007
Charter Member
Didn't take long to reduce you to exactly what you are, a dumbass.I know you hate America and the constitution, no need to prove it to me.
Go brush your tooth......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Didn't take long to reduce you to exactly what you are, a dumbass.I know you hate America and the constitution, no need to prove it to me.
Go brush your tooth......
Lets all bear in mind that in 2018 ALL House seats are up for election (plus a whole bunch of gubernatorial ones.).
There seems to be little doubt that the Clinton's actions have been less than reputable. This is confirmed by their own associates:
Bill Clinton aide Douglas Band wrote a memo that is described as follows:
""The memo … lays out the aggressive strategy behind lining up the consulting contracts and paid speaking engagements for Bill Clinton that added tens of millions of dollars to the family's fortune, including during the years that Hillary Clinton led the State Department. It describes how Band helped run what he called 'Bill Clinton Inc.,' obtaining 'in-kind services for the President and his family — for personal travel, hospitality, vacation and the like.'""
"What the memo makes clear is how inseparable the Clinton Foundation was to business interests. And while the Clinton campaign has refused to acknowledge the authenticity of the previous WikiLeaks emails, the company that Band co-founded -- Teneo -- did confirm the memo."
Hacked memo reinforces worst perception of the Clintons
Clinton adds proof to the fact that we have the "best politicians money can buy".
.
Yes, highly unethical but NOT unlawful.........Bill is NOT running for president.
You can have the coffee we'll take the tea.
All house seats are up for election every two years einstein.
Right over your half brain, Lordbrownnose...
Seems you feel that someone who is HIGHLY UNETHICAL should be president. Truly sad.
Given the choice of a moronic clown, yes.....I'll take a chance with Hillary since there is NO direct quid pro quo back to her.
You must be a very religious man because that is one huge leap of faith.
Oops!Even if we win we will still have huge differences so what's the point. Let's just accept the enevidible and move on.Honestly I don't think we will ever get along/work together. I say we cut our losses and split the country in 2. Conservatives go one way, liberals the other and we can both live in our utopian societies. Why waste anymore time? Besides, I think we all know we headed for chaos and possibly a civil war in 25-30 years anyway. It's all going to collapse or reset and half the population is going to be pissed off depending on the results. We could save millions of lives.I can appreciate the reasonable response and I sincerely wish that Hillary had not been the DNC's choice with her tremendous bad baggage on her back.
But, good Lord, we so many fucking problems to resolve that starting from day one with hearings and investigations as a form of revenge, seems like a huge waste on our democracy......Will it take another devastating attack by terrorists or another recession to finally make us work together?
Why do your types want to blow everything up when you lose?
That is insane.
I'm still looking for a definition of "enevidible".......
But seriously does anyone honestly think it will get better? We have too many differences in our ideologies. It's not about trump or Hillary.
And by doing so all but guarantee Clinton's reelection.It is almost a foregone certainty that Hillary Clinton will be our next president....warts and all.
But the political animosity has already shown its ugly face even before the swearing in of Hillary.
Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz of Utah has already stated that his "oversight committee" is preparing 2 years worth of investigations of Clinton, showing that a segment of the House has NO intention of doing the nation's work but, instead, spend its time (and lots of money) on revengeful tactics to bolster self aggrandizement by some of the GOPers in congress.
What BULLSHIT !!!
And by doing so all but guarantee Clinton's reelection.
Hilary doesnt support Drumpf you moron. She is his competition.That would be HILLARY...the moment she tries to take guns away from Americans.So which inbred Drumpf supporter will be brave enough to start a civil war?
(Not saying that is what she will do....)
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit, I see.Hilary doesnt support Drumpf you moron. She is his competition.That would be HILLARY...the moment she tries to take guns away from Americans.So which inbred Drumpf supporter will be brave enough to start a civil war?
(Not saying that is what she will do....)
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit at all.Reading comprehension is not your strong suit, I see.Hilary doesnt support Drumpf you moron. She is his competition.That would be HILLARY...the moment she tries to take guns away from Americans.So which inbred Drumpf supporter will be brave enough to start a civil war?
(Not saying that is what she will do....)
And I opined that it would not be a Trump supporter who started such a war but the individual who has sworn she will push for / support strict limitations on the 'Right to bear arms'. (By the way, When Trump was giving her millions Hillary was a huge Trump supporter"So which inbred Drumpf supporter will be brave enough to start a civil war?"
No you just claimed Hilary would do it. For the record Hilary isnt a Drumpf supporter. You have bad reading comprehension.And I opined that it would not be a Trump supporter who started such a war but the individual who has sworn she will push for / support strict limitations on the 'Right to bear arms'. (By the way, When Trump was giving her millions Hillary was a huge Trump supporter"So which inbred Drumpf supporter will be brave enough to start a civil war?")
That would be HILLARY...the moment she tries to take guns away from Americans.
(Not saying that is what she will do....)
It is almost a foregone certainty that Hillary Clinton will be our next president....warts and all.
But the political animosity has already shown its ugly face even before the swearing in of Hillary.
Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz of Utah has already stated that his "oversight committee" is preparing 2 years worth of investigations of Clinton, showing that a segment of the House has NO intention of doing the nation's work but, instead, spend its time (and lots of money) on revengeful tactics to bolster self aggrandizement by some of the GOPers in congress.
What BULLSHIT !!!
When the court gets to 5lefties and 4righties that's when it may happen. Sometime in the near future they will be on a case involving a firearm and they will just happen to find that while researching the case that the 2nd amendment actually says.......No you just claimed Hilary would do it. For the record Hilary isnt a Drumpf supporter. You have bad reading comprehension.And I opined that it would not be a Trump supporter who started such a war but the individual who has sworn she will push for / support strict limitations on the 'Right to bear arms'. (By the way, When Trump was giving her millions Hillary was a huge Trump supporter"So which inbred Drumpf supporter will be brave enough to start a civil war?")
That would be HILLARY...the moment she tries to take guns away from Americans.
(Not saying that is what she will do....)