DUDE. This is MY POINT.
You don't get to tell me what my own point is -- what the **** is wrong with you?
*I* am drawing a contrast between two police, one at 40 seconds, the second at 48 seconds. One is doing it right, the second is doing it wrong. The first is acting to keep the peace, the second to disturb it.
Stop trying to hijack other people's words, Dipshit.
I would, if you had a point.
The difference was in the teens.
Not the cops
The boys were calm, and did what the cop told them to do the first time. the girl continued to run her mouth, get in the cops face, and ignored what he was telling her to do.
I've asked maybe a dozen times now where this "run your mouth" law is.
How come I keep getting crickets?
Because you've got your head buried?
No 'run your mouth' law
BUT
Obstruction, inciting to riot, interfering with a policeman in the pursuit of his duties, a few others I can't name off the top of my head.
Good point. Eric Casebolt could certainly be charged with inciting to riot. Fortunately for him the locals didn't take his bait.
So if there's no "run your mouth" law, and clearly there's no obstruction, since HE went and pulled HER down, not the other way around ---- then what we have here is false arrest. That what you're saying?
"Good point. Eric Casebolt could certainly be charged with inciting to riot. Fortunately for him the locals didn't take his bait."
The 'locals', n the whole, are backing him.
Just watching CNN reporting on the incident, interviewing eyewitnesses. One, ( a white woman), felt he deserved a medal, and a black man is complaining that there is only 7 minutes of video out of the 30 of what was going on.
he's blaming 7 'knuckleheads' that dont' live in the area for being the cause of the problem.
He is also backing what he cops did.
It also appears that people backing the cops are getting death threats.