toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
An interesting study on contrasts in two elections just four years apart and the divergent approaches to the SAME QUESTION. Either two diametrically different explanations are given for similar circumstances where convenient or the exact same explanations are being foisted about for entirely different things when convenient!
2016: no supporting evidence of election fraud--
Trump's Electoral College Victory Challenged by Democrats
The election has been shadowed by concerns over Russian attempts to influence the result
U.S. Representative Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas plans to file an objection to electoral votes
A member of Congress needs at least one U.S. senator to back the objection and suspend the joint session while the House of Representatives and Senate meet separately to debate it.
House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said the Russian hacking concerns cast a pall over the 2016 vote.
"That's why people have some level of dismay today on the vote ... about the Electoral College," Pelosi said at a news conference.
www.newsweek.com
House Democrats to challenge Trump's Electoral College win
As many as 10 members plan to mount objections when Congress meets Friday
A Democratic congresswoman from Texas confirmed late Thursday that she and as many as 10 colleagues will contest the validity of Donald Trump's election Friday
"This is an American question of justice and fairness and the appropriate running of presidential elections," Jackson Lee said.
Though the Constitution empowers the Electoral College to choose the president, it requires Congress to review the votes and reject any it deems invalid.
www.politico.com
2020: tons of supporting evidence of election fraud--
Goya's board had enough of CEO Robert Unanue's public comments in support of former President Donald Trump and his unfounded claims of voter fraud. On Friday, it voted to muzzle him.
Unanue will no longer be allowed to speak to the media without the board's permission
The source said this is a "full stop" on Unanue speaking to the press, not only about politics, but also about the company itself.
www.cnn.com
Election officials say combating lies will be big challenge: ‘It’s unfortunate that is the case that we have now’
After an election season dominated by conspiracy theories and false claims about voting
www.baltimoresun.com
Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram have indefinitely canceled social media accounts that speak of election irregularities
www.realclearpolitics.com
It is becoming more and more common that big tech companies are censoring the opinions of people. The latest turn is that YouTube is going to begin deleting videos that are critical of the 2020 election
Most media outlets haven’t even waited that long to declare Biden the president-elect. For those who don’t know, they do not have that kind of power
www.rt.com
Cartoonist Scott Adams censored by YouTube for discussing vote fraud
The move came after the platform announced it would be removing content that is critical of the election process that alleges voter fraud
“We will start removing any piece of content uploaded today that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 US Presidential election.”
The Google-owned platform also said that it had taken down 8,000 channels since September that had uploaded what it claimed were “harmful and misleading elections-related videos.”
YouTube is effectively trying to silence debate on whether free and fair elections were carried out, which states that no one can express the opinion that the election may have been manipulated.
youtubecensorship.com
THE ONLY DIFFERENCE HERE is that the first was designed by the Socialist Big-government Left to facilitate the obstruction of a pro-people / anti-government Trump becoming elected or operating, and the second was designed by the Socialist Big-government Left to ensure the obstruction of a pro-people / anti-government Trump becoming RE-elected.
You better believe it. Your democrat-owned media is lying through their teeth to you. Election fraud is alive and well. They couldn't survive without it. They are trying to silence all opposition by trying to label and criminalize it as "hate speech" to speak out in opposition to their coup d'état of America's free speech two-party system.
2016: no supporting evidence of election fraud--
Trump's Electoral College Victory Challenged by Democrats
The election has been shadowed by concerns over Russian attempts to influence the result
U.S. Representative Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas plans to file an objection to electoral votes
A member of Congress needs at least one U.S. senator to back the objection and suspend the joint session while the House of Representatives and Senate meet separately to debate it.
House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said the Russian hacking concerns cast a pall over the 2016 vote.
"That's why people have some level of dismay today on the vote ... about the Electoral College," Pelosi said at a news conference.
Trump's Electoral College Victory Challenged by Dems
A member of Congress needs at least one U.S. senator to back the objection and suspend the joint session.
www.newsweek.com
As many as 10 members plan to mount objections when Congress meets Friday
A Democratic congresswoman from Texas confirmed late Thursday that she and as many as 10 colleagues will contest the validity of Donald Trump's election Friday
"This is an American question of justice and fairness and the appropriate running of presidential elections," Jackson Lee said.
Though the Constitution empowers the Electoral College to choose the president, it requires Congress to review the votes and reject any it deems invalid.
House Democrats to challenge Trump's Electoral College win
As many as 10 members plan to mount objections when Congress meets Friday, but so far no senator has joined them.
www.politico.com
2020: tons of supporting evidence of election fraud--
Goya's board had enough of CEO Robert Unanue's public comments in support of former President Donald Trump and his unfounded claims of voter fraud. On Friday, it voted to muzzle him.
Unanue will no longer be allowed to speak to the media without the board's permission
The source said this is a "full stop" on Unanue speaking to the press, not only about politics, but also about the company itself.
Goya board silences its CEO after he tells Fox News the election was rigged
Goya's board of directors had enough of CEO Robert Unanue's public comments in support of former President Donald Trump and his unfounded claims of voter fraud. On Friday, it voted to muzzle him.
www.cnn.com
After an election season dominated by conspiracy theories and false claims about voting
Election officials say combating lies will be big challenge: ‘It’s unfortunate that is the case that we have now’
After an election season dominated by conspiracy theories and false claims about voting, top election officials across the country say they already are bracing for what comes next. They are grappli…
www.baltimoresun.com
Big Tech's Conservative Purge Changes the Free Speech Debate | RealClearPolitics
Big Techs coordinated silencing of conservative voices, including President Trumps, signals a crossing of the Rubicon in the debate over government...
Most media outlets haven’t even waited that long to declare Biden the president-elect. For those who don’t know, they do not have that kind of power
YouTube’s censorship of the 2020 election criticism is an argument for abolishing Section 230
YouTube has benefited from the protections of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act for years. Its selective censoring of the 2020 election content, though, makes the case for why Section 230 should be thrown out.
The move came after the platform announced it would be removing content that is critical of the election process that alleges voter fraud
“We will start removing any piece of content uploaded today that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 US Presidential election.”
The Google-owned platform also said that it had taken down 8,000 channels since September that had uploaded what it claimed were “harmful and misleading elections-related videos.”
YouTube is effectively trying to silence debate on whether free and fair elections were carried out, which states that no one can express the opinion that the election may have been manipulated.
Cartoonist Scott Adams censored by YouTube for discussing vote fraud
Cartoonist Scott Adams is the latest victim of Big Tech’s out-of-control censorship, with YouTube removing the “Dilbert” creator’s video of a podcast about election fraud from the platform. Tweeting to his more than 650,000 followers, Adams announced: “Google (YouTube) just shut me down. The...
youtubecensorship.com
THE ONLY DIFFERENCE HERE is that the first was designed by the Socialist Big-government Left to facilitate the obstruction of a pro-people / anti-government Trump becoming elected or operating, and the second was designed by the Socialist Big-government Left to ensure the obstruction of a pro-people / anti-government Trump becoming RE-elected.
You better believe it. Your democrat-owned media is lying through their teeth to you. Election fraud is alive and well. They couldn't survive without it. They are trying to silence all opposition by trying to label and criminalize it as "hate speech" to speak out in opposition to their coup d'état of America's free speech two-party system.
Last edited:
