You CAN'T prejudice the vote that way. Nobody in a city, a rural area, a state that begins with a consonant, or any other random criterion should count any more, or less, than everybody else's. We haven't done anything like that since Slavery.
It is apparent that your understanding of what the Electoral College is all about is materially different from that of most people here, including me. To be fair to you, the Wall Street Journal agrees with you: that it was an arcane device now outmoded. I think it DOES function currently to give smaller states a chance to have a voice and could be improved to give populations within states a better chance to have their votes counted if the winner-take-all by state rule was gotten rid of.