False. She did not go public before the election.
Stormy Daniels was paid before the election then repaid after it, otherwise, how could Trump be accused of hiding the payments to influence the election, fool.
NDAs and what is not being disclosed may be legal, but falsifying business records about paying the NDA is not.
Calling a repayment to your attorney "legal fees" is not falsifying. It is a matter of opinion based on semantics. And that was the accountant's job. Do you really think Trump keeps track of every minor detail in 200 business interests? That is what he paid others to do. It was a frame job. That is why no one is ever charged for this simple misdemeanor as a "crime" (except Trump), much less conflated into 34 "felonies" long after the alleged "crime" had passed the statute of limitations. Wrong again.
They were not private business records. In NY State they are required state records, that are available for other entities to request...and available to the State. They knew what to look for and where to precisely look, because Cohen told them, in testimony.
So in other words, these records never could have "influenced" the election without New York State climbing down Trump's shorts on a witchhunt LOOKING for a crime to prosecute him on, THEN releasing it to the public themselves hoping to damage HIS election, the very thing they accused HIM of trying to do.
You see, in American jurisprudence, you are assumed innocent. The law sees a crime occur first, then tries to hunt down the party guilty of committing it, but in far-left wing nutjob fascist TDS New York State, they saw Trump as a man they wanted to destroy, then crawled up and down throughout his life looking for something they could charge him with, even if it required instructing the jury to imaging their own crime(s) from a chinese laundry list to arrive at a guilty conclusion. That makes Trump's felony conviction a purely technical one purely for the sake of political motivations. Funny how it turns out that the democrats and Left really are the ones destroying our democracy in their mad quest for power.
And as to E. Jean Carroll, that happened so very long ago, that no one will ever know if anything happened at all other than HER WORD it did. Funny she never brought it up until NOW.
It was proved the reason was for his campaign
You cannot prove what is in a man's mind, just as you cannot prove he had no other motivation, like protecting his wife.
They DID NOT RIG the trial so Trump could not testify
Sure they did. Merchan made the rules so broad in that case to include subjecting Trump to cross on EVERY OTHER CASE AGAINST HIM CURRENTLY PENDING that the risks and complications were so high in testifying in his behalf that it inhibited his defense, just as they disallowed many other aspects of his defense such as not allowing an expert from the Federal Elections Committee to testify that in their opinion, what Trump did was no crime to the elections board. Swing and a miss.
Testifying would open him up to cross examination and anything can be brought up.
Not when these other cases have nothing to do with the case under examination, just as Stormy's testimony about sex positions and other tawdry details were extraneous.
That is the way it works for every defendant and every witness.
Maybe in your make-believe LaLa-Land.
His campaign believed it would be the death of his candidacy
Right. This from a guy who once said (as a joke) that he could shoot someone right on 5th Avenue and people would still support him. He is probably basically right though, not because of any blind cultism for Trump but the fact that the only other alternative to him is so much worse in electing a democrat like the human stool fistula, Drooling Joe Biden and his band of sex deviants, creeps, and traitors.
The FORMER intelligence agents writing the letter were not government agents working for the DOJ.
Nope. Just top ranking officials from their agencies, heads of them who had just recently left their positions to work as paid lobbyists for leftwing media who still got intelligence reports from the DOJ and so presented themselves as unimpeachable news sources.
And you did it all to keep a nursing home has-been in the office as a mere figurehead hiding his true condition passing him off as a competent leader while others ran the government for him in the background. That is treason. Some people ought to be doing life for that.
Any person who testifies under oath, even on their own behalf, is subject under the law, to counter questioning ....cross examination, by the opposition lawyers/prosecutors.
