At least in the free market I can choose not to do business with a corrupt organization. They do not operate at the barrel of a gun like government does. Trying to compare the two is ignorant.
We're not talking about the world, stupid, nor do we care about the world. We're talking about the United States. Where "wealth inequality" does not exist.
And sadly progressives don't have the intellectual capacity to see it for the propaganda that it is. It just simply doesn't exist. There is no centralized body distributing wealth. That's the only way "wealth inequality" could exist. Stop playing the victim because you don't have the talent and/or the work ethic to make as much money as Bill Gates.
That's ironic...Hamilton was the first idiot progressive that insisted on expanding the size and scope of the federal government. Funny how you're able to see how stupid he was but your so blind to how stupid the progressive ideology is today.
Are you at all aware of current events? Supreme Court hearings, presidential vetos etc etc. the debate and the balance of power is active and alive and well.
What does a centralized body distributing wealth have to do with this discussion? You are reenfircing the point that you have no understanding is what wealth inequality is... Go spend some time in the net and do some homework
Yes...it does...stupid. There can only be "wealth inequality" if someone distributes wealth. Otherwise, people are simply earning what they are worth. There is nothing "unequal" about it. It's completely equal. Someone with high skills and high work ethic earns high wages. Someone with low skills and low work ethic earns low wages. Nothing "unequal" stupid.
There can only be "wealth inequality" if someone distributes wealth. Otherwise, people are simply earning what they are worth. There is nothing "unequal" about it. It's completely equal. Someone with high skills and high work ethic earns high wages. Someone with low skills and low work ethic earns low wages. Nothing "unequal".
Where do you get that from? "Someone" doesn't need to distribute wealth, wealth is naturally distributed through commerce. The measurement of where that wealth goes is what causes a statistical distribution of wealth. This is an acceptable and natural part of a capitalistic system... However when the stats get skewed in a way that causes an unfair advantage that takes away the opportunity for the poor or small businesses owners to achieve success then restrictive measures need to be taken. We call this dangerous scenario "wealth inequality"
But you notice how these dumb monkey's like SYTFE never demand effort equality or talent equality? They want all of the money with none of the same results. They want a Super Bowl ring but they don't want to have to win the game. Hell, they don't even want to play the game. They just want it awarded to them.
No. Not it's not. It is earned. It is never "distributed". Nobody distributes it. If you create a product (say like Microsoft Windows) nobody "distributes" wealth to you. You earn the wealth through the products you've created. If people like it, they buy it. If they don't like it, they don't buy it (and you don't get any wealth from those that don't purchase).
Dude, stop with the word games, of course it is earned, but in the act of earning money creates a distribution of wealth. Just like a product supply distributor distributes goods that are purchased. Sit in on one of your 4 year olds vocabulary lessons
