The Brownshirts Among Us

Bonnie

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2004
Messages
9,476
Reaction score
669
Points
48
Location
Wherever
October 17th, 2006



It’s no secret that hurling names about is as common in the political world as it is in a grammar school playground. One oft-used pejorative is “fascist,” which, along with racist, sexist, homophobe and others, tends to be least understood by those who utter it most. And because these damning terms are used wantonly, more to discredit than describe, they tend to be misapplied. Then, soon, calling someone a fascist becomes akin to calling him a snake: more a vague impugnment of character then a characterization of methods and goals.

Rhetoric aside, however, I’ve come to realize that true fascists do exist in our time. But who are they? How can they be correctly identified? To discover the answer, let’s start with a trip down Bad Memory Lane.

Another word that makes the rounds these days is “Brownshirts,” which, as many know, harks back to the SA, a paramilitary organization that was instrumental in Adolf Hitler’s rise to power in 1933. The Brownshirts were the adolescent Nazi Party’s muscle, squelching opposition through violence and intimidation. Shout-downs and beat-downs were their stock-in-trade, making their name a metaphor for fascist intolerance and oppression.

Now for a little current events. There was a university, some speakers and an audience. The speakers had been invited to the university in the name of intellectual debate and free expression. Some of the audience, however, would have none of it. Intolerant of the views being aired, they shouted-down the speakers and repeatedly called one of the black representatives “******.” Then, in a final fit of hatred and rage, in quintessential Brownshirt style, they stormed the stage violently, squelching voices that would have contributed to a fruitful exchange of ideas.

But what was the university? And, more to the point, who were the speakers and the audience? Were the guests communists or advocates for illegal immigration and the audience right-wing ideologues? No, not at all.

This fascistic display occurred at vaunted Columbia University, ostensibly a bastion of free expression. The speakers were with the Minuteman Project, the organization of citizen border sentinels. And the mob posing as an audience comprised those who despise such individuals: leftists. Leftists who did the Brownshirts proud.

Then, there once was a woman who traveled to the University of Arizona to give a speech. But members of the crowd didn’t like what she had to say, and a couple of them attacked her, hurling pies. Now, this isn’t the first time this lady has been targeted with violence, and she now travels with bodyguards.

But who was this woman? Was she a member of GLAAD beating the drum for the legal sanction of anti-marriage or a terrorist sympathizer criticizing US interrogation techniques? No, she was conservative pundit Ann Coulter, and her offense that night was to dare to defend the institution of marriage. And, needless to say, those who tried to silence her were her leftist foes.

And you don’t have to be famous to feel the left’s wrath. On more than one occasion student newspapers have been burned, and even one of my editors related a story to me about being shouted down by colleagues during a previous career in academia.

Lest you think this is unusual, errant blips on the radar screen, know that this is standard practice on university campuses today. Liberals are afforded the right to speak mostly unfettered by disruptive voices, while conservatives are subjected to as much abuse as today’s Brownshirts can get away with dishing out.

Getting back to the more fashion conscious fascists of yesteryear, once the Brownshirts had helped catapult the Nazis into power, the SS (sometimes called the “Blackshirts”) was created. Among other functions, the SS served the regime’s agenda by arresting, questioning and punishing those who expressed the politically incorrect thoughts of the day. It was effective enough so that many German people wouldn’t even express dissent within earshot of their own children.

Fast-forward again, and we have the story of a 14-year-old working class girl in England named Codie Stott. Recently she said something in her classroom to which her teachers didn’t exactly cotton. In fact, her words didn’t find favor with the government, either, and she found herself cooling her heels in a jail cell for three and a half hours. Mind you, this wasn’t for the commission of an untoward act, but for mere use of the tongue.

So what was Codie’s grave transgression? Did she threaten the life of the Queen? Was she a hippie advocating the replacement of tea time with a trip to an opium den? Perish the thought.

What happened was that Codie had been assigned to work on a project with a group of five Asian students, four of whom couldn’t speak English. And the fifth was probably limited to the pidgin variety. After being seated with the quintet and instructed to discuss the subject matter in question, the foreigners commenced speaking amongst themselves in Urdu (one of Pakistan’s major languages), a language Codie couldn’t understand, prompting her to approach the teacher and request placement elsewhere. The teacher’s response was to scream “It’s racist, you’re going to get done by the police.”

And she was.

Suspected of committing a “section five racial public order offense,” Codie was arrested, interrogated, photographed, fingerprinted and told to relinquish her shoelaces and jewelry and then imprisoned.

Now, do I have to tell you whose agenda visited this injustice upon the hapless Codie? Well, be assured that it’s not the work of a “right-wing” boogeyman like Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell or the Vatican.

Be outraged, but not surprised. Like the Brownshirt activity that the left’s useful idiots engage in regularly nowadays, SS-like government suppression of free speech has become rampant in the western world. In Canada, Ontario man Mark Harding was convicted in 1998 of a “hate-crime” for distributing pamphlets critical of Islam. Further west in Saskatchewan, countryman Hugh Owens was forced to pay damages of 1,500 Canadian dollars after taking out a newspaper advertisement in which he criticized homosexuality and cited Bible passages. In April of this year in Irlam, England, a ten-year-old boy was brought before a judge in a criminal court after calling another student a “Paki” and “Bin Laden” in the heat of a playground argument.
And don’t think that we in the United States are immune from such governmental infringement upon freedom of speech. But, wait, relative to other western nations America is supposed to be a citadel of rightist zealotry, a place akin to the Death Star in Star Wars with Darth Vader at the helm. So, perhaps our fascists really are the stuff of leftist nightmares. Well, it’s time for one last story.

In 2004, two opposing groups confronted each other at the Outfest National Coming Out Day street fair, a celebration of homosexuality in Philadelphia, Pa. Each group was committed to its cause, and while stories differ regarding who cast the first stone, words were exchanged in what became a rancorous confrontation. However, despite the fact that the most dangerous weapon wielded that day was an acid tongue, arrests were made. And, despite the fact that both groups launched verbal salvos, only one group’s members were arrested.

Was the persecuted group a contingent of NAMBLA or ACT-UP? Not on your life. It comprised eleven Christians who dared espouse their traditional beliefs about homosexual behavior. And the homosexual group that locked horns with them, the Pink Angels, was left unmolested by the government storm troopers.

I want you to remember these stories the next time you hear leftist sophistry about how conservatives would visit fascism upon us. We hear liberal campfire tales about how the “Christian Right” is converting us into a theocracy, but I have yet to hear about someone being arrested for denying the divinity of Jesus, immersing a crucifix in a jar of urine (smut-peddler Abdres Serrano) or using the Lord’s name in vain. We’re told of neocon designs on our freedoms, but I have yet to see ACLU or CAIR hauled in front of tribunals. The truth is that fascism has reared its ugly head in the western world, but that head always, always, always tilts left.

So Brownshirts do lurk among us, and their number is not insignificant. But there are Americans who fancy themselves to be liberals who cannot be counted among them, individuals who still think this is the age of their grandfather’s liberalism. And for these people, I’ll present some points to ponder. Doesn’t it give you pause for thought that fascist methods are ever more frequently employed in our time, and that when they are it is virtually always in the service of a leftist agenda? Then, a definition of liberalism from Dictionary.com states:

“favoring or permitting freedom of action, esp. with respect to matters of personal belief or expression . . . ”

So I ask you, don’t you think that perhaps, just maybe, there’s something wrong with the soul of today’s liberalism when it has become so illiberal?
As for you Brownshirts, you are the initiated. I know I can’t disabuse you of your misbegotten notions. I also know that you’re winning the culture war in the West, and for good reason.

You’re meaner, more violent and more devious than people of the light, and above nothing. And you may smell blood as you look forward to your ascendancy as masters of the Universe. So, I have an addendum to my stories . . . just for you.
After the Brownshirts (SA) in Germany had served their purpose – giving the Nazis an iron fist of tyranny with which to rule – they themselves became victims of the monster they had created. Starting on the infamous “Night of the Long Knives,” June 29th-30th, the SS began arresting the leaders of the SA and, ultimately, scores of them were executed. It seems that there is no honor among fascists. Besides, the pseudo-sophisticates in the Nazi hierarchy had no use for Brownshirts, always the most boorish of thugs.

Useful idiots never get respect. They just get used.
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=5952
 

musicman

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2004
Messages
5,171
Reaction score
533
Points
48
Location
Ohio
Great post, Bonnie; you've given me a new sig!
 

insein

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2004
Messages
6,096
Reaction score
356
Points
48
Location
Philadelphia, Amazing huh...
Once again, Facism is not a "Far Right" of the political spectrum. Facism is the extreme left of the politcal spectrum.

The Left of the spectrum wants absolute government control to run every aspect of life. They want restricted freedoms for those that don't agree with the "correct" point of view. They basically want a system that takes care of their every needs in life and eliminates anyone who doesnt agree with this ideology. So the absolute Far-Left is facism.

The Right side of the spectrum wants as little government control as possible. So the absolute far right would be total Anarchy. There would be no government. No law. Every man for themselves. This is the complete opposite of Facism.

The common connection between Far right and Facism is a myth that is brought on by the left in order to make the connection from Nazis to Right wing politics. It is a flat out lie that has been cultivated over time in the media and politics to be used as a weapon in the ongoing struggle between right and left in the world.
 

Gunny

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2004
Messages
44,689
Reaction score
6,852
Points
198
Location
The Republic of Texas
Once again, Facism is not a "Far Right" of the political spectrum. Facism is the extreme left of the politcal spectrum.

The Left of the spectrum wants absolute government control to run every aspect of life. They want restricted freedoms for those that don't agree with the "correct" point of view. They basically want a system that takes care of their every needs in life and eliminates anyone who doesnt agree with this ideology. So the absolute Far-Left is facism.

The Right side of the spectrum wants as little government control as possible. So the absolute far right would be total Anarchy. There would be no government. No law. Every man for themselves. This is the complete opposite of Facism.

The common connection between Far right and Facism is a myth that is brought on by the left in order to make the connection from Nazis to Right wing politics. It is a flat out lie that has been cultivated over time in the media and politics to be used as a weapon in the ongoing struggle between right and left in the world.
While I agree with you, the lefties have brainwashed themselves and the uneducated otherwise.
 

trobinett

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2004
Messages
1,832
Reaction score
162
Points
48
Location
Arkansas, The Ozarks
It seems fitting to add here, the term, "mutual admiration society", seems to fit.

The left, has ALWAYS admired their self proclaimed high moral ground.

I don't know about others, but that probably more than anything makes me puke.

Just can't stand someone or group, that elects themselves as the "truth givers" of the world.

It's just lucky for this country, and maybe the world, that the more conservative folks, seem to be more grounded, and in the end, win the day.

I only pray, that it holds true.
 

Turboswede

Very Metal
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Messages
487
Reaction score
58
Points
28
Location
The Emerald City (Seattle), USA
I find it ironic that these sites have been popping up on the web while supporters of McCain at political events call for violent action against Obama and his supporters. I guess calling the democrats communists and socialists isn’t enough, now they are considered fascists as well.

Obama and his brown shirts

Fascism is an extreme “right wing” ideology which may look like state socialism to the casual observer but has a number of distinguishing factors that set it apart from strict socialism. The Fascist model exposes the idea of the “nation” or “people” as the key method used in self definition. So, one would say “I am a Swede (or what ever)”, and would relate to other Swedes first, regardless of class or occupation. On the other hand the strict socialist would view the world from a class based perspective. In that case one may say “I am an engineer and part of the educated middle class”, and our engineer would identify more with a British or Chinese engineer than (for example) a Swedish factory worker.

Another factor inherent in fascism is the concept of a “corporativist” state where the state is able to recognize or 'incorporate” every divergent interest into a single economic / political power structure as it stands alone. Again this may look like another example of state socialism, but communism at its heart abhors the concept of private property with the Corporativist model behind fascism uses the lure of property to entice business into the Corporativist relationship.

Put another way, under the (admittedly extreme) socialist model one would come to power, seize all private property, and allow the state to apportion the bounty as it sees fit. The Corporativist model is much more subtle in that it uses lucrative government contracts or state authorized monopolies to encourage business’ compliance with the will of the state. Just remember:

Private Property = Right
Communal Ownership = Left

The final big separation between Fascism and Socialism is the focus on the irrational over the rational. A socialist state is based on the Hegelian dialectic (thesis/antithesis/synthesis) and the concept of scientific socialism. Under a socialist model all social problems can be solved through application of scientific methods and an appeal to logic, as humans are thought to be rational individuals.

On the other hand the Fascist state embraces the irrational and encourages emotive displays of national pride and power to promote the idea that individual identity is based on belonging to a “nation” or “people”.

This is why a Socialist’s speech may sound like a detailed lecture while a Fascist’s speech would seem like a passionate sermon.

On the violence front, both camps advocate violence against the “other” whether based on class (Socialist) or nation/people (Fascist). Socialists tend to view violence as a means to an end while Fascists are more likely to revel in emotions triggered by the violent acts themselves.

So, I think Obama and his supporters deserve the “progressive” and “liberal” (as in favoring change) moniker with maybe a little socialism thrown in, but to call Obama and his supporters “Fascists” for stating that some GOP political ads should be rescinded due to untrue claims is just absurd.
 

Chris

Gold Member
Joined
May 30, 2008
Messages
23,154
Reaction score
1,967
Points
205
What a bunch of nut cases!

You people really need help.
 

DiveCon

gone
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
48,025
Reaction score
3,510
Points
48
I find it ironic that these sites have been popping up on the web while supporters of McCain at political events call for violent action against Obama and his supporters. I guess calling the democrats communists and socialists isn’t enough, now they are considered fascists as well.

.
uh, news flash for ya
the Secret Service has said this never happened
 

editec

Mr. Forgot-it-All
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
41,421
Reaction score
5,661
Points
48
Location
Maine
It never ceases to amaze me how like fascists leftists are, but refuse to see it, and claim to be a peaceful bunch while destroying something to squelch an opposing viewpoint.

That brush you're using is a tad broad, but I definitely do understand your point.

When I read of some left wing protestor trying to repress the right of right wing pols to speak in a public venue, it pisses me off, too.

"How dare they claim to speak for the left when they are acting like fascists? " I think.
 

jillian

Princess
Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Messages
84,492
Reaction score
16,376
Points
2,220
Location
The Other Side of Paradise
While I agree with you, the lefties have brainwashed themselves and the uneducated otherwise.
puleeze....

wanna talk about brainwashing? talk about the geniuses who want four more years of the same failures they've had for the last eight.

Now THAT'S brainwashing. ;)
 

editec

Mr. Forgot-it-All
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
41,421
Reaction score
5,661
Points
48
Location
Maine
My brain isn't washed.

I send it out to be dry cleaned.
 

Chris

Gold Member
Joined
May 30, 2008
Messages
23,154
Reaction score
1,967
Points
205
uh, news flash for ya
the Secret Service has said this never happened
Uh, news flash for ya......

The Secret Service agent in the crowd didn't hear it, but it is audible on the video tape.

Those pesky facts bothering you again?
 

DiamondDave

Army Vet
Joined
Jun 30, 2008
Messages
18,169
Reaction score
2,824
Points
183
Location
MD, on the Potomac River
Uh, news flash for ya......

The Secret Service agent in the crowd didn't hear it, but it is audible on the video tape.

Those pesky facts bothering you again?
No it's not even remotely audible on the video tape... and you saying it is there does not make it fact...
 

Truthmatters

Diamond Member
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
80,182
Reaction score
2,265
Points
1,283
Heres the little part the the piece missed.

The people in the audience were speaking out against the intolerance of the schedualed speakers.

You see the brown shirts were part of an organized effort of the government to keep the ideas of regular people from going where they didnt want them to go.

They repressed the regular citizens.

Both of the speakers you metioned are part of the Power structure now werent they?

The Republicans had more power than any party at the time and Man Cultwhore is a republican speaking on the limmiting of rights of other citizens.

The border clones are people who lean republican and dont much like brown people in their country and suspect brown Americans are illegals and are ruining our country.


They were the brown shirts in this situation and the citizens who shouted them down were not of the party of power now were they?

They were the ones telling the brownshirts to take a hike because these citizens will not sit back and allow the brownshirts to do what they did in Germany all those years ago.

Brown shirts are tools and these tools like Man Cultwhore and the border clones often dont even know they are brown shirts. Someone had to tell them.
 
Last edited:

rayboyusmc

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2008
Messages
4,015
Reaction score
339
Points
48
Location
Florida
While I agree with you, the lefties have brainwashed themselves and the uneducated otherwise.
And your brains are all pure and clear of logic.

Get a life. The far right is just a brainwashed as the far left.

What horseshit.
 

Truthmatters

Diamond Member
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
80,182
Reaction score
2,265
Points
1,283
It just killed me that these peopel didnt even think very hard about the fact that the Brownshirts were doing the governments work.

They completely missed that fascist have to have the gov behind them to be the threat.

How brainless to see the citizens as the threat.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top