gee... who to listen to...; brilliant scientists or wackjobs on a message board?
trump loons are so funny.
science ... try it sometimes.
Fake science...they done went and got caught again
Australia Weather Bureau Caught Tampering With Climate Numbers
not fake science, nutter butter. and no one cares about your one scammer.... but it is cute how your little brain focuses on that one.
So how about an honest answer? The claim was that the earth temperature will rise 2 degrees C in about 100 years, and we still can't reliably predict the weather next week! So haw can you predict this minuscule rise so far off into the future?
Look asshole, I posted a link yesterday that described what a 2C rise would mean for the planet. It is not may fault you are too God damn stupid to read.
Nice try, but you can see I didn't ask what a 2 degree increase in temp would mean, I asked how you can predict it when you can't predict what the weather will be like next week? So how about answering that question, just one time, an honest answer?
First as to weather prediction, you are looking an a weather event in a particular area at a particular time. A lot has to do with timing between air masses. Forecasters typically predict rain as a percent probability i.e. 70% change of a stray thunderstorm.
Climate predictions involve average over the globe within a long time span. They look at past trends involving the numerous factors to determining the climate. They look at future trends to answer things like what the temps might be if the CO2 concentration in our atmosphere continues to increase. Or what we need to do emission wise to reduce the rise in temperatures.
It is like your doctor telling you that if you continue to eat 4000 calories a day within your current exercise level, you could weight 300 pounds within a year. Would you jump up & down & have a fit "OMG OMG OMG a prediction!!!! OMG OMG OMG" Maybe your doctor understands food intake, exercise, and consequences as to your weight.
Climatologists understand CO2 concentrations, solar cycles, etc.
As to my link, you call it a minuscule rise while it is not when you consider the effects.
The combined global average temperature over the land and ocean surfaces for March 2017 was 1.05°C (1.89°F) above the 20th century average of 12.7°C (54.9°F) or 13.75C. a 2C rise would be a nearly a 15% increase.
Maybe the next trip to the doc he will send you home explaining your 113 degree temperature in a minuscule increase.
