the information in the OP link is inaccurate or false.

At LEAST Holder could go after the wife with all this evidence....but somehow I doubt if he or Obama will have the stones to do so.

Thomas would merely accuse the WH of trying to get at him through his wife, and declare the investigation another ‘high-tech lynching.’

This is how they're going to try and get ObamaCare upheld by the Supreme Court. They need to get one of the Republican justices out of the way so they end up with a 4 - 4 decision worst case scenario and the law becomes upheld. Thomas seems to be the one the Marxists feel is most vulnerable to public attack.

Unnecessary.

Kennedy will vote to allow the IM to remain in place.

 

[whitehall]

Did "Common Cause" look at the tax returns of every judge and politician? I doubt it. "Common Cause" is another left wing tax exempt propaganda machine. The CEO is a former democrat congressman and the executive officer is none other than Clinton defender Bob Reich. They are left wing elitists who especially target independent successful Black people who stray from the democrat plantation.

 

[Baruch Menachem]

Bad Link

Loony left has never forgiven Thomas for not kissing their asses. They will keep on making up stuff till they find something that sticks.

 

[Trajan]

The source, "truthout" is a left wing tax exempt propaganda site funded by guess who? The godfather of left wing propaganda, George Soros. The radical left wing today is an evolution of the racist segregationist democrat party of the 50's and 60's.

This is how they're going to try and get ObamaCare upheld by the Supreme Court. They need to get one of the Republican justices out of the way so they end up with a 4 - 4 decision worst case scenario and the law becomes upheld. Thomas seems to be the one the Marxists feel is most vulnerable to public attack.

kagan should recuse herself, she won't.

 

[Trajan]

The source, "truthout" is a left wing tax exempt propaganda site funded by guess who? The godfather of left wing propaganda, George Soros. The radical left wing today is an evolution of the racist segregationist democrat party of the 50's and 60's.

This is how they're going to try and get ObamaCare upheld by the Supreme Court. They need to get one of the Republican justices out of the way so they end up with a 4 - 4 decision worst case scenario and the law becomes upheld. Thomas seems to be the one the Marxists feel is most vulnerable to public attack.

She wasn't just randomly chosen. She affiliated herself w/ the T Party who is, apparently, vehemently against the Affordable Care Act. He also didn't report 100's of 1000's of dollars from groups like Heritage. Conflict of interest.
Clarence Thomas' dangerous conceit - Los Angeles Times

Common Cause discovered that Thomas had failed to disclose a source of income for 13 years on required federal forms. Thomas stated that his wife, Virginia, had no income, when in truth she had hundreds of thousands of dollars of income from conservative organizations, including roughly $700,000 from the Heritage Foundation between 2003 and 2007. Thomas reported "none" in answering specific questions about "spousal non-investment income" on annual forms — answers expressly made "subject to civil and criminal sanctions."

what does this-

Common Cause discovered that Thomas had failed to disclose a source of income for 13 years on required federal forms. Thomas stated that his wife, Virginia, had no income, when in truth she had hundreds of thousands of dollars of income from conservative organizations, including roughly $700,000 from the Heritage Foundation between 2003 and 2007. Thomas reported "none" in answering specific questions about "spousal non-investment income" on annual forms — answers expressly made "subject to civil and criminal sanctions."

have to do with him and obamacare when it reaches the court?

 

[Zona]

Once again, lets all just thank God he is a republican.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Kennedy will vote to allow the IM to remain in place.

I don't suspect that he will considering some of the comments he's made about Obama's policies.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

The source, "truthout" is a left wing tax exempt propaganda site funded by guess who? The godfather of left wing propaganda, George Soros. The radical left wing today is an evolution of the racist segregationist democrat party of the 50's and 60's.

This is how they're going to try and get ObamaCare upheld by the Supreme Court. They need to get one of the Republican justices out of the way so they end up with a 4 - 4 decision worst case scenario and the law becomes upheld. Thomas seems to be the one the Marxists feel is most vulnerable to public attack.

kagan should recuse herself, she won't.

Why Kagan?

 

[Trajan]

This is how they're going to try and get ObamaCare upheld by the Supreme Court. They need to get one of the Republican justices out of the way so they end up with a 4 - 4 decision worst case scenario and the law becomes upheld. Thomas seems to be the one the Marxists feel is most vulnerable to public attack.

kagan should recuse herself, she won't.

Why Kagan?

snip-

As Judicial Watch details, a Jan. 8, 2010, e-mail from Neal Katyal, former deputy solicitor general (and current acting solicitor general) to Brian Hauck, senior counsel to Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli, discussing organizing the defense of ObamaCare against the inevitable legal challenges, wrote: "Brian, Elena would definitely like OSG (Office of Solicitor General) to be involved in this set of issues ... we will bring in Elena as needed."

On March 21, 2010, the day ObamaCare passed the House of Representatives, Katyal urged Kagan to attend a health care litigation meeting that was evidently organized by the Obama White House. It is not credible to suggest Kagan did not attend or did not contribute. An e-mail chain on that date, entitled "Health care litigation meeting," refers to an "internal government meeting regarding the expected litigation." Kagan is both author and recipient in the chain.
mp3Listen to the Podcast
Subscribe through iTunes

After Kagan was nominated on May 10, 2010, for the Supreme Court vacancy left by the retiring John Paul Stevens , Katyal began spreading the cover story insisting that Kagan was "walled off" from such discussions, defying belief that the solicitor general would not be actively involved in the legal strategy to defend the centerpiece of the Obama administration's agenda.

This is after Katyal invited Kagan to administration meetings to discuss precisely that. Another email trail unearthed by Judicial Watch discusses everyone getting his or her story story straight about Kagan's sudden lack of involvement in ObamaCare's defense.

On May 17, 2010, for example, Tracy Schmaler, a Department of Justice spokesperson, wrote to Katyal asking if Kagan had been involved in ObamaCare defense strategy. Katyal responded that she had not been. He forwarded the exchange to Kagan, saying, "This is what I told Tracy about HealthCare."

Kagan's response speaks volumes about her involvement in ObamaCare's legal defense: "This needs to be coordinated. Tracy you should not say anything about this before talking to me." We are reminded of the adage that if you tell the truth you never have to get your story straight or be "coordinated."

"Any reasonable person would read these documents and come to the same conclusion," says Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "Elena Kagan helped coordinate the Obama administration's defense of ObamaCare."

more at-

Justice Kagan's ObamaCare Conflict - Investors.com

 

[JakeStarkey]

The source, "truthout" is a left wing tax exempt propaganda site funded by guess who? The godfather of left wing propaganda, George Soros. The radical left wing today is an evolution of the racist segregationist democrat party of the 50's and 60's.

This is how they're going to try and get ObamaCare upheld by the Supreme Court. They need to get one of the Republican justices out of the way so they end up with a 4 - 4 decision worst case scenario and the law becomes upheld. Thomas seems to be the one the Marxists feel is most vulnerable to public attack.

Obamacare will survive just fine. Get wetting your panties.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I'd pay to see Clarence Thomas debate ANY Liberal Intellectual Elite on the Constitution from Rdean to Larry Tribe to Barack Hussein "Negative Right" Obama

 

[kiwiman127]

The source, "truthout" is a left wing tax exempt propaganda site funded by guess who? The godfather of left wing propaganda, George Soros. The radical left wing today is an evolution of the racist segregationist democrat party of the 50's and 60's.

Most of those "racist segregationist" who were left in Washington went from Dixiecrats to Republicans.
Yeah, that Soros guy is an evil lefty. The guy is using his wealth to influence national and international policies by funding the Dems.
AND then there's the Koch brothers, doing the same thing,,,,but that's different. And to tie it into this thread, it doesn't matter that Clarence Thomas has become their tool and favorite pet. The Koch brothers have paid for trips for Thomas, arranged speaking events where Thomas was paid for his arranged speech by the Koch Brothers and the Koch brothers have had secret conferences with Thomas.
So, why deflect to Soros, when the right has their own Soros in the form of the Koch brothers.
Personally, I think there is something very, very wrong with politicans or judges being attached at the waist to an ideologue who is trying to influence national policy and laws by buying that influence. So therefore, I hate the influence the Soros's and Koch's of the world, have on those who make laws and those who uphold these laws as Constitutional.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The source, "truthout" is a left wing tax exempt propaganda site funded by guess who? The godfather of left wing propaganda, George Soros. The radical left wing today is an evolution of the racist segregationist democrat party of the 50's and 60's.

Most of those "racist segregationist" who were left in Washington went from Dixiecrats to Republicans.
Yeah, that Soros guy is an evil lefty. The guy is using his wealth to influence national and international policies by funding the Dems.
AND then there's the Koch brothers, doing the same thing,,,,but that's different. And to tie it into this thread, it doesn't matter that Clarence Thomas has become their tool and favorite pet. The Koch brothers have paid for trips for Thomas, arranged speaking events where Thomas was paid for his arranged speech by the Koch Brothers and the Koch brothers have had secret conferences with Thomas.
So, why deflect to Soros, when the right has their own Soros in the form of the Koch brothers.
Personally, I think there is something very, very wrong with politicans or judges being attached at the waist to an ideologue who is trying to influence national policy and laws by buying that influence. So therefore, I hate the influence the Soros's and Koch's of the world, have on those who make laws and those who uphold these laws as Constitutional.

“I'll have those ******* voting Democratic for the next 200 years”

 

[kiwiman127]

The source, "truthout" is a left wing tax exempt propaganda site funded by guess who? The godfather of left wing propaganda, George Soros. The radical left wing today is an evolution of the racist segregationist democrat party of the 50's and 60's.

Most of those "racist segregationist" who were left in Washington went from Dixiecrats to Republicans.
Yeah, that Soros guy is an evil lefty. The guy is using his wealth to influence national and international policies by funding the Dems.
AND then there's the Koch brothers, doing the same thing,,,,but that's different. And to tie it into this thread, it doesn't matter that Clarence Thomas has become their tool and favorite pet. The Koch brothers have paid for trips for Thomas, arranged speaking events where Thomas was paid for his arranged speech by the Koch Brothers and the Koch brothers have had secret conferences with Thomas.
So, why deflect to Soros, when the right has their own Soros in the form of the Koch brothers.
Personally, I think there is something very, very wrong with politicans or judges being attached at the waist to an ideologue who is trying to influence national policy and laws by buying that influence. So therefore, I hate the influence the Soros's and Koch's of the world, have on those who make laws and those who uphold these laws as Constitutional.

“I'll have those ******* voting Democratic for the next 200 years”

Point taken.
But I didn't say all Dixiecrats went to the GOP, I said "most"!