The Arctic Ocean has been warming since the beginning of the 20th century

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2013
96,199
68,958
3,605
Right coast, classified
They’re going to lose their funding if they don’t get in line.
The Arctic Ocean has been warming since the beginning of the 20th century, fueled by a process known as Atlantification, according to a study published Wednesday in the journal Science Advances.

The new research highlights the connection between the North Atlantic and Arctic between Greenland and Svalbard, a region known was Fram Strait, where warmer, saltier water from the south has been steadily infiltrating northern waters.
 

The Arctic Ocean has been warming since the beginning of the 20th century​


That pretty much blows a hole in the entire man-made climate change theory. Are we then to believe climate change was spurred by the Civil War? Steam locomotives? This new fact makes the Earth so reactionary that Earth never could have settled down long enough for advanced life to ever form if every little thing sent it reeling off to disaster.
 
They’re going to lose their funding if they don’t get in line.
The Arctic Ocean has been warming since the beginning of the 20th century, fueled by a process known as Atlantification, according to a study published Wednesday in the journal Science Advances.

The new research highlights the connection between the North Atlantic and Arctic between Greenland and Svalbard, a region known was Fram Strait, where warmer, saltier water from the south has been steadily infiltrating northern waters.
The whole planet has been warming up for the last 12,000 years.....since the last ice age. Global Warming is a hoax.
 
"The seafloor sediment cores provided researchers with geochemical and ecological data stretching back 800 years.

For most of those 800 years, researchers noted the Arctic Ocean's temperature and salinity were relatively stable. But the geochemical signatures began to shift around the beginning of the 20th century, revealing a significant uptick in temperature and salinity."

The industrial revolution started around 1760. By 1900 there was a significant uptick in both atmospheric CO2 and CH4. Since nothing had happened in the previous 700 years, only after there was the increase in GHGs, I would say that is further proof of AGW, and an indication that the planets sensitivity to GHGs is more than previously thought.
 
"The seafloor sediment cores provided researchers with geochemical and ecological data stretching back 800 years.
800 years might as well be yesterday. And let's see if the data say the same thing to an independent, non-Leftist controlled group of scientists.

For most of those 800 years, researchers noted the Arctic Ocean's temperature and salinity were relatively stable. But the geochemical signatures began to shift around the beginning of the 20th century, revealing a significant uptick in temperature and salinity."
Coincidence doesn't mean correlation.

The industrial revolution started around 1760.
The entire world population was only about 700 million and there were only a handful of industrializing nations doing a minimal of industry.

By 1900 there was a significant uptick in both atmospheric CO2 and CH4. Since nothing had happened in the previous 700 years
Proving once again that man could not have been a factor. Real industry had only been around only a very short period at the time and in only a very few countries, which makes it impossible that they could be responsible for an already significant change in the atmosphere! But since the Left have demonstrated a desire to blame man and to rule out any other possible causes for something of this importance wanting to ACT on their misguided fantasies, we must be very careful to disallow any action based solely on crazy leftwing delusions.
 
The whole planet has been warming up for the last 12,000 years.....since the last ice age. Global Warming is a hoax.
No, it has not. We reached the maximum for this interglacial about 6
000 years ago, and have been slowly cooling ever since.

1637975109980.png

 
800 years might as well be yesterday. And let's see if the data say the same thing to an independent, non-Leftist controlled group of scientists.


Coincidence doesn't mean correlation.


The entire world population was only about 700 million and there were only a handful of industrializing nations doing a minimal of industry.


Proving once again that man could not have been a factor. Real industry had only been around only a very short period at the time and in only a very few countries, which makes it impossible that they could be responsible for an already significant change in the atmosphere! But since the Left have demonstrated a desire to blame man and to rule out any other possible causes for something of this importance wanting to ACT on their misguided fantasies, we must be very careful to disallow any action based solely on crazy leftwing delusions.
CO2 had increased from 280 ppm to 296 ppm, CH4 from 740 ppb to 880 ppb from pre-industrial to 1900.
 
"The seafloor sediment cores provided researchers with geochemical and ecological data stretching back 800 years.

For most of those 800 years, researchers noted the Arctic Ocean's temperature and salinity were relatively stable. But the geochemical signatures began to shift around the beginning of the 20th century, revealing a significant uptick in temperature and salinity."

The industrial revolution started around 1760. By 1900 there was a significant uptick in both atmospheric CO2 and CH4. Since nothing had happened in the previous 700 years, only after there was the increase in GHGs, I would say that is further proof of AGW, and an indication that the planets sensitivity to GHGs is more than previously thought.
Yes, 1700’s fireplaces changed the temperature of the oceans.
You’re a nutter who hates science.
 
Which means what, you silly ass.
Let me help... It means your sedimentation claims are baseless... Current water flows are different than previous flows due to ice blockage. Your 800-year claim is so small in time that it is irresponsible to draw any conclusion from it. And you wonder why I laugh at your lack of scientific process.
 
Let me help... It means your sedimentation claims are baseless... Current water flows are different than previous flows due to ice blockage. Your 800-year claim is so small in time that it is irresponsible to draw any conclusion from it. And you wonder why I laugh at your lack of scientific process.
Billy Boob, you continue to be a silly ass. That time line was from the article in the original post. If you are going to through that out, then everything that Weatherman posted is wrong.
 
It makes sense if you adopt the liberal point of view.

Nature must NOT "follow the science". It must follow The Democrat Party Line or be shouted down. Best they can do - water, sadly for them, does not burn.

See how great that's working out for them?
 
It makes sense if you adopt the liberal point of view.

Nature must NOT "follow the science". It must follow The Democrat Party Line or be shouted down. Best they can do - water, sadly for them, does not burn.

See how great that's working out for them?
Another dumb fuck that cannot grasp reality. Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. It is Trumpanzees like you that are lying for political reasons.
 
Another dumb fuck that cannot grasp reality. Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. It is Trumpanzees like you that are lying for political reasons.
I'm deeply saddened by your paucity of faith.
 
Another dumb fuck that cannot grasp reality. Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. It is Trumpanzees like you that are lying for political reasons.
And every professional medical society said blood letting is the cure for everything, every science organization said the earth is flat and don’t go to far because you’ll fall off the end of the earth.

So what’s your point again?
 

Forum List

Back
Top