Test of Dominion Voting System in Georgia proves equal # of votes gave 26% lead for Biden.

[OldLady]

All of that would have been caught by a handcount. Which when done did not show any of that going on. As for verifying signatures, of course they were.

No, all of "that" would not have been caught by a hand count because the hand recounts were a joke and not all signatures were verified. People were registering from addresses with PO boxes, using variations of the their name, women using married and maiden name, dead people voted, people voted in more than one state. It's apparent you do not understand what is really going on.

In the recount, a Dominion Voting server crashed. The Georgia officials blamed a Fulton county worker, who allegedly “ignored basic instructions” (1).

“Sterling said when they ‘cut a corner’ by using the express server, a Dominion employee told them they couldn’t do that because it would crash the server. Instead, Fulton officials decided to put the database on that server.”

They let it slip that a Dominion Voting representative stood by the county employee, telling him/her what to do.

“A security measure flagged the process because timestamps were off, causing the server to crash and ultimately making it impossible to get the database, he said.”

WTF? Why does the security measure cause the server to crash? It should have made a an error record in the log, refuse to proceed, and displayed an error dialog.

“Because of this decision, Sterling said they are going to be forced to scan ballots again – which is more work, more manpower, and more time.”

Wait a minute – the recount was supposed to be manual. Why the Dominion software and ballots scanning were involved at all? Fake recount!

From the horse’s mouth (Ben Adida, a founder of VotingWorks, BA1, BA2):

The re-count, “certified” by GA government today, and sometimes called 2nd or even 3rd re-count, consisted of re-scanning ballots. It was expected to give the same result that the first count, the one with the fake flooding, counting ballots by Democrats in the absence of Republicans, and a mysterious suitcases of ballots. In Georgia, recount can be done only after the results certification.
What is sometimes reported as the first recount, was an enlarged risk limiting audit.

Fulton county election commission “certified” the alleged results by a split vote 3:2 (2). The Republican-led Georgia government entrusted the recounts to Democrat-dominated Fulton county, essentially allowing it to inspect itself. Even in the light of the split decision, they simply accepted the majority opinion!

They also defended Fulton county when its Democrat ballot counters sent Republicans away, then continued “counting,” and brought out a suitcase with additional ballots.

Another software piece involved in the recount was ElectioNet Suite from PCC Technology. It is part of a group providing services to governments, which likely means being on the lash of Democrats.
Dominion Voting and GA Counties Self-Audited

Also...again

106,000 ballots went to adjudication in Fulton county, GA by November 4. Not all ballots were actually adjudicated. Here, “adjudicated” means that the vote was entered manually using Dominion Voting software. This is more than 20% of all the ballots cast in that county. The videos from the linked article show that the same batch of ballots can be passed through the scanner in the Dominion Democracy Suite multiple times. It is surprising that they allowed Trump to have 26% of the cast votes. Continue reading 2020 Elections Fraud Updates →

Well, you are certainly well versed on all the accusations. They've been debunked, refuted and thrown out of court for lack of evidence. State legislatures, Republican governors who supported Trump and SoS's, and conservative judges have all refused to buy it. Maybe you should think about that, too.

 

[AudeSapere]

All of that would have been caught by a handcount. Which when done did not show any of that going on. As for verifying signatures, of course they were.

No, all of "that" would not have been caught by a hand count because the hand recounts were a joke and not all signatures were verified. People were registering from addresses with PO boxes, using variations of the their name, women using married and maiden name, dead people voted, people voted in more than one state. It's apparent you do not understand what is really going on.

In the recount, a Dominion Voting server crashed. The Georgia officials blamed a Fulton county worker, who allegedly “ignored basic instructions” (1).

“Sterling said when they ‘cut a corner’ by using the express server, a Dominion employee told them they couldn’t do that because it would crash the server. Instead, Fulton officials decided to put the database on that server.”

They let it slip that a Dominion Voting representative stood by the county employee, telling him/her what to do.

“A security measure flagged the process because timestamps were off, causing the server to crash and ultimately making it impossible to get the database, he said.”

WTF? Why does the security measure cause the server to crash? It should have made a an error record in the log, refuse to proceed, and displayed an error dialog.

“Because of this decision, Sterling said they are going to be forced to scan ballots again – which is more work, more manpower, and more time.”

Wait a minute – the recount was supposed to be manual. Why the Dominion software and ballots scanning were involved at all? Fake recount!

From the horse’s mouth (Ben Adida, a founder of VotingWorks, BA1, BA2):

The re-count, “certified” by GA government today, and sometimes called 2nd or even 3rd re-count, consisted of re-scanning ballots. It was expected to give the same result that the first count, the one with the fake flooding, counting ballots by Democrats in the absence of Republicans, and a mysterious suitcases of ballots. In Georgia, recount can be done only after the results certification.
What is sometimes reported as the first recount, was an enlarged risk limiting audit.

Fulton county election commission “certified” the alleged results by a split vote 3:2 (2). The Republican-led Georgia government entrusted the recounts to Democrat-dominated Fulton county, essentially allowing it to inspect itself. Even in the light of the split decision, they simply accepted the majority opinion!

They also defended Fulton county when its Democrat ballot counters sent Republicans away, then continued “counting,” and brought out a suitcase with additional ballots.

Another software piece involved in the recount was ElectioNet Suite from PCC Technology. It is part of a group providing services to governments, which likely means being on the lash of Democrats.
Dominion Voting and GA Counties Self-Audited

Also...again

106,000 ballots went to adjudication in Fulton county, GA by November 4. Not all ballots were actually adjudicated. Here, “adjudicated” means that the vote was entered manually using Dominion Voting software. This is more than 20% of all the ballots cast in that county. The videos from the linked article show that the same batch of ballots can be passed through the scanner in the Dominion Democracy Suite multiple times. It is surprising that they allowed Trump to have 26% of the cast votes. Continue reading 2020 Elections Fraud Updates →

Well, you are certainly well versed on all the accusations. They've been debunked, refuted and thrown out of court for lack of evidence. State legislatures, Republican governors who supported Trump and SoS's, and conservative judges have all refused to buy it. Maybe you should think about that, too.

You employ a host of logical fallacies. Namely hasty generalizations, personal incredulity, bandwagon fallacy.... The courts did not throw the cases out from lack of evidence, they never allowed the evidence to be entered into court, shows how much you know, they were tossed from procedural problems or the "lack of standing" judgement. Lame. The evidence was never allowed to be entered into court to be reviewed and argued. The "accusations" are not just "accusations" that I cited but established facts. You never point specifically what has been allegedly "debunked" and use a linked source that alleges to debunk it. This is a hasty generalization from personal incredulity.