BackAgain
Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
The problem in the plaintiff’s defamation “case” against Trump is that E. Jean Carroll herself will have to testify. And she is a nut bar.
It is a mystery why the court has allowed this bullshit to even be litigated. Her theory of the case is that she was permitted to accuse Trump of a crime but when he publicly denied her allegation that denial somehow defamed her.
The self-evident absurdity of that position is something which shouldn’t even be denied or debated even by the folks with the most profound case of TDS.
In what imaginable view of the real world and present-day America can an accuser seek to deny the accused the right to deny the allegation?
Think it through. J says D raped her. D says “I deny J’s claim.” And in that basis the accuser says she has been defamed?
It is a mystery why the court has allowed this bullshit to even be litigated. Her theory of the case is that she was permitted to accuse Trump of a crime but when he publicly denied her allegation that denial somehow defamed her.
The self-evident absurdity of that position is something which shouldn’t even be denied or debated even by the folks with the most profound case of TDS.
In what imaginable view of the real world and present-day America can an accuser seek to deny the accused the right to deny the allegation?
Think it through. J says D raped her. D says “I deny J’s claim.” And in that basis the accuser says she has been defamed?