Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's a good point, can an American break and ignore all these laws and get away with it?? Hell no we can't. But these illegal assholes come here, break all our laws, kill and mangle Americans driving around drunk as F with no license, no insurance in their shit mobiles and they are immune from the law.I agree that they have no rights other than what was outlined in the op. I agree that our governments, federal or state, should not be spending on them what they are, those funds should go to help American citizens. The dems only support it and encourage it for one reason, their power, that's it. The rest are useful idiots who 'feel sorry' for these people and feel like they should be free from having to obey our laws, unlike any conservative or R in the country, where they change laws in order to prosecute. Some are 'human filth', but not all, some of them come here for a better life. But, be that as it may, they have no legal right to do so, there are ways to immigrate legally, and that's what they should do.
they stayed the lower court right? It was unanimous at that right?They put it all on hold until they had a chance to hear the case just like the lower court did.
why would they need more than a regular citizen? I asked that in another thread and no response was received.An administrative warrant is not needed to detain an illegal in public
dishonesty doesn't suit you!The ninth circuit is conservative
Typically they get an administrative warrant when the they are going into courthouses or waiting at jails and have specifically identified illegals they are going after.why would they need more than a regular citizen? I asked that in another thread and no response was received.
Wow. Put down the bong.The ninth circuit is conservative
she's in the middle of autoerotic asphyxiationWow. Put down the bong.
So you agree ICE has been violating immigrants rights.Since leftards keep pining about rights that don't exist, it seems appropriate to set the record straight.
What are the actual rights of illegal aliens?
![]()
Know Your Rights | Immigrants' Rights | ACLU
Regardless of your immigration status, you have guaranteed rights under the Constitution. Learn more here about your rights as an immigrant, and how to express them.www.aclu.org
Here's how it plays.
If you are inside your home, or inside someone else's home, a judicial warrant is required for agents to gain access. Without a judicial warrant you are not required to open your door, and agents are in violation if they break in.
If you are outside in public, agents can stop you at any time for any reason. An administrative warrant is sufficient to arrest you and detain you on the spot.
In either case, you have the right to remain silent and the right to access legal counsel. Agents may not deprive you of property. If you own a home it can not be taken away from you. Anything removed from you upon arrest must be returned to you upon release.
All persons have the right to access emergency medical care, whether detained or not.
Beyond that, illegal aliens have no rights. There is no right to work, and no right to vote. There is no right to welfare and no right to government funded medical care (emergency or otherwise).
Illegal aliens only have the minimal constitutional rights afforded to all persons in the United States. And there are even exceptions to those, if you engage in terrorism or otherwise threaten another person's life.
That law is, first and foremost, the law. You can't pretend it doesn't exist or wish it into the cornfield.Going from memory only, I believe Ronald Reagan signed that monstrosity into law. He did not, however, have to face an invasion from south of the border.
That law is, first and foremost, the reason our Health Care in this Country SUCKS ASS.
So? Illegals can still be deported.The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) is a federal law that requires most hospitals to provide medical screening and stabilizing treatment, regardless of a patient's ability to pay or insurance status, when they present with an emergency medical condition or are in active labor. This means that if someone comes to an emergency room needing help, the hospital must assess their condition and, if an emergency exists, provide the necessary care to stabilize them before potentially transferring them to another facility.
Health care in this country is outstanding and the envy of the world. I am a living medical miracle in that I have the liver that belonged to a 17-year-old young man who died halfway across this country, and I am alive today because of it. Your problem is not knowing the difference in health care and health insurance.Going from memory only, I believe Ronald Reagan signed that monstrosity into law. He did not, however, have to face an invasion from south of the border.
That law is, first and foremost, the reason our Health Care in this Country SUCKS ASS.
Why do you lie?The lower court ruled the same way until they heard the case.
In outlining the duties of government and the Rights of The People, the Constitution necessarily said that ALL The People of The United States, be they Citizen or not, are covered.
That is because, in those Days, not everybody lived in an Actual Admitted State. And Citizenship wasn't defined until the 14th Amendment. Settlers in the Michigan Territory, Pioneers in the Great Plains..... Few of them lived in an Admited State.
The People might have lived in a Territory or a Protectorate and didn't have full citizenship but they did need to be protected because the US still had Marshalls and Army Troops governing them.
Those days are mosty gone and SCOTUS needs to get off its Collective Lazy ASSES and do a better job of bringing Citizenship, it's rights, protections and DUTIES into the 21st Century.
The vast majority of Laws that the Lazy-Ass Hacks-In-Black use are from the 18th and 19th Centuries, birthright citizenship among them.
Things have changed since then.
The Judicial Branch just simply SUCKS ass. They make shit up as they go along and it needs to stop.
We need some clarity so we keep dimocrap scum from screrwing the whole country every time they steal an election. Which is the only way they get elected.
Courts do not create laws. That was the problem all along when they tried. If you want an issue fixed, change the law or Constitution. Judges do not make law and do not change with which way the wind blows, whether you like it or not. Respectfully, your posts bespeak of a lack of knowledge of how out system of government is supposed to work.In outlining the duties of government and the Rights of The People, the Constitution necessarily said that ALL The People of The United States, be they Citizen or not, are covered.
That is because, in those Days, not everybody lived in an Actual Admitted State. And Citizenship wasn't defined until the 14th Amendment. Settlers in the Michigan Territory, Pioneers in the Great Plains..... Few of them lived in an Admited State.
The People might have lived in a Territory or a Protectorate and didn't have full citizenship but they did need to be protected because the US still had Marshalls and Army Troops governing them.
Those days are mosty gone and SCOTUS needs to get off its Collective Lazy ASSES and do a better job of bringing Citizenship, it's rights, protections and DUTIES into the 21st Century.
The vast majority of Laws that the Lazy-Ass Hacks-In-Black use are from the 18th and 19th Centuries, birthright citizenship among them.
Things have changed since then.
The Judicial Branch just simply SUCKS ass. They make shit up as they go along and it needs to stop.
We need some clarity so we keep dimocrap scum from screrwing the whole country every time they steal an election. Which is the only way they get elected.
sure. They just have to be given the opportunity to exercise their rights. You can't jut grab them and put them in a foreign prion for life just because they said something trump doesn't like.So? Illegals can still be deported.
You are way off base, sir. A glaring example of your incorrectness is Roe v. Wade, and before that, "Griswold"Courts do not create laws. That was the problem all along when they tried. If you want an issue fixed, change the law or Constitution. Judges do not make law and do not change with which way the wind blows, whether you like it or not. Respectfully, your posts bespeak of a lack of knowledge of how out system of government is supposed to work.
I am happy for you that you are doing well.Health care in this country is outstanding and the envy of the world. I am a living medical miracle in that I have the liver that belonged to a 17-year-old young man who died halfway across this country, and I am alive today because of it. Your problem is not knowing the difference in health care and health insurance.