1srelluc
Diamond Member
Eagle pass maybe.Don't get philosophical. Just answer the question.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Eagle pass maybe.Don't get philosophical. Just answer the question.
Those folks won't be staying in Texas. See that bus in the upper left corner?Eagle pass maybe.
Texans don't want to share a country with you anyway.I say…..
Good Bye
‘A Texas secessionist group plans to sue the state GOP for rejecting a ballot measure asking if Texas should leave the U.S.
The Texas Nationalist Movement claims it collected the necessary signatures required to add the “TEXIT” question – asking “The State of Texas should reassert its status as an independent nation. For or against” – to the primary ballot. Under state law, the minimum number of signatures “that must appear on the petition is five percent of the total vote received by all candidates for governor in the party's most recent gubernatorial general primary election.”
But state party leaders say the group submitted the signatures after the Dec. 10 deadline, and that most of the signatures were invalid.’
Texas GOP rejects ballot question asking if state should secede
The Texas Nationalist Movement says it plans to sue the state Republican Party after it rejected a petition to include a "TEXIT" question on the March primary ballot. The party says the signatures were turned in after the deadline, and many were invalid.www.hppr.org
It’s not just signatures that are invalid, ‘secession’ is invalid – un-Constitutional, in fact.
If they do, Mexico will invade them and take Texas back
Loyal Americans will do nothing to save them
Where does the Constitution prohibit states from seceding?‘A Texas secessionist group plans to sue the state GOP for rejecting a ballot measure asking if Texas should leave the U.S.
The Texas Nationalist Movement claims it collected the necessary signatures required to add the “TEXIT” question – asking “The State of Texas should reassert its status as an independent nation. For or against” – to the primary ballot. Under state law, the minimum number of signatures “that must appear on the petition is five percent of the total vote received by all candidates for governor in the party's most recent gubernatorial general primary election.”
But state party leaders say the group submitted the signatures after the Dec. 10 deadline, and that most of the signatures were invalid.’
Texas GOP rejects ballot question asking if state should secede
The Texas Nationalist Movement says it plans to sue the state Republican Party after it rejected a petition to include a "TEXIT" question on the March primary ballot. The party says the signatures were turned in after the deadline, and many were invalid.www.hppr.org
It’s not just signatures that are invalid, ‘secession’ is invalid – un-Constitutional, in fact.
There is no text to that effect.Where does the Constitution prohibit states from seceding?
‘A Texas secessionist group plans to sue the state GOP for rejecting a ballot measure asking if Texas should leave the U.S.
The Texas Nationalist Movement claims it collected the necessary signatures required to add the “TEXIT” question – asking “The State of Texas should reassert its status as an independent nation. For or against” – to the primary ballot. Under state law, the minimum number of signatures “that must appear on the petition is five percent of the total vote received by all candidates for governor in the party's most recent gubernatorial general primary election.”
But state party leaders say the group submitted the signatures after the Dec. 10 deadline, and that most of the signatures were invalid.’
Texas GOP rejects ballot question asking if state should secede
The Texas Nationalist Movement says it plans to sue the state Republican Party after it rejected a petition to include a "TEXIT" question on the March primary ballot. The party says the signatures were turned in after the deadline, and many were invalid.www.hppr.org
It’s not just signatures that are invalid, ‘secession’ is invalid – un-Constitutional, in fact.
They will.Think if Texas leaves the US with its 40 Electoral Votes and two Senate Seats
Republicans will lose both the White House and Senate
If the signatures were truly not legit, they did the right thing, regardless of how I feel about sucession.A case of damned if you do and damned if you don't? The Texas GOP did the right thing by rejecting the ballot but will no doubt be criticized anyway.
Can the UK do it?If the signatures were truly not legit, they did the right thing, regardless of how I feel about sucession.
If the signatures are legit, or if a future petition drives gathers the required legitimate signatures, then there is no reason whatsoever not to include the measure on the ballot.
Surely if the UK can do it, Texas can do it.
Quote the part of the Constitution which says that states can't secede.What you and many others fail to see, is Texas would be seceding from the country that has the Constitution that prevents them from seceding. Get it now?