I did read them...and? 
Put your point in your own words and lets' see where it goes. Neither I or anyone is denying that an assualt weapons fires faster than a handgun...
I laugh at your control freak tendencies... You fail to articulate a valid argument for the necessity to have citizens bearing rapid-fire assault weapons. Whether you try or you don't, I don't take it personally, I'll just simply disagree. I await your convincing argument of "what good" lifting the ban has done...???
He could have run his mother over in the driveway then plow into the children at recess. How can you stop a violent impulse?
I don't think you know what you're trying to argue. I'll make this so easy a dunce like you will get it.
Are they illegal to own now and are they constitutionaly banned? I didn't say it's a necessity. By the same token you're presenting wishful thinking and I'm telling you... like it is.
I'll ask you what good has the ban done?
"How can you stop a violent impulse?"
The above is my point to you? Ban assault weapons and there will still be the same types of incidents.
Now somehow read into that reality that I'm an advocate of assault weapons.
All I'm saying is you can't make a valid case for banning them because that's a band-aid on a wound that requires stitches.